Intro
Cancer occurs all too frequently in young adults. For example, over 70,000 persons
between 15 and 39 years old are diagnosed with malignant neoplasms each year in the
US ( Coccia et al., 2014 ). In
one study of cancer patients of reproductive age, 47 to 63% desired to have children
after tumor diagnosis and treatment ( Letourneau
et al., 2012 ). Embryo or oocyte cryopreservation
before cancer treatment as fertility preservation is recommended by American and
European oncologic societies ( Loren et
al ., 2013 ; Peccatori
et al ., 2013 ).
Because embryo cryopreservation requires a committed sexual partner or a sperm donor,
and may encounter social or religious objections in some countries and communities,
oocyte cryopreservation is performed and investigated more often. In addition, a
smaller fraction among women with a cancer history ultimately thaw their
cryopreserved oocytes for childbearing than among women with no cancer history
( Cobo et al., 2018 ). For
these reasons, the developmental competence of oocytes and pregnancy rates have not
been investigated thoroughly for cryopreserved oocytes from patients with a history
of malignant disease. Most previous studies have focused on differences in numbers
of oocytes obtained for cryopreservation between women with and without a cancer
diagnosis ( Lekovich et al.,
2016 ; Klock et al.,
2010 ; Pal et al.,
1998 ; Quintero et al.,
2010 ; Robertson et al.,
2011 ; Quinn et al.,
2017 ; Almog et al.,
2012 ; Oktay et al.,
2006 ; Knopman et al.,
2009 ), rather than oocyte developmental potential or pregnancy rates
(Cobo et al., 2018; Pal et al., 1998; Quintero
et al., 2010; Almog et al., 2012; Oktay
et al., 2006). Furthermore, for both cryopreserved and fresh
oocytes, the influence of a cancer history on assisted reproduction outcome is still
unclear.
Some past studies suggested that malignant neoplasm could negatively affect
fertility. A large cohort study of cancer survivor in Scotland showed a negative
impact of cancer on subsequent achievement of pregnancy ( Anderson et al., 2018 ). In addition,
concentrations of anti-Mullerian hormone have been found to be low in patients with
cancer even before it is treated ( Harzif et
al., 2019 ). Thus, patients with malignant neoplasia might
have decreased ovarian reserve and potential for fertility even before beginning
cancer treatment. However, whether the cause of these deficits lies in the tumor
itself or in background factors predisposing to tumor.
To clarify effects of malignant tumors on oocyte developmental competence, we
compared fertilization, embryonic development, and pregnancy rate between patients
with and without a medical history of malignant tumors. In sub-analyses we
investigated whether the malignant tumors themselves affected oocyte developmental
competence.
Results
No significant differences were evident between case and control groups for such
general features as age (38.5±4.1 vs. 39.4±3.5),
BMI (20.4±3.2 vs. 20.9±2.2), and basal endocrine
profile values, except that baseline luteinizing hormone was significantly
higher in the case than the control groups although the case group remained
within the normal range (4.13±2.42 vs. 3.12±1.44;
Table 1 ).
Characteristics of case and control groups.
BMI, body mass index; FSH, follicle-stimulating hormone; LH:
luteinizing hormone; E 2 , estradiol; T, testosterone; PRL,
prolactin; HOMA-IR, homeostasis model assessment - insulin
resistance.
p <0.05 vs . control, unpaired t
test.
Values for FO, CE, and SCE were significantly lower in the case group than the
control group (2.8±2.5, 2.5±2.2, and 1.1±1.2
vs. 3.8±2.6, 3.4±2.5, and 1.9±1.6;
Table 2 ). Values for RO tended to be
lower in the case group than in the control group (4.4±4.2
vs. 5.2±3.5; p =0.060, Mann-Whitney
U test). The rate of fertilization was significantly lower in the case group
than the control group (63% vs. 72%; Table 2 ). The case group had significantly lower rates of
development to SCE from any of RO, FO, or CE than the control group (25, 39, and
43% vs. 36, 50, and 55%; p <0.05,
Chi-squared test; odds ratios [OR], 0.578, 0.630, and 0.610; confidence
intervals [CI], 0.392-0.853, 0.407-0.974, and 0.387-0.962, respectively).
