Laparotomy versus laparoscopy in the surgical treatment of endometriosis: the end of an era?

Acta Europaea fertilitatis · 1990 · vol. 20(3) , pp. 163–6 · PMID:2533780 · W2397173246
article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 1 in-corpus citation
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed
AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-07-29

Laparotomy remains superior to laparoscopy for complex endometriosis with adhesions, while early-stage disease benefits little from intervention compared to observation.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

The Authors compare the efficiency of laparoscopic treatment with laparotomic surgical management of endometriosis. When the disease causes mechanical distortions and adnexal adhesions, there is an obvious explanation for infertility; in these cases laparotomic surgery has so far proved the only treatment to produce significantly valid results. No findings have yet been reported to demonstrate that cytoreduction, either pharmacological, laparoscopic or laparotomic, offers concrete advantages compared with simple observation when the disease is in the early stage.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosisinfertility

MeSH descriptors

Endometriosis Endometriosis Female Humans Laparoscopy Laparotomy

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cited by (1)

Cited by (1)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-08-26T06:08:41.316361+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:09:15.954262+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK