Deprescribing Anticholinergics to Preserve Brain Health: Reducing the Risk of Dementia through Deprescribing (R2D2): Study Protocol for a Randomized Clinical Trial

Deprescribing Anticholinergics to Preserve Brain Health: Reducing the Risk of Dementia through Deprescribing (R2D2): Study Protocol for a Randomized Clinical Trial | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Deprescribing Anticholinergics to Preserve Brain Health: Reducing the Risk of Dementia through Deprescribing (R2D2): Study Protocol for a Randomized Clinical Trial Noll L. Campbell, Richard J. Holden, Sujuan Gao, Frederick W. Unverzagt, and 14 more This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4682599/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Published Journal Publication published 22 Nov, 2024 Read the published version in Trials → Version 1 posted 5 You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Background: Older adults commonly experience chronic medical conditions and are at risk of cognitive impairment as a result of age, chronic comorbidity, and medications prescribed to manage multiple chronic conditions. Anticholinergic medications are common treatments for chronic conditions, and have been repeatedly associated with poor cognitive outcomes, including delirium and dementia, in epidemiologic studies. However, no study has definitively evaluated the causal relationship between anticholinergics and cognition in a randomized controlled trial design. Utilizing our prior experience in deprescribing anticholinergic medications in various clinical environments, we designed an outpatient deprescribing intervention to prospectively test the potential causal relationship between anticholinergics and cognition in primary care older adults. Methods: This cluster randomized clinical trial will be conducted to evaluate the impact of an anticholinergic deprescribing intervention compared to usual care on outcomes of cognition and safety in primary care older adults. Participants will include those aged 65 years and over, receiving primary care in the greater Indianapolis area, using a strong anticholinergic within the last two weeks or with evidence of high-risk exposure in the past year. Those excluded will have a diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease or related dementia, or serious mental illness. The trial plans to enroll 344 participants who will be cluster-randomized at the level of primary care physician to avoid contamination. Participants will complete outcome assessments every six months up to 2 years by blinded outcome assessors. The primary outcome of the study is a composite measure of cognition that includes domains assessing executive cognitive function, language, and memory. Secondary outcomes include patient-reported measures of pain intensity, depression, anxiety, sleep disturbance, and health-related quality of life. Discussion: The R2D2 trial will be the largest and longest prospective randomized trial testing the impact of an anticholinergic-specific deprescribing intervention on cognition in primary care older adults. Results could influence deprescribing methodology and provide new insight on the relationship between anticholinergics and cognition. Trial Registration: Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04270474. Registered17 February 2020. Anticholinergics deprescribing cognition dementia Figures Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Background More than 6 million older adults annually experience disability, hospitalization, or death due to a medication-related adverse event. 1-4 Up to 30% of older Americans use at least one strong anticholinergic medication every year. 5 6 These medications are associated with increased risks of delirium, general cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease and related disorders (ADRD), 6-16 leading to higher morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. 17 Medications with anticholinergic activity block cholinergic receptors in the brain, and have been associated with increased pathology thought to cause ADRD, with evidence from both mouse models and human studies. 18-24 Structural changes in human brain imaging studies have also been identified among users of anticholinergics compared with non-users. 25 Although a specific mechanism connecting anticholinergics with ADRD remains to be proven, several epidemiologic studies in humans show that anticholinergics increase the risk of ADRD among older adults receiving primary care. 7-11 13-16 However, these association studies lack evidence for a causal relationship between anticholinergics and ADRD. This warrants the pursuit of prospective “deprescribing” trials to determine whether changing the potential risk factor (anticholinergic medication use) has an influence on cognition or important clinical outcomes related to brain health and patient safety. Despite recommendations that anticholinergics should not be used as first line treatments in older adults, no deprescribing guidelines exist to support the safe and effective reduction of these high-risk medications. Prior studies have evaluated deprescribing interventions in reducing exposure to anticholinergics. 26-30 These studies targeted a variety of populations and medications, including those with pre-existing ADRD, with some designed as feasibility studies with small sample sizes and short duration. However, two studies identified benefit in cognition in subgroups. 26 30 Prior deprescribing trials suggest that pharmacist-based and educational interventions can safely deprescribe anticholinergics; however, the impact on clinical outcomes, namely performance on cognitive measures or the onset or diagnosis of ADRD, have not been tested in clinical trials. 5 26-28 31 32 Furthermore, prior trials have not focused exclusively on strong anticholinergics, which hold the highest binding affinity to cholinergic receptors and would provide the strongest test of the link between anticholinergic medication and adverse cognitive effects. 33 34 Therefore, we designed and initiated the randomized clinical trial, “Reducing the Risk of Dementia through Deprescribing” (R2D2) to evaluate the impact of a pharmacist-based deprescribing intervention on important cognitive and safety outcomes. The primary aim for the R2D2 trial is to determine the efficacy of anticholinergic deprescribing on objectively measured cognition compared to usual care in community-dwelling older adults. The secondary aim is to examine the quality of life and safety profile of anticholinergic deprescribing compared to usual care. Our conceptual model (Figure 1) holds that removal of offending anticholinergic agents will lead to increased cholinergic neurotransmission and preserved or improved cognitive function including memory, executive cognitive ability, and speed of processing. The enhancement in neural function and cognitive function produced by the intervention should result in a lower risk of cognitive impairment or delay in the time to ADRD. This trial will focus on proximal outcomes with future studies planned to evaluate the impact on disease outcomes (i.e., diagnosis of ADRD). Insert Figure 1: Conceptual Model of the R2D2 trial Methods The R2D2 trial primary objective is to determine the efficacy of an anticholinergic deprescribing intervention on cognition compared to usual care in older adults using strong anticholinergics at baseline. The second objective is to examine the quality of life and safety profile of deprescribing compared to usual care. Third, the study intends to determine whether demographic (age, gender, race), genetic (APOE Ɛ4 status), or clinical characteristics (comorbidities, number of medications) moderate the effect of the deprescribing intervention. Study Design This trial adopts a cluster randomized design of a deprescribing intervention delivered over 24 months in primary care patients. The clustering component is intended to minimize the potential for contamination and is conducted at the level of primary care provider. Figure 2 provides an overview of the general study design noting the level of randomization and schedule of outcome assessments. A unique feature of the design intended to address a key gap in the existing literature is the long duration of follow-up, allowing us to detect trends in changes in outcomes up to 24 months. Insert Figure 2: Overview of the cluster randomized design and outcome assessments. Study Sites and Recruitment Procedures Recruitment is conducted within primary care practices of health systems in central Indiana, including Indiana University Health and the Community Health Network. Indiana University Health is a large, quaternary care state-wide health system. Primary care locations in the greater Indianapolis area were prioritized based on the original plan for in-person recruitment. Community Health Network is a large tertiary care regional network located in central Indiana. Select primary care locations in the greater Indianapolis area were invited to participate based on potentially eligible population density and availability of support from clinical pharmacists. Primary care leaders provide approval to conduct proposed studies in primary care environments and within patient panels. Searchable elements from electronic medical records are used to identify providers with potentially eligible patients, and group those lists of patients by providers. While we do not collect data directly from providers, the intervention may influence the care some of their patients receive (particularly those providers randomized to the intervention group), making it ethically appropriate to allow providers the opportunity to opt out. Thus, prior to recruitment of potentially eligible patients, providers receive information about the study objectives, procedures, and expectations and are offered an opportunity to not participate (thus excluding all patients under their care) or exclude some of their patients. See figure 3 for the timeline of recruitment, intervention, and assessment of the R2D2 trial. This opt out approach was recommended by primary care leadership at participating sites. Recruitment of potentially eligible patients utilizes lists generated from searchable criteria from electronic medical records, including age, medication and visit history, diagnostic data, and participating provider. With telephone-based recruitment, the Informed Consent Form and HIPAA forms are provided to the participant by postal or electronic mail, or left at an agreed-upon location based on the participants comfort. The person obtaining consent arranges a time to discuss the study with the participant by telephone. During this telephone meeting, the person obtaining consent reviews the Informed Consent and HIPAA and answers any questions. After all questions have been addressed, the participant is asked to sign and date these study documents, then to return them by mail or email. The personnel obtaining consent signs and dates each returned document and proceeds with study procedures. This person is blinded to randomization status. Eligibility criteria: Eligible individuals are community-dwelling older adults without a diagnosis of ADRD who receive primary care from two regional healthcare systems in Indiana. We intentionally exclude those with ADRD because prior work suggests this population is not likely to benefit from the intervention. 16 26 35 Inclusion Criteria: Age 65 years and older At least one office visit to their primary care physician within the previous 12 months Use of at least one strong anticholinergic medication in the previous 2 weeks OR a ratio of total standardized days exposed within the prior 365 days of at least 0.4 or higher. 7 11 14 Original criteria required the presence of subjective cognitive dysfunction by meeting either (a) or (b) of the following criteria: A response of “somewhat worse” or “much worse” to the SCD screening question: “In general, how would you describe your memory as compared to 10 years ago? Response offerings are: much better / somewhat better / about the same / somewhat worse / much worse. This item is derived from the Sydney Memory and Aging study 36 and is comparable to items used to document self-report of memory in the HRS-AHEAD Study (1993 to present), the IQCODE questionnaire for cognitive decline in the elderly, 37 and items used in the Pittsburgh cohort studies of aging. 38 A score of 5 or less on the Six-Item Screener (SIS). 