Short Term Selection to Diflubenzuron and Bacillus Thuringiensis Subsp. Israelensis Differentially Affects the Winter Survival of Culex Pipiens F. Pipiens and Culex Pipiens F. Molestus (Diptera: Culicidae)

Short Term Selection to Diflubenzuron and Bacillus Thuringiensis Subsp. Israelensis Differentially Affects the Winter Survival of Culex Pipiens F. Pipiens and Culex Pipiens F. Molestus (Diptera: Culicidae) | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Short Term Selection to Diflubenzuron and Bacillus Thuringiensis Subsp. Israelensis Differentially Affects the Winter Survival of Culex Pipiens F. Pipiens and Culex Pipiens F. Molestus (Diptera: Culicidae) Charalampos S Ioannou, Christos Hadjichristodoulou, Maria A Kyritsi, and 1 more This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-121993/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Background The Culex pipiens mosquito consists of two forms named pipiens and molestus that exhibit substantial differences in their biology including overwintering behavior. Diflubenzuron (DFB) and Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis ( Bti ) are among the most widely used larvicides for controlling Cx. pipiens populations. The high dependency on these two larvicides, pose major concerns for resistance development. The evolution and stability of tolerance/resistance to insecticides has been associated with fitness costs that may be manifested under stressful conditions such as the winter period. This study aimed to investigate how short term selection of pipiens and molestus forms to both larvicides affect their susceptibility and their overwintering success. Methods Colonies of both forms of Cx. pipiens were established from the same area. Following standard protocols, the efficacy of both larvicides was determined for each mosquito population. Then, larvae from each form, were selected for three successive generations by applying fixed doses corresponding to IE 80 (Inhibition of adult Emergence) and LC 80 (Lethal Concentration) for DFB and Bti , respectively. At the end of this process, the susceptibility levels and the winter survival of the selected populations relative to controls (colonies that received no selection) were determined. Results Contrary to Bti , selection with DFB induced different susceptibility levels between the two forms of Cx. pipiens . The selected populations of Cx. pipiens f. molestus to both larvicides exhibited a high fitness cost in terms of reduced winter larval survival rates relative to control. Moreover, the obtained adults of the Bti selected population experienced significantly shorter lifespan compared to control and DFB selected population. On the other hand, selection with both DFB and Bti had no apparent effects on Cx. pipiens f. pipiens female winter survival rates relative to control. Furthermore, the reproductive parameters and the longevity of the overwintered females were similar between the selected populations and the control. Conclusions Our findings reveal that sort term selection to DFB and Bti induces a high fitness cost on the winter survival of Cx. pipiens f. molestus but not of pipiens form, suggesting potential differences on the persistence of tolerant individuals from year to year between the two forms. Parasitology Insecticide selection fitness cost diflubenzuron Bti winter survival Figures Figure 1 Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 4 Figure 5 Figure 5 Figure 6 Figure 6 Figure 7 Figure 7 Figure 8 Figure 8 Background The common house mosquito, Culex pipiens (L.) is a widespread insect pest of extremely high medical and veterinary importance as it is considered effective vector of several human and animal diseases, including filarial nematodes and arbovirus such as West Nile virus (WNV), Sindbis virus, Rift Valley fever and Japanese encephalitis virus [ 1 , 2 ]. Culex pipiens includes two distinct forms (usually referred as biotypes), pipiens and molestus , which are morphologically identical but differ in several behavioral and physiological aspects [ 3 , 4 ]. In particular, the molestus form prefers to colonize underground breeding sites, while pipiens is commonly found in above ground habitats. Moreover, Cx. pipiens f. molestus is stenogamous (copulation can occur in confined spaces), autogenus (ability to develop a first batch of eggs without a blood meal), and mammophilic (prefers to feed on mammals, including humans). On the other hand, Cx. pipiens f. pipiens is eurygamous (copulation occur outdoors in swarms), anautogenous (blood feeding is necessary for eggs development), and rather ornithophilic (prefers to feed on birds) [ 3 ]. Another major difference between the two forms is lying on their winter biology at temperate regions. Contrary to the molestus form which remain active and reproduce during winter, the pipiens form undergoes diapause as inseminated females with arrested ovariole development and elevated fat body reserves that serve as energy source [ 3 , 5 , 6 ]. Short day length and relative low temperatures perceived in larval and pupal stage during autumn are responsible for triggering the physiological changes underling diapause induction [ 7 , 8 ]. The two forms often co-occur and can hybridize, while the hybridization rates may reach up to 31.8% as has recently demonstrated [ 9 ]. Hybrids are considered to play a key role on WNV transmission, since they may exhibit a more opportunistic biting behavior and therefore act as effective bridge vectors between the avian/WNV reservoirs and humans [ 10 ]. Although nowadays several non-chemical methods for mosquito control are under development and evaluation such as the Sterile Insect Technique (SIT), the Release of Insects carrying a Dominant Lethal (RIDL) and the release of Wolbachia -infected mosquitoes [ 11 ], insecticide applications still remain the principal tool for tackling mosquitos’ related problems. This is mostly because several medically important mosquito species, including Cx. pipiens f. pipiens , tend to colonize fixed, open breeding sites that can concentrate very large populations. In such situations, the use of insecticides can be very effective since both mapping and treating is feasible. However, this is not the case for the artificial container-breeding mosquitoes, such as Aedes aegypti and Ae. albopictus which distribute individual eggs in several, ephemeral oviposition sites [ 12 ]. Among the insecticides that are employed, larvicides are considered as the most important means for the prevention of mosquito-borne diseases, as they target immature stages (larvae and pupae) and thus prevent females’ emergence which are responsible for the pathogens transmission. Despite the high importance of this approach, under the current European Union biocide legislation and the prohibition of organophosphates (OPs) such as temephos, larval control relies almost exclusively on two main categories of biocides, the Insect Growth Regulators (IGRs) and the microbial ones [ 13 ]. Diflubenzuron (DFB) and Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis ( Bti ) are the most widely used larvicides in each category, as they combine some very desirable features such as the high efficacy against mosquito larvae and the very low toxicity to vertebrates. DFB is a member of the Benzoylurea insecticide family that inhibits the chitin biosynthesis process causing abnormal molting during the immature development preventing adult emergence [ 14 ], while contrary to other IGRs like methoprene it has a remarkable ability to control all mosquito larval instars [ 15 ]. Following its introduction in the early 1970s, DFB has been extensively used in agricultural, forestry and more recently in medical insect pest larvae [ 14 ]. On the other hand, over the last years the microbial larvicide Bti has increasingly used as an alternative to chemical insecticides as it displays high selective action against mosquito larvae and minimal impacts on the environment and non-target organisms including human [ 16 ]. During sporulation Bti produces a parasporal crystalline body composed of four major (Cry11Aa, Cry 4Ba, Cry 4Aa and Cyt1Aa) and at least two minor (Cry10Aa and Cyt2Ba) protoxins. Upon ingestion, the crystals are solubilized under the alkaline conditions in the larval midgut and the protoxins are proteolytically converted into active toxins [ 17 ]. The Cry toxins bind to specific midgut membrane receptors, while the Cyt toxins appear to act synergistically with the Cry toxins functioning as surrogate receptors that improve their capacity to bind on the available target sites (receptors) [ 18 , 19 ]. After the toxins binding on the midgut receptors, they insert in the plasma membrane forming lytic pores that disturb the cell’s osmotic balance, resulting in cell lysis and consequently death of the larvae [ 20 ]. The synergistic interactions between the Cyt and the Cry toxins have attracted particular attention due to the drastic enhancement of their larvicidal activity against mosquitoes [ 21 ]. Moreover, the synergism between the Cyt1Aa and the Cry toxins is considered the key factor for the low potential of resistance development following extensive selection with Bti [ 17 , 22 ]. The high dependency on both DFB and Bti for the suppression of mosquito populations, including Cx. pipiens , pose major concerns for resistance development which may jeopardize the control efforts and increase the risk of diseases transmission such as the WNV. Indeed, striking DFB resistance levels associated with specific mutations have been already detected in Cx. pipiens natural populations from Italy and Turkey in areas with intense use of this insecticide [ 23 – 26 ]. On the other hand, there is only a single record of high (33-fold) Bti resistance levels in Cx. pipiens wild populations with a background of previous exposure to support for potential resistance development [ 27 ]. Interestingly, evaluation of field populations of Cx. pipiens without history of Bti exposure has shown variations of resistance ratios ranging from less than 3- to 10-fold [ 28 ]. Therefore, this inherent variability in Cx. pipiens populations’ susceptibility to Bti may be of high importance since it is possible to affect their response to selection pressure. Despite the prominence of the above findings regarding both DFB and Bti resistance in Cx. pipiens populations, no efforts have been made to separate potential differences between the form pipiens and molestus given their divergent biology. Insecticide resistance emergence and evolution in the wild is a dynamic process that depends among others, on the genetic background and the biology of mosquito species, the intensity of biocides selection pressure and the resistance mechanisms that are involved [ 29 ]. However, resistance development is often associated with significant reductions in fitness parameters of the resistant individuals as a result of increased metabolic costs of physiological/biochemical resistance mechanisms. The reason underlying this phenomenon is because there is a trade-off of energetic resources from primary biological functions associated with fitness to secondary ones that contribute to the function of resistance mechanisms [ 30 ]. In Cx. pipiens resistance development against organophosphates (OPs) has been associated with male mating competition cost [ 31 ], predation avoidance cost [ 32 ] and decreases in preimaginal survival [ 33 ]. Moreover, adverse abiotic conditions can also affect the impact of insecticide resistance on key life history traits. Winter in temperate areas represents a very challenging and stressful period for the survival of many insects including mosquitoes and therefore potential fitness costs associated with insecticide resistance may reduce their overwintering success. Indeed, the frequency of two genetic loci in Cx. pipiens f. pipiens females associated with OPs resistance decreased over winter, indicating reduced survival for resistant individuals [ 34 ]. This is of great importance since it can determine the persistence of resistant mosquitoes from year to year affecting both the evolution and stability of acquired resistance in the wild. However, it remains completely unknown if a similar phenomenon holds in the case of DFB and Bti given their different mode of action relative to OPs. Considering the importance of Cx. pipiens as an effective vector of several diseases, the fundamental differences in biology between its two forms and the high dependency on DFB and Bti to tactile its populations, the aim of the present study was to explore how short term exposure of pipiens and molestus forms to both larvicides affect their susceptibility and most importantly their overwintering success. For this purpose, we established colonies of both Cx. pipiens f. pipiens and Cx.pipiens f. molestus originated from the same area and subjected them to the same selective pressure (80% population mortality) for three successive generations with DFB and Bti. The susceptibility levels and the overwintering survival of the selected populations relative to controls (colonies that received no selection) were determined. Methods Mosquito colonies and rearing methods All mosquito colonies were established during early September to late October of 2017 from eggs that were collected at the vicinity of Volos and Larissa city, Thessaly province, Greece. Earlier surveys in the study area revealed Cx. pipiens as the most abundant mosquito species, followed by Aedes caspius [ 35 ]. Since 2010 WNV outbreak in Greece, there is a regular presence of human cases in the area, with a peak of 24 incidents in Larissa in 2019 [ 36 ]. Mosquito control is performed routinely since 2010 by private enterprises and involves mainly the use of DFB in urban and suburban breeding sites, while Bti is applied in protected wetlands such as rivers, streams and lakes [ 25 , 37 ]. In total 74 and 59 egg rafts were recovered for Cx. pipiens form pipiens and molestus respectively. Separation of Cx. pipiens forms was confirmed by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) protein profiling [ 38 ]. Colonization took place within the insectary facilities of the laboratory of Entomology and Agricultural Zoology at the University of Thessaly. The insectary walk-in chamber was maintained at 25 ± 1 °C, 65 ± 5% relative humidity and a photoperiod of L14 : D10 with a simulated dusk and dawn for 45 min. Photophase initiation was set at 00:00 hr and termination at 14:00 hr. Larvae were reared in 42 × 30 × 10 cm white plastic containers in 3 l of bottled table water (Table Water, Epirotic Bottling Industry S.A. Ioannina, Greece) fed a total amount of 2 g of ground cat food (Friskies Adult, Purina, Italy) and held at a density of approximately 1000 individuals per container. Adults were kept in 32 × 32 × 32 cm screened cages at a density of 400–500 individuals and fed with 10% sugar solution that was renewed every week. Females of Cx. pipiens f. pipiens were fed on certified human blood derived from samples that were provided by a blood analysis laboratory. Blood temperature was set at 38 °C using two custom made, cylindrical (7.5 cm in diameter and 10 cm in height) feeding apparatus operated with circulated water from a warm bath via 12V DC mini water pumps. The apparatus were placed on the top of the holding cages for 1 h, and females had accesses to feed via a stretched Parafilm M (Bemis, USA) membrane. Depending on the experimental needs, colonies received two to three blood meals per month. In general, colonies of Cx. pipiens f. molestus were kept without access to blood. Only in a few cases they were provided with a blood meal after the deposition of their first autogenus egg raft in order to reinforce colonies population during the selection process (see below). Both mosquito populations were reared for 3 generations in order to establish a uniform genetic background before the initiation of the experiments. Larval bioassays Standard World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines [ 39 ] were adopted to evaluate the susceptibility of each collected population against DFB and Bti . Larval susceptibility was evaluated against analytical standard DFB (Purity ≥ 99.8%, Pestanal®, Sigma-Aldrich, Germany) and formulated Bti (Vectobac® 12AS, 11.61% w/w Bti serotype H-14, strain AM65-52, 1200 ITU/mg, Valent BioSciences Corporation, USA). Stock solutions were prepared in 99.5% acetone for DFB and distilled water for Bti and stored at -22 °C until use for up to two weeks. For DFB, six concentrations ranging from 0.001 to 0.01 mg/l and for Bti five doses ranging from 0.02 to 0.04 mg/l were used yielding larval control between 10 and 95%. Six replicates were performed per concentration and an equal number of controls, each involving twenty five 3rd and early 4th instar larvae for DFB and Bti , respectively. Bioassays were run three times on different days using new batches of larvae and larvicide solutions. Larval mortality for Bti and adult emergence inhibition for DFB were recorded according to WHO recommended exposure times [ 39 ]. For each mosquito population, dose mortality responses were used to calculate IE 50 , IE 80 and IE 90 values (IE: Adult emergence inhibition) for DFB and LC 50 , LC 80 and LC 90 values (LC: Lethal concentration) for Bti using Probit Analysis [ 40 ]. Larval selection Larvae from each population were exposed for three successive generations to fixed concentrations of DFB and Bti corresponding to IE 80 and LC 80 , respectively. During the selection process, six to eight groups of ≈ 1.000 larvae were placed into rearing containers (see above) provided with 3 l of table water and the fixed dose of each larvicide. Selection against DFB involved 3rd instar larvae, while 1.2 g of cat food was added in the containers to allow development (pupation). Selection against Bti involved the exposure of early 4th instar larvae to fixed doses for 24 h without any accesses to food. Surviving larvae were placed at a maximum density of ≈ 1.000 individuals into rearing containers with 3L of clean table water and offered 1 g of food to complete development. Resulting pupae from both DFB & Bti selection process, were transferred daily into cages and reared following the standard procedures described above. Additionally, for each population, two larvae groups (≈ 1.000 individuals each) were maintained under identical conditions but in the absence of DFB & Bti exposure serving as controls. There was at no point exchange of individuals among treatments and controls during the above mentioned procedures. After the completion of the final (third) selection process, new dose-response bioassays were performed for each population to establish the new susceptibility levels against both DFB & Bti . A range of five concentrations was tested for each larvicide (DFB: 0.002–0.015 mg/l; Bti : 0.03–0.08 mg/l) using the same procedures described previously. Moreover, the winter survival of the descendants of both selected and control populations was evaluated. Winter survival Since Cx. pipiens f. molestus remains active and reproduce during the winter period, both immature and adult survival were assessed. For this purpose, 1.000 first instar larvae 3–5 hours after their eclosion from both selected populations and the control were equally apportioned into five white, plastic, containers (30 × 20 × 10 cm) (200 larvae/container) with 1.5 l of table water and 2 mg of cat food per larvae. Then, all containers were randomly placed side by side in a humid, unheated warehouse located at the outdoor facilities of the laboratory that simulated the winter breading sites of the species. Natural daylight was provided through a 70 × 70 cm window in the east side of the warehouse. To prevent water evaporation, each container was shield with a well fitted lid bearing a 2.5 cm hole at the centre covered with mesh. Larval exposure took place on December 23, 2018. Containers were inspected every five days until the appearance of the first 4th instar larvae and since then daily. The initiation of larvae pupation took place on February 5 and completed on March 3. Resulting pupae from each population were transferred into transparent, plastic bowls filed with 200 ml of table water kept at the same conditions. A maximum number of 15 pupae was placed in each bowl, while a lid prevented emerging adults from escaping. First adult emergence was observed on February 17 and the last on March 5. Upon adult appearance, pairs consisting of a male and a female from each population were placed into individual cages. Each cage comprised a 0.4 l capacity transparent plastic cup (height 12.5 cm high, upper diameter 6.5 cm, base diameter 9.2 cm) fitted into a 9.2 cm in diameter plastic Petri dish lid. On the side of each cup, an opening of 25 cm 2 covered with nylon mesh was formed for ventilation. Each individual cage was placed upon a 9 cm in diameter Petri dish provided with 5% sugar solution while adults had access to feed via a small piece of wick made of sponge cloth (Wettex® classic, Freudenberg, Sweden). Depending on the adult emergence rates, 30, 47 and 50 replications (pairs) were established for DFB and Bti selected and the control population respectively. Adults were kept at the same place where larval development took place (warehouse). Their survival was monitored daily from February 18 until the death of the last individual on June 27, while the sugar solution in the individual cages was renewed every week. Prevailing temperature and RH conditions inside the warehouse during the experiments were recorded by an indoor data logger (HOBO UX100-011, ONSET, USA) set to receive 4 recordings per 24 h. For each selected population and the control, both larval and pupal developmental duration and survival were assessed as well as adult longevity. Diapausing females of Cx. pipiens f. pipiens from both selected populations and the control were reared from 1st instar larvae, using the standard procedures described above, in an environmental chamber set at 20 °C, 8L:16D, and 70% RH [ 6 ]. Adults were provided constant access to 10% sugar solution 10–14 days post eclosion to allow female copulation and lipid accumulation reserves. To confirm diapause induction, 10 randomly selected females from each population were dissected and the primary follicle/germarium length ratio was used as criterion of ovarian diapause [ 41 ]. After the lipid accumulation period, two hundred females from each population were equally apportioned into five 20 × 20 × 20 cm screened cages (40 females/cage) having access only to water and transferred to the same warehouse described before to simulate winter conditions. Female exposure took place on January 15, 2019. Cages were inspected at two week intervals and female survival for each population was recorded. Dead mosquitos were removed with an aspirator through a 2 cm hole in the cages door shielded with a cork. Female winter survival was terminated at the end of March (26/3), following temperature rise, by providing the remaining individuals with 10% sugar solution without been removed from their winter shelter. Two weeks later, on April 8, survived females from each population (25–32 individuals, see results) were merged in a 20 × 20 × 20 cm screened cage and were given the opportunity to receive a blood meal for an hour over three successive nights. All three cages (one per population) were transferred inside the walk-in chamber between 20:00 and 22:00 and females were allowed to feed through the apparatus described above. After each blood feeding trial, cages were transferred back to the warehouse. One week following the last blood meal, a white, plastic cylindrical (10 cm in diameter and 5 cm in height) bowl with 200 mL of table water and 0.05 g of cat food was placed in each cage to allow oviposition. Bowls remained inside cages for 7 days. During that period, cages were daily inspected and deposited egg rafts were collected and pictured under a binocular stereoscope (ZEISS, SteREO, Discovery.V12) equipped with a digital camera (ZEISS, AxioCam, ERc 5 s) to facilitate eggs counting. Then, each egg raft was transferred individually into a white bowl (same as