Correlation between age and number of RO, FO, CE, and SCE in case and control
groups are shown in Table 3 . Significant
negative correlations were evident between age and number of RO and FO in the
control group (R= -0.299 and -0.274), while no significant correlations were
observed in the case group (R=-0.060 and -0.024). No significant correlations
were present between age and number of CE or SCE in either group. Clinical
outcomes are included in Table 2 . The
case group had significantly lower rates of clinical pregnancy and live birth
per ET than the control group (respectively 7.6 and 1.5% vs.
20.4 and 14.0%; p <0.05, Chi-squared test; OR, 0.319 and
0.095; CI, 0.117-0.877 and 0.016-0.585).
Developmental potentials of oocytes and clinical outcomes of embryo
transfer in case and control groups.
RO, retrieved oocytes; FO, fertilized oocytes; CE, cleaving embryos;
SCE, superior cleaving embryos; ET, embryo transfer; OR, odds ratio;
CI, confidence interval.
p <0.05 vs . control group,
Mann-Whitney U test
p <0.01 vs . control group,
Mann-Whitney U test
p <0.05 vs . control group,
Chi-squared test
p <0.01 vs . control group,
Chi-squared test
Correlations between age and numbers of RO, FO, CE, or SCE in case and
control groups.
RO, retrieved oocytes; FO, fertilized oocytes; CE, cleaving embryos;
SCE, superior cleaving embryos.
p <0.05, Spearman’s correlation coefficient.
No significant differences in numbers of RO, FO, CE, and SCE were evident among
stages 0, 1, and 2 of breast cancer (respectively 0±0, 0±0,
0±0, and 0±0 in stage 0; 3.2±4.5, 2.2±1.9,
2.1±1.8, and 1.1±1.3 in stage 1; and 3.8±4.3,
2.8±3.8, 2.8±2.0, and 1.3±1.5 in stage 2; Kruskal-Wallis
test). No significant differences were evident in general characteristics
between S+ and S- groups, except that baseline estradiol was significantly
higher in the S+ group (63.8±46.4 vs. 42.8±23.4,
Table 4 ). No significant difference
was noted in numbers of RO, FO, CE, or SCE between S+ and S- groups, nor in
rates of development to SCE ( Table
5 ).
Patient profiles for sub analysis of groups with (S+) and without (S-)
cancer surgery.
BMI, body mass index; FSH, follicle-stimulating hormone; LH,
luteinizing hormone; E 2 , estradiol; T, testosterone; PRL,
prolactin; HOMA-IR, homeostasis model assessment - insulin
resistance.
p <0.05 vs . control, unpaired t
test.
Fertilization and embryonic development potentials of oocytes from
patient with (S+) and without (S-) cancer surgerys.
RO, retrieved oocytes; FO, fertilized oocytes; CE, cleaving embryos;
SCE, superior cleaving embryos.
p <0.05 vs . S- group, Chi-squared
test/Fisher’s exact test; odds ratio. 0.484; 95% confidence
intervals, 0.258-0.908.
Discussion
This study investigated whether a history of malignant tumor affected oocyte
developmental competence. Folliculogenesis was analyzed quantitatively by number of
RO and qualitatively by oocyte developmental competence. The rates of development to
SCE from RO, FO, and CE, which reflect oocyte developmental competence, all were
significantly lower in the case group than the control group. The proportion of SCE
among CE also was significantly lower in the case group. The number of RO was less
in the case than the control group, but only at a borderline significance
( p =0.06). Age and the number of RO showed a significant
negative correlation in the control group but not in the case group, suggesting that
ovarian dysfunction in the case group already was compromised, observing any effect
of aging. FO, CE, and SCE, reflecting effects of both RO and oocyte developmental
competence, again were significantly decreased in the case group. Altogether, our
results indicate that women with a history of malignant disease are likely to have
impaired folliculogenesis, sharply evident in terms of oocyte developmental
competence and somewhat but less marked for number of RO.
Previous studies have shown conflicting results for number of RO, showing significant
cancer related decreases in number of RO in some reports ( Lekovich et al., 2016 ; Klock et al., 2010 ) but not others ( Pal et al., 1998 ; Quintero et al., 2010 ; Robertson et al., 2011 ; Quinn et al., 2017 ; Almog et al. , 2012 ; Oktay et al., 2006 ; Knopman et al., 2009 ). Five of
these previous studies (Lekovich et al., 2016; Pal et
al., 1998; Quintero et al., 2010; Almog et
al., 2012; Oktay et al., 2006) considered
fertilization rates, with 1 showing a significant decrease (Pal et
al. , 1998) but 4 finding no difference. None of these studies examined
embryonic development beyond fertilization. Patients in these studies were in their
early 30s, which is considerably younger than the mean age of 39 years in our study.
This age-related difference in influence of malignant disease on RO and
fertilization rate might reflect a greater ovarian reserve in younger women.
In sub-analyses, no significant difference in oocyte developmental competence was
evident between ART carried out after resection of malignant tumors and ART without
prior tumor resection. In addition, we found no significant difference in oocyte
development related to stage of breast cancer. These results suggest that impaired
oocyte developmental competence in patients with a history of malignant tumor might
not have resulted from the tumors, but possibly from background factors shared by
cancer development and infertility. Insulin resistance which is involved in the
mechanism underlying polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), a common disease underlying
some case of infertility also has been suspected as a contributor to carcinogenesis
associated with obesity ( Wolin et
al. , 2010 ). Reactive oxygen species similarly have been
linked to progression of malignant tumors ( Liou
& Storz, 2010 ; Aggarwal et
al., 2019 ), ovulation disorders, decreased sperm function,
and damage to embryos ( Lu et al.,
2018 ). Reactive oxygen species also have been implicated in development
of PCOS ( Mohammadi, 2019 ) and endometriosis
( Máté et al.,
2018 ). Relationships between advanced glycation end-products (AGE) and
infertility ( Jinno et al.,
2011 ), and between AGE and carcinogenesis ( Walter et al. , 2019 ; Healey et al., 2019 ) have been suggested. Thus,
risk factors for malignant tumors and infertility often appear to overlap.
Because embryo cryopreservation for fertility preservation has encountered various
difficulties, oocyte cryopreservation is more often performed and investigated at
present. Further, fewer women with malignant tumors have been found to actually thaw
their cryopreserved oocytes for childbearing than women who had undergone oocyte
cryopreservation for other reasons than cancer ( Cobo
et al., 2018 ). Our present investigation of oocyte
cryopreservation in patients with a history of cancer showed significantly decreased
rates of oocyte development and pregnancy, so women with malignant tumors might need
to be warned about a higher risk for infertility despite ART. Further, when
infertility is encountered, shared background factors might pose higher risk of
malignant tumors later in life.
Materials|Methods
A case-control study was conducted starting with data from a total of 635 cycles
of oocyte retrieval performed at Toranomon Hospital in Tokyo from January 2010
to December 2019. Since blastocyst cultures were carried out in only 49 cycles
during this period, these were excluded from analysis. Ninety cycles were
excluded because of previous ovarian surgery (45 cycles), previous chemotherapy
(5 cycles), history of malignant tumor in male partner (16 cycles), or oocyte
cryopreservation alone (24 cycles). The remaining 496 cycles represented our
study population. The case group was defined as oocyte retrievals from women
with a history of malignant neoplasia (52 cycles). From remaining the 444 cycles
involving no such history, 52 control group cycles were randomly selected
according to propensity score adjustment based on age and body mass index (BMI)
( Fig. 1 ).
Figure 1 Study population enrollment flow chart. Among 635 cycles of ART
performed at Toranomon Hospital from 2010 to 2019, 139 cycles were
excluded because of previous ovarian surgery, previous chemotherapy,
history of malignant tumor in male partner, oocyte cryopreservation,
or blastocyst culture. The remaining 496 cycles represented our
study population. Fifty-two cycles where women had a history of
malignant tumor made up the case group. The 52 cycles in the control
group were randomly chosen from the non-cancer study population by
computer matching of propensity scores involving age and body mass
index.
Study population enrollment flow chart. Among 635 cycles of ART
performed at Toranomon Hospital from 2010 to 2019, 139 cycles were
excluded because of previous ovarian surgery, previous chemotherapy,
history of malignant tumor in male partner, oocyte cryopreservation,
or blastocyst culture. The remaining 496 cycles represented our
study population. Fifty-two cycles where women had a history of
malignant tumor made up the case group. The 52 cycles in the control
group were randomly chosen from the non-cancer study population by
computer matching of propensity scores involving age and body mass
index.
Oocytes were retrieved after stimulation with gonadotropin and gonadotropin
releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist or antagonist. Fourteen cycles in the case
group were stimulated without gonadotropin because the patient's breast cancer
showed high hormonal receptivity based on receptor testing. In
vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection
(ICSI) was selected according to condition of the semen. Fertilization was
confirmed on the day after IVF/ICSI. Fresh embryo transfer (ET) or embryo
cryopreservation was performed 2 or 3 days after oocyte retrieval. We defined
superior cleaving embryos (SCE) as Grade 1 or 2 according to Veeck's criteria
( Scott et al. ,
1991 ). Pregnancy was defined as concentration of serum hCG beta subunit
exceeding 50 IU/L at 14 days after embryo transfer. Clinical pregnancy was
defined as detection of a gestational sac by transvaginal ultrasonography.
Ongoing pregnancy was defined by detection of a fetal heartbeat.
Oocyte developmental competence and rates of pregnancy and live birth were
compared between case and control groups as the main outcome measures of the
study.
Among the 52 cycles in the case group, the patient's history in 25 cycles
involved breast cancer (48%); 9 cycles, cancer of the uterine corpus (17%); 2
cycles, cancer of the uterine cervix (4%); 9 cycles, cancer of the thyroid
(17%); 3 cycles, gastrointestinal cancer (6%); and 4 cycles, lymphoma or
leukemia (8%). The 25 cycles involving breast cancer included stage 0 in 1 cycle
(4%), stage 1 in 20 cycles (80%), and stage 2 in 4 cycles (16%). To analyze the
influence of breast cancer stage, we compared oocyte developmental competence
between breast cancer stages in those 25 cycles (BC group). Next, to analyze the
reproductive influence of malignant tumors apart from their treatment, we
divided the case group into subgroups and compared oocyte developmental
competence between cycles with and without surgical resections of malignant
tumors (S+ vs. S-, n=33 and 19, respectively).
Data were analyzed using IMB SPSS (Statistical Program for Social Sciences)
software version 27. Student's t tests were used for normally distributed data.
For non-normal distributions of data, the Mann-Whitney U test was used for
bivariate comparisons, the Kruskal-Wallis test for comparisons of 3 or more
groups, and the Bonferroni test as the post hoc test. Chi-squared tests and
Fisher's exact test were used to compare ratios. Spearman's correlation
coefficient was used for non-parametric data. P values below
0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. Results are presented
as the mean ± standard deviation (SD).
This study was conducted with the approval of the Research Ethics Review
Committee at the Toranomon Hospital. We also provided for patient optouts from
the research plan according to the instructions of the Research Ethics Review
Committee.
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.