39 The SIS is a global measure of cognitive status that assesses three-item recall and orientation to year, month, and day of the week. 39 The SIS screening test was developed in the primary care population at Eskenazi Health and validated in a racially diverse population. Scoring is determined by the number correct with a range of 0-6, where higher scores indicate better cognition; a score of ≤ 5 has a sensitivity of 97.7% and specificity of 49.3% for identifying cognitive impairment in primary care older adults. 39 40 41 Able to communicate in English Access to a telephone. After reviewing the initial 6 months of recruitment, the study team recognized that certain eligibility requirements significantly compromised the ability to meet recruitment targets. With approval from the Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB), we subsequently expanded criterion 2 to include those who achieved a calculated measure of anticholinergic medication exposure based on medical record data from the prior 12 months, and removed the requirement for criterion 4a and 4b (presence of subjective cognitive decline defined through either approach). We continued to collect data on the presence of subjective cognitive complaints in a similar manner as outlined above. Exclusion Criteria: Permanent resident of an extended care facility (nursing home) Diagnosis of schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, or schizoaffective disorder defined by ICD9/10 codes Diagnosis of ADRD as determined by either: ICD-9/ICD10 codes, or Current use of a medication for ADRD (donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine, or memantine), or A pattern of responses to the Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ) that suggest a combination of assistance and dependence in daily activities that is consistent with level of function in ADRD (i.e., exclude if ≥ 3 FAQ items are scored at “requires assistance,” or if ≥ 1 FAQ item is scored at “dependent”). 42 Insert Figure 3: Schedule of Enrollment, Interventions, and Assessments Randomization procedures In this cluster randomized trial, randomization occurs at the level of primary care provider in a 1:1 proportion between intervention and usual care using a randomization list with a computer-generated random scheme in random blocks of 4 or 6 stratified by healthcare system. Research staff are blinded to provider allocation status at the time of recruitment and throughout the study to avoid bias in data collection. Deprescribing Intervention The deprescribing intervention is executed through a trained clinical pharmacist employed within each study site, called a Deprescribing Care Coordinator (DCC). This model is developed from prior experiences in anticholinergic deprescribing in our local institutions. 33 43-45 Training is provided in geriatric care (particularly high risk medications and appropriate alternatives), educational methods, titration and monitoring schedules, and behavioral economic principles that encourage communication and successful deprescribing attempts. The latter emphasizes the use of messengers, identifying incentives, and setting defaults that can support deprescribing. The trained clinical pharmacists communicate the deprescribing attempt with the patient, providers, and pharmacy as needed to coordinate the transition from a high-risk anticholinergic medication to a safer alternative. The following general steps are conducted by the DCC to complete the deprescribing process: 1) Clarifying the indication for the anticholinergic through medical record review and participant interview, 2) Education of potential risks of cognitive impairment in older adults, 3) Making a shared decision to deprescribe among participant, caregiver (as needed), and providers, 4) Identifying an appropriate alternative (not an anticholinergic medication or potentially inappropriate medication for older adults as defined by the American Geriatrics Society’s Beers Criteria ® 46 ) if desired, 5) Communicating the deprescribing plan with the appropriate provider(s), and 6) Monitoring and revising the plan as needed. The deprescribing process is initiated within seven days of enrollment, and most deprescribing is expected to be completed within four to six weeks after enrollment (see appendix The participant, pharmacist and physician will decide which deprescribing approach is most appropriate. Timelines for taper schedules will follow recommendations in the appendix regardless of the intent to replace the anticholinergic with a non-anticholinergic alternative or non-pharmacologic approach. Modification to deprescribing tapering intervals will be allowed based on clinical judgment of the research or clinical staff (DCC or provider physician) along with monitoring of symptom burden. If multiple anticholinergics are being used concurrently, a drug-specific decision on the deprescribing approach will be necessary, and only one deprescribing attempt will be performed at a time. According to the deprescribing protocol, tapering/discontinuation attempts will follow either a concurrent crossover, delayed crossover, or tapered discontinuation plan (see Appendices 1 & 2 for additional recommendations); however, this process is subject to interruption and delay based on clinical context for each participant and agreement between the DCC and providers caring for the participant. The design of the intervention acknowledges a number of factors that influence deprescribing success as recognized in the general model published by Linsky and colleagues (see figure 4 below). 47 These include patient factors, provider considerations/factors, and the process of deprescribing (medication orders, monitoring plans and adjustment based on patient-reported outcomes). Furthermore, our model of deprescribing anticholinergics includes the influence of behavioral economics on each of these factors. Recognizing the role of the messenger, incentives, and default settings in the process of deprescribing is addressed in the deprescribing protocol and contributes to the implementation of the intervention. Insert Figure 4: Factors to be influenced by the Pharmacist Deprescribing Care Coordinator. Usual Care The group randomized to usual care will receive educational material via traditional mail that reviews risks of polypharmacy, but no information specific to anticholinergic medications. The material will direct participants to their prescribers or pharmacists if they have concerns about their medications. The information will be delivered approximately 7 days following enrollment to coincide with the onset of the intervention in those randomized to the intervention group. Measures The primary outcome measure is cognitive performance in three critical domains relevant to the diagnosis of dementia that include information processing speed, memory, and executive function. In older adults, these domains have been shown to be impaired by anticholinergic medications. 48 We originally selected four cognitive tests based on a systematic review of 78 RCT’s among healthy adults that identified tests that were sensitive to the adverse cognitive effects of medications. 48 These included the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (information processing speed), Buschke selective reminding task (memory and new learning), Choice Reaction Time and Trail Making Test Parts A and B (executive cognitive function). 49-51 Because approval to initiate recruitment was received only days before in-person research operations were interrupted by the COVID-19 pandemic, we identified an alternative battery of cognitive tests encompassing the same domains but with the ability to be administered remotely with equivalent validity. Therefore, we modified the battery for the primary outcome to include the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (information processing speed), Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (memory & new learning), Oral Trails Making Test (executive function), and Controlled Oral Word Association and Semantic Fluency tests (executive function including phonemic and semantic fluency). These tests have been used by our team with fidelity across telephonic modes of delivery. 52 We will form an overall cognitive composite score as the average of each cognitive measure’s z-score, which is constructed by subtracting the mean baseline scores and dividing by the baseline standard deviation. Cognitive measures will be taken at baseline, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months during scheduled outcome assessment visits conducted by telephone. Parallel alternate forms will be used for all tests (3 versions each) presented in a counterbalanced fashion throughout the trial thus minimizing confounding due to learning effect. The study intervention proposes to reduce exposure to medications that are prescribed to manage symptoms of depression, anxiety, insomnia, and pain. We will use the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) to capture the four patient safety outcomes. PROMIS was developed by the National Institute of Health. It is unique in its ability to standardize scores across diagnoses and symptoms, it possesses excellent reliability and validity, and it is inclusive of diverse population characteristics and backgrounds. 53 The PROMIS profile-29 (www.nihpromis.org) includes brief scales for several domains; we will use four-item scales for depression, anxiety, and sleep disturbance (insomnia), and a 3-item pain intensity scale. 53 These and other safety measures (see below) will be collected at baseline and months 6, 12, 18, and 24. Comprehensive scoring manuals are available for each measure with guidance for interpreting individual and composite scales. Each PROMIS raw score can be converted to a T-score where 50 represents the general population norm for that symptom and each 10-point deviation represents one standard deviation (SD) from the population norm. We will use the 15-item Health Utility Index (HUI) to determine each participant’s health-related quality of life (HRQOL) at baseline and months 6, 12, 18, and 24. 54 The HUI is a utility-based HRQOL instrument applied in patients with a wide range of medical conditions. It has eight attributes: vision, hearing, speech, ambulation, dexterity, emotion, cognitive function and pain. The individual health domain scores range from 0.00 (maximum impairment) to 1.00 (no impairment) and the multi-attribute (HUI) scores, a multiplicative function of individual attribute levels, range from 0.36 to 1.00 with anchors 0.00 = dead and 1.00 = perfect health. To assess adverse events, two methods are planned: 1) a single-item question will be asked at each follow-up assessment to collect self-reported adverse events, and 2) acute care utilization, defined as emergency room or hospitalization recognized through our statewide health information exchange (Indiana Network for Patient Care). Both methods will be reviewed and summarized at each meeting of the DSMB. The presence of APOE Ɛ4 alleles may modify the effect of anticholinergics on cognitive impairment, therefore, we originally planned to collect blood from each participant at baseline to include as a covariate in the responder analysis (secondary aim). However, given the COVID-19 interruption of in-person research, we revised our procedures to collect the APOE Ɛ4 variable remotely through saliva samples. Genomic DNA will be extracted from saliva samples using the DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Inc., Valencia, CA) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Sample kits will be distributed by mail to participant homes with instructions on how to complete and with pre-paid packaging to return to the Indiana Biobank for storage and processing. The sample kit will be distributed at the beginning of the study, but may be completed at any time of participation, and must be completed before 24 months or withdrawal from the study. Extracted DNA will be sent to LGC Limited, the preferred genotyping resource of the Indiana Alzheimer’s Disease Center and the Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute. Because individual differences have potential to modify treatment outcomes, we will measure the following demographic and clinical factors: age, self-reported race, self-reported gender, self-reported years of education, and relevant clinical diagnoses impacting cognition such as depression, cardiovascular disease, stroke, and diabetes as we have done in prior studies. 8 17 55 These demographic variables will be collected at baseline while diagnoses from the electronic medical record will be collected at baseline and 24 months (see Table 1). We will collect medication use through both self-report at baseline and each outcome assessment, and extract prescribed medications (medication orders) from electronic medical records prior to enrollment as well as during the 24-month study period. Table 1: Planned Outcome Measures and Covariates Variables/Outcomes Baseline 6 Months 12 Months 18 Months 24 Months Method Demographic characteristics X Self Report Clinical characteristics/Diagnoses X X Self Report & EMR Self-Reported Medications X X X X X Self Report Prescribed Medications X X EMR Cognitive Performance X X X X X Performance PROMIS 4-item scales: Pain Anxiety Insomnia Depression X X X X X Self Report Health Utility Index X X X X X Self Report ApoE Ɛ4 X Saliva ApoE Ɛ4: Apolipoprotein Ɛ4 EMR: Electronic medical record PROMIS: Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Data Management Study data are collected and managed using the Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) electronic data capture tools supported by the Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute at Indiana University. 56 57 REDCap is a secure, web-based software platform designed to support data capture for research studies, providing 1) an intuitive interface for validated data capture; 2) audit trails for tracking data manipulation and export procedures (auditing is independent of investigators and sponsors); 3) automated export procedures for seamless data downloads to common statistical packages; and 4) procedures for data integration and interoperability with external sources. Analysis Plan The cluster randomized trial design will be used by randomizing primary care physicians (PCP) into the intervention or usual care arms. Outcomes will be collected and analyzed at the patient level. We will examine assigned randomization against the computer-generated randomization scheme to ensure randomization validity. Patient characteristics between the two groups will be compared using mixed effects models for continuous variables and generalized estimating equations for categorical variables while adjusting for random PCP effects. We will examine the distributions of continuous variables and use alternative approaches such as transformation or nonparametric methods in cases of violation to the normal distribution assumption. We will also examine the frequency distribution of all categorical variables and adopt exact inference procedures in cases of zero or small cell size. Any baseline variable that is found to be significantly different between the two groups will be included as a covariate in the analyses outlined below. An intension to treat approach will be used in the analysis of all outcome measures. Composite cognitive scores collected at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months will be used as the primary outcome variables in mixed effects models. An indicator variable for intervention group (intervention vs usual care), time, interaction between group and time, and baseline cognitive scores will be included as independent variables as well as significant factors from the baseline comparison. PCP will be used as random effects to adjust for within-physician correlations. Significant group and time interaction or significant group main effect will indicate differences in cognitive function between the two groups. If significant interactions between group and time are found, post-hoc analyses will be conducted to determine the times when the two groups have significantly different cognitive scores. A significant main group effect in the absence of a group-by-time interaction would indicate differences between groups in cognitive function at all follow-up time points. In a second set of models, we will determine whether differences between groups were accounted for by decreases in total exposure to anticholinergics from baseline to 24 months. For each medication, standardized daily exposure will be calculated using standardized daily dose as in the study by Gray 7 and validated in our prior work 14 17 33 in which the daily dose is divided by the minimum effective dose. Days of standardized exposure for each medication will be the sum of the standardized days of exposure in a time period that includes each medication for each patient. This exposure is defined analogously to the pack-years concept used to characterize exposure to cigarette smoking and is a cumulative measure reflecting both exposure intensity and duration. Total exposure will be compared between the two groups using mixed effects models with group (intervention and control) as the independent variable adjusting for significant baseline variables and random PCP effects. We will then use the mixed effect model with cognitive scores at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months as outcome variables described above with total anticholinergic exposure as an additional independent variable adjusting for baseline cognitive scores and PCP random effects. Attenuation of the intervention effect from the original model would indicate that the effect of intervention is mediated through the reduction in anticholinergic exposure. Comparisons of PROMIS scores and HUI will be conducted similarly to the models we described above for cognitive scores. Exploration of potential moderation effects from APOE , or participants' characteristics will be conducted by including each of these variables and its interaction with the randomization group in the mixed effects models for the outcome measures. Significant interactions will indicate significantly different intervention effects in subgroups defined by APOE , or participants' characteristics. Interim analyses will not be conducted to evaluate conditional power (futility) or efficacy, thus preserving the overall Type-I error probability regarding the efficacy of the intervention. Given the nature of an elderly study population, we expect study attrition in the form of participant death or withdrawal. Our proposed analysis plan using mixed effects models are robust under the missing at random (MAR) assumption that the probability for dropping out depends on participants’ characteristics and medical conditions. We will compare patients’ characteristics between the completers