those that described just above) covered with mesh to assess larval hatch rates under the warehouse conditions. The females of each population remained in the warehouse under ambient conditions and their survival was monitored every two days until the death of the last individual on July 28, while the sugar solution in each cage was renewed every week. Climatic data (temperature and RH) during the course of the above experiments were recorded as described previously. For post-overwintering females of each population we estimated a) the percentage of individuals that received a blood meal b) preoviposition period c) mean number of eggs per raft d) mean larval hatch rate per egg raft and e) lifespan under the ambient conditions inside the warehouse. Data analysis The effect of mosquito population on larval and female (in each sampling date) winter survival rates of Cx. pipiens f. molestus and Cx. pipiens f. pipiens respectively were assessed using One-way analysis of variance, after appropriate transformations for normality and homoscedasticity when necessary, followed by Tukey’s HSD post hoc to separate means. The same analysis was also performed to assess the effect of mosquito population on the number of eggs per raft and the larval hatch rates per egg raft of the survived Cx. pipiens f. pipiens females. The proportions of pupae survived in each population of Cx. pipiens f. molestus , their sex ratio as well as the proportions of female of Cx. pipiens f. pipiens that received a blood meal were analyzed using the Chi-square test. The effects of mosquito population and sex on larval and pupal developmental duration as well as on obtained adult lifespan of Cx. pipiens f. molestus were assed using the Cox proportional hazards model. This model is commonly applied to assess the effects of one or more predictors on time to event incidents such as time to pupation, adult emergence/death ect. Pairwise comparisons were conducted using the log rank (Mantel–Cox) test. The same analysis was also performed to assess the effect of mosquito population on both the preoviposition period and the lifespan of the survived Cx. pipiens f. pipiens females. Data analysis was performed using IBM SPSS 25 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Results Dose-response larval bioassays results are given in Tables 1 & 2 for DFB and Bti respectively. The EI 50 values for DFB were similar between the two forms of Cx. pipiens before the initiation of the selection trials, however the EI 90 value of Cx. pipiens f. pipiens was twice as much as that of molestus suggesting a lower inherent susceptibility. The selection process for three successive generations by applying fixed DFB doses corresponded to the EI 80 for each population resulted in 3.7 and 3.1 resistance ratio values for EI 50 and EI 90 respectively for Cx. pipiens f. pipiens , and 1.7 and 2.9 for the Cx. pipiens f. molestus (Table 1 ). The LC 50 and LC 90 values for Bti were almost identical between the two populations before selection. The selection processes against Bti had minor effects on the susceptibility levels of both Cx. pipiens forms (Table 2). Table 1 Effective doses of diflubenzuron against the two forms of Culex pipiens after the selection process for three successive generations by applying fixed doses corresponding to EI 80 of the control populations. Population N* EI 50 (95% CL) a RR 50 EI 90 (95% CL) a RR 90 Slope X 2 (df) Cx. pipiens f. pipiens Control 3150 0.0025 (0.0014–0.0035) - 0.0081 (0.0065–0.0097) - 2.47 177.57 b ( 105) Selected 2700 0.0093 (0.0076–0.0106) 3.7 0.0252 (0.0218–0.0321) 3.1 2.96 70.98 (87) Cx. pipiens f. molestus Control 3150 0.0022 (0.0016–0.0026) - 0.0040 (0.0037–0.0044) - 4.49 201.99 b (105) Selected 2700 0.0037 (0.0028–0.0046) 1.7 0.0116 (0.0101–0.0132) 2.9 2.60 57.94 (87) * Number of larvae tested a EI values are expressed in milligrams per liter, and they are considered significantly different when 95% of confidence limits (CL) fail to overlap b Since goodness-of-fit test is significant ( P < 0.05), a heterogeneity factor was used in the calculation of confidence limits (CL) Table 2. Effective doses of Bti against the two forms of Culex pipiens after the selection process for three successive generations by applying fixed doses corresponding to LC 80 of the control populations Population N* LC 50 (95% CL) a RR 50 LC 90 (95% CL) a RR 90 Slope X 2 (df) Cx. pipiens f. pipiens Control 2700 0.031 (0.029–0.033) - 0.047 (0.044–0.051) - 7.52 120.73 b (87) Selected 2700 0.042 (0.035–0.048) 1.3 0.069 (0.065–0.074) 1.5 6.12 47.99 (87) Cx. pipiens f. molestus Control 2700 0.032 (0.029–0.034) - 0.047 (0.044–0.051) - 7.62 126.68 b (87) Selected 2700 0.045 (0.034–0.059) 1.4 0.081 (0.065–0.089) 1.7 4.98 117.21 b (87) * Number of larvae tested a LC values are expressed in milligrams per liter, and they are considered significantly different when 95% of confidence limits (CL) fail to overlap b Since goodness-of-fit test is significant ( P < 0.05), a heterogeneity factor was used in the calculation of confidence limits (CL) Ambient temperature and relative humidity conditions inside the warehouse from the beginning of the exposure of 1st instar larvae of Cx. pipiens f. molestus until the death of the last adult are depicted in Fig. 1 .Temperatures ranged between 3.9–13.6 °C with a mean value of 10.2 °C from larvae exposure (on December 23) until the formation of the last pupae (on March 3). Corresponding values regarding the first adult emergence until the death of the last individual ranged between 7.7–26.8 °C with a mean value of 17.4 °C. Population differentially affected larva-to-pupa winter survival rates of Cx. pipiens f. molestus ( F 2, 12 = 25.26, P < 0.001). Selection to both DFB & Bti significantly reduced larva-to-pupa survival relative to control, while significant differences were also found between the two selected populations (Fig. 2 ). Cox regression analysis revealed mosquito population as a significant predictor (Wald test, X 2 2 = 30.26, P < 0.001) of the larvae developmental duration considering the total number (viable and dead) of pupae formed. Larval developmental duration was significantly longer in both DFB & Bti selected populations relative to control, while significant differences were also observed between the two selected populations (Fig. 3 ). Cox regression analysis revealed mosquito population (Wald test, X 2 2 = 7.87, P = 0.020) and sex (Wald test, X 2 1 = 11.49, P = 0.001) as significant predictors of the larvae developmental duration considering the viable pupae yielded. Larval developmental duration of control male larvae was significantly shorter than the Bti selected population but not than the DFB (Fig. 4 ). On the other hand, no significant differences were observed between the control and the two selected populations as far as the female larvae developmental duration is regarded. Pupal survival rates were 50.7%, 45.0% and 44.4% for control, DBF and Bti selected population respectively and did not differ significantly among the three populations (Chi-square test, X 2 2 = 2.10, P = 0.349). Neither mosquito population (Wald test, X 2 2 = 4.00, P = 0.135) nor sex (Wald test, X 2 1 = 1.20, P = 0.272) were significant predictors of the pupae developmental duration of Cx. pipiens f. molestus (Fig. 5 ). Sex ratio rates (females/males) were 52.3%, 58.3% and 44.3% for control, DBF and Bti selected population respectively, though no significant differences were observed (Chi-square test, X 2 2 = 3.54, P = 0.170). Cox regression analysis revealed mosquito population (Wald test, X 2 2 = 13.29, P = 0.001) and sex (Wald test, X 2 1 = 4.52, P = 0.033) as significant predictors of adult lifespan. Both males and females of the Bti selected population exhibited significantly shorter longevity relative to control. Females of the DFB selected population also outlived those of Bti (Fig. 6 , Table 3 ). Climatic conditions during the experiments of Cx. pipiens f. pipiens are shown in Fig. 1 . Temperatures ranged between 7.7–16.5 °C with a mean value of 11.9 °C from the beginning of female exposure until the termination of the overwintering period on March 26. Corresponding values regarding the post-overwintering period until the death of the last female ranged between 13.5–27.1 °C with a mean value of 21.2 °C. Analyses in each sampling date revealed no significant differences on female survival rates among the three populations ( F 2, 12 = 0.48 to 1.05, P = 0.379 to 0.631) (Fig. 7 ). Additionally, no significant differences were observed in female reproductive parameters (Table 4 ). Finally, Cox regression analysis showed that mosquito population was not a significant predictor (Wald test, X 2 2 = 3.35, P = 0.187) of female post-overwintering survival. Average survival was approximately three months for all three populations demonstrating that overwintered females of Cx. pipiens f. pipiens may experience extensive remaining lifespans (Fig. 8 , Table 5). Table 3 Longevity parameters of Culex pipiens f. molestus populations that either were selected against diflubenzuron (DFB) and Bti for three successive generations or not (control). Adults were maintained at the same place (warehouse) where they developed as larvae during winter having access to 5% sugar solution. Within sex, different letters indicate significant differences (pairwise comparisons log-rank test, P < 0.05). Longevity parameters in days ± SE Average Quartiles 25 50 75 Males Control (n = 49) 72.88 ± 3.46 a 92 ± 3.51 75 ± 6.29 60 ± 6.85 DFB selected (n = 30) 69.13 ± 4.48 ab 93 ± 6.95 66 ± 1.36 50 ± 9.68 Bti selected (n = 47) 61.23 ± 3.69 b 80 ± 4.83 68 ± 5.38 46 ± 11.45 Females Control (n = 49) 73.38 ± 4.37 a 97 ± 1.72 77 ± 2.78 62 ± 13.39 DFB selected (n = 30) 77.23 ± 4.50 a 95 ± 6.17 76 ± 5.46 62 ± 3.22 Bti selected (n = 47) 70.08 ± 3.33 b 88 ± 3.59 77 ± 2.56 62 ± 7.44 Table 4 Reproductive parameters of post-overwintering Culex pipiens f. pipiens females. Females originated from populations that either were selected against diflubenzuron (DFB) and Bti for three successive generations or not (control). Population n Blood meal acceptance % Preoviposition period days (± SE) Eggs per raft (± SE) Larval hatch rate per egg raft (± SE) Control 31 35.71 10.00 ± 0.76 61.10 ± 5.43 89.10 ± 3.42 DFB selected 32 34.38 11.72 ± 0.61 51.54 ± 4.50 92.58 ± 3.04 Bti selected 25 46.43 11.53 ± 0.50 51.46 ± 3.70 90.68 ± 3.81 F - - - 1.43 0.22 X 2 - 1.06 a 2.64 b - - df - 2 2 2, 31 2, 31 P - 0.587 0.266 0.254 0.798 a Chi-square test b Wald test Table 5. Post-overwintering longevity parameters of Culex pipiens f. pipiens populations that either were selected against diflubenzuron (DFB) and Bti for three successive generations or not (control). Females were maintained at the same place (warehouse) were they overwintered having access to 10% sugar solution. Different letters indicate significant differences (pairwise comparisons log-rank test, P < 0.05). Longevity parameters in days ± SE Average Quartiles 25 50 75 Population Control (n = 31) 81.45 ± 6.02 a 109 ± 6.59 89 ± 5.00 68 ± 15.02 DFB selected (n = 32) 92.40 ± 5.84 a 115 ± 1.23 105 ± 2.80 83 ± 22.04 Bti selected (n = 25) 99.84 ± 3.19 a 115 ± 1.62 97 ± 1.48 92 ± 2.91 Discussion Our study revealed that the implementation of equivalent selective pressure for three successive generations with both DFB and Bti against the form pipiens and molestus of Cx. pipiens induced differential susceptibility levels only in the first case. The selected populations of Cx. pipiens f. molestus to both larvicides exhibited a high fitness cost in terms of reduced winter larval survival rates accompanied with increased larval developmental times. Moreover, the obtained adults of the Bti selected population appeared to suffer an additional cost in terms of shorter lifespan compared to the other two (control and DFB selected). On the other hand, the selection process had no apparent effect on Cx. pipiens f. pipiens female winter survival rates relative to control. Additionally, overwintered females showed similar reproductive parameters among populations. Interestingly, these females, irrespective of population origin, experienced considerable post-overwintering longevity periods. The EI 50 values estimated in the current study for the control populations of both forms were found to be almost identical with that of the Benaki Cx. pipiens f. molestus laboratory reference strain [ 23 ], suggesting high susceptibility to DFB. Similarly, earlier studies conducted in different regions of Greece using the WHO diagnostic dose protocols demonstrated high susceptibility of most Cx. pipiens populations tested [ 37 ]. Moreover, recent surveys failed to detect any specific mutations in the chitin synthase gene of Cx. pipiens sampled from Greece that are associated with high levels of resistance against DFB. On the contrary, two and three different mutations at amino acid I1043 of the chitin synthase gene have been reported in neighboring Turkey and Italy, respectively with phenotypes exhibiting up to 128 fold Resistance Ratios (RR) relative to the Benaki reference strain [ 23 – 26 ]. The different selection pressure regimes imposed on these populations over the past years relative to the Greek ones, have been proposed as a possible explanation. Interestingly, in our study by imposing the same short term selection pressure with DFB we observed differential response on the susceptibility levels between the form pipiens and molestus , especially as EI 50 RR values are concerned. This tendency was found to be even more pronounced after additional generations of continuous selection to DFB (F6, F9 & F12 generation) in the laboratory (Ioannou et al. in preparation). The reasons underlying this differential response to DFB selection of the two forms of Cx. pipiens remain largely unknown. A possible explanation could lay on their different biology. The tendency of the molestus form to reproduce below ground may largely decrease both its exposure to insecticides as well as the gene flow rates among different populations. On the other hand there are no such limitations for the above ground free living pipiens form. Therefore, it is anticipated that the molestus form populations may lack the genetic background for a rapid apparition and evolution of tolerance. This argument is also supported by the fact that in the current study the EI 90 value of the control Cx. pipiens f. pipiens population (without selection) was twice as much as of the molestus form. Another possible explanation could be the fact that the DFB selected populations of each form may encounter differential levels of fitness costs in the wild such as winter survival rates as evidenced by the present study. Sort term selection with Bti had a minor impact on the susceptibility levels of both biotypes. This is an expected outcome since there are no consistent recordings of mosquito resistance development to the full crystal. Despite some sporadic reports describing considerable resistance levels of wild mosquito populations against Bti [ 27 , 42 – 44 ], long-term studies under both laboratory and field conditions provide no support to these data [ 45 – 51 ]. The low tolerance against Bti after long periods of applications in natural settings or intensive laboratory selection have been primarily attributed to the synergistic action between the Cry and the Cyt toxins as previously mentioned. In contrast, selection with single, purified Cry toxins can rapidly lead to considerable resistance levels [ 45 , 52 , 53 ]. Another factor that seems to promote the lack of Bti resistance in mosquitoes is the fact that in the absence of selection pressure within only a few generations (3–5), any acquired tolerance disappears almost completely [ 46 , 48 ]. The high fitness costs following extensive selection to this microbial larvicide have been proposed as the most convincing explanation of this phenomenon. Both DFB and Bti selection against Cx. pipiens f. molestus conferred a high fitness cost in terms of larvae winter survival as mortality rates relative to control increased more than 50% and 30% respectively. When we repeated the same experimental procedure after three additional generations of selection (F6) under optimum (laboratory) conditions we found no apparent differences in larval survival rates among tested populations. This suggests that the observed costs are manifested only under stressful conditions. Indeed, the mean prevailing temperature during larval development reached the lowest developmental thresholds described for the species [ 54 ] shaping a very challenging environment for survival. In general, the fitness costs determined in optimal conditions are not always representative of that experienced in the wild. This is because stressful environments and/or limited resources might be more deleterious for tolerant/resistant individuals. Similarly to our findings, the prolongation of larval developmental times in OPs resistant Cx. pipiens populations was found to emerge only under stressful crowding conditions in natural breeding sites [ 33 ]. Therefore, both biotic and abiotic factors as in our case, may shape the expression of fitness costs related to insecticides’ selection. The observed differences on the reduction of larval survival rates between DFB and Bti selected populations suggest deferential levels of fitness costs. A possible explanation may lay on the different mode of action of the two larvicides. An interesting finding that emerged from the current study is the fact that while short selection against Bti has minor effects on the tolerance levels, it may confer a high fitness cost under stressful conditions. Reduction on winter larvae survival rates following selection against DFB and Bti in Cx. pipiens f. molestus was also accompanied with a discrete increment of their developmental duration relative to control. Interestingly, the longest larvae developmental times were recorded in the Bti selected population. Moreover, the adults obtained exhibited significantly shorter lifespan compared to DFB selected and control population. This is probably because a higher tolerance to Bti has been associated with a modified microbiota of larvae, which may affect their midgut proper function and therefore the nutrients assimilation, developmental processes and ultimately adult performance as it is well documented that nutrition during the mosquito larval stage may shape important fitness elements of the emerging adults [ 55 , 56 ]. Similarly to our results, Bti selection against Ae. aegypti also resulted in significant prolongation of larvae developmental times relative to control [ 48 ]. No effects were found regarding adult survival in the same study. However, it should be stressed that in this case, adults had access to only water and therefore no direct comparisons can be made with our results. A moderate reduction on both male and female longevity following selection with Bti was observed in Cx. pipiens f. pipiens compared to untreated control [ 46 ]. The optimal laboratory conditions in this study may account for not detecting significant differences as in our case. Contrary to Cx. pipiens f. molestus , selection against DFB and Bti had no apparent effects on the winter survival of the pipiens form. The differential overwintering developmental stages (larva vs adult) in these two forms may account for the observed outcome. Mosquito larvae require a minimum amount of nutrition to fully mature and pupate. Furthermore, larval developmental completion takes place within specific time limits which are endogenously defined. This dynamic process may be more prone to selection costs relative to the adult stage where full development have been already attained. In contrast to our findings, resistance of Cx. pipiens f. pipiens against OPs have been associated with reduced overwintering survival [ 34 ]. Among others, the differential exhaustion of fat reserves was proposed as the basic proximate cause. Indeed, a later study confirmed that the presence of resistance alleles against OPs in this species is negatively correlated with female lipid reserves [ 57 ]. The fact that female winter survival patterns in our study were almost identical between the control and the selected populations suggest no differences on the physiological process of fat reserves accumulation and/or exploitation. But most importantly, it means that these females have equal probabilities of survival as the untreated ones, providing the base for the building of higher tolerance levels in the next year. This argument seems to be supported by the fact that the resistance ratio against DFB of Cx. pipiens field populations in Italy, from 32.5 fold in 2015 reached 128.5 fold in 2016 [ 23 ], which backs the idea of the persistence of resistant mosquitoes in the wild from year to year. However, this is something that needs to be demonstrated for the specific populations, as in contrast to our case, they carry mutations of the chitin synthase gene associated with striking DFB resistance levels. Interestingly, further studies in the same country reveled a high focal distribution of DFB resistant Cx. pipiens mosquitoes which was attributed to the differential selection pressure imposed by both agricultural and mosquito control applications with DFB in the tested areas [ 24 ]. Since no separation between the two forms of Cx. pipiens took place in this study, the following explanation is possible. The high focal distribution of DFB resistant mosquitoes may only reflect differences in the mosquito populations’ composition regarding the two forms, with the predominance of pipiens form to account for the observed outcome. For instance, analysis of population structure from different areas of Greece, a country with identical climate, revealed extreme variations between the two forms on the composition of Cx. pipiens populations [ 9 ]. Nevertheless, as mentioned above, the validity of this hypothesis has to be confirmed for the specific populations. Winter survival of diapausing Cx. pipiens f. pipiens females may largely vary depending on the hibernacula conditions [ 3 , 58 ]. It has been observed that females may abandon their overwintering sites and actively search for new ones, a behavior described as an adaptive response associated with increased survival. It seems that the quality of each overwintering site, as experienced by females, is depending on multiple parameters such as the prevailing temperature and humidity levels, predator density, parasite frequency and human disturbance and therefore this quality may change during winter [ 34 ]. Under our experimental design, mosquitoes were not able to select the most optimal environment for maximizing their survival as they were forced to overwinter in a given place (warehouse). Nevertheless, this does not diminish the reliability of our results since females from all populations experienced exactly the same conditions. Female survival rates observed in the current study are comparable with that found by Koenraadt et al. [ 58 ] considering similar overwintering sites such as unheated house rooms. Interestingly, they found that non-diapausing females kept under the same conditions, died within four days, suggesting that in the absence of nutritional resources such females have a very limited ability to survive but also see Rinehart et al. [ 59 ]. Reproductive parameters of overwintered females of Cx. pipiens f. pipiens were similar between the two selected populations and the control. Blood meal acceptance percentages ranged between 34.4–46.4% suggesting that females had partially terminated their reproductive diapause by the time that trials took place. Contrary to other studies that used artificial conditions to terminate diapause in order to induce females to either respond to host stimuli [ 60 ] or receive a blood meal [ 58 ] we intentionally preferred to simulate as much as possible the natural conditions in an attempt to detect any potential variations in feeding activity. Although, no significant differences were observed regarding both the preoviposition period and the average number of eggs per egg raft, the better performance of the control population in respect to these parameters may reflect an early form of fitness cost in the selected ones. The short term selection to both larvicides may have acted against more pronounced differences as indicated by other studies. For example, Bti selection against Cx. pipiens f. pipiens for 20 generations resulted in 44.8% decrease of female fecundity [ 46 ] while Belinato & Valle [ 61 ] by applying the same experimental protocol as we, found that DFB selection against Ae . aegypti for 6 generations also conferred a significant reduction on this parameter. Finally, an interesting finding that emerged from the current study is the fact that females, irrespective of population origin (selected or not), experienced extensive post-overwintering longevity periods, which appeared to even exceed the total lifespans of Cx. pipiens f. molestus females (Tables 3 & 5). This observation is in accordance with a previous study documented that the physiological changes that take place during the pre-hibernation transition of these females confer a considerable increase in their longevity potential [ 62 ]. Conclusions By imposing the same short term selection with both DFB and Bti against Cx. pipines form pipiens and molestus we found differences on the acquired tolerance in the first case which is probably associated with their divergent biology. Moreover, the selection process with both larvicides had a significant negative impact on the winter survival of the molestus form but not that of the pipiens. These findings are of high importance since provide insights on the early phase of tolerance development between the two forms but mostly on its prevalence in the wild form year to year. The incorporation of such information on a properly developed model it is anticipated to contribute on the better understanding of the two Cx. pipiens forms performance against these two important larvicides over time. Abbreviations DFB: Diflubenzuron; Bti : Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis ; IE: Inhibition of adult Emergence; LC: Lethal Concentration; SIT: Sterile Insect Technique; RIDL: Release of Insects carrying a Dominant Lethal; WNV: West Nile virus; IGRs: Insect growth regulators; WHO: World Health Organization; OPs: Organophosphates; 95% CL: 95% confidence limits; RR: Resistance Ratio. Declarations Ethics approval and consent to participate Not applicable. Consent for publication Not applicable. Availability of data and materials The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Funding This work was supported by a postdoctoral scholarship program (Project number 5394.02.11) implemented by University of Thessaly and funded by Stavros Niarchos Foundation. Authors' contributions CSI, CH and NTP conceived and designed the study. CSI and MAK performed the experiments. CSI and NTP analyzed the data. CSI, CH, MAK and NTP wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Acknowledgements We would like to thank Evridiki Markopoulou and Eleni Savvidou for technical support. References Farajollahi A, Fonseca DM, Kramer LD, Kilpatrick AM. " Bird biting " mosquitoes and human disease: A review of the role of Culex pipiens complex mosquitoes in epidemiology. Infect Genet Evol. 2011;11:1577-85. Brugman VA, Hernández-Triana LM, Medlock JM, Fooks AR, Carpenter S, Johnson N. The role of Culex pipiens (Diptera: Culicidae) in virus transmission in Europe. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15:389. Vinogradova EB. Culex pipiens pipiens mosquitoes: taxonomy, distribution, ecology, physiology, genetics, applied importance and control. Sofia-Moscow: Pensoft Publishers; 2000. Becker N, Jöst A, Weitzel T. The Culex pipiens complex in Europe . J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2012;28:53-67. Vogels CBF, Van De Peppel LJJ, van Vliet AJH, Westenberg M, Ibañez-Justica A, Stroo A, et al. Winter activity and aboveground hybridization between the two biotypes of the West Nile virus vector Culex pipiens. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2015;15:619-26. Mitchell CJ, Briegel H. Inability of diapausing Culex pipiens (Diptera: Culicidae) to use blood for producing lipid reserves for overwitrer survival. J Med Entomol. 1989;26:318-26. Sim C, Denlinger DL. Insulin signaling and the regulation of insect diapause. Front Physiol. 2013;4:189. Robich RM, Denlinger DL. Diapause in the mosquito Culex pipiens evokes a metabolic switch from blood feeding to sugar gluttony. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:15912-7. Fotakis EA, Chaskopoulou A, Grigoraki L, Tsiamantas A, Kounadi S, Georgiou L, et al. Analysis of population structure and insecticide resistance in mosquitoes of the genus Culex , Anopheles and Aedes from different environments of Greece with a history of mosquito borne disease transmission. Acta Trop. 2017;174:29-37. Fonseca DM, Keyghobadl N, Malcolm CA, Mehmet C, Schaffner F, Mogi M, et al. Emerging vectors in the Culex pipiens Science. 2004;303:1535-38. Flores HA, O'Neill SL. Controlling vector-borne diseases by releasing modified mosquitoes. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2018;16:508-18. Becker N, Petric D, Zgomba M, Boase C, Madon MB, Dahl C, Kaiser A. Mosquitoes and their control. 2nd ed. Heidelberg: Spriger-Verlag; 2010. Bellini R, Zeller H, Van Bortel W. A review of the vector management methods to prevent and control outbreaks of West Nile virus infection and the challenge for Europe. Parasit Vectors. 2014;7:323. Merzendorfer H. Chitin synthesis inhibitors: old molecules and new developments. Insect Sci. 2013;20:121-38. Silva JJ, Menders J. Susceptibility of Aedes aegypti (L) to the insect growth regulators diflubenzuron and methoprene in Uberlandia, State of Minas Gerais. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2007;40:612-16. Lacey LA. Bacillus thuringiensis serovariety israelensis and Bacillus sphaericus for mosquito control. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2007;23:133-63. Ben-Dov E. Bacillus thuringiensis subsp . israelensis and Its Dipteran-Specific Toxins. Toxins. 2014;6:1222-43. Cantón PE, Zanicthe Reyes EZ, Ruiz de Escudero I, Bravo A, Soberón M. Binding of Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis Cry4Ba to Cyt1Aa has an important role in synergism. Peptides. 2011;32:595-600. Pérez C, Fernandez LE, Sun J, Folch JL, Gill SS, Soberón M, et al. Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis Cyt1Aa synergizes Cry11Aa toxin by functioning as a membrane-bound receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:18303-8. Vachon V, Laprade R, Schwartz JL. Current models of the mode of action of Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidal crystal proteins: A critical review. J Invertebr Pathol. 2012;111:1-12. Valtierra de Luis D, Villanueva M, Lai L, Williams T, Caballero P. Potential of Cry10Aa and Cyt2Ba, Two Minority delta-endotoxins Produced by Bacillus thuringiens israelensis , for the Control of Aedes aegypti Larvae. Toxins. 2020;12:355. Wirth MC, Park HW, Walton WE, Federici BA. Cyt1A of Bacillus thuringiensis delays evolution of resistance to Cry11A in the mosquito Culex quinquefasciatus . Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005;71:185-9. Grigoraki L, Puggioli A, Mavridis K, Douris V, Montanari M, Bellini R, et al. Striking diflubenzuron resistance in Culex pipiens, the prime vector of West Nile virus. Sci Rep. 2017;7:11699. Porretta D, Fotakis EA, Mastrantonio V, Chaskopoulpou A, Michaelakis A, Kioulos I, et al. Focal distribution of diflubenzuron resistance mutations in Culex pipiens mosquitoes from Northern Italy. Acta Trop. 2019;193:106-12. Fotakis EA, Mastrantonio V, Grigoraki L, Porretta D, Puggioli A, Chaskopoulou A, et al. Identification and detection of a novel point mutation in the Chitin Synthase gene of Culex pipiens associated with diflubenzuron resistance. PLos Negl Trop Dis. 2020;14:e0008284 Guz N, Cagatay NS, Fotakis EA, Durmusoglu E, Vontas J. (2020). Detection of diflubenzuron and pyrethroid resistance mutations in Culex pipiens from Mugla, Turkey. Acta Trop. 2020;203:105294. Paul A, Harrington L, Zhang L, Scott J. Insecticide resistance in Culex pipiens from New York. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2005;21:305-9. Ferreira LM, Silva-Filha MHLN. Bacterial larvicides for vector control: mode of action of toxins and implications for resistance. Biocontrol Sci and Technol. 2013;23:1137-68. Liu NN. Insecticide resistance in mosquitoes: Impact, mechanisms, and research directions. Ann Rev Entomol. 2015;60:537-59. Kliot A, Ghanim M. Fitness costs associated with insecticide resistance. Pest Manag Sci. 2012;68:1431-7. Berticat C, Boquien G, Raymond M, Chevillon C. Insecticide resistance genes induce a mating competition cost in Culex pipiens Genet Res. 2002;79:41-7. Berticat C, Duron O, Heyse D, Raymond M. Insecticide resistance genes confer a predation cost on mosquitoes, Culex pipiens. Genet Res. 2004;83:189-96. Bourguet D, Guillemaud T, Chevillon C, Raymond M. Fitness costs of insecticide resistance in natural breeding sites of the mosquito Culex pipiens. 2004;58:128-35. Gazave L, Chevillon C, Lenormand T, Marquine M, Raymond M. Dissecting the cost of insecticide resistance genes during the overwintering period of the mosquito Culex pipiens. 2001;87:441-8. Peppe P. Molecular identification of species of mosquitoes for the detection of vectors of the West Nile Virus. MSc thesis, University of Thessaly (Abstract in English); 2015 West Nile virus in Greece. Annual epidemiological report for 2019. In: National Public Health Organization. H.C.D.C.P 2019. https://eody.gov.gr/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/WNV_annual_report_2019_ENG.pdf Kioulos I, Kampouraki A, Morou E, Skavdis G, Vontas J. Insecticide resistance status in the major West Nile virus vector Culex pipiens from Greece. Pest Manag Sci. 2014;70:623-7. Dieme C, Yssouf A, Vega-Rúa A, Berenger J, Failloux A, Raoult D, et al. Accurate identification of Culicidae at aquatic developmental stages by MALDI-TOF MS profiling. Parasit Vectors. 2014;7:544. Guidelines for laboratory and field testing of mosquito larvicides. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2005. Finney DJ. Probit analysis. London: Cambridge University Press; 1971. Spielman A, Wong J. Environmental control of ovarian diapause in Culex pipiens. Ann Entomol Soc Am. 1973;66:905-7. Zhang HY, Yang CJ, Huang JY, Lü L. Susceptibility of field populations of Anopheles sinensis (Diptera: Culicidae) to Bacillus thuringiensis subsp Biocontrol Sci Technol . 2004;14:321-5. Boyer S, Tilquin M, Ravanel P. Differential sensitivity to Bacillus thuringiensis Israelensis and temephos in field mosquito populations of Ochlerotatus cataphylla (Diptera: Culicidae): Toward resistance? Environ Toxicol Chem. 2007;26:157-62. Boyer S, Paris M, Jego S, Lempérière G, Ravanel P. Influence of insecticide Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis treatments on resistance and enzyme activities in Aedes rusticus larvae (Diptera: Culicidae). Biol Control. 2012;62:75-81. Georghiou GP, Wirth MC. Influence of exposure to single versus multiple toxins of Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis on development of resistance in the mosquito Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae). Appl Environ Microbiol. 1997;63:1095-101. Saleh MS, El-Meniawi FA, Kelada NL, Zahran HM. Resistance development in mosquito larvae Culex pipiens to the bacterial agent Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis. J Appl Entomol. 2003;127:29-32. Carvalho KDS, Crespo MM, Araújo AP, da Silva RS, de Melo-Santos MAV, de Oliveira CMF, et al. Long-term exposure of Aedes aegypti to Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis did not involve altered susceptibility to this microbial larvicide or to other control agents. Parasit Vectors. 2018;11:673. Paris M, David JP, Despres L. Fitness costs of resistance to Bti toxins in the dengue vector Aedes aegypti. 2011;20:1184-94. Becker N. Microbial control of mosquitoes: Management of the upper rhine mosquito population as a model programme. Parasitol Today. 1997;13:485-7. Mittal PK, Adak T, Subbarao SK. Laboratory selection to investigate the development of resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis var . israelensis H-14 in Culex quinquefasciatus Say (Diptera: Culicidae). Natl Acad Sci Lett. 2005;28:281-3. Becker N, Ludwig M, Su TY. Lack of resistance in Aedes vexans field populations after 36 years of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp . Israelensis applications in the uper Rhine valley, Germany. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2018;34:154-7. Cadavid-Restrepo G, Sahaza J, Orduz S. Treatment of an Aedes aegypti colony with the Cry11Aa toxin for 54 generations results in the development of resistance. Memo Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2012;107:74-9. Stalinski R, Tetreau G, Gaude T, Despres L. Pre-selecting resistance against individual Bti Cry toxins facilitates the development of resistance to the Bti toxins cocktail. J Invertebr Pathol. 2014;119:50-3. Spanoudis CG, Andreadis SS, Tsaknis NK, Petrou AP, Gkeka CD, Savopoulou–Soultani M. Effect of temperature on biological parameters of the West Nile virus vector Culex pipiens form 'molestus' (Diptera: Culicidae) in Greece: Constant vs fluctuating temperatures. J Med Entomol. 2019;56:641-50. Tetreau G, Grizard S, Patil CD, Tran FH, Van VT, Stalinski R, et al. Bacterial microbiota of Aedes aegypti mosquito larvae is altered by intoxication with Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis . Parasit Vectors. 2018;11:121. Takken W, Smallegange RC, Vigneau AJ, Johnston V, Brown M, Mordue-Luntz AJ, et al. Larval nutrition differentially affects adult fitness and Plasmodium development in the malaria vectors Anopheles gambiae and Anopheles stephensi. Parasit Vectors. 2013;6:345. Rivero A, Magaud A, Nicot A, Vezilier J. Energetic cost of insecticide resistance in Culex pipiens mosquitoes . J Med Entomol. 2011;48:694-700. Koenraadt CJM, Möhlmann TWR, Verhulst NO, Spitzen J, Vogels CBF. Effect of overwintering on survival and vector competence of the West Nile virus vector Culex pipiens. Parasit Vectors. 2019;12:147. Rinehart JP, Yocum GD, Leopold RA, Robich RM. Cold storage of Culex pipiens in the absence of diapause . J Med Entomol. 2010;47:1071-6. Faraji A, Gaugler R. Experimental host preference of diapause and non-diapause induced Culex pipiens pipiens (Diptera: Culicidae). Parasit Vectors. 2015;8:389. Belinato TA, Valle D. The impact of selection with diflubenzuron, a chitin synthesis inhibitor, on the fitness of two Brazilian Aedes aegypti field populations . PLos One. 2015;10:e0130719. Papadopoulos NT, Carey JR, Ioannou CS, Ji H, Müller HG, Wang JL, et al., Seasonality of post-capture longevity in a medically-important mosquito ( Culex pipiens ). Front Ecol Evol. 2016;4:63. Supplementary Files GraphicalAbstract.png GraphicalAbstract.png Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-121993","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":5878735,"identity":"e033b7f3-dd99-4bae-b9ca-4e8d441b2feb","order_by":0,"name":"Charalampos S Ioannou","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Thessaly School of Agricultural Sciences: Panepistemio Thessalias Schole Geoponikon Epistemon","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Charalampos","middleName":"S","lastName":"Ioannou","suffix":""},{"id":5878736,"identity":"ce1de22c-c3da-4ae5-8cc1-545b9626e2cc","order_by":1,"name":"Christos Hadjichristodoulou","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Thessaly Department of Medicine: Panepistemio Thessalias Tmema Iatrikes","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Christos","middleName":"","lastName":"Hadjichristodoulou","suffix":""},{"id":5878737,"identity":"527376cc-23dc-48fc-8245-9099c5792f75","order_by":2,"name":"Maria A Kyritsi","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Thessaly Department of Medicine: Panepistemio Thessalias Tmema Iatrikes","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Maria","middleName":"A","lastName":"Kyritsi","suffix":""},{"id":5878738,"identity":"8fb88e8c-033a-4c94-b34c-011c03b81cd2","order_by":3,"name":"Nikos T Papadopoulos","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Thessaly School of Agricultural Sciences","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Nikos","middleName":"T","lastName":"Papadopoulos","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2020-12-04 16:55:44","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-121993/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-121993/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":4104227,"identity":"5a3890c1-5392-45e2-bec9-5b54181eea67","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2020-12-08 17:39:35","extension":"jpeg","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":437026,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Ambient conditions inside the warehouse where winter and post-winter survival experiments of both Culex pipiens forms took place. White arrows indicate the initiation of larvae pupation and adult emergence of Culex pipiens f. molestus respectively. Black arrows indicate the initiation and termination of the overwintering period of Culex pipiens f. pipiens. ","description":"","filename":"floatimage1.jpeg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-121993/v1/74a9b25c348231d4d4be4f78.jpeg"},{"id":4104209,"identity":"ffe98a2a-8371-4057-b31f-c207758c0be0","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2020-12-08 17:39:29","extension":"jpeg","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":437026,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Ambient conditions inside the warehouse where winter and post-winter survival experiments of both Culex pipiens forms took place. White arrows indicate the initiation of larvae pupation and adult emergence of Culex pipiens f. molestus respectively. Black arrows indicate the initiation and termination of the overwintering period of Culex pipiens f. pipiens. ","description":"","filename":"floatimage1.jpeg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-121993/v1/eabab9e523675e17f49baa36.jpeg"},{"id":4104228,"identity":"6e36879d-9e2f-47b6-b8b9-789778a33f68","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2020-12-08 17:39:35","extension":"jpeg","order_by":2,"title":"Figure 2","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":41000,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Larva to pupa winter survival rates of Culex pipiens f. molestus populations that either were selected against diflubenzuron (DFB) and Bti for three successive generations or not (control). For each population five replicates were considered involving 200 1st instar larvae each. Different letters indicate significant differences (Tukey’s HSD test, P \u003c 0.05). ","description":"","filename":"floatimage2.jpeg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-121993/v1/3ea9672664867c9dde5efb13.jpeg"},{"id":4104210,"identity":"2580ea5d-6823-4ed9-b994-7ca5a4e75b14","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2020-12-08 17:39:29","extension":"jpeg","order_by":2,"title":"Figure 2","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":41000,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Larva to pupa winter survival rates of Culex pipiens f. molestus populations that either were selected against diflubenzuron (DFB) and Bti for three successive generations or not (control). For each population five replicates were considered involving 200 1st instar larvae each. Different letters indicate significant differences (Tukey’s HSD test, P \u003c 0.05). ","description":"","filename":"floatimage2.jpeg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-121993/v1/3212767921bed0d961b6a4d3.jpeg"},{"id":4104229,"identity":"6d57a8b4-1e0f-41d8-84ae-2426a26080c2","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2020-12-08 17:39:35","extension":"jpeg","order_by":3,"title":"Figure 3","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":58031,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Larva to pupa winter developmental duration of Culex pipiens f. molestus populations that either were selected against diflubenzuron (DFB) and Bti for three successive generations or not (control). Number in each parenthesis indicates the individuals that were considered in each case. Different letters indicate significant differences (pairwise comparisons log-rank test, P \u003c 0.05).","description":"","filename":"floatimage3.jpeg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-121993/v1/d530b796ce5ad591c4ef3194.jpeg"},{"id":4104211,"identity":"cb33c3dc-799d-4d40-97a5-3033079dc046","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2020-12-08 17:39:29","extension":"jpeg","order_by":3,"title":"Figure 3","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":58031,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Larva to pupa winter developmental duration of Culex pipiens f. molestus populations that either were selected against diflubenzuron (DFB) and Bti for three successive generations or not (control). Number in each parenthesis indicates the individuals that were considered in each case. Different letters indicate significant differences (pairwise comparisons log-rank test, P \u003c 0.05).","description":"","filename":"floatimage3.jpeg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-121993/v1/ab1e1ad9f1c709eb89908dfd.jpeg"},{"id":4104230,"identity":"938b13c5-934d-42b5-8159-7a6d4622d07f","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2020-12-08 17:39:36","extension":"jpeg","order_by":4,"title":"Figure 4","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":520976,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Male and female larva to pupa winter developmental duration of Culex pipiens f. molestus populations that either were selected against diflubenzuron (DFB) and Bti for three successive generations or not (control). Number in each parenthesis indicates the individuals that were considered in each case. Within sex, different letters indicate significant differences (pairwise comparisons log-rank test, P \u003c 0.05)","description":"","filename":"floatimage4.jpeg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-121993/v1/152aaa2a8181435e5c85ce03.jpeg"},{"id":4104212,"identity":"e2e475be-610f-4aee-9fd3-f80585a9a835","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2020-12-08 17:39:29","extension":"jpeg","order_by":4,"title":"Figure 4","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":520976,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Male and female larva to pupa winter developmental duration of Culex pipiens f. molestus populations that either were selected against diflubenzuron (DFB) and Bti for three successive generations or not (control). Number in each parenthesis indicates the individuals that were considered in each case. Within sex, different letters indicate significant differences (pairwise comparisons log-rank test, P \u003c 0.05)","description":"","filename":"floatimage4.jpeg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-121993/v1/c7e89c28d5735b3357d3bb74.jpeg"},{"id":4104231,"identity":"5dae817d-0734-440e-9885-e674d014a068","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2020-12-08 17:39:36","extension":"jpeg","order_by":5,"title":"Figure 5","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":483460,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Male and female pupa to adult winter developmental duration of Culex pipiens f. molestus populations that either were selected against diflubenzuron (DFB) and Bti for three successive generations or not (control). Number in each parenthesis indicates the individuals that were considered in each case.","description":"","filename":"floatimage5.jpeg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-121993/v1/ed9f429bc5dad764e009145f.jpeg"},{"id":4104213,"identity":"d5efe45b-6bb2-42b5-9e56-c53a5c40a0e2","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2020-12-08 17:39:30","extension":"jpeg","order_by":5,"title":"Figure 5","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":483460,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Male and female pupa to adult winter developmental duration of Culex pipiens f. molestus populations that either were selected against diflubenzuron (DFB) and Bti for three successive generations or not (control). Number in each parenthesis indicates the individuals that were considered in each case.","description":"","filename":"floatimage5.jpeg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-121993/v1/198e1a617c7a9ca7b0104620.jpeg"},{"id":4104232,"identity":"31913708-1d0c-40b1-b4ff-9697d15d3330","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2020-12-08 17:39:36","extension":"jpeg","order_by":6,"title":"Figure 6","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":56006,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Male (a) and female (b) age-specific survival of Culex pipiens f. molestus populations that either were selected against diflubenzuron (DFB) and Bti for three successive generations or not (control). Adults were maintained in pairs (male and female) at the same place (warehouse) were they developed as larvae during winter having access to 5% sugar solution. For the control, DFB and Bti selected populations 49, 30 and 47 pairs were considered. ","description":"","filename":"floatimage6.jpeg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-121993/v1/a5655bb4fa8a34f6ca453b48.jpeg"},{"id":4104214,"identity":"eb5f6aa2-f9f6-4240-9856-ceb0d7c246b6","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2020-12-08 17:39:30","extension":"jpeg","order_by":6,"title":"Figure 6","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":56006,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Male (a) and female (b) age-specific survival of Culex pipiens f. molestus populations that either were selected against diflubenzuron (DFB) and Bti for three successive generations or not (control). Adults were maintained in pairs (male and female) at the same place (warehouse) were they developed as larvae during winter having access to 5% sugar solution. For the control, DFB and Bti selected populations 49, 30 and 47 pairs were considered. ","description":"","filename":"floatimage6.jpeg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-121993/v1/4ee12f48021f73d8cc8e613d.jpeg"},{"id":4104233,"identity":"783f14fd-8592-4713-a957-4b49e8a1e8ac","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2020-12-08 17:39:36","extension":"jpeg","order_by":7,"title":"Figure 7","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":69019,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Winter survival rates of diapausing females of Culex pipiens f. pipiens populations that either were selected against diflubenzuron (DFB) and Bti for three successive generations or not (control). For each population five replicates were considered involving 40 females each.","description":"","filename":"floatimage7.jpeg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-121993/v1/0a8707fbd471535d45736bfb.jpeg"},{"id":4104215,"identity":"77ec792d-fcd0-4e4e-954e-73dfdcb573f0","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2020-12-08 17:39:30","extension":"jpeg","order_by":7,"title":"Figure 7","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":69019,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Winter survival rates of diapausing females of Culex pipiens f. pipiens populations that either were selected against diflubenzuron (DFB) and Bti for three successive generations or not (control). For each population five replicates were considered involving 40 females each.","description":"","filename":"floatimage7.jpeg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-121993/v1/39852382d727d8cd938cc662.jpeg"},{"id":4104234,"identity":"cae6f42a-aa5d-4160-acac-09e70ba74145","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2020-12-08 17:39:36","extension":"jpeg","order_by":8,"title":"Figure 8","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":50422,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Post overwintering survival of Culex pipiens f. pipiens populations that either were selected against diflubenzuron (DFB) and Bti for three successive generations or not (control). Females were maintained at the same place (warehouse) were they overwintered having access to 10 % sugar solution. For the control, DFB and Bti selected populations 31, 32 and 25 females were considered.","description":"","filename":"floatimage8.jpeg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-121993/v1/5824b8f51f45493fe9504e46.jpeg"},{"id":4104216,"identity":"f9a2c6c9-1ef6-47a0-beaf-4a47f1976114","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2020-12-08 17:39:30","extension":"jpeg","order_by":8,"title":"Figure 8","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":50422,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Post overwintering survival of Culex pipiens f. pipiens populations that either were selected against diflubenzuron (DFB) and Bti for three successive generations or not (control). Females were maintained at the same place (warehouse) were they overwintered having access to 10 % sugar solution. For the control, DFB and Bti selected populations 31, 32 and 25 females were considered.","description":"","filename":"floatimage8.jpeg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-121993/v1/1467759127844a09c8ea46ae.jpeg"},{"id":13630619,"identity":"af641434-b79c-4cb6-acb9-ab041292c293","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2021-09-17 08:13:09","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":1449321,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-121993/v1/dd9e56ba-c60f-47b3-86a1-f33d799fa35b.pdf"},{"id":4104226,"identity":"c7a777ca-c50c-4019-9a86-4e240aca8415","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2020-12-08 17:39:35","extension":"png","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":1248351,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"GraphicalAbstract.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-121993/v1/3232016a88fd6fec70f6c19c.png"},{"id":4104208,"identity":"a4fec8bb-4e20-4462-a088-3217cc5dbcb7","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2020-12-08 17:39:29","extension":"png","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":1248351,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"GraphicalAbstract.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-121993/v1/8f8531b356640b5ae750e7e7.png"}],"financialInterests":"","formattedTitle":"\u003cp\u003eShort Term Selection to Diflubenzuron and Bacillus Thuringiensis Subsp. Israelensis Differentially Affects the Winter Survival of Culex Pipiens F. Pipiens and Culex Pipiens F. Molestus (Diptera: Culicidae)\u003c/p\u003e","fulltext":[{"header":"Background","content":" \u003cp\u003eThe common house mosquito, \u003cem\u003eCulex pipiens\u003c/em\u003e (L.) is a widespread insect pest of extremely high medical and veterinary importance as it is considered effective vector of several human and animal diseases, including filarial nematodes and arbovirus such as West Nile virus (WNV), Sindbis virus, Rift Valley fever and Japanese encephalitis virus [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e]. \u003cem\u003eCulex pipiens\u003c/em\u003e includes two distinct forms (usually referred as biotypes), \u003cem\u003epipiens\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003emolestus\u003c/em\u003e, which are morphologically identical but differ in several behavioral and physiological aspects [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e]. In particular, the \u003cem\u003emolestus\u003c/em\u003e form prefers to colonize underground breeding sites, while \u003cem\u003epipiens\u003c/em\u003e is commonly found in above ground habitats. Moreover, \u003cem\u003eCx. pipiens\u003c/em\u003e f. \u003cem\u003emolestus\u003c/em\u003e is stenogamous (copulation can occur in confined spaces), autogenus (ability to develop a first batch of eggs without a blood meal), and mammophilic (prefers to feed on mammals, including humans). On the other hand, \u003cem\u003eCx. pipiens\u003c/em\u003e f. \u003cem\u003epipiens\u003c/em\u003e is eurygamous (copulation occur outdoors in swarms), anautogenous (blood feeding is necessary for eggs development), and rather ornithophilic (prefers to feed on birds) [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e]. Another major difference between the two forms is lying on their winter biology at temperate regions. Contrary to the \u003cem\u003emolestus\u003c/em\u003e form which remain active and reproduce during winter, the \u003cem\u003epipiens\u003c/em\u003e form undergoes diapause as inseminated females with arrested ovariole development and elevated fat body reserves that serve as energy source [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR6\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e]. Short day length and relative low temperatures perceived in larval and pupal stage during autumn are responsible for triggering the physiological changes underling diapause induction [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e]. The two forms often co-occur and can hybridize, while the hybridization rates may reach up to 31.8% as has recently demonstrated [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e9\u003c/span\u003e]. Hybrids are considered to play a key role on WNV transmission, since they may exhibit a more opportunistic biting behavior and therefore act as effective bridge vectors between the avian/WNV reservoirs and humans [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e10\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAlthough nowadays several non-chemical methods for mosquito control are under development and evaluation such as the Sterile Insect Technique (SIT), the Release of Insects carrying a Dominant Lethal (RIDL) and the release of \u003cem\u003eWolbachia\u003c/em\u003e-infected mosquitoes [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e11\u003c/span\u003e], insecticide applications still remain the principal tool for tackling mosquitos\u0026rsquo; related problems. This is mostly because several medically important mosquito species, including \u003cem\u003eCx. pipiens\u003c/em\u003e f. \u003cem\u003epipiens\u003c/em\u003e, tend to colonize fixed, open breeding sites that can concentrate very large populations. In such situations, the use of insecticides can be very effective since both mapping and treating is feasible. However, this is not the case for the artificial container-breeding mosquitoes, such as \u003cem\u003eAedes aegypti\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eAe. albopictus\u003c/em\u003e which distribute individual eggs in several, ephemeral oviposition sites [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e12\u003c/span\u003e]. Among the insecticides that are employed, larvicides are considered as the most important means for the prevention of mosquito-borne diseases, as they target immature stages (larvae and pupae) and thus prevent females\u0026rsquo; emergence which are responsible for the pathogens transmission. Despite the high importance of this approach, under the current European Union biocide legislation and the prohibition of organophosphates (OPs) such as temephos, larval control relies almost exclusively on two main categories of biocides, the Insect Growth Regulators (IGRs) and the microbial ones [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR13\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e13\u003c/span\u003e]. Diflubenzuron (DFB) and \u003cem\u003eBacillus thuringiensis\u003c/em\u003e subsp. \u003cem\u003eisraelensis\u003c/em\u003e (\u003cem\u003eBti\u003c/em\u003e) are the most widely used larvicides in each category, as they combine some very desirable features such as the high efficacy against mosquito larvae and the very low toxicity to vertebrates. DFB is a member of the Benzoylurea insecticide family that inhibits the chitin biosynthesis process causing abnormal molting during the immature development preventing adult emergence [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e14\u003c/span\u003e], while contrary to other IGRs like methoprene it has a remarkable ability to control all mosquito larval instars [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e15\u003c/span\u003e]. Following its introduction in the early 1970s, DFB has been extensively used in agricultural, forestry and more recently in medical insect pest larvae [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e14\u003c/span\u003e]. On the other hand, over the last years the microbial larvicide \u003cem\u003eBti\u003c/em\u003e has increasingly used as an alternative to chemical insecticides as it displays high selective action against mosquito larvae and minimal impacts on the environment and non-target organisms including human [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e16\u003c/span\u003e]. During sporulation \u003cem\u003eBti\u003c/em\u003e produces a parasporal crystalline body composed of four major (Cry11Aa, Cry 4Ba, Cry 4Aa and Cyt1Aa) and at least two minor (Cry10Aa and Cyt2Ba) protoxins. Upon ingestion, the crystals are solubilized under the alkaline conditions in the larval midgut and the protoxins are proteolytically converted into active toxins [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e17\u003c/span\u003e]. The Cry toxins bind to specific midgut membrane receptors, while the Cyt toxins appear to act synergistically with the Cry toxins functioning as surrogate receptors that improve their capacity to bind on the available target sites (receptors) [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e18\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR19\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e19\u003c/span\u003e]. After the toxins binding on the midgut receptors, they insert in the plasma membrane forming lytic pores that disturb the cell\u0026rsquo;s osmotic balance, resulting in cell lysis and consequently death of the larvae [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR20\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e20\u003c/span\u003e]. The synergistic interactions between the Cyt and the Cry toxins have attracted particular attention due to the drastic enhancement of their larvicidal activity against mosquitoes [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR21\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e21\u003c/span\u003e]. Moreover, the synergism between the Cyt1Aa and the Cry toxins is considered the key factor for the low potential of resistance development following extensive selection with \u003cem\u003eBti\u003c/em\u003e [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e17\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR22\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e22\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe high dependency on both DFB and \u003cem\u003eBti\u003c/em\u003e for the suppression of mosquito populations, including \u003cem\u003eCx. pipiens\u003c/em\u003e, pose major concerns for resistance development which may jeopardize the control efforts and increase the risk of diseases transmission such as the WNV. Indeed, striking DFB resistance levels associated with specific mutations have been already detected in \u003cem\u003eCx. pipiens\u003c/em\u003e natural populations from Italy and Turkey in areas with intense use of this insecticide [\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR24 CR25\" citationid=\"CR23\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e23\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR26\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e26\u003c/span\u003e]. On the other hand, there is only a single record of high (33-fold) \u003cem\u003eBti\u003c/em\u003e resistance levels in \u003cem\u003eCx. pipiens\u003c/em\u003e wild populations with a background of previous exposure to support for potential resistance development [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR27\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e27\u003c/span\u003e]. Interestingly, evaluation of field populations of \u003cem\u003eCx. pipiens\u003c/em\u003e without history of \u003cem\u003eBti\u003c/em\u003e exposure has shown variations of resistance ratios ranging from less than 3- to 10-fold [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR28\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e28\u003c/span\u003e]. Therefore, this inherent variability in \u003cem\u003eCx. pipiens\u003c/em\u003e populations\u0026rsquo; susceptibility to \u003cem\u003eBti\u003c/em\u003e may be of high importance since it is possible to affect their response to selection pressure. Despite the prominence of the above findings regarding both DFB and \u003cem\u003eBti\u003c/em\u003e resistance \u003cem\u003ein Cx. pipiens\u003c/em\u003e populations, no efforts have been made to separate potential differences between the form \u003cem\u003epipiens\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003emolestus\u003c/em\u003e given their divergent biology.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eInsecticide resistance emergence and evolution in the wild is a dynamic process that depends among others, on the genetic background and the biology of mosquito species, the intensity of biocides selection pressure and the resistance mechanisms that are involved [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR29\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e29\u003c/span\u003e]. However, resistance development is often associated with significant reductions in fitness parameters of the resistant individuals as a result of increased metabolic costs of physiological/biochemical resistance mechanisms. The reason underlying this phenomenon is because there is a trade-off of energetic resources from primary biological functions associated with fitness to secondary ones that contribute to the function of resistance mechanisms [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR30\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e30\u003c/span\u003e]. In \u003cem\u003eCx. pipiens\u003c/em\u003e resistance development against organophosphates (OPs) has been associated with male mating competition cost [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR31\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e31\u003c/span\u003e], predation avoidance cost [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR32\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e32\u003c/span\u003e] and decreases in preimaginal survival [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR33\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e33\u003c/span\u003e]. Moreover, adverse abiotic conditions can also affect the impact of insecticide resistance on key life history traits. Winter in temperate areas represents a very challenging and stressful period for the survival of many insects including mosquitoes and therefore potential fitness costs associated with insecticide resistance may reduce their overwintering success. Indeed, the frequency of two genetic loci in \u003cem\u003eCx. pipiens\u003c/em\u003e f. \u003cem\u003epipiens\u003c/em\u003e females associated with OPs resistance decreased over winter, indicating reduced survival for resistant individuals [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR34\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e34\u003c/span\u003e]. This is of great importance since it can determine the persistence of resistant mosquitoes from year to year affecting both the evolution and stability of acquired resistance in the wild. However, it remains completely unknown if a similar phenomenon holds in the case of DFB and \u003cem\u003eBti\u003c/em\u003e given their different mode of action relative to OPs.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eConsidering the importance of \u003cem\u003eCx. pipiens\u003c/em\u003e as an effective vector of several diseases, the fundamental differences in biology between its two forms and the high dependency on DFB and \u003cem\u003eBti\u003c/em\u003e to tactile its populations, the aim of the present study was to explore how short term exposure of \u003cem\u003epipiens\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003emolestus\u003c/em\u003e forms to both larvicides affect their susceptibility and most importantly their overwintering success. For this purpose, we established colonies of both \u003cem\u003eCx. pipiens\u003c/em\u003e f. \u003cem\u003epipiens\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eCx.pipiens\u003c/em\u003e f. \u003cem\u003emolestus\u003c/em\u003e originated from the same area and subjected them to the same selective pressure (80% population mortality) for three successive generations with DFB and \u003cem\u003eBti.\u003c/em\u003e The susceptibility levels and the overwintering survival of the selected populations relative to controls (colonies that received no selection) were determined.\u003c/p\u003e "},{"header":"Methods","content":" \u003cdiv id=\"Sec3\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eMosquito colonies and rearing methods\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eAll mosquito colonies were established during early September to late October of 2017 from eggs that were collected at the vicinity of Volos and Larissa city, Thessaly province, Greece. Earlier surveys in the study area revealed \u003cem\u003eCx. pipiens\u003c/em\u003e as the most abundant mosquito species, followed by \u003cem\u003eAedes caspius\u003c/em\u003e [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR35\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e35\u003c/span\u003e]. Since 2010 WNV outbreak in Greece, there is a regular presence of human cases in the area, with a peak of 24 incidents in Larissa in 2019 [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR36\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e36\u003c/span\u003e]. Mosquito control is performed routinely since 2010 by private enterprises and involves mainly the use of DFB in urban and suburban breeding sites, while \u003cem\u003eBti\u003c/em\u003e is applied in protected wetlands such as rivers, streams and lakes [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR25\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e25\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR37\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e37\u003c/span\u003e]. In total 74 and 59 egg rafts were recovered for \u003cem\u003eCx. pipiens\u003c/em\u003e form \u003cem\u003epipiens\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003emolestus\u003c/em\u003e respectively. Separation of \u003cem\u003eCx. pipiens\u003c/em\u003e forms was confirmed by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) protein profiling [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR38\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e38\u003c/span\u003e]. Colonization took place within the insectary facilities of the laboratory of Entomology and Agricultural Zoology at the University of Thessaly. The insectary walk-in chamber was maintained at 25\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1\u0026nbsp;\u0026deg;C, 65\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;5% relative humidity and a photoperiod of L14 : D10 with a simulated dusk and dawn for 45\u0026nbsp;min. Photophase initiation was set at 00:00 hr and termination at 14:00 hr. Larvae were reared in 42\u0026thinsp;\u0026times;\u0026thinsp;30\u0026thinsp;\u0026times;\u0026thinsp;10\u0026nbsp;cm white plastic containers in 3\u0026nbsp;l of bottled table water (Table Water, Epirotic Bottling Industry S.A. Ioannina, Greece) fed a total amount of 2\u0026nbsp;g of ground cat food (Friskies Adult, Purina, Italy) and held at a density of approximately 1000 individuals per container. Adults were kept in 32\u0026thinsp;\u0026times;\u0026thinsp;32\u0026thinsp;\u0026times;\u0026thinsp;32\u0026nbsp;cm screened cages at a density of 400\u0026ndash;500 individuals and fed with 10% sugar solution that was renewed every week. Females of \u003cem\u003eCx. pipiens\u003c/em\u003e f. \u003cem\u003epipiens\u003c/em\u003e were fed on certified human blood derived from samples that were provided by a blood analysis laboratory. Blood temperature was set at 38\u0026nbsp;\u0026deg;C using two custom made, cylindrical (7.5\u0026nbsp;cm in diameter and 10\u0026nbsp;cm in height) feeding apparatus operated with circulated water from a warm bath via 12V DC mini water pumps. The apparatus were placed on the top of the holding cages for 1\u0026nbsp;h, and females had accesses to feed via a stretched Parafilm M (Bemis, USA) membrane. Depending on the experimental needs, colonies received two to three blood meals per month. In general, colonies of \u003cem\u003eCx. pipiens\u003c/em\u003e f. \u003cem\u003emolestus\u003c/em\u003e were kept without access to blood. Only in a few cases they were provided with a blood meal after the deposition of their first autogenus egg raft in order to reinforce colonies population during the selection process (see below). Both mosquito populations were reared for 3 generations in order to establish a uniform genetic background before the initiation of the experiments.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec4\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eLarval bioassays\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eStandard World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR39\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e39\u003c/span\u003e] were adopted to evaluate the susceptibility of each collected population against DFB and \u003cem\u003eBti\u003c/em\u003e. Larval susceptibility was evaluated against analytical standard DFB (Purity\u0026thinsp;\u0026ge;\u0026thinsp;99.8%, Pestanal\u0026reg;, Sigma-Aldrich, Germany) and formulated \u003cem\u003eBti\u003c/em\u003e (Vectobac\u0026reg; 12AS, 11.61% w/w \u003cem\u003eBti\u003c/em\u003e serotype H-14, strain AM65-52, 1200 ITU/mg, Valent BioSciences Corporation, USA). Stock solutions were prepared in 99.5% acetone for DFB and distilled water for \u003cem\u003eBti\u003c/em\u003e and stored at -22\u0026nbsp;\u0026deg;C until use for up to two weeks. For DFB, six concentrations ranging from 0.001 to 0.01\u0026nbsp;mg/l and for \u003cem\u003eBti\u003c/em\u003e five doses ranging from 0.02 to 0.04\u0026nbsp;mg/l were used yielding larval control between 10 and 95%. Six replicates were performed per concentration and an equal number of controls, each involving twenty five 3rd and early 4th instar larvae for DFB and \u003cem\u003eBti\u003c/em\u003e, respectively. Bioassays were run three times on different days using new batches of larvae and larvicide solutions. Larval mortality for \u003cem\u003eBti\u003c/em\u003e and adult emergence inhibition for DFB were recorded according to WHO recommended exposure times [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR39\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e39\u003c/span\u003e]. For each mosquito population, dose mortality responses were used to calculate IE\u003csub\u003e50\u003c/sub\u003e, IE\u003csub\u003e80\u003c/sub\u003e and IE\u003csub\u003e90\u003c/sub\u003e values (IE: Adult emergence inhibition) for DFB and LC\u003csub\u003e50\u003c/sub\u003e, LC\u003csub\u003e80\u003c/sub\u003e and LC\u003csub\u003e90\u003c/sub\u003e values (LC: Lethal concentration) for \u003cem\u003eBti\u003c/em\u003e using Probit Analysis [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR40\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e40\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec5\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eLarval selection\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eLarvae from each population were exposed for three successive generations to fixed concentrations of DFB and \u003cem\u003eBti\u003c/em\u003e corresponding to IE\u003csub\u003e80\u003c/sub\u003e and LC\u003csub\u003e80\u003c/sub\u003e, respectively. During the selection process, six to eight groups of \u0026asymp;\u0026thinsp;1.000 larvae were placed into rearing containers (see above) provided with 3\u0026nbsp;l of table water and the fixed dose of each larvicide. Selection against DFB involved 3rd instar larvae, while 1.2\u0026nbsp;g of cat food was added in the containers to allow development (pupation). Selection against \u003cem\u003eBti\u003c/em\u003e involved the exposure of early 4th instar larvae to fixed doses for 24\u0026nbsp;h without any accesses to food. Surviving larvae were placed at a maximum density of \u0026asymp;\u0026thinsp;1.000 individuals into rearing containers with 3L of clean table water and offered 1\u0026nbsp;g of food to complete development. Resulting pupae from both DFB \u0026amp; \u003cem\u003eBti\u003c/em\u003e selection process, were transferred daily into cages and reared following the standard procedures described above. Additionally, for each population, two larvae groups (\u0026asymp;\u0026thinsp;1.000 individuals each) were maintained under identical conditions but in the absence of DFB \u0026amp; \u003cem\u003eBti\u003c/em\u003e exposure serving as controls. There was at no point exchange of individuals among treatments and controls during the above mentioned procedures. After the completion of the final (third) selection process, new dose-response bioassays were performed for each population to establish the new susceptibility levels against both DFB \u0026amp; \u003cem\u003eBti\u003c/em\u003e. A range of five concentrations was tested for each larvicide (DFB: 0.002\u0026ndash;0.015\u0026nbsp;mg/l; \u003cem\u003eBti\u003c/em\u003e: 0.03\u0026ndash;0.08\u0026nbsp;mg/l) using the same procedures described previously. Moreover, the winter survival of the descendants of both selected and control populations was evaluated.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec6\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eWinter survival\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eSince \u003cem\u003eCx. pipiens\u003c/em\u003e f. \u003cem\u003emolestus\u003c/em\u003e remains active and reproduce during the winter period, both immature and adult survival were assessed. For this purpose, 1.000 first instar larvae 3\u0026ndash;5 hours after their eclosion from both selected populations and the control were equally apportioned into five white, plastic, containers (30\u0026thinsp;\u0026times;\u0026thinsp;20\u0026thinsp;\u0026times;\u0026thinsp;10\u0026nbsp;cm) (200 larvae/container) with 1.5\u0026nbsp;l of table water and 2\u0026nbsp;mg of cat food per larvae. Then, all containers were randomly placed side by side in a humid, unheated warehouse located at the outdoor facilities of the laboratory that simulated the winter breading sites of the species. Natural daylight was provided through a 70\u0026thinsp;\u0026times;\u0026thinsp;70\u0026nbsp;cm window in the east side of the warehouse. To prevent water evaporation, each container was shield with a well fitted lid bearing a 2.5\u0026nbsp;cm hole at the centre covered with mesh. Larval exposure took place on December 23, 2018. Containers were inspected every five days until the appearance of the first 4th instar larvae and since then daily. The initiation of larvae pupation took place on February 5 and completed on March 3. Resulting pupae from each population were transferred into transparent, plastic bowls filed with 200\u0026nbsp;ml of table water kept at the same conditions. A maximum number of 15 pupae was placed in each bowl, while a lid prevented emerging adults from escaping. First adult emergence was observed on February 17 and the last on March 5. Upon adult appearance, pairs consisting of a male and a female from each population were placed into individual cages. Each cage comprised a 0.4\u0026nbsp;l capacity transparent plastic cup (height 12.5\u0026nbsp;cm high, upper diameter 6.5\u0026nbsp;cm, base diameter 9.2\u0026nbsp;cm) fitted into a 9.2\u0026nbsp;cm in diameter plastic Petri dish lid. On the side of each cup, an opening of 25\u0026nbsp;cm\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e covered with nylon mesh was formed for ventilation. Each individual cage was placed upon a 9\u0026nbsp;cm in diameter Petri dish provided with 5% sugar solution while adults had access to feed via a small piece of wick made of sponge cloth (Wettex\u0026reg; classic, Freudenberg, Sweden). Depending on the adult emergence rates, 30, 47 and 50 replications (pairs) were established for DFB and \u003cem\u003eBti\u003c/em\u003e selected and the control population respectively. Adults were kept at the same place where larval development took place (warehouse). Their survival was monitored daily from February 18 until the death of the last individual on June 27, while the sugar solution in the individual cages was renewed every week. Prevailing temperature and RH conditions inside the warehouse during the experiments were recorded by an indoor data logger (HOBO UX100-011, ONSET, USA) set to receive 4 recordings per 24\u0026nbsp;h. For each selected population and the control, both larval and pupal developmental duration and survival were assessed as well as adult longevity.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eDiapausing females of \u003cem\u003eCx. pipiens\u003c/em\u003e f. \u003cem\u003epipiens\u003c/em\u003e from both selected populations and the control were reared from 1st instar larvae, using the standard procedures described above, in an environmental chamber set at 20\u0026nbsp;\u0026deg;C, 8L:16D, and 70% RH [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR6\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e]. Adults were provided constant access to 10% sugar solution 10\u0026ndash;14 days post eclosion to allow female copulation and lipid accumulation reserves. To confirm diapause induction, 10 randomly selected females from each population were dissected and the primary follicle/germarium length ratio was used as criterion of ovarian diapause [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR41\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e41\u003c/span\u003e]. After the lipid accumulation period, two hundred females from each population were equally apportioned into five 20\u0026thinsp;\u0026times;\u0026thinsp;20\u0026thinsp;\u0026times;\u0026thinsp;20\u0026nbsp;cm screened cages (40 females/cage) having access only to water and transferred to the same warehouse described before to simulate winter conditions. Female exposure took place on January 15, 2019. Cages were inspected at two week intervals and female survival for each population was recorded. Dead mosquitos were removed with an aspirator through a 2\u0026nbsp;cm hole in the cages door shielded with a cork. Female winter survival was terminated at the end of March (26/3), following temperature rise, by providing the remaining individuals with 10% sugar solution without been removed from their winter shelter. Two weeks later, on April 8, survived females from each population (25\u0026ndash;32 individuals, see results) were merged in a 20\u0026thinsp;\u0026times;\u0026thinsp;20\u0026thinsp;\u0026times;\u0026thinsp;20\u0026nbsp;cm screened cage and were given the opportunity to receive a blood meal for an hour over three successive nights. All three cages (one per population) were transferred inside the walk-in chamber between 20:00 and 22:00 and females were allowed to feed through the apparatus described above. After each blood feeding trial, cages were transferred back to the warehouse. One week following the last blood meal, a white, plastic cylindrical (10\u0026nbsp;cm in diameter and 5\u0026nbsp;cm in height) bowl with 200\u0026nbsp;mL of table water and 0.05\u0026nbsp;g of cat food was placed in each cage to allow oviposition. Bowls remained inside cages for 7 days. During that period, cages were daily inspected and deposited egg rafts were collected and pictured under a binocular stereoscope (ZEISS, SteREO, Discovery.V12) equipped with a digital camera (ZEISS, AxioCam, ERc 5\u0026nbsp;s) to facilitate eggs counting. Then, each egg raft was transferred individually into a white bowl (same as those that described just above) covered with mesh to assess larval hatch rates under the warehouse conditions. The females of each population remained in the warehouse under ambient conditions and their survival was monitored every two days until the death of the last individual on July 28, while the sugar solution in each cage was renewed every week. Climatic data (temperature and RH) during the course of the above experiments were recorded as described previously. For post-overwintering females of each population we estimated a) the percentage of individuals that received a blood meal b) preoviposition period c) mean number of eggs per raft d) mean larval hatch rate per egg raft and e) lifespan under the ambient conditions inside the warehouse.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec7\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eData analysis\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe effect of mosquito population on larval and female (in each sampling date) winter survival rates of \u003cem\u003eCx. pipiens\u003c/em\u003e f. \u003cem\u003emolestus\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eCx. pipiens\u003c/em\u003e f. \u003cem\u003epipiens\u003c/em\u003e respectively were assessed using One-way analysis of variance, after appropriate transformations for normality and homoscedasticity when necessary, followed by Tukey\u0026rsquo;s HSD post hoc to separate means. The same analysis was also performed to assess the effect of mosquito population on the number of eggs per raft and the larval hatch rates per egg raft of the survived \u003cem\u003eCx. pipiens\u003c/em\u003e f. \u003cem\u003epipiens\u003c/em\u003e females. The proportions of pupae survived in each population of \u003cem\u003eCx. pipiens\u003c/em\u003e f. \u003cem\u003emolestus\u003c/em\u003e, their sex ratio as well as the proportions of female of \u003cem\u003eCx. pipiens\u003c/em\u003e f. \u003cem\u003epipiens\u003c/em\u003e that received a blood meal were analyzed using the Chi-square test. The effects of mosquito population and sex on larval and pupal developmental duration as well as on obtained adult lifespan of \u003cem\u003eCx. pipiens\u003c/em\u003e f. \u003cem\u003emolestus\u003c/em\u003e were assed using the Cox proportional hazards model. This model is commonly applied to assess the effects of one or more predictors on time to event incidents such as time to pupation, adult emergence/death ect. Pairwise comparisons were conducted using the log rank (Mantel\u0026ndash;Cox) test. The same analysis was also performed to assess the effect of mosquito population on both the preoviposition period and the lifespan of the survived \u003cem\u003eCx. pipiens\u003c/em\u003e f. \u003cem\u003epipiens\u003c/em\u003e females. Data analysis was performed using IBM SPSS 25 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e "},{"header":"Results","content":"\u003cp\u003eDose-response larval bioassays results are given in Tables\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e \u0026amp; 2 for DFB and \u003cem\u003eBti\u003c/em\u003e respectively. The EI\u003csub\u003e50\u003c/sub\u003e values for DFB were similar between the two forms of \u003cem\u003eCx. pipiens\u003c/em\u003e before the initiation of the selection trials, however the EI\u003csub\u003e90\u003c/sub\u003e value of \u003cem\u003eCx. pipiens\u003c/em\u003e f. \u003cem\u003epipiens\u003c/em\u003e was twice as much as that of \u003cem\u003emolestus\u003c/em\u003e suggesting a lower inherent susceptibility. The selection process for three successive generations by applying fixed DFB doses corresponded to the EI\u003csub\u003e80\u003c/sub\u003e for each population resulted in 3.7 and 3.1 resistance ratio values for EI\u003csub\u003e50\u003c/sub\u003e and EI\u003csub\u003e90\u003c/sub\u003e respectively for \u003cem\u003eCx. pipiens\u003c/em\u003e f. \u003cem\u003epipiens\u003c/em\u003e, and 1.7 and 2.9 for the \u003cem\u003eCx. pipiens\u003c/em\u003e f. \u003cem\u003emolestus\u003c/em\u003e (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e). The LC\u003csub\u003e50\u003c/sub\u003e and LC\u003csub\u003e90\u003c/sub\u003e values for \u003cem\u003eBti\u003c/em\u003e were almost identical between the two populations before selection. The selection processes against \u003cem\u003eBti\u003c/em\u003e had minor effects on the susceptibility levels of both \u003cem\u003eCx. pipiens\u003c/em\u003e forms (Table\u0026nbsp;2).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eTable 1 Effective doses of diflubenzuron against the two forms of \u003cem\u003eCulex pipiens\u003c/em\u003e after the selection process for three successive generations by applying fixed doses corresponding to EI\u003csub\u003e80\u003c/sub\u003e of the control populations.\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\n\u003ctable id=\"Taba\" border=\"1\"\u003e\n\u003cthead\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/th\u003e\n\u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePopulation\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/th\u003e\n\u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eN*\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/th\u003e\n\u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eEI\u003csub\u003e50\u003c/sub\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e(95% CL)\u003csup\u003ea\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/th\u003e\n\u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRR\u003csub\u003e50\u003c/sub\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/th\u003e\n\u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eEI\u003csub\u003e90\u003c/sub\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e(95% CL)\u003csup\u003ea\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/th\u003e\n\u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRR\u003csub\u003e90\u003c/sub\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/th\u003e\n\u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSlope\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/th\u003e\n\u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eX\u003c/em\u003e\u003csup\u003e\u003cem\u003e2\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e (df)\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/th\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003c/thead\u003e\n\u003ctbody\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd rowspan=\"2\" align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCx. pipiens\u003c/em\u003e f.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003epipiens\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eControl\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e3150\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e0.0025\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e(0.0014\u0026ndash;0.0035)\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e-\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e0.0081\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e(0.0065\u0026ndash;0.0097)\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e-\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2.47\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e177.57\u003csup\u003eb\u003c/sup\u003e ( 105)\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSelected\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2700\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e0.0093\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e(0.0076\u0026ndash;0.0106)\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e3.7\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e0.0252 (0.0218\u0026ndash;0.0321)\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e3.1\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2.96\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e70.98 (87)\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd rowspan=\"2\" align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCx. pipiens\u003c/em\u003e f.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003emolestus\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eControl\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e3150\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e0.0022\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e(0.0016\u0026ndash;0.0026)\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e-\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e0.0040\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e(0.0037\u0026ndash;0.0044)\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e-\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e4.49\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e201.99\u003csup\u003eb\u003c/sup\u003e (105)\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSelected\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2700\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e0.0037\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e(0.0028\u0026ndash;0.0046)\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1.7\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e0.0116 (0.0101\u0026ndash;0.0132)\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2.9\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2.60\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e57.94 (87)\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003c/tbody\u003e\n\u003ctfoot\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd colspan=\"9\"\u003e\u003csup\u003e*\u003c/sup\u003eNumber of larvae tested\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd colspan=\"9\"\u003e\u003csup\u003ea\u003c/sup\u003e EI values are expressed in milligrams per liter, and they are considered significantly different when 95% of confidence limits (CL) fail to overlap\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd colspan=\"9\"\u003e\u003csup\u003eb\u003c/sup\u003e Since goodness-of-fit test is significant (\u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05), a heterogeneity factor was used in the calculation of confidence limits (CL)\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003c/tfoot\u003e\n\u003c/table\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eTable\u0026nbsp;2. Effective doses of \u003cem\u003eBti\u003c/em\u003e against the two forms of \u003cem\u003eCulex pipiens\u003c/em\u003e after the selection process for three successive generations by applying fixed doses corresponding to LC\u003csub\u003e80\u003c/sub\u003e of the control populations\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\n\u003ctable id=\"Tab1\" border=\"1\"\u003e\n\u003cthead\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/th\u003e\n\u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePopulation\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/th\u003e\n\u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eN*\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/th\u003e\n\u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLC\u003csub\u003e50\u003c/sub\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e(95% CL)\u003csup\u003ea\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/th\u003e\n\u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRR\u003csub\u003e50\u003c/sub\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/th\u003e\n\u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLC\u003csub\u003e90\u003c/sub\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e(95% CL)\u003csup\u003ea\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/th\u003e\n\u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRR\u003csub\u003e90\u003c/sub\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/th\u003e\n\u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSlope\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/th\u003e\n\u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eX\u003c/em\u003e\u003csup\u003e\u003cem\u003e2\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e (df)\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/th\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003c/thead\u003e\n\u003ctbody\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd rowspan=\"2\" align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCx. pipiens\u003c/em\u003e f.