Assessing the sensitivity and robustness of the Living Planet Index through simulated population dynamics: strengths, stability, and challenges

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,885 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 4 of this Preprint. You must log in to post a comment. There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 4 of this Preprint. Add a Comment You must log in to post a comment. Comments There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. Understanding population change through time is crucial for effective conservation of biodiversity. The Living Planet Index (LPI) is a key indicator for tracking global species abundance trends under the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, offering a picture of population change over time. However, the sensitivity of the index to zero values or to the number of missing values in time series has not been fully explored. Using simulations, we assessed how missing data and zero values influence the index and associated trends. We found that the LPI method is informative with complete datasets, as missing data raises variation but only results in minor deviations from baseline trends. In contrast, the presence and distribution of zeros within the underlying data substantially influence the results and produce significantly lower trends. These findings highlight the need to develop complementary approaches for evaluating how data heterogeneity influences LPI trends, towards a comprehensive understanding and better-informed decisions on biodiversity change https://doi.org/10.32942/X2F961 Animal Sciences, Biodiversity, Biology, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Forest Sciences, Life Sciences Indicators, null models, decision making Published: 2026-05-07 14:39 Last Updated: 2026-05-12 08:36 CC-BY Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Data and Code Availability Statement: https://github.com/crcruzr/LPI_Simulations Language: English

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00