and non-completers to detect potential violation to the missing at random assumption. We will conduct sensitivity analyses to assess the potential impact of missing data using multiple imputation which allows the imputation of missing outcomes for those who drop out using data gathered from these patients at baseline and prior to drop-out. We will use SAS software version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina) or relevant updated versions for all analyses. Sample Size and Rationale The sample size calculation was conducted using a mixed effects model and adjusting for the cluster randomization design. Assuming a within-subject correlation of 0.3, 0.2 and 0.1 for outcomes observed 6, 12 and 18 months apart, respectively, from the same individuals over time, 96 patients per group is required for 80% power to detect differences in composite cognitive scores of 0.6 SD at 24 months between the intervention and usual care groups with type I error rate at α=0.05 assuming linear trends in cognitive change in both groups. We further assume an intra-class coefficient (ICC) of 0.05 for primary care physicians and an average of 6 patients per physician. Accounting for the cluster design requires 120 patients per group to complete the trial. With an expected 30% attrition rate, we plan to enroll 172 patients per group into the study. Prior studies have reported mean differences in 1-year change of cognitive scores of 1.82 (SD 17) or 1.93 (SD 15) between those on definite anticholinergics versus those non-users. The effect sizes we used assume that our intervention will be able to detect a one-sixth reduction in expected cognitive decline if patients in the intervention group discontinue anticholinergics. Our assumption on the ICC is based on prior studies on prescribing patterns in physicians and practices. 58 In Primary Aim 2, using the effective sample size of 96 patients per group accounting for the design effect from cluster randomization, we will have 85.6% power to estimate the confidence bands with half-width of 0.3 SD for the differences in symptom scores from PROMIS and HUI scores between the intervention and usual care groups during follow-up using the two-sample t-tests at the 0.05 level. Power estimates were calculated using the GLMPower and Power procedures in SAS software version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina). Ethics Review and Approval All procedures have received and maintained ethical approval from the Institutional Review Board of the Indiana University (IRB# 1811254189; Federal-Wide Assurance Number, FWA00003544). As a multisite clinical trial, a reliance agreement was established to retain the Indiana University IRB as the single site ethical review board. The trial has also been registered at clinicaltrials.gov (Identifier: NCT04270474). The study employs an external DSMB including a senior investigator trained in geriatrics (chair), a biostatistician, a pharmacist/pharmacy services researcher, and funding agency representatives. The DSMB approved the study procedures meets at 6-9 month intervals or as needed to review safety data. The study received approval to initiate recruitment in March 2020 just days before a national interruption of research activities as a result of the global pandemic. In response, the study team revised operations to shift to fully remote procedures to avoid further delay in initiating and executing the trial. This included revisions to the process for recruitment, data collection, and measures employed. In June 2020, these changes were approved by the IRB, the DSMB, and the National Institute on Aging (NIA), with recruitment starting in July 2020. Discussion The R2D2 study will be the first to evaluate the impact of deprescribing strong anticholinergic medications on measures of cognition captured up to two years following the deprescribing attempt. Key elements of the study design include cluster randomization to minimize risk of contamination and a two year follow up phase to evaluate the impact of deprescribing on long-term cognition. The deprescribing intervention utilizes a pharmacist-based deprescribing care coordinator approach to reduce the use of potentially inappropriate anticholinergic medications in primary care older adults. This study will advance the field by addressing the potential causal relationship between anticholinergic medication use and cognition. In addition to these key features, we note that our approach to the deprescribing intervention intends to test the hypothesis that anticholinergic medications adversely affect cognitive performance. Therefore, the intervention offers alternative, non-anticholinergic medications as alternatives where preferred by participants in the intervention arm. This is not to be confused with other deprescribing approaches that may attempt to reduce the total number of medications (polypharmacy in general). While the intervention does offer a tapered discontinuation without replacement of an alternative medication if acceptable to the participant, it is possible the net impact on the total number of medications will be nil. We recognize other prospective anticholinergic deprescribing trials that have been conducted, including studies by Moga and colleagues, 30 Ailabouni and colleagues, 29 Kersten and colleagues, 26 and Gnjidic and colleagues. 