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003epipiens\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eControl\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2700\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e0.031\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e(0.029\u0026ndash;0.033)\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e-\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e0.047\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e(0.044\u0026ndash;0.051)\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e-\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e7.52\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e120.73\u003csup\u003eb\u003c/sup\u003e (87)\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSelected\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2700\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e0.042\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e(0.035\u0026ndash;0.048)\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1.3\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e0.069\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e(0.065\u0026ndash;0.074)\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1.5\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e6.12\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e47.99 (87)\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd rowspan=\"2\" align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCx. pipiens\u003c/em\u003e f.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003emolestus\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eControl\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2700\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e0.032\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e(0.029\u0026ndash;0.034)\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e-\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e0.047\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e(0.044\u0026ndash;0.051)\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e-\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e7.62\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e126.68\u003csup\u003eb\u003c/sup\u003e (87)\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSelected\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2700\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e0.045\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e(0.034\u0026ndash;0.059)\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1.4\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e0.081\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e(0.065\u0026ndash;0.089)\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1.7\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e4.98\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e117.21\u003csup\u003eb\u003c/sup\u003e (87)\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003c/tbody\u003e\n\u003ctfoot\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd colspan=\"9\"\u003e\u003csup\u003e*\u003c/sup\u003eNumber of larvae tested\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd colspan=\"9\"\u003e\u003csup\u003ea\u003c/sup\u003e LC values are expressed in milligrams per liter, and they are considered significantly different when 95% of confidence limits (CL) fail to overlap\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd colspan=\"9\"\u003e\u003csup\u003eb\u003c/sup\u003e Since goodness-of-fit test is significant (\u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05), a heterogeneity factor was used in the calculation of confidence limits (CL)\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003c/tfoot\u003e\n\u003c/table\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAmbient temperature and relative humidity conditions inside the warehouse from the beginning of the exposure of 1st instar larvae of \u003cem\u003eCx. pipiens\u003c/em\u003e f. \u003cem\u003emolestus\u003c/em\u003e until the death of the last adult are depicted in Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e.Temperatures ranged between 3.9\u0026ndash;13.6\u0026nbsp;\u0026deg;C with a mean value of 10.2\u0026nbsp;\u0026deg;C from larvae exposure (on December 23) until the formation of the last pupae (on March 3). Corresponding values regarding the first adult emergence until the death of the last individual ranged between 7.7\u0026ndash;26.8\u0026nbsp;\u0026deg;C with a mean value of 17.4\u0026nbsp;\u0026deg;C. Population differentially affected larva-to-pupa winter survival rates of \u003cem\u003eCx. pipiens\u003c/em\u003e f. \u003cem\u003emolestus\u003c/em\u003e (\u003cem\u003eF\u003c/em\u003e\u003csub\u003e2, 12\u003c/sub\u003e= 25.26, \u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001). Selection to both DFB \u0026amp; \u003cem\u003eBti\u003c/em\u003e significantly reduced larva-to-pupa survival relative to control, while significant differences were also found between the two selected populations (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e). Cox regression analysis revealed mosquito population as a significant predictor (Wald test, \u003cem\u003eX\u003c/em\u003e\u003csup\u003e\u003cem\u003e2\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e\u003csub\u003e\u003cem\u003e2\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/sub\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;30.26, \u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001) of the larvae developmental duration considering the total number (viable and dead) of pupae formed. Larval developmental duration was significantly longer in both DFB \u0026amp; \u003cem\u003eBti\u003c/em\u003e selected populations relative to control, while significant differences were also observed between the two selected populations (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e). Cox regression analysis revealed mosquito population (Wald test, \u003cem\u003eX\u003c/em\u003e\u003csup\u003e\u003cem\u003e2\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e\u003csub\u003e\u003cem\u003e2\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/sub\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;7.87, \u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.020) and sex (Wald test, \u003cem\u003eX\u003c/em\u003e\u003csup\u003e\u003cem\u003e2\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e\u003csub\u003e\u003cem\u003e1\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/sub\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;11.49, \u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.001) as significant predictors of the larvae developmental duration considering the viable pupae yielded. Larval developmental duration of control male larvae was significantly shorter than the \u003cem\u003eBti\u003c/em\u003e selected population but not than the DFB (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e). On the other hand, no significant differences were observed between the control and the two selected populations as far as the female larvae developmental duration is regarded. Pupal survival rates were 50.7%, 45.0% and 44.4% for control, DBF and \u003cem\u003eBti\u003c/em\u003e selected population respectively and did not differ significantly among the three populations (Chi-square test, \u003cem\u003eX\u003c/em\u003e\u003csup\u003e\u003cem\u003e2\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e\u003csub\u003e\u003cem\u003e2\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/sub\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;2.10, \u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.349). Neither mosquito population (Wald test, \u003cem\u003eX\u003c/em\u003e\u003csup\u003e\u003cem\u003e2\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e\u003csub\u003e\u003cem\u003e2\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/sub\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;4.00, \u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.135) nor sex (Wald test, \u003cem\u003eX\u003c/em\u003e\u003csup\u003e\u003cem\u003e2\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e\u003csub\u003e\u003cem\u003e1\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/sub\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;1.20, \u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.272) were significant predictors of the pupae developmental duration of \u003cem\u003eCx. pipiens\u003c/em\u003e f. \u003cem\u003emolestus\u003c/em\u003e (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e). Sex ratio rates (females/males) were 52.3%, 58.3% and 44.3% for control, DBF and \u003cem\u003eBti\u003c/em\u003e selected population respectively, though no significant differences were observed (Chi-square test, \u003cem\u003eX\u003c/em\u003e\u003csup\u003e\u003cem\u003e2\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e\u003csub\u003e\u003cem\u003e2\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/sub\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;3.54, \u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.170). Cox regression analysis revealed mosquito population (Wald test, \u003cem\u003eX\u003c/em\u003e\u003csup\u003e\u003cem\u003e2\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e\u003csub\u003e\u003cem\u003e2\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/sub\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;13.29, \u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.001) and sex (Wald test, \u003cem\u003eX\u003c/em\u003e\u003csup\u003e\u003cem\u003e2\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e\u003csub\u003e\u003cem\u003e1\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/sub\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;4.52, \u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.033) as significant predictors of adult lifespan. Both males and females of the \u003cem\u003eBti\u003c/em\u003e selected population exhibited significantly shorter longevity relative to control. Females of the DFB selected population also outlived those of \u003cem\u003eBti\u003c/em\u003e (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e, Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eClimatic conditions during the experiments of \u003cem\u003eCx. pipiens\u003c/em\u003e f. \u003cem\u003epipiens\u003c/em\u003e are shown in Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e. Temperatures ranged between 7.7\u0026ndash;16.5\u0026nbsp;\u0026deg;C with a mean value of 11.9\u0026nbsp;\u0026deg;C from the beginning of female exposure until the termination of the overwintering period on March 26. Corresponding values regarding the post-overwintering period until the death of the last female ranged between 13.5\u0026ndash;27.1\u0026nbsp;\u0026deg;C with a mean value of 21.2\u0026nbsp;\u0026deg;C. Analyses in each sampling date revealed no significant differences on female survival rates among the three populations (\u003cem\u003eF\u003c/em\u003e\u003csub\u003e2, 12\u003c/sub\u003e= 0.48 to 1.05, \u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.379 to 0.631) (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e). Additionally, no significant differences were observed in female reproductive parameters (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e). Finally, Cox regression analysis showed that mosquito population was not a significant predictor (Wald test, \u003cem\u003eX\u003c/em\u003e\u003csup\u003e\u003cem\u003e2\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e\u003csub\u003e\u003cem\u003e2\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/sub\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;3.35, \u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.187) of female post-overwintering survival. Average survival was approximately three months for all three populations demonstrating that overwintered females of \u003cem\u003eCx. pipiens\u003c/em\u003e f. \u003cem\u003epipiens\u003c/em\u003e may experience extensive remaining lifespans (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e, Table\u0026nbsp;5).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eTable 3 Longevity parameters of \u003cem\u003eCulex pipiens\u003c/em\u003e f. \u003cem\u003emolestus\u003c/em\u003e populations that either were selected against diflubenzuron (DFB) and \u003cem\u003eBti\u003c/em\u003e for three successive generations or not (control). Adults were maintained at the same place (warehouse) where they developed as larvae during winter having access to 5% sugar solution. Within sex, different letters indicate significant differences (pairwise comparisons log-rank test, \u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05).\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\n\u003ctable id=\"Tab2\" border=\"1\"\u003e\u003ccaption\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/caption\u003e\n\u003cthead\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/th\u003e\n\u003cth colspan=\"4\" align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLongevity parameters in days\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;SE\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/th\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003c/thead\u003e\n\u003ctbody\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd rowspan=\"2\" align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAverage\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd colspan=\"3\" align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eQuartiles\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e25\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e50\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e75\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMales\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eControl (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;49)\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e72.88\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;3.46 a\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e92\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;3.51\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e75\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;6.29\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e60\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;6.85\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDFB selected (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;30)\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e69.13\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;4.48 ab\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e93\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;6.95\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e66\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.36\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e50\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;9.68\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eBti\u003c/em\u003e selected (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;47)\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e61.23\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;3.69 b\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e80\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;4.83\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e68\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;5.38\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e46\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;11.45\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFemales\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eControl (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;49)\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e73.38\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;4.37 a\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e97\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.72\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e77\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;2.78\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e62\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;13.39\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDFB selected (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;30)\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e77.23\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;4.50 a\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e95\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;6.17\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e76\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;5.46\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e62\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;3.22\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eBti\u003c/em\u003e selected (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;47)\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e70.08\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;3.33 b\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e88\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;3.59\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e77\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;2.56\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e62\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;7.44\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003c/tbody\u003e\n\u003c/table\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eTable 4 Reproductive parameters of post-overwintering \u003cem\u003eCulex pipiens\u003c/em\u003e f. \u003cem\u003epipiens\u003c/em\u003e females. Females originated from populations that either were selected against diflubenzuron (DFB) and \u003cem\u003eBti\u003c/em\u003e for three successive generations or not (control).\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\n\u003ctable id=\"Tabb\" border=\"1\"\u003e\n\u003cthead\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePopulation\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/th\u003e\n\u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003en\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/th\u003e\n\u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBlood meal acceptance %\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/th\u003e\n\u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePreoviposition period days (\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;SE)\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/th\u003e\n\u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eEggs per raft (\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;SE)\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/th\u003e\n\u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLarval hatch rate per egg raft (\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;SE)\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/th\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003c/thead\u003e\n\u003ctbody\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eControl\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e31\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e35.71\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e10.00\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.76\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e61.10\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;5.43\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e89.10\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;3.42\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDFB selected\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e32\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e34.38\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e11.72\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.61\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e51.54\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;4.50\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e92.58\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;3.04\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eBti\u003c/em\u003e selected\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e25\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e46.43\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e11.53\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.50\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e51.46\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;3.70\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e90.68\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;3.81\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eF\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e-\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e-\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e-\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1.43\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e0.22\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eX\u003c/em\u003e\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e-\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1.06 \u003csup\u003ea\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2.64 \u003csup\u003eb\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e-\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e-\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003edf\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e-\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2, 31\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e2, 31\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e-\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e0.587\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e0.266\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e0.254\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e0.798\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003c/tbody\u003e\n\u003ctfoot\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd colspan=\"6\"\u003e\u003csup\u003ea\u003c/sup\u003e Chi-square test\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd colspan=\"6\"\u003e\u003csup\u003eb\u003c/sup\u003e Wald test\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003c/tfoot\u003e\n\u003c/table\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eTable\u0026nbsp;5.\u0026nbsp;Post-overwintering longevity parameters of\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eCulex pipiens\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;f.\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003epipiens\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;populations that either were selected against diflubenzuron (DFB) and\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eBti\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;for three successive generations or not (control). Females were maintained at the same place (warehouse) were they overwintered having access to 10% sugar solution. Different letters indicate significant differences (pairwise comparisons log-rank test,\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05).\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\n\u003ctable id=\"Tab3\" border=\"1\"\u003e\n\u003cthead\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/th\u003e\n\u003cth colspan=\"4\" align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLongevity parameters in days\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;SE\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/th\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003c/thead\u003e\n\u003ctbody\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd rowspan=\"2\" align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAverage\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd colspan=\"3\" align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eQuartiles\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e25\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e50\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e75\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePopulation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eControl (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;31)\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e81.45\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;6.02 a\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e109\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;6.59\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e89\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;5.00\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e68\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;15.02\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDFB selected (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;32)\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e92.40\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;5.84 a\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e115\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.23\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e105\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;2.80\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e83\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;22.04\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eBti\u003c/em\u003e selected (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;25)\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e99.84\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;3.19 a\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e115\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.62\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e97\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.48\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e92\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;2.91\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003c/tbody\u003e\n\u003c/table\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"Discussion","content":" \u003cp\u003eOur study revealed that the implementation of equivalent selective pressure for three successive generations with both DFB and \u003cem\u003eBti\u003c/em\u003e against the form \u003cem\u003epipiens\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003emolestus\u003c/em\u003e of \u003cem\u003eCx. pipiens\u003c/em\u003e induced differential susceptibility levels only in the first case. The selected populations of \u003cem\u003eCx. pipiens\u003c/em\u003e f. \u003cem\u003emolestus\u003c/em\u003e to both larvicides exhibited a high fitness cost in terms of reduced winter larval survival rates accompanied with increased larval developmental times. Moreover, the obtained adults of the \u003cem\u003eBti\u003c/em\u003e selected population appeared to suffer an additional cost in terms of shorter lifespan compared to the other two (control and DFB selected). On the other hand, the selection process had no apparent effect on \u003cem\u003eCx. pipiens\u003c/em\u003e f. \u003cem\u003epipiens\u003c/em\u003e female winter survival rates relative to control. Additionally, overwintered females showed similar reproductive parameters among populations. Interestingly, these females, irrespective of population origin, experienced considerable post-overwintering longevity periods.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe EI\u003csub\u003e50\u003c/sub\u003e values estimated in the current study for the control populations of both forms were found to be almost identical with that of the Benaki \u003cem\u003eCx. pipiens\u003c/em\u003e f. \u003cem\u003emolestus\u003c/em\u003e laboratory reference strain [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR23\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e23\u003c/span\u003e], suggesting high susceptibility to DFB. Similarly, earlier studies conducted in different regions of Greece using the WHO diagnostic dose protocols demonstrated high susceptibility of most \u003cem\u003eCx. pipiens\u003c/em\u003e populations tested [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR37\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e37\u003c/span\u003e]. Moreover, recent surveys failed to detect any specific mutations in the chitin synthase gene of \u003cem\u003eCx. pipiens\u003c/em\u003e sampled from Greece that are associated with high levels of resistance against DFB. On the contrary, two and three different mutations at amino acid I1043 of the chitin synthase gene have been reported in neighboring Turkey and Italy, respectively with phenotypes exhibiting up to 128 fold Resistance Ratios (RR) relative to the Benaki reference strain [\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR24 CR25\" citationid=\"CR23\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e23\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR26\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e26\u003c/span\u003e]. The different selection pressure regimes imposed on these populations over the past years relative to the Greek ones, have been proposed as a possible explanation. Interestingly, in our study by imposing the same short term selection pressure with DFB we observed differential response on the susceptibility levels between the form \u003cem\u003epipiens\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003emolestus\u003c/em\u003e, especially as EI\u003csub\u003e50\u003c/sub\u003e RR values are concerned. This tendency was found to be even more pronounced after additional generations of continuous selection to DFB (F6, F9 \u0026amp; F12 generation) in the laboratory (Ioannou et al. in preparation). The reasons underlying this differential response to DFB selection of the two forms of \u003cem\u003eCx. pipiens\u003c/em\u003e remain largely unknown. A possible explanation could lay on their different biology. The tendency of the \u003cem\u003emolestus\u003c/em\u003e form to reproduce below ground may largely decrease both its exposure to insecticides as well as the gene flow rates among different populations. On the other hand there are no such limitations for the above ground free living \u003cem\u003epipiens\u003c/em\u003e form. Therefore, it is anticipated that the \u003cem\u003emolestus\u003c/em\u003e form populations may lack the genetic background for a rapid apparition and evolution of tolerance. This argument is also supported by the fact that in the current study the EI\u003csub\u003e90\u003c/sub\u003e value of the control \u003cem\u003eCx. pipiens\u003c/em\u003e f. \u003cem\u003epipiens\u003c/em\u003e population (without selection) was twice as much as of the \u003cem\u003emolestus\u003c/em\u003e form. Another possible explanation could be the fact that the DFB selected populations of each form may encounter differential levels of fitness costs in the wild such as winter survival rates as evidenced by the present study.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSort term selection with \u003cem\u003eBti\u003c/em\u003e had a minor impact on the susceptibility levels of both biotypes. This is an expected outcome since there are no consistent recordings of mosquito resistance development to the full crystal. Despite some sporadic reports describing considerable resistance levels of wild mosquito populations against \u003cem\u003eBti\u003c/em\u003e [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR27\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e27\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR43\" citationid=\"CR42\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e42\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR44\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e44\u003c/span\u003e], long-term studies under both laboratory and field conditions provide no support to these data [\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR46 CR47 CR48 CR49 CR50\" citationid=\"CR45\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e45\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR51\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e51\u003c/span\u003e]. The low tolerance against \u003cem\u003eBti\u003c/em\u003e after long periods of applications in natural settings or intensive laboratory selection have been primarily attributed to the synergistic action between the Cry and the Cyt toxins as previously mentioned. In contrast, selection with single, purified Cry toxins can rapidly lead to considerable resistance levels [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR45\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e45\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR52\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e52\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR53\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e53\u003c/span\u003e]. Another factor that seems to promote the lack of \u003cem\u003eBti\u003c/em\u003e resistance in mosquitoes is the fact that in the absence of selection pressure within only a few generations (3\u0026ndash;5), any acquired tolerance disappears almost completely [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR46\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e46\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR48\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e48\u003c/span\u003e]. The high fitness costs following extensive selection to this microbial larvicide have been proposed as the most convincing explanation of this phenomenon.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eBoth DFB and \u003cem\u003eBti\u003c/em\u003e selection against \u003cem\u003eCx. pipiens\u003c/em\u003e f. \u003cem\u003emolestus\u003c/em\u003e conferred a high fitness cost in terms of larvae winter survival as mortality rates relative to control increased more than 50% and 30% respectively. When we repeated the same experimental procedure after three additional generations of selection (F6) under optimum (laboratory) conditions we found no apparent differences in larval survival rates among tested populations. This suggests that the observed costs are manifested only under stressful conditions. Indeed, the mean prevailing temperature during larval development reached the lowest developmental thresholds described for the species [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR54\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e54\u003c/span\u003e] shaping a very challenging environment for survival. In general, the fitness costs determined in optimal conditions are not always representative of that experienced in the wild. This is because stressful environments and/or limited resources might be more deleterious for tolerant/resistant individuals. Similarly to our findings, the prolongation of larval developmental times in OPs resistant \u003cem\u003eCx. pipiens\u003c/em\u003e populations was found to emerge only under stressful crowding conditions in natural breeding sites [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR33\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e33\u003c/span\u003e]. Therefore, both biotic and abiotic factors as in our case, may shape the expression of fitness costs related to insecticides\u0026rsquo; selection. The observed differences on the reduction of larval survival rates between DFB and \u003cem\u003eBti\u003c/em\u003e selected populations suggest deferential levels of fitness costs. A possible explanation may lay on the different mode of action of the two larvicides. An interesting finding that emerged from the current study is the fact that while short selection against \u003cem\u003eBti\u003c/em\u003e has minor effects on the tolerance levels, it may confer a high fitness cost under stressful conditions.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eReduction on winter larvae survival rates following selection against DFB and \u003cem\u003eBti\u003c/em\u003e in \u003cem\u003eCx. pipiens\u003c/em\u003e f. \u003cem\u003emolestus\u003c/em\u003e was also accompanied with a discrete increment of their developmental duration relative to control. Interestingly, the longest larvae developmental times were recorded in the \u003cem\u003eBti\u003c/em\u003e selected population. Moreover, the adults obtained exhibited significantly shorter lifespan compared to DFB selected and control population. This is probably because a higher tolerance to \u003cem\u003eBti\u003c/em\u003e has been associated with a modified microbiota of larvae, which may affect their midgut proper function and therefore the nutrients assimilation, developmental processes and ultimately adult performance as it is well documented that nutrition during the mosquito larval stage may shape important fitness elements of the emerging adults [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR55\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e55\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR56\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e56\u003c/span\u003e]. Similarly to our results, \u003cem\u003eBti\u003c/em\u003e selection against \u003cem\u003eAe. aegypti\u003c/em\u003e also resulted in significant prolongation of larvae developmental times relative to control [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR48\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e48\u003c/span\u003e]. No effects were found regarding adult survival in the same study. However, it should be stressed that in this case, adults had access to only water and therefore no direct comparisons can be made with our results. A moderate reduction on both male and female longevity following selection with \u003cem\u003eBti\u003c/em\u003e was observed in \u003cem\u003eCx. pipiens\u003c/em\u003e f. \u003cem\u003epipiens\u003c/em\u003e compared to untreated control [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR46\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e46\u003c/span\u003e]. The optimal laboratory conditions in this study may account for not detecting significant differences as in our case.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eContrary to \u003cem\u003eCx. pipiens\u003c/em\u003e f. \u003cem\u003emolestus\u003c/em\u003e, selection against DFB and \u003cem\u003eBti\u003c/em\u003e had no apparent effects on the winter survival of the \u003cem\u003epipiens\u003c/em\u003e form. The differential overwintering developmental stages (larva vs adult) in these two forms may account for the observed outcome. Mosquito larvae require a minimum amount of nutrition to fully mature and pupate. Furthermore, larval developmental completion takes place within specific time limits which are endogenously defined. This dynamic process may be more prone to selection costs relative to the adult stage where full development have been already attained. In contrast to our findings, resistance of \u003cem\u003eCx. pipiens\u003c/em\u003e f. \u003cem\u003epipiens\u003c/em\u003e against OPs have been associated with reduced overwintering survival [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR34\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e34\u003c/span\u003e]. Among others, the differential exhaustion of fat reserves was proposed as the basic proximate cause. Indeed, a later study confirmed that the presence of resistance alleles against OPs in this species is negatively correlated with female lipid reserves [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR57\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e57\u003c/span\u003e]. The fact that female winter survival patterns in our study were almost identical between the control and the selected populations suggest no differences on the physiological process of fat reserves accumulation and/or exploitation. But most importantly, it means that these females have equal probabilities of survival as the untreated ones, providing the base for the building of higher tolerance levels in the next year. This argument seems to be supported by the fact that the resistance ratio against DFB of \u003cem\u003eCx. pipiens\u003c/em\u003e field populations in Italy, from 32.5 fold in 2015 reached 128.5 fold in 2016 [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR23\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e23\u003c/span\u003e], which backs the idea of the persistence of resistant mosquitoes in the wild from year to year. However, this is something that needs to be demonstrated for the specific populations, as in contrast to our case, they carry mutations of the chitin synthase gene associated with striking DFB resistance levels. Interestingly, further studies in the same country reveled a high focal distribution of DFB resistant \u003cem\u003eCx. pipiens\u003c/em\u003e mosquitoes which was attributed to the differential selection pressure imposed by both agricultural and mosquito control applications with DFB in the tested areas [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR24\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e24\u003c/span\u003e]. Since no separation between the two forms of \u003cem\u003eCx. pipiens\u003c/em\u003e took place in this study, the following explanation is possible. The high focal distribution of DFB resistant mosquitoes may only reflect differences in the mosquito populations\u0026rsquo; composition regarding the two forms, with the predominance of \u003cem\u003epipiens\u003c/em\u003e form to account for the observed outcome. For instance, analysis of population structure from different areas of Greece, a country with identical climate, revealed extreme variations between the two forms on the composition of \u003cem\u003eCx. pipiens\u003c/em\u003e populations [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e9\u003c/span\u003e]. Nevertheless, as mentioned above, the validity of this hypothesis has to be confirmed for the specific populations.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWinter survival of diapausing \u003cem\u003eCx. pipiens\u003c/em\u003e f. \u003cem\u003epipiens\u003c/em\u003e females may largely vary depending on the hibernacula conditions [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR58\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e58\u003c/span\u003e]. It has been observed that females may abandon their overwintering sites and actively search for new ones, a behavior described as an adaptive response associated with increased survival. It seems that the quality of each overwintering site, as experienced by females, is depending on multiple parameters such as the prevailing temperature and humidity levels, predator density, parasite frequency and human disturbance and therefore this quality may change during winter [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR34\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e34\u003c/span\u003e]. Under our experimental design, mosquitoes were not able to select the most optimal environment for maximizing their survival as they were forced to overwinter in a given place (warehouse). Nevertheless, this does not diminish the reliability of our results since females from all populations experienced exactly the same conditions. Female survival rates observed in the current study are comparable with that found by Koenraadt et al. [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR58\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e58\u003c/span\u003e] considering similar overwintering sites such as unheated house rooms. Interestingly, they found that non-diapausing females kept under the same conditions, died within four days, suggesting that in the absence of nutritional resources such females have a very limited ability to survive but also see Rinehart et al. [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR59\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e59\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eReproductive parameters of overwintered females of \u003cem\u003eCx. pipiens\u003c/em\u003e f. \u003cem\u003epipiens\u003c/em\u003e were similar between the two selected populations and the control. Blood meal acceptance percentages ranged between 34.4\u0026ndash;46.4% suggesting that females had partially terminated their reproductive diapause by the time that trials took place. Contrary to other studies that used artificial conditions to terminate diapause in order to induce females to either respond to host stimuli [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR60\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e60\u003c/span\u003e] or receive a blood meal [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR58\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e58\u003c/span\u003e] we intentionally preferred to simulate as much as possible the natural conditions in an attempt to detect any potential variations in feeding activity. Although, no significant differences were observed regarding both the preoviposition period and the average number of eggs per egg raft, the better performance of the control population in respect to these parameters may reflect an early form of fitness cost in the selected ones. The short term selection to both larvicides may have acted against more pronounced differences as indicated by other studies. For example, \u003cem\u003eBti\u003c/em\u003e selection against \u003cem\u003eCx. pipiens\u003c/em\u003e f. \u003cem\u003epipiens\u003c/em\u003e for 20 generations resulted in 44.8% decrease of female fecundity [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR46\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e46\u003c/span\u003e] while Belinato \u0026amp; Valle [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR61\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e61\u003c/span\u003e] by applying the same experimental protocol as we, found that DFB selection against \u003cem\u003eAe\u003c/em\u003e. \u003cem\u003eaegypti\u003c/em\u003e for 6 generations also conferred a significant reduction on this parameter. Finally, an interesting finding that emerged from the current study is the fact that females, irrespective of population origin (selected or not), experienced extensive post-overwintering longevity periods, which appeared to even exceed the total lifespans of \u003cem\u003eCx. pipiens\u003c/em\u003e f. \u003cem\u003emolestus\u003c/em\u003e females (Tables\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e \u0026amp; 5). This observation is in accordance with a previous study documented that the physiological changes that take place during the pre-hibernation transition of these females confer a considerable increase in their longevity potential [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR62\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e62\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e "},{"header":"Conclusions","content":" \u003cp\u003eBy imposing the same short term selection with both DFB and \u003cem\u003eBti\u003c/em\u003e against \u003cem\u003eCx. pipines\u003c/em\u003e form \u003cem\u003epipiens\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003emolestus\u003c/em\u003e we found differences on the acquired tolerance in the first case which is probably associated with their divergent biology. Moreover, the selection process with both larvicides had a significant negative impact on the winter survival of the \u003cem\u003emolestus\u003c/em\u003e form but not that of the \u003cem\u003epipiens.\u003c/em\u003e These findings are of high importance since provide insights on the early phase of tolerance development between the two forms but mostly on its prevalence in the wild form year to year. The incorporation of such information on a properly developed model it is anticipated to contribute on the better understanding of the two \u003cem\u003eCx. pipiens\u003c/em\u003e forms performance against these two important larvicides over time.\u003c/p\u003e "},{"header":"Abbreviations","content":"\u003cp\u003eDFB: Diflubenzuron; \u003cem\u003eBti\u003c/em\u003e: \u003cem\u003eBacillus thuringiensis\u003c/em\u003e subsp. \u003cem\u003eisraelensis\u003c/em\u003e; IE: Inhibition of adult Emergence; LC: Lethal Concentration; SIT: Sterile Insect Technique; RIDL: Release of Insects carrying a Dominant Lethal; WNV: West Nile virus; IGRs: Insect growth regulators; WHO: World Health Organization; OPs: Organophosphates; 95% CL: 95% confidence limits; RR: Resistance Ratio.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEthics approval and consent to participate\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNot applicable.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eConsent for publication\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNot applicable.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAvailability of data and materials\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCompeting interests\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe authors declare that they have no competing interests.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFunding\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis work was supported by a postdoctoral scholarship program (Project number 5394.02.11) implemented by University of Thessaly and funded by Stavros Niarchos Foundation.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAuthors' contributions\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCSI, CH and NTP conceived and designed the study. CSI and MAK performed the experiments. CSI and NTP analyzed the data. CSI, CH, MAK and NTP wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAcknowledgements\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWe would like to thank Evridiki Markopoulou and Eleni Savvidou for technical support.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eFarajollahi A, Fonseca DM, Kramer LD, Kilpatrick AM.\u003cem\u003e\"\u003c/em\u003eBird biting\u003cem\u003e\" \u003c/em\u003emosquitoes and human disease: A review of the role of\u003cem\u003e Culex pipiens \u003c/em\u003ecomplex mosquitoes in epidemiology. Infect Genet Evol. 2011;11:1577-85.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBrugman VA, Hern\u0026aacute;ndez-Triana LM, Medlock JM, Fooks AR, Carpenter S, Johnson N. The role of\u003cem\u003e Culex pipiens \u003c/em\u003e (Diptera: Culicidae) in virus transmission in Europe. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15:389.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eVinogradova EB. \u003cem\u003eCulex pipiens pipiens \u003c/em\u003emosquitoes: taxonomy, distribution, ecology, physiology, genetics, applied importance and control. Sofia-Moscow: Pensoft Publishers; 2000.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBecker N, J\u0026ouml;st A, Weitzel T. The\u003cem\u003e Culex pipiens \u003c/em\u003ecomplex in Europe\u003cem\u003e.\u003c/em\u003e J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2012;28:53-67.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eVogels CBF, Van De Peppel LJJ, van Vliet AJH, Westenberg M, Iba\u0026ntilde;ez-Justica A, Stroo A, et al. Winter activity and aboveground hybridization between the two biotypes of the West Nile virus vector\u003cem\u003e Culex pipiens.\u003c/em\u003e Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2015;15:619-26.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMitchell CJ, Briegel H. Inability of diapausing \u003cem\u003eCulex pipiens\u003c/em\u003e (Diptera: Culicidae) to use blood for producing lipid reserves for overwitrer survival. J Med Entomol. 1989;26:318-26.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSim C, Denlinger DL. Insulin signaling and the regulation of insect diapause. Front Physiol. 2013;4:189.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRobich RM, Denlinger DL. Diapause in the mosquito\u003cem\u003e Culex pipiens \u003c/em\u003eevokes a metabolic switch from blood feeding to sugar gluttony. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:15912-7.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eFotakis EA, Chaskopoulou A, Grigoraki L, Tsiamantas A, Kounadi S, Georgiou L, et al. Analysis of population structure and insecticide resistance in mosquitoes of the genus\u003cem\u003e Culex\u003c/em\u003e,\u003cem\u003e Anopheles \u003c/em\u003eand\u003cem\u003e Aedes \u003c/em\u003efrom different environments of Greece with a history of mosquito borne disease transmission. Acta Trop. 2017;174:29-37.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eFonseca DM, Keyghobadl N, Malcolm CA, Mehmet C, Schaffner F, Mogi M, et al. Emerging vectors in the\u003cem\u003e Culex pipiens \u003c/em\u003e Science. 2004;303:1535-38.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eFlores HA, O'Neill SL. Controlling vector-borne diseases by releasing modified mosquitoes. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2018;16:508-18.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBecker N, Petric D, Zgomba M, Boase C, Madon MB, Dahl C, Kaiser A. Mosquitoes and their control. 2nd ed. Heidelberg: Spriger-Verlag; 2010.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBellini R, Zeller H, Van Bortel W. A review of the vector management methods to prevent and control outbreaks of West Nile virus infection and the challenge for Europe. Parasit Vectors. 2014;7:323.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMerzendorfer H. Chitin synthesis inhibitors: old molecules and new developments. Insect Sci. 2013;20:121-38.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSilva JJ, Menders J. Susceptibility of\u003cem\u003e Aedes aegypti \u003c/em\u003e(L) to the insect growth regulators diflubenzuron and methoprene in Uberlandia, State of Minas Gerais. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2007;40:612-16.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLacey LA. \u003cem\u003eBacillus thuringiensis \u003c/em\u003eserovariety\u003cem\u003e israelensis \u003c/em\u003eand\u003cem\u003e Bacillus sphaericus \u003c/em\u003efor mosquito control. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2007;23:133-63.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBen-Dov E. \u003cem\u003eBacillus thuringiensis\u003c/em\u003e subsp\u003cem\u003e. israelensis\u003c/em\u003e and Its Dipteran-Specific Toxins. Toxins. 2014;6:1222-43.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCant\u0026oacute;n PE, Zanicthe Reyes EZ, Ruiz de Escudero I, Bravo A, Sober\u0026oacute;n M. Binding of\u003cem\u003e Bacillus thuringiensis \u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003e israelensis \u003c/em\u003eCry4Ba to Cyt1Aa has an important role in synergism. Peptides. 2011;32:595-600.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eP\u0026eacute;rez C, Fernandez LE, Sun J, Folch JL, Gill SS, Sober\u0026oacute;n M, et al. \u003cem\u003eBacillus thuringiensis \u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003e israelensis \u003c/em\u003eCyt1Aa synergizes Cry11Aa toxin by functioning as a membrane-bound receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:18303-8.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eVachon V, Laprade R, Schwartz JL. Current models of the mode of action of\u003cem\u003e Bacillus thuringiensis \u003c/em\u003einsecticidal crystal proteins: A critical review. J Invertebr Pathol. 2012;111:1-12.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eValtierra de Luis D, Villanueva M, Lai L, Williams T, Caballero P. Potential of Cry10Aa and Cyt2Ba, Two Minority delta-endotoxins Produced by \u003cem\u003eBacillus thuringiens\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003eisraelensis\u003c/em\u003e, for the Control of \u003cem\u003eAedes aegypti\u003c/em\u003e Larvae. Toxins. 2020;12:355.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWirth MC, Park HW, Walton WE, Federici BA. Cyt1A of \u003cem\u003eBacillus thuringiensis\u003c/em\u003e delays evolution of resistance to Cry11A in the mosquito \u003cem\u003eCulex quinquefasciatus\u003c/em\u003e. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005;71:185-9.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGrigoraki L, Puggioli A, Mavridis K, Douris V, Montanari M, Bellini R, et al. Striking diflubenzuron resistance in\u003cem\u003e Culex pipiens, \u003c/em\u003ethe prime vector of West Nile virus. Sci Rep. 2017;7:11699.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePorretta D, Fotakis EA, Mastrantonio V, Chaskopoulpou A, Michaelakis A, Kioulos I, et al. Focal distribution of diflubenzuron resistance mutations in\u003cem\u003e Culex pipiens \u003c/em\u003emosquitoes from Northern Italy. Acta Trop. 2019;193:106-12.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eFotakis EA, Mastrantonio V, Grigoraki L, Porretta D, Puggioli A, Chaskopoulou A, et al. Identification and detection of a novel point mutation in the Chitin Synthase gene of \u003cem\u003eCulex pipiens\u003c/em\u003e associated with diflubenzuron resistance. PLos Negl Trop Dis. 2020;14:e0008284\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGuz N, Cagatay NS, Fotakis EA, Durmusoglu E, Vontas J. (2020). Detection of diflubenzuron and pyrethroid resistance mutations in \u003cem\u003eCulex pipiens\u003c/em\u003e from Mugla, Turkey. Acta Trop. 2020;203:105294.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePaul A, Harrington L, Zhang L, Scott J. Insecticide resistance in \u003cem\u003eCulex pipiens\u003c/em\u003e from New York. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2005;21:305-9.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eFerreira LM, Silva-Filha MHLN. Bacterial larvicides for vector control: mode of action of toxins and implications for resistance. Biocontrol Sci and Technol. 2013;23:1137-68.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLiu NN. Insecticide resistance in mosquitoes: Impact, mechanisms, and research directions. Ann Rev Entomol. 2015;60:537-59.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKliot A, Ghanim M. Fitness costs associated with insecticide resistance. Pest Manag Sci. 2012;68:1431-7.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBerticat C, Boquien G, Raymond M, Chevillon C. Insecticide resistance genes induce a mating competition cost in\u003cem\u003e Culex pipiens \u003c/em\u003e Genet Res. 2002;79:41-7.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBerticat C, Duron O, Heyse D, Raymond M. Insecticide resistance genes confer a predation cost on mosquitoes,\u003cem\u003e Culex pipiens.\u003c/em\u003e Genet Res. 2004;83:189-96.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBourguet D, Guillemaud T, Chevillon C, Raymond M. Fitness costs of insecticide resistance in natural breeding sites of the mosquito\u003cem\u003e Culex pipiens.\u003c/em\u003e 2004;58:128-35.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGazave L, Chevillon C, Lenormand T, Marquine M, Raymond M. Dissecting the cost of insecticide resistance genes during the overwintering period of the mosquito\u003cem\u003e Culex pipiens.\u003c/em\u003e 2001;87:441-8.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePeppe P. Molecular identification of species of mosquitoes for the detection of vectors of the West Nile Virus. MSc thesis, University of Thessaly (Abstract in English); 2015\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWest Nile virus in Greece. Annual epidemiological report for 2019. In: National Public Health Organization. H.C.D.C.P 2019. https://eody.gov.gr/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/WNV_annual_report_2019_ENG.pdf\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKioulos I, Kampouraki A, Morou E, Skavdis G, Vontas J. Insecticide resistance status in the major West Nile virus vector \u003cem\u003eCulex pipiens \u003c/em\u003efrom Greece. Pest Manag Sci. 2014;70:623-7.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDieme C, Yssouf A, Vega-R\u0026uacute;a A, Berenger J, Failloux A, Raoult D, et al. Accurate identification of Culicidae at aquatic developmental stages by MALDI-TOF MS profiling. Parasit Vectors. 2014;7:544.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGuidelines for laboratory and field testing of mosquito larvicides. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2005.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eFinney DJ. Probit analysis. London: Cambridge University Press; 1971.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSpielman A, Wong J. Environmental control of ovarian diapause in \u003cem\u003eCulex pipiens.\u003c/em\u003e Ann Entomol Soc Am. 1973;66:905-7.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eZhang HY, Yang CJ, Huang JY, L\u0026uuml; L. Susceptibility of field populations of \u003cem\u003eAnopheles sinensis \u003c/em\u003e(Diptera: Culicidae) to\u003cem\u003e Bacillus thuringiensis \u003c/em\u003esubsp Biocontrol Sci Technol\u003cem\u003e.\u003c/em\u003e 2004;14:321-5.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBoyer S, Tilquin M, Ravanel P. Differential sensitivity to\u003cem\u003e Bacillus thuringiensis \u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003e Israelensis \u003c/em\u003eand temephos in field mosquito populations of\u003cem\u003e Ochlerotatus cataphylla \u003c/em\u003e(Diptera: Culicidae): Toward resistance? Environ Toxicol Chem. 2007;26:157-62.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBoyer S, Paris M, Jego S, Lemp\u0026eacute;ri\u0026egrave;re G, Ravanel P. Influence of insecticide\u003cem\u003e Bacillus thuringiensis \u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003e israelensis \u003c/em\u003etreatments on resistance and enzyme activities in\u003cem\u003e Aedes rusticus \u003c/em\u003elarvae (Diptera: Culicidae). Biol Control. 2012;62:75-81.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGeorghiou GP, Wirth MC. Influence of exposure to single versus multiple toxins of\u003cem\u003e Bacillus thuringiensis \u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003e israelensis \u003c/em\u003eon development of resistance in the mosquito \u003cem\u003eCulex quinquefasciatus \u003c/em\u003e(Diptera: Culicidae). Appl Environ Microbiol. 1997;63:1095-101.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSaleh MS, El-Meniawi FA, Kelada NL, Zahran HM. Resistance development in mosquito larvae\u003cem\u003e Culex pipiens \u003c/em\u003eto the bacterial agent\u003cem\u003e Bacillus thuringiensis \u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003e israelensis.\u003c/em\u003e J Appl Entomol. 2003;127:29-32.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCarvalho KDS, Crespo MM, Ara\u0026uacute;jo AP, da Silva RS, de Melo-Santos MAV, de Oliveira CMF, et al. Long-term exposure of\u003cem\u003e Aedes aegypti \u003c/em\u003eto\u003cem\u003e Bacillus thuringiensis \u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003e israelensis \u003c/em\u003edid not involve altered susceptibility to this microbial larvicide or to other control agents. Parasit Vectors. 2018;11:673.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eParis M, David JP, Despres L. Fitness costs of resistance to\u003cem\u003e Bti \u003c/em\u003etoxins in the dengue vector\u003cem\u003e Aedes aegypti.\u003c/em\u003e 2011;20:1184-94.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBecker N. Microbial control of mosquitoes: Management of the upper rhine mosquito population as a model programme. Parasitol Today. 1997;13:485-7.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMittal PK, Adak T, Subbarao SK. Laboratory selection to investigate the development of resistance to \u003cem\u003eBacillus thuringiensis\u003c/em\u003e var\u003cem\u003e. israelensis\u003c/em\u003e H-14 in \u003cem\u003eCulex quinquefasciatus\u003c/em\u003e Say (Diptera: Culicidae). Natl Acad Sci Lett. 2005;28:281-3.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBecker N, Ludwig M, Su TY. Lack of resistance in \u003cem\u003eAedes vexans\u003c/em\u003e field populations after 36 years of\u003cem\u003e Bacillus thuringiensis\u003c/em\u003e subsp\u003cem\u003e. Israelensis\u003c/em\u003e applications in the uper Rhine valley, Germany. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2018;34:154-7.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCadavid-Restrepo G, Sahaza J, Orduz S. Treatment of an \u003cem\u003eAedes aegypti\u003c/em\u003e colony with the Cry11Aa toxin for 54 generations results in the development of resistance. Memo Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2012;107:74-9.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eStalinski R, Tetreau G, Gaude T, Despres L. Pre-selecting resistance against individual \u003cem\u003eBti\u003c/em\u003e Cry toxins facilitates the development of resistance to the \u003cem\u003eBti\u003c/em\u003e toxins cocktail. J Invertebr Pathol. 2014;119:50-3.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSpanoudis CG, Andreadis SS, Tsaknis NK, Petrou AP, Gkeka CD, Savopoulou\u0026ndash;Soultani M. Effect of temperature on biological parameters of the West Nile virus vector\u003cem\u003e Culex pipiens \u003c/em\u003eform 'molestus' (Diptera: Culicidae) in Greece: Constant vs fluctuating temperatures. J Med Entomol. 2019;56:641-50.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTetreau G, Grizard S, Patil CD, Tran FH, Van VT, Stalinski R, et al. Bacterial microbiota of \u003cem\u003eAedes aegypti\u003c/em\u003e mosquito larvae is altered by intoxication with \u003cem\u003eBacillus thuringiensis israelensis\u003c/em\u003e. Parasit Vectors. 2018;11:121.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTakken W, Smallegange RC, Vigneau AJ, Johnston V, Brown M, Mordue-Luntz AJ, et al. Larval nutrition differentially affects adult fitness and \u003cem\u003ePlasmodium\u003c/em\u003e development in the malaria vectors\u003cem\u003e Anopheles gambiae \u003c/em\u003eand\u003cem\u003e Anopheles stephensi.\u003c/em\u003e Parasit Vectors. 2013;6:345.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRivero A, Magaud A, Nicot A, Vezilier J. Energetic cost of insecticide resistance in\u003cem\u003e Culex pipiens \u003c/em\u003emosquitoes\u003cem\u003e.\u003c/em\u003e J Med Entomol. 2011;48:694-700.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKoenraadt CJM, M\u0026ouml;hlmann TWR, Verhulst NO, Spitzen J, Vogels CBF. Effect of overwintering on survival and vector competence of the West Nile virus vector\u003cem\u003e Culex pipiens.\u003c/em\u003e Parasit Vectors. 2019;12:147.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRinehart JP, Yocum GD, Leopold RA, Robich RM. Cold storage of\u003cem\u003e Culex pipiens \u003c/em\u003ein the absence of diapause\u003cem\u003e.\u003c/em\u003e J Med Entomol. 2010;47:1071-6.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eFaraji A, Gaugler R. Experimental host preference of diapause and non-diapause induced\u003cem\u003e Culex pipiens pipiens \u003c/em\u003e(Diptera: Culicidae). Parasit Vectors. 2015;8:389.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBelinato TA, Valle D. The impact of selection with diflubenzuron, a chitin synthesis inhibitor, on the fitness of two Brazilian\u003cem\u003e Aedes aegypti \u003c/em\u003efield populations\u003cem\u003e.\u003c/em\u003e PLos One. 2015;10:e0130719.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePapadopoulos NT, Carey JR, Ioannou CS, Ji H, M\u0026uuml;ller HG, Wang JL, et al., Seasonality of post-capture longevity in a medically-important mosquito (\u003cem\u003eCulex pipiens\u003c/em\u003e). Front Ecol Evol. 2016;4:63.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Insecticide selection, fitness cost, diflubenzuron, Bti, winter survival","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-121993/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-121993/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eBackground\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe \u003cem\u003eCulex pipiens\u003c/em\u003e mosquito consists of two forms named \u003cem\u003epipiens\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003emolestus\u003c/em\u003e that exhibit substantial differences in their biology including overwintering behavior. Diflubenzuron (DFB) and \u003cem\u003eBacillus thuringiensis\u003c/em\u003e subsp. \u003cem\u003eisraelensis\u003c/em\u003e (\u003cem\u003eBti\u003c/em\u003e) are among the most widely used larvicides for controlling\u003cem\u003e Cx. pipiens\u003c/em\u003e populations. The high dependency on these two larvicides, pose major concerns for resistance development. The evolution and stability of tolerance/resistance to insecticides has been associated with fitness costs that may be manifested under stressful conditions such as the winter period. This study aimed to investigate how short term selection of\u003cem\u003e pipiens\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003emolestus\u003c/em\u003e forms to both larvicides affect their susceptibility and their overwintering success.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eMethods\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eColonies of both forms of \u003cem\u003eCx. pipiens\u003c/em\u003e were established from the same area. Following standard protocols, the efficacy of both larvicides was determined for each mosquito population. Then, larvae from each form, were selected for three successive generations by applying fixed doses corresponding to IE\u003csub\u003e80\u003c/sub\u003e (Inhibition of adult Emergence) and LC\u003csub\u003e80\u003c/sub\u003e (Lethal Concentration) for DFB and \u003cem\u003eBti\u003c/em\u003e, respectively. At the end of this process, the susceptibility levels and the winter survival of the selected populations relative to controls (colonies that received no selection) were determined.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eResults\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eContrary to\u003cem\u003e Bti\u003c/em\u003e, selection with DFB induced different susceptibility levels between the two forms of \u003cem\u003eCx. pipiens\u003c/em\u003e. The selected populations of \u003cem\u003eCx. pipiens\u003c/em\u003e f. \u003cem\u003emolestus\u003c/em\u003e to both larvicides exhibited a high fitness cost in terms of reduced winter larval survival rates relative to control. Moreover, the obtained adults of the \u003cem\u003eBti\u003c/em\u003e selected population experienced significantly shorter lifespan compared to control and DFB selected population. On the other hand, selection with both DFB and \u003cem\u003eBti\u003c/em\u003e had no apparent effects on\u003cem\u003e Cx. pipiens\u003c/em\u003e f. \u003cem\u003epipiens\u003c/em\u003e female winter survival rates relative to control. Furthermore, the reproductive parameters and the longevity of the overwintered females were similar between the selected populations and the control. \u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eConclusions\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eOur findings reveal that sort term selection to DFB and \u003cem\u003eBti\u003c/em\u003e induces a high fitness cost on the winter survival of \u003cem\u003eCx. pipiens\u003c/em\u003e f. \u003cem\u003emolestus\u003c/em\u003e but not of \u003cem\u003epipiens\u003c/em\u003e form, suggesting potential differences on the persistence of tolerant individuals from year to year between the two forms.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Short Term Selection to Diflubenzuron and Bacillus Thuringiensis Subsp. Israelensis Differentially Affects the Winter Survival of Culex Pipiens F. Pipiens and Culex Pipiens F. Molestus (Diptera: Culicidae)","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2020-12-08 17:39:27","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-121993/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"5738125a-7bda-43ae-b589-5f125878086d","owner":[],"postedDate":"December 8th, 2020","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[{"id":1383559,"name":"Parasitology"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2021-04-08T11:40:52+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2020-12-08 17:39:27","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-121993","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-121993","identity":"rs-121993","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"_2-kVJe1T_tPrBINL-cwx","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}