Abstract
Background Stress and pain are adaptive, bidirectionally related systems, modulated by shared factors. However, how stress reactivity relates to individual differences in pain-related distress and pain sensitivity remains unclear. This preregistered study therefore investigates how physiological reactivity to acute stress relates to trait pain-related distress and stress-induced changes in pain sensitivity, and whether pain-related distress acts as moderator.
Methods
Trait pain-related distress was assessed in 148 healthy males using questionnaires. Baseline blood pressure, pulse rate, alpha-amylase, and cortisol were obtained as well as initial heat pain thresholds and tolerances. One group underwent the Maastricht Acute Stress Task, while another group performed the placebo version. Consecutively all stress- and experimental pain indicators were examined again.
Results
Trait pain-related distress was not associated with stress reactivity (MAST-induced changes in physiological stress indicators), while stress-induced changes in pain sensitivity showed high individual variability, but were not associated with stress reactivity. Finally, we found preliminary evidence that in individuals with a higher tendency to catastrophize and to fear pain, stronger alpha-amylase increases were associated with larger stress-induced increases in pain threshold (p-FDR = .07).
Conclusion
Our study illustrates the idiosyncrasy of the complex interplay between trait pain-related distress, physiological stress reactivity, and stress-induced changes in pain sensitivity. While our preliminary results require replication, they suggest that stable individual differences influence the link between stress and pain beyond physiology. This underscores the importance of considering trait differences in future research on stress-pain interactions to, ultimately, better tailoring preventions and treatments for patients with chronic pain.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Footnotes
Our main changes in the revised manuscript include: - Greater emphasis on the non-significant findings following correction for multiple testing, with more cautious wording adopted throughout to better reflect the strength of the evidence. - Subjective responses to the MAST and AUCi cortisol measures were removed from the primary analyses, - Terminology was standardized throughout the manuscript to improve consistency (e.g., using stress response versus stress reactivity). - Additional clarification and background information, including clearer identification of the involved stress systems, stronger theoretical grounding for the hypotheses based on existing literature, greater depth in the discussion section (e.g., regarding the absence of significant findings), and increased transparency concerning the studys limitations.
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.