Experimental and Numerical Investigation for Structural Design of a Rocket Launcher Boom | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Experimental and Numerical Investigation for Structural Design of a Rocket Launcher Boom Islam Osama, Ahmed R. Gomaa, Ahmed Elsabbagh This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6431118/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Under Review Version 1 posted 12 You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract The Structural design of rocket launcher booms is critical in aerospace engineering , requiring a careful balance between strength, weight, and durability. This study focuses on design optimization of rocket launcher booms by analyzing various cross-sectional geometries. Cross-sections investigated include Rectangular Hollow Sections (RHS), I-beams, and their tapered variants. Finite Element Analysis (FEA) is employed to simulate and evaluate the performance of each cross-sectional design. Experimental validation was conducted by testing four different beam types and monitoring stress and deformation for each design. Experimental data were found to be closely aligned with simulation results. Moreover, the results proved that tapered I-beams provide the best design considering low weight, high strength, and minimal deflection, outperforming traditional RHS and standard I-beams. The primary goal is to identify the most efficient configuration that minimizes weight while maximizing stress resistance and reducing deformation under static and dynamic loading conditions. This significant performance of tapered I-beams demonstrates its selection as the best choice for advanced rocket launcher systems. This research significantly contributes to developing more efficient and reliable rocket launcher booms, advancing aerospace technology. This study provides critical insights for the future design and optimization of rocket launcher systems, ensuring improved performance, efficiency, and safety in aerospace applications. Rocket Launcher Boom Structural Design Experimental Validation FEA Crack Resistance Full Text Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Under Review Version 1 posted Editorial decision: Revision requested 12 May, 2025 Reviews received at journal 08 May, 2025 Reviews received at journal 05 May, 2025 Reviews received at journal 04 May, 2025 Reviewers agreed at journal 03 May, 2025 Reviewers agreed at journal 01 May, 2025 Reviewers agreed at journal 01 May, 2025 Reviewers invited by journal 01 May, 2025 Editor invited by journal 30 Apr, 2025 Editor assigned by journal 28 Apr, 2025 Submission checks completed at journal 28 Apr, 2025 First submitted to journal 11 Apr, 2025 You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-6431118","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":452158737,"identity":"042d7c84-7fc9-46fd-b8c1-1989159afd04","order_by":0,"name":"Islam Osama","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Ain Shams University","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Islam","middleName":"","lastName":"Osama","suffix":""},{"id":452158739,"identity":"92ceabba-21a9-4ba0-8543-da29f478a382","order_by":1,"name":"Ahmed R. Gomaa","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Military Technical Collage, Kobry Elkobbah","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Ahmed","middleName":"R.","lastName":"Gomaa","suffix":""},{"id":452158740,"identity":"379950c7-971f-416d-8254-e7dc4e4ad2d9","order_by":2,"name":"Ahmed Elsabbagh","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Ain Shams University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Ahmed","middleName":"","lastName":"Elsabbagh","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2025-04-11 21:23:12","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6431118/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6431118/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":82092347,"identity":"0816913d-b4c9-41c2-b851-5c14bfca12c8","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-05-06 16:36:51","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":24714973,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"ExperimentalandNumericalInvestigation.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6431118/v1_covered_906ae97b-f7c9-4849-9279-d7f0df8a7b80.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"Experimental and Numerical Investigation for Structural Design of a Rocket Launcher Boom","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":false,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":true,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"
[email protected]","identity":"discover-mechanical-engineering","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"discmecheng","sideBox":"Learn more about [Discover Mechanical Engineering](https://www.springer.com/journal/44245)","snPcode":"44245","submissionUrl":"https://submission.nature.com/new-submission/44245/3","title":"Discover Mechanical Engineering","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"stoa","reportingPortfolio":"Discover Series","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Rocket Launcher Boom, Structural Design, Experimental Validation, FEA, Crack Resistance","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6431118/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6431118/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"The Structural design of rocket launcher booms is critical in aerospace engineering , requiring a careful balance between strength, weight, and durability. This study focuses on design optimization of rocket launcher booms by analyzing various cross-sectional geometries. Cross-sections investigated include Rectangular Hollow Sections (RHS), I-beams, and their tapered variants. Finite Element Analysis (FEA) is employed to simulate and evaluate the performance of each cross-sectional design. Experimental validation was conducted by testing four different beam types and monitoring stress and deformation for each design. Experimental data were found to be closely aligned with simulation results. Moreover, the results proved that tapered I-beams provide the best design considering low weight, high strength, and minimal deflection, outperforming traditional RHS and standard I-beams. The primary goal is to identify the most efficient configuration that minimizes weight while maximizing stress resistance and reducing deformation under static and dynamic loading conditions. This significant performance of tapered I-beams demonstrates its selection as the best choice for advanced rocket launcher systems. This research significantly contributes to developing more efficient and reliable rocket launcher booms, advancing aerospace technology. This study provides critical insights for the future design and optimization of rocket launcher systems, ensuring improved performance, efficiency, and safety in aerospace applications.","manuscriptTitle":"Experimental and Numerical Investigation for Structural Design of a Rocket Launcher Boom","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2025-05-06 16:28:41","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6431118/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0},{"type":"decision","content":"Revision requested","date":"2025-05-12T05:10:32+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2025-05-08T09:30:05+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2025-05-05T10:24:09+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2025-05-04T15:24:09+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"18614199854640569840308708751698741626","date":"2025-05-03T09:46:02+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"229924816868974023425903480851970146222","date":"2025-05-01T14:14:03+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"310843962129186511292123864304337982186","date":"2025-05-01T09:36:01+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewersInvited","content":"","date":"2025-05-01T09:28:06+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvited","content":"","date":"2025-04-30T23:18:43+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorAssigned","content":"","date":"2025-04-29T02:09:17+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"checksComplete","content":"","date":"2025-04-29T02:06:23+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"submitted","content":"Discover Mechanical Engineering","date":"2025-04-11T21:17:07+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"
[email protected]","identity":"discover-mechanical-engineering","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"discmecheng","sideBox":"Learn more about [Discover Mechanical Engineering](https://www.springer.com/journal/44245)","snPcode":"44245","submissionUrl":"https://submission.nature.com/new-submission/44245/3","title":"Discover Mechanical Engineering","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"stoa","reportingPortfolio":"Discover Series","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"3af646ba-bf9c-4232-af01-a7815a3512d8","owner":[],"postedDate":"May 6th, 2025","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"under-review","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2025-08-07T11:53:41+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2025-05-06 16:28:41","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-6431118","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-6431118","identity":"rs-6431118","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"8U1c8b4HqxoKbykW_rLl7","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.