Types of support expected by women treated due to gynaecological reasons during the peri-operative period
article
OA: gold
CC0
Abstract
Introduction: Women at the peri-and post-menopausal age who are qualified for surgical procedures for gynaecological reasons are exposed to specific emotional problems related with the necessity to perform the surgery. Therefore, they often expect various types of support. A characteristic feature of this support is an exchange of emotions, information, instruments for action and tangible property.
Full text
31,588 characters
· extracted from
oa-pdf
· 14 sections
· click to expand
Introduction
Women at the peri- and post-menopausal age who are qualified for surgical procedures for
gynaecological reasons are exposed to specific emotional problems related with the necessity to perform the
surgery. Therefore, they often expect various types of support. A characteristic feature of this support is an
exchange of emotions, information, instruments for action and tangible property.
Aim of the study: The objective of the study was to perform an analysis of the type of support expected
during the peri-operative period by women treated for gynaecological reasons.
Material and methods
The study covered 232 women at the pre- and peri-menopausal age who received
surgical treatment for various gynaecological reasons. The study was carried out using an author-designed
questionnaire form. The results of the study obtained were analysed statistically. The p values p < 0.05 were
considered statistically significant.
Results
It was found out that respondents who had university education significantly more frequently
(p < 0.05) expected information and instrumental support, compared to those with elementary/elementary
vocational or secondary education level. In turn, patients who were married significantly more often expected
emotional and information support, compared to those who were single. The respondents who had undergone
a surgical procedure with considerable tissue injury significantly more frequently (p < 0.05) expected material
support than women who had undergone surgery with moderate tissue injury.
Conclusions
The education level and marital status of patients determined the expectations of support
during the peri-operative period, whereas patients’ age and category of surgical procedure did not have any
effect on the expectations of support during this time.
Key words: support, gynaecological surgery, peri-operative period.
Streszczenie
Wstęp: Kobiety w wieku około- i pomenopauzalnym, które kwalifikowane są do operacji z powodów gine-
kologicznych, narażone są na specyficzne problemy emocjonalne związane z koniecznością wykonania operacji,
dlatego często oczekują różnego rodzaju wsparcia. Cechą charakterystyczną wsparcia jest wymiana emocji,
informacji, instrumentów działania oraz dóbr materialnych.
Cel pracy: Celem pracy było dokonanie analizy rodzaju oczekiwanego wsparcia w okresie okołooperacyjnym
u kobiet leczonych z powodów ginekologicznych.
Materiał i metody: Badaniami objęto 232 kobiety w wieku przed- i okołomenopauzalnym, leczone operacyj-
nie z różnych powodów ginekologicznych. Badania przeprowadzono z zastosowaniem kwestionariusza ankiety
Types of support expected by women treated due to gynaecological reasons
during the peri-operative period
Typy oczekiwanego wsparcia w okresie oko³ooperacyjnym u kobiet leczonych ginekologicznie
Magdalena Lewicka1, Artur Wdowiak1, Magdalena Sulima1, Barbara Stawarz2, Szymon Bakalczuk3,
Grzegorz Bakalczuk1
1Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Obstetrical-Gynaecological Nursing Faculty of Nursing and Health Sciences,
Medical University, Lublin;
Head of Department: Prof. Henryk Wiktor, MD, PhD
2Institute of Health Protection, Rev. Bronisław Markiewicz State Higher School of Technology and Economics, Jarosław;
Head of Institute: Irena Brukwicka, MD, PhD
3Non-Public Health Care Unit ‘Ovum Reproduction and Andrology’, Lublin
Przegląd Menopauzalny 2013; 3: 216–222
DOI: 10.5114/pm.2013.36586
Przegl¥d menoP auzalny 3/2013
217
Introduction
While deciding about the scope of surgical treat-
ment of a woman it is necessary to consider medi-
cal goals, eva luate the state of health, patient’s
expectations, and consent expressed by the woman
to the type of surgery proposed [1-3]. According to
Friebe [4], an acceptance and understanding by the
woman of the surgical procedure proposed is of great
importance in gynaecology. Pa tient’s knowledge about
the type of surgery, chances for its success and possible
complications allow her to relatively precisely analyze
the risk, which is usually related with injury, as well as
the benefits of surgical treatment, and determines the
emotional state of the patient.
The Expert Team of the Polish Gynaecological Asso-
ciation developed categorization of surgical procedures
in gynaecology, taking into consideration the extent of
tissue injuries. Four categories of surgical procedures in
gynaecology were distinguished:
• category I – surgical procedures related with slight
tissue injury;
• category II – surgical procedures related with moderate
tissue injury;
• category III – surgical procedures associated with
considerable tissue injury;
• category IV – surgical procedures related with
extensive tissue injury [5].
Women at the peri- and post-menopausal age who
are qualified for surgical procedures for gynaecological
reasons, apart from the symptoms directly related
with menopause, are exposed to specific emotional
problems associated with the necessity to perform the
surgery, and therefore, often expect various types of
support.
Social support is a multi-dimensional concept,
which may be variously defined. Sęk [6, 7] considers
it as assistance available to an individual in difficult
situa tions, possible to obtain due to interactions with
others, which is a consequence of the affiliation of an
individual to society. A characteristic feature of support
is an exchange of emotions, information, instruments
for action and material goods. Such an exchange may
be one-sided or mutual, and its supporting-supported
direction may be constant or alternating. It is important
that this exchange accurately meets the demands of
the person who is in a difficult situation [8, 9].
Irrespective of different opinions concerning the
type of support, the following types are distinguished:
• Emotional support – consists in passing on supporting,
reassuring emotions, which are the manifestation of
concern and positive attitude towards the supported
person in order to create the sense of affiliation,
care and increase self-esteem. Due to the emotional
support those who suffer may release themselves
from own tensions and negative feelings, may
express their anxiety, concerns, and sadness. Also, an
adequate behaviour of the supporting person releases
the sense of hopefulness.
• Informative support – consists in the exchange
and provision of information and giving advice,
which favour better understanding of the situation,
own position in life and problems. Provision of
feedback information concerning the effectiveness
of undertaking by the supported person of various
preventive measures, and sharing own experience
with an individual experiencing similar problems also
plays an important role. Informative support responds
to the need for understanding the sense of critical
events and their causes.
• Instrumental support – consists in passing on
information pertaining to specific ways of conduct,
and may take the form of the modelling of effective
remedial behaviours.
• Tangible (material) support – consists in the provision
of direct assistance, in the form of a loan, gift or
service. Such a form of support may be, for example,
acting on behalf of those in need: feeding, provision
of shelter, residence, conveying financial support for
living, provision with pharmaceuticals and medicinal
products [6-8, 10].
The category of support may be considered and
measured from structural or functional perspectives.
Social structural support covers the category of the
structure of interpersonal relationships. It enables an
Objective
evaluation of mutual relationships between
various types of social bonds. Social functional support
makes it possible to evaluate whether these bonds fulfil
their specified functions. Therefore, a division was made
into perceived social support and received social support.
własnego autorstwa. Uzyskane wyniki badań poddano analizie statystycznej. Przyjęto 5-procentowe ryzyko błę-
du wnioskowania, p < 0,05 uznano za istotne statystycznie.
Wyniki: Stwierdzono, że badane z wykształceniem wyższym istotnie częściej (p < 0,05) oczekiwały wsparcia
informacyjnego i instrumentalnego aniżeli pacjentki z wykształceniem podstawowym lub zawodowym oraz
średnim. Z kolei badane zamężne istotnie częściej oczekiwały wsparcia emocjonalnego i informacyjnego ani-
żeli pacjentki samotne. Badane, u których wykonano operację ze znacznym urazem tkanek, istotnie częściej
(p < 0,05) oczekiwały wsparcia rzeczowego aniżeli kobiety poddane operacji z miernym urazem tkanek.
Wnioski: Wykształcenie i stan cywilny pacjentek warunkowały oczekiwanie wsparcia w okresie okołoope-
racyjnym, natomiast wiek pacjentek i kategoria zabiegu operacyjnego nie warunkowały takiego oczekiwania.
Słowa kluczowe: wsparcie, operacje ginekologiczne, okres okołooperacyjny.
Przegl¥d menoP auzalny 3/2013
218
Perceived support results from the knowledge and
convictions of an individual concerning from whom
and where he/she may obtain assistance in a difficult
situation, whereas received support is objectively
evaluated or subjectively reported by a recipient,
as an actually received type and amount of support
[7, 11]. These two types of support exert an effect
on the level of evaluation of stressful events, and
may be associated with a lower intensity of negative
emotions, or contribute to an increase in the sense of
own resourcefulness, effectiveness, and independence.
In the functional effect of support it is important to
adjust received support to perceived support. According
to Verheijden et al. [12], this type of support shows
a strong correlation with health.
Objective
The objective of the study was to perform an analysis
of the type of support expected during the peri-operative
period among women treated for gynaecological
reasons, according to socio-demographic variables and
category of the surgical procedure.
Material and methods
The study covered 232 women at the pre- and peri-
menopausal age who received surgical treatment due
to various gynaecological reasons at the Chairs II and
III, Clinic of Gynaecology, Independent Public Clinical
Hospital No. 4 in Lublin, and the Gynaecology and
Ob stetric Ward with Outpatient Department at the
Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński Specialist Hospital in Lublin.
Consent to the study was obtained from the Bioethical
Commission at the Medical University in Lublin.
The study was conducted using a questionnaire form
designed by the author for the needs of the presented
investigations. The study was carried out in two stages:
on the day preceding the surgery and on the third
day after the surgical procedure. On these days, the
respondents completed an identical questionnaire form.
All the women in the study expressed their voluntary
consent to complete the questionnaires, after being
informed about the use of the results of the study only
for scientific purposes and assurance of its anonymity.
Among patients who participated in the study there
were 74 (31.90%) patients aged 41-50, 80 women (34.48%)
aged over 50, and 78 (33.62%) respondents aged up to
40. As many as 55 (23.7%) patients had elementary or
elementary vocational education, 115 (49.6%) – secondary
education, and 62 (26.7%) – uni versity education. Among
the respondents, 157 (67.68%) women were married,
while 75 (32.32%) patients were single.
The structure of the study group according to the type
of surgical procedure was as follows: in the group of 167
(71.98%) patients in the study, a surgical procedure with
considerable tissue injury was performed, whereas in 65
(28.02%) respondents the surgery was performed with
moderate tissue injury. Among the surgical procedures
with moderate tissue injury in 21 (32.31%) patients
surgical hysteroscopy was performed, in 13 (20.0%)
surgery due to vaginal prolapse, also in 13 (20.0%)
patients diagnostic laparoscopy was performed. In
10 (15.38%) patients amputation of the cervix was
performed, in 5 (7.69%) the Burch colposuspension,
while in 3 (4.62%) – the Marshall-Marchetti-Krantz
(MMK) colposuspension. In the group of patients who
had undergone surgery with considerable tissue injury,
simple abdominal hysterectomy was most frequently
performed – 68 (40.72%) patients, followed by surgical
laparoscopy – 31 (18.55%), myomectomy – 26 (15.57%),
and partial or complete surgical removal of the uterine
body – in 20 (11.98%) patients. Surgical treatment of
endometriosis was performed in 9 (5.39%) patients,
10 (5.99%) respondents had undergone unilateral
removal of the uterine appendages, while bilateral
removal of the uterine appendages was performed in
3 (1.80%) of the patients in the study.
The results of the studies obtained were analysed
statistically using chi-square (chi
2) test for homogeneity
by means of computer software STATISTICA 8.0
(StatSoft, Poland). The p values p < 0.05 were considered
statistically significant.
Results
Table I presents the relationship between the type
of support expected during the peri-operative period
and patients’ age.
The study showed that during the peri-operative pe-
riod, patients aged 40 and under expected emotional, in-
for mative, instrumental and material support on a similar
level as those aged 41-50, and also over 50. These
differences were statistically insignificant (p > 0.05). The
fact of performance of the procedure did not re sult in
variation in the support expected by patients in the age
groups compared. Also, during the post-operative period
the respondents aged 40 and under expected emotional,
informative, instrumental and material support on a level
similar to those aged 41-50, and also over 50. These
differences were statistically insignificant (p > 0.05).
Table II presents an analysis of the relationship
between the type of perceived support during the peri-
operative period and the respondents’ education level.
Based on the results of studies it was found that
during the pre-operative period the patients with uni-
versity education significantly more frequently expec ted
informative support (69.35%) and instrumental support
(25.81%), compared to those with secondary education
(46.09% and 11.30%, respectively), and elementary or
elementary vocational education level (41.82% and
7.27%, respectively). The statistical analysis performed
Przegl¥d menoP auzalny 3/2013
219
showed a statistically significant relationship between
the expectations of informative support (p < 0.02) and
instrumental support (p 0.05) between the expectations of emotional and
Material
support during the pre-operative period, accor-
ding to the respondents’ education level. The per centage
distributions determining the expectations of support
during the post-operative period did not con siderably
change according to the respondents’ edu cation level.
Also, during the post-operative period, women who
had university education more frequently expected
informative support (62.90%) and instrumental support
(25.81%) than the respondents who had secondary
education (53.04% and 16.52%, respectively), and ele-
mentary or elementary vocational education (41.82%
and 12.73%, respectively). A statistically significant rela-
tionship was confirmed between the expectations of
informative support (p < 0.05) and instrumental support
(p 0.05)
between expectations of social and material support
Table I. Relationship between the type of expected support and the respondents’ age during the peri-operative period
Category
of surgical
procedure
Support expected before surgery*
emotional informative instrumental material
n % n % n % n %
up to 40 71 91.03 45 57.69 17 21.79 3 3.85
41-50 67 90.54 32 43.24 4 5.41 1 1.35
over 50 68 85.00 42 52.50 12 15.00 2 2.50
χ
2 1.268 2.265 3.007 0.147
p NS NS NS NS
Category
of surgical
procedure
Support expected after surgery*
emotional informative instrumental material
n % n % n % n %
up to 40 68 87.18 44 56.41 19 24.36 2 2.56
41-50 64 86.49 44 59.46 10 13.51 3 4.05
over 50 68 85.00 35 43.75 13 16.25 3 3.75
χ
2 0.589 1.898 1.740 0.159
p NS NS NS NS
*the respondents provided more than one reply
Table II. Relationship between the type of support expected during the peri-operative period and the respondents’ education level
Category of surgical procedure Support expected before surgery*
emotional informative instrumental material
n % n % n % n %
elementary or elementary vocational 47 85.45 23 41.82 4 7.27 0 0.00
secondary 101 87.83 53 46.09 13 11.30 6 5.22
university 58 93.55 43 69.35 16 25.81 0 0.00
χ2 3.598 7.899 6.448 1.287
p NS < 0.02 < 0.05 NS
Category of surgical procedure Support expected after surgery*
emotional informative instrumental material
n % n % n % n %
elementary or elementary vocational 42 76.36 23 41.82 7 12.73 2 3.64
secondary 102 88.70 61 53.04 19 16.52 4 3.48
university 56 90.32 39 62.90 16 25.81 2 3.23
χ2 4.228 6.517 6.210 1.278
p NS < 0.05 < 0.05 NS
*the respondents provided more than one reply
Przegl¥d menoP auzalny 3/2013
220
during the post-operative period, and the respondents’
education level.
Table III shows the relationship between the type of
support expected during the peri-operative period and
the respondents’ marital status.
Marital status considerably determined the respon-
dents’ expectations of emotional and informative sup-
port during the pre-operative period. Single women
(unmarried, widowed, divorced) considerably less fre-
quently expected emotional support (77.33%) and
informative support (38.67%), compared to the married
women (94.77% and 57.32%, respectively). In both cases,
a statistically significant relationship was observed at
a level of p < 0.02 and p < 0.01, respectively. During the
post-operative period, married women also considerably
more often expected emotional support (91.72%) and
informative support (57.32%), compared to those who
were single (74.67% and 44.00%, respectively). During
the post-operative period a statistically significant
relationship was noted between the expectation of
emotional support (p < 0.02) and informative support
(p 0.05) between expec-
tations of instrumental and material support, and
the respondents’ marital status, both during the pre-
operative and post-operative periods.
Table IV presents relationship between the type of
support expected during the pre- and post-operative
periods, and the category of the surgical procedure.
The study showed that patients in whom surgery
was planned with moderate tissue injury slightly
more rarely expected emotional support (84.62%)
and informative support (47.69%) during the pre-
Table III. Relationship between the type of expected support and respondents’ marital status during the peri-operative period
Category
of surgical
procedure
Support expected before surgery*
emotional informative instrumental material
n % n % n % n %
single 58 77.33 29 38.67 11 14.67 2 2.67
married 148 94.27 90 57.32 22 14.01 4 2.55
χ
2 8.457 10.569 0.259 0.477
p < 0.02 < 0.01 NS NS
Category
of surgical
procedure
Support expected after surgery*
emotional informative instrumental material
n % n % n % n %
single 56 74.67 33 44.00 12 16,00 4 5,33
married 144 91.72 90 57.32 30 19,11 4 2,55
χ
2 8,598 7.458 3.569 2.659
p < 0.02 < 0.02 NS NS
*the respondents provided more than one reply
Table IV. Relationship between the type of support expected and category of surgical procedure during the peri-operative period
Category of surgical procedure Support expected before surgery*
emotional informative instrumental material
n % n % n % n %
moderate tissue injury 55 84.62 31 47.69 9 13.85 2 3.08
considerable tissue injury 151 90.42 88 52.69 24 14.37 4 2.40
χ2 2.585 3.569 1.741 0.879
p NS NS NS NS
Category of surgical procedure Support expected after surgery*
emotional informative instrumental material
n % n % n % n %
moderate tissue injury 53 81.54 30 46.15 24 36.92 8 12.31
considerable tissue injury 143 85.63 79 47.31 57 34.13 37 22.16
χ2 2.268 0.144 1028 6.598
p NS NS NS <0.05
*the respondents provided more than one reply
Przegl¥d menoP auzalny 3/2013
221
operative period, compared to those in whom surgery
was planned with considerable tissue injury (90.42%
and 52.69%, respectively). However, this difference
was statistically insignificant (p > 0.05), similar to the
expected instrumental and material support (p > 0.05).
Also, during the post-operative period, the women who
had undergone surgery with a moderate tissue injury
slightly more rarely expected emotional support (81.54%)
and informative support (46.15%), compared to the
women who had undergone surgery with considerable
tissue injury (emotional support – 85.63%, informative
support – 47.31%). This difference was not statistically
significant (p > 0.05). Nevertheless, during the post-
operative period, a statistically significant relationship
was found (p < 0.05) between the category of surgical
procedure and expectation of material support in the
group of patients. The respondents who had undergone
surgery with a considerable tissue injury significantly
more frequently expected material support (22.16%)
than those who had undergone surgical treatment
with moderate tissue injury (12.31%). However, among
the patients in the study, no statistically significant
differences were observed (p > 0.05) between the ca-
te gory of surgical procedure and expectations of
emotional, informative and instrumental support during
the post-operative period.
Discussion
Women, irrespective of age, perceive gynaecological
surgical procedures as a form of mutilation, which is
associated with the violation of physical integrity,
disturbed body image, and decreased self-esteem.
Therefore, during the peri-operative period, it is im-
portant to identify patients with a low level of personal
and social resources, in order to provide them with an
adequate type of support [13-15].
Salmon [16] emphasizes that social support is
especially important for hospitalized patients, because
it serves as their protection against physiological and
emotional stress responses. According to this researcher,
the obtaining of support from the medical staff and others
is related with a lower level of anxiety and depression,
and better adaptation after the surgery. Social support is
an important factor which results in the restoration and
increase in the sense of coherence, and when provided by
a family or other social network, may help the patient to
perceive her own situation as understandable, steerable
and meaningful [17]. The studies by Łepecka-Klusek et al.
[18] show that older women (aged > 49 years) significantly
more often than those younger (aged ≤ 49 years) expect
support mainly from the medical staff, because in their
opinion, they may less often count on support from their
family than the younger patients.
Lindberg and Nolan [19] consider that it is important
to provide women with adequate informative and emo-
tional support during the period of decision making
concerning surgical treatment. The patients’ need for
emotional support, to a great extent, is due to their
being insufficiently informed about the goal of surgical
treatment and the surgical method [20]. The presented
study shows that during the pre-operative period the
patients expected emotional, informative, instrumental
and material support on a similar level, irrespective of
their age. In turn, considering the respondents’ edu-
cation level, in own studies it was observed that during
the pre-operative period patients with university
education considerably more often expected informative
and instrumental support, compared to those with
elementary/elementary vocation or secondary edu ca-
tion. Also, married women significantly more frequen-
tly expected emotional and informative support than
those who were single.
The effect of social support on the self-reported
and objective indicators of stress during the peri-
operative period was investigated by Krohne and
Slangen [21]. The results of the studies obtained
showed that patients who received high social support
were characterized by a lower level of anxiety, were
administered lower doses of anaesthetics, and the
duration of their hospitalization was considerably
shorter, compared to patients who received poor
support during the peri-operative period. According
to Chan et al. [22], during the post-operative period,
the obtaining of material and informative support is
more important for patients than emotional support.
Studies conducted by Bunde et al. [23] showed that
patients who had undergone hysterectomy received
high emotional and material support from their
closest surroundings. However, despite this, the above-
mentioned patients considerably more frequently
sought for information and advice from other women
who had undergone a similar surgical procedure, than
sought emotional support. The presented study shows
that age did not determine the type of expected support
during the post-operative period. Nevertheless, the
type of expected support depended on the education
level and marital status of the women examined. In
own studies, it was observed that during the post-
operative period the patients with university education
considerably more often expected informative and
instrumental support, compared to respondents with
an elementary/elementary vocational or secondary
education level. In turn, married women significantly
more frequently expected emotional and informative
support than women who were single. No significant
differences were found between the category of the
surgical procedure and expectations of emotional,
informative, instrumental or material support in the
group of patients examined, during the pre-operative
and post-operative periods.
Przegl¥d menoP auzalny 3/2013
222
Conclusions
1. Patients’ age did not determine the expectation of
support during the peri-operative period.
2. The education level and marital status of patients
determined expectation of support during the peri-
ope rative period. The respondents with university
edu cation significantly more frequently expected
informative and instrumental support, compared to
patients with elementary/elementary vocational or
secondary edu cation level. In turn, married women
significantly more often expected emotional and
informative support than patients who were single.
3. The category of the surgical procedure did not
determine the expected emotional, informative,
instru mental and material support during the pre-
operative period. However, during the post-operative
period, only material support was determined by the
category of the surgical procedure. The respondents
who had undergone surgery with a considerable
tissue injury significantly more frequently expected
Material
support, compared to those who had
undergone surgery with moderate tissue injury.
References
1. Bidzan M. Ja realne i ja idealne u kobiet operowanych radykalnie i za-
chowawczo z powodu guzów łagodnych i nienowotworowych narządów
rodnych. Psychoonkologia 2003; 7: 101-7.
2. Kotarski J. Leczenie mięśniaków macicy metodą embolizacji tętnic ma-
cicznych. W: Spaczyński M (red.). Postępy w ginekologii i położnictwie.
Polskie Towarzystwo Ginekologiczne, Poznań 2006.
3. Skręt A. Współczesne operacje ginekologiczne. W: Postępy w ginekologii
i położnictwie. Spaczyński M (red.). Polskie Towarzystwo Ginekologicz-
ne, Poznań 2006.
4. Friebe Z. Operacyjne leczenie w ginekologii. W: Położnictwo i ginekologia.
Bręborowicz G (red.). Wydawnictwo Lekarskie PZWL, Warszawa 2007.
5. Rekomendacje dotyczące postępowania przeciwbólowego w ginekologii
i położnictwie część pierwsza: leczenie bólu po zabiegach ginekologicz-
nych. Lubelski Biuletyn Ginekologiczno-Położniczy 2007; 2: 35-43.
6. Sęk H. O wieloznacznych funkcjach wsparcia społecznego. W: Psycho-
logia kliniczna i psychologia zdrowia. Cierpiałkowska L, Sęk H (red.).
Wydawnictwo Humaniora, Poznań 2001; 13-33.
7. Sęk H, Cieślak R. Wsparcie społeczne – sposoby definiowania, rodzaje
i źródła wsparcia, wybrane koncepcje teoretyczne. W: Wsparcie społecz-
ne, stres i zdrowie. Sęk H, Cieślak R (red.). Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN,
Warszawa 2006; 11-29.
8. Skwara A, Kolarzyk E. Rola i znaczenie wsparcia społecznego w radzeniu
sobie ze stresem. Medycyna Środowiskowa 2002; 5: 15-8.
9. Dyga-Konarska M. Informacyjne i emocjonalne wsparcie pacjenta przez
personel medyczny. Standardy Medyczne 2004; 5: 599-604.
10. Piotrkowska R, Książek J, Kolka A. Wsparcie w procesie pielęgnowania
osób niepełnosprawnych. Pielęgniarka i Położna 2005; 7-8: 4-5.
11. Skrzypek M, Widomska-Czekajska T. Znaczenie wsparcia społecznego
dla stanu zdrowia pacjentów z chorobą wieńcową kwalifikowanych do
koronarografii. Zdr Publ 2004; 114: 46-51.
12. Verheijden MW, Bakx JC, van Weel C, et al. Role of social support in
lifestyle-focoused weight management interventions. Eur J Clin Nutr
2005; supp. 1: 179-86.
13. Wilczak M, Mojs E, Samulak D, et al. Wpływ operacji ginekologicznych
na stopień zaburzeń snu oraz emocji u kobiet w wieku około- i pomeno-
pauzalnym. Prz Menopauz 2011; 5: 393-9.
14. Malicka I, Szczepańska J, Anioł K, et al. Zaburzenia nastroju i strategie
przystosowania do choroby u kobiet leczonych operacyjnie z powodu no-
wotworu piersi i narządów rodnych. Współczesna Onkol 2009; 13: 41-6.
15. Rannestad T. Hysterectomy: effects on quality of life and psychological
aspects. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2005; 19: 419-30.
16. Salmon P . Psychologia w medycynie. Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psycholo-
giczne, Gdańsk 2002.
17. Skarsater I, Langius A, Agren H, et al. Sense of coherence and social
support in relation to recovery in first-episode patients with major de-
pression: a one-year prospective study. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2005; 14:
258-64.
18. Łepecka-Klusek C, Pilewska-Kozak AB, Syty K, Jakiel G. Potrzeba wspar-
cia psychicznego kobiet w okresie oczekiwania na operację ginekolo-
giczną. Prz Menopauz 2010; 5: 309-14.
19. Lindberg CE, Nolan LB. Women's decision making regarding hysterec-
tomy. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2001; 30: 607-16.
20. Łuczyńska V, Grochans E, Ćwiek D. Wsparcie emocjonalne jako element
pracy pielęgniarki-położnej w oddziale ginekologii operacyjnej. Pielę-
gniarstwo XXI wieku 2003; 3: 13-8.
21. Krohne HW, Slangen KE. Influence of social support on adaptation to
surgery. Health Psychol 2005; 24: 101-5.
22. Chan CW, Hon HC, Chien WT, Lopez V. Social support and coping in Chi-
nese patients undergoing cancer surgery. Cancer Nurs 2004; 27: 230-6.
23. Bunde M, Suls J, Martin R, Barnett K. Hystersisters online: social support
and social comparison among hysterectomy patients on the internet.
Ann Behav Med 2006; 31: 271-8.
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Ask this paper
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cites (1)
References (9)
- Hysterectomy: effects on quality of life and psychological aspects via openalex
- W1987996461 via openalex
- W1997394792 via openalex
- W2068358191 via openalex
- W2148046043 via openalex
- W2149804331 via openalex
- W2593603501 via openalex
- W1985122959 via openalex
- W6649661004 via openalex
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK