Let's not abandon programmed frozen embryo transfers yet: a countercurrent perspective
other
OA: bronze
public-domain-us
AI-generated summary
Optimal frozen embryo transfer management requires individualized patient assessment, balancing natural-cycle FET advantages against practical and clinical considerations rather than adopting a single approach.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
The countercurrent opinion given in this paper is that the optimal management of frozen embryo transfers (FET) is not a one-size-fits-all matter, but rather one that should be decided after considering all the various parameters and options. This choice should notably encompass patients' individual characteristics - including variable risks of obstetric complications - and weigh out the respective advantages of each FET option in each case. While there may be real advantages for natural-cycle FET in many cases, these need to be balanced against both practical and clinical issues. Contrary to several prevailing, sometimes loudly expressed suggestions, there is not a one single effective approach when it comes to choosing a mode of scheduling FET.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-06-18T06:15:08.409253+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-06-18T06:12:46.966435+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-15T02:00:00.661756+00:00
License: public-domain-us
· commercial use OK
· attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine