Regional ecological variation drives isotopic niche divergence in Pacific nautiloids

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,225 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Nautiloids, the only surviving externally shelled cephalopods, persist in isolated Indo-Pacific reef slopes despite life-history traits that limit dispersal and recovery. Yet the ecological basis of their persistence remains poorly understood. Here, we compare carbon (δ13C) and nitrogen (δ15N) isotope values from seven nautiloid populations (including Nautilus and Allonautilus) spanning the Pacific. Isotopic niches varied strongly among locations, but only weakly among species, suggesting that geographic context rather than phylogenetic identity is the primary driver of trophic differentiation. Populations from the Bismarck Sea and American Samoa exhibited elevated δ15N, consistent with regional nutrient cycling and nitrogen fixation, whereas Great Barrier Reef (GBR) nautiloids displayed unusually broad δ13C ranges linked to possible reef-derived carbon subsidies. These results reveal how local oceanography and resource availability shape isotopic niches in long-isolated populations, providing a framework for understanding both the ecological resilience and evolutionary divergence of ancient cephalopods in modern oceans. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00