28 These studies were important preliminary work that either proved feasibility or guided deprescribing approaches in anticholinergic deprescribing, however only the study by Moga and colleagues identified the potential for improvement in executive function in a subgroup of participants with a higher level of amyloid-beta pathology. Other studies failed to find differences in cognitive outcomes, though three were preliminary studies limited by sample size, one was limited by frailty of the study population or duration of follow-up. Our approach is unique in its exclusive focus on strong anticholinergic medications, target population of primary care older adults without dementia, and duration of follow-up. Additionally, our planned sample size of 344 represents the largest randomized trial of anticholinergic deprescribing conducted to date. Some limitations of the study are worth noting. First, while the cognitive outcomes employed in this study represent domains relevant to the diagnosis of dementia, we recognize that performance on cognitive outcomes alone is only one component of the diagnosis of dementia. If our hypotheses hold, and a differential effect on cognition between groups is identified, future work could extend the intervention and determine the impact on the diagnosis of dementia and time to diagnosis of dementia. Secondly, the study as proposed lacks a measure of the mechanism through which the causal relationship between anticholinergics and cognition are linked. While financial and scientific support for the planned trial is acknowledged, the resources were insufficient to include biomarkers of the mechanism through which anticholinergics may lead to cognitive impairment. We are unable to include biomarkers of anticholinergic use and cognitive impairment to correlate changes is measures of medication use with brain health. Finally, we collect two sources of medication use: self-reported medication use at six month intervals and medication prescriptions (orders) from the electronic medical records. These sources introduce advantages and disadvantages, however represent the data sources available to the study team throughout the conduct of the study. Trial Status The study began recruitment on July 20 th , 2020 and is currently recruiting participants. At the time of drafting of the manuscript, approximately 328 participants have been enrolled and is expected to be completed by July 31 st , 2024. Data collection is expected to be completed by July 31 st , 2026. Declarations Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate All procedures have received and maintained ethical approval from the Institutional Review Board of the Indiana University (IRB# 1811254189; Federal-Wide Assurance Number, FWA00003544). The trial has also been registered at clinicaltrials.gov (Identifier: NCT04270474). Consent for Publication Identities of individuals are not discussed in this manuscript. A model consent form is available on request. Availability of Data and Materials Data will be made available upon written request, including information about the identity of the investigator(s), data requested and plans for data analysis. Trial results will be shared on clinicaltrials.gov, published in peer-reviewed scientific publications and presented at state, regional, national, and possibly international scientific meetings. Competing Interests Dr. Boustani serves as a chief Scientific Officer and co-Founder of BlueAgilis; the Chief Health Officer of DigiCare Realized, Inc; and the Chief Health Officer of Mozyne health, inc. He has equity interest in Blue Agilis, Inc; DigiCare Realized, Inc; and Mozyne Health, Inc. He sold his equity in Preferred Population Health Management LLC; and MyShift, Inc (previously known as RestUp, LLC). He serves as an advisory board member or consultant for Eli Lilly and Co,; Eisai, Inc; Merck & Co Inc; Biogen Inc; and Genentech Inc. These conflicts have been reviewed by Indiana University and has been appropriately managed to maintain objectivity. All other authors report no conflicts of interest. Funding Acknowledgement Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute on Aging of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R01AG061452 (PI: Campbell). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. Authors’ Contributions Author contributions include the following: Conception, design, acquisition of funding: NLC, RJH, SG, FWU, MAB; operational execution: NLC, RJH, KAL, AC, ABH, SM, EP, DAL, KA, MAB; ethical review and maintenance: NLC, AC, ABH, SM; acquisition of data: ABH, SM, NM, DLR, CP, KP, KA, HK; data management: KAL, AC, ABH, CP, KP, NK, KA, HK. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript. References Hanlon JT, Schmader KE, Koronkowski MJ, et al. Adverse drug events in high risk older outpatients. J Am Geriatr Soc 1997;45(8):945-8. [published Online First: 1997/08/01] Opondo D, Eslami S, Visscher S, et al. Inappropriateness of medication prescriptions to elderly patients in the primary care setting: a systematic review. PloS one 2012;7(8):e43617. Anathhanam S, Powis RA, Cracknell AL, et al. Impact of prescribed medications on patient safety in older people. Therapeutic advances in drug safety 2012;3(4):165-74. Boudreau RM, Hanlon JT, Roumani YF, et al. Central nervous system medication use and incident mobility limitation in community elders: the Health, Aging, and Body Composition study. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2009;18(10):916-22. doi: 10.1002/pds.1797 [published Online First: 2009/07/09] Castelino RL, Hilmer SN, Bajorek BV, et al. Drug Burden Index and potentially inappropriate medications in community-dwelling older people: the impact of Home Medicines Review. Drugs Aging 2010;27(2):135-48. doi: 10.2165/11531560-000000000-00000 [published Online First: 2010/01/29] Campbell N, Boustani M, Limbil T, et al. The cognitive impact of anticholinergics: a clinical review. Clin Interv Aging 2009;4:225-33. [published Online First: 2009/06/26] Gray SL, Anderson ML, Dublin S, et al. Cumulative use of strong anticholinergics and incident dementia: a prospective cohort study. JAMA internal medicine 2015;175(3):401-07. Cai X, Campbell N, Khan B, et al. Long-term anticholinergic use and the aging brain. Alzheimer's & Dementia 2013;9(4):377-85. Kalisch Ellett LM, Pratt NL, Ramsay EN, et al. Multiple anticholinergic medication use and risk of hospital admission for confusion or dementia. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 2014;62(10):1916-22. Fox C, Smith T, Maidment I, et al. Effect of medications with anti-cholinergic properties on cognitive function, delirium, physical function and mortality: a systematic review. Age and ageing 2014;43(5):604-15. Richardson K, Fox C, Maidment I, et al. Anticholinergic drugs and risk of dementia: case-control study. BMJ 2018;361:k1315. Coupland CAC, Hill, T., Dening, T., Morriss, R. Moore, M., Hippisley-Cox, J. Anticholinergic drug exposure and the risk of dementia: A nested case-control study. . JAMA Intern Med 2019;179(8):1084-93. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.0677 Campbell NL, Boustani MA, Lane KA, et al. Use of anticholinergics and the risk of cognitive impairment in an African American population. Neurology 2010;75(2):152-9. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181e7f2ab [published Online First: 2010/07/14] Campbell NL, Lane KA, Gao S, et al. Anticholinergics influence transition from normal cognition to mild cognitive impairment in older adults in primary care. Pharmacotherapy 2018;38(5):511-19. Coupland CA, Hill T, Dening T, et al. Anticholinergic drug exposure and the risk of dementia: a nested case-control study. JAMA internal medicine 2019 Fox C, Richardson K, Maidment ID, et al. Anticholinergic medication use and cognitive impairment in the older population: the medical research council cognitive function and ageing study. J Am Geriatr Soc 2011;59(8):1477-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03491.x [published Online First: 2011/06/29] Campbell N, Perkins A, Bradt P, et al. Association of anticholinergic burden with cognitive impairment and healthcare utilization among a diverse ambulatory older adult population. Pharmacotherapy 2016;36(11):1123-31. Scheiderer CL, McCutchen E, Thacker EE, et al. Sympathetic sprouting drives hippocampal cholinergic reinnervation that prevents loss of a muscarinic receptor-dependent long-term depression at CA3–CA1 synapses. Journal of Neuroscience 2006;26(14):3745-56. Caccamo A, Oddo S, Billings LM, et al. M1 receptors play a central role in modulating AD-like pathology in transgenic mice. Neuron 2006;49(5):671-82. Bierer LM, Haroutunian V, Gabriel S, et al. Neurochemical correlates of dementia severity in Alzheimer's disease: relative importance of the cholinergic deficits. Journal of neurochemistry 1995;64(2):749-60. Geula C. Abnormalities of neural circuitry in Alzheimer's disease Hippocampus and cortical cholinergic innervation. Neurology 1998;51(1 Suppl 1):S18-S29. Sivaprakasam K. Towards a unifying hypothesis of Alzheimer's disease: cholinergic system linked to plaques, tangles and neuroinflammation. Current medicinal chemistry 2006;13(18):2179-88. Perry EK, Kilford L, Lees AJ, et al. Increased Alzheimer pathology in Parkinson's disease related to antimuscarinic drugs. Annals of neurology 2003;54(2):235-38. del Pino J, Zeballos G, Anadón MJ, et al. Cadmium-induced cell death of basal forebrain cholinergic neurons mediated by muscarinic M1 receptor blockade, increase in GSK-3β enzyme, β-amyloid and tau protein levels. Archives of toxicology 2016;90(5):1081-92. Risacher SL, McDonald BC, Tallman EF, et al. Association between anticholinergic medication use and cognition, brain metabolism, and brain atrophy in cognitively normal older adults. JAMA neurology 2016;73(6):721-32. Kersten H, Molden E, Tolo IK, et al. Cognitive effects of reducing anticholinergic drug burden in a frail elderly population: a randomized controlled trial. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2013;68(3):271-8. doi: 10.1093/gerona/gls176 [published Online First: 2012/09/18] Yeh Y-C, Liu C-L, Peng L-N, et al. Potential benefits of reducing medication-related anticholinergic burden for demented older adults: a prospective cohort study. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2013;13:694-700. Gnjidic D, Le Couteur DG, Abernethy DR, et al. A pilot randomized clinical trial utilizing the drug burden index to reduce exposure to anticholinergic and sedative medications in older people. Ann Pharmacother 2010;44(11):1725-32. doi: 10.1345/aph.1P310 [published Online First: 2010/09/30] Ailabouni N, Mangin, D., Nishtala, P. S. DEFEAT-polypharmacy: deprescribing anticholinergic and sedative medicines feasibility trial in residential aged care facilities. Int J Clin Pharm 2019;1 (41):167-78. doi: 10.1007/s11096-019-00784-9 Moga DC, Abner, E. L., Schmitt, F. A., Eckmann, L., Huffmeyer, M., Martinez, A. I., Beech, B. F., George, R., El Khouli, R. H., Ali, D., Jicha, G. A. intervention for Cognitive Reserve Enhancement in Delaying the Onset of Alzheimer's Symptomatic Expression (INCREASE) Study: Results from a Randomized Controlled Study of Medication Therapy Management Targeting a Delay in Prodromal Dementia Symptom Progression. . J Prev Alz Dis 2022;9(4):646-54. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14283/jpad.2022.55 Salahudeen MS, Duffull SB, Nishtala PS. Impact of anticholinergic discontinuation on cognitive outcomes in older people: a systematic review. Drugs & aging 2014;31(3):185-92. Gnjidic D, Le Couteur DG, Kouladjian L, et al. Deprescribing trials: methods to reduce polypharmacy and the impact on prescribing and clinical outcomes. Clinics in geriatric medicine 2012;28(2):237-53. Campbell NL, Pitts C, Corvari C, et al. Deprescribing anticholinergics in primary care older adults: experience from two models and impact on a continuous measure of exposure. . J Am Coll Clin Pharm 2022;Published online ahead of print [published Online First: July 18, 2022] Campbell NL, Holden R, Boustani MA. Preventing Alzheimer Disease by Deprescribing Anticholinergic Medications. JAMA Intern Med 2019 doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.0676 Sink KM, Thomas J, Xu H, et al. Dual use of bladder anticholinergics and cholinesterase inhibitors: long-term functional and cognitive outcomes. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 2008;56(5):847-53. Slavin MJ, Brodaty H, Kochan NA, et al. Prevalence and predictors of "subjective cognitive complaints" in the Sydney Memory and Ageing Study. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2010;18(8):701-10. [published Online First: 2011/04/16] Jorm AF. The Informant Questionnaire on cognitive decline in the elderly (IQCODE): a review. International psychogeriatrics / IPA 2004;16(3):275-93. Snitz BE, Yu L, Crane PK, et al. Subjective Cognitive Complaints of Older Adults at the Population Level An Item Response Theory Analysis. Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders 2012;26(4):344-51. doi: 10.1097/WAD.0b013e3182420bdf Callahan CM, Unverzagt FW, Hui SL, et al. Six-item screener to identify cognitive impairment among potential subjects for clinical research. Medical care 2002;40(9):771-81. Wilber ST, Lofgren SD, Mager TG, et al. An evaluation of two screening tools for cognitive impairment in older emergency department patients. Acad Emerg Med 2005;12(7):612-16. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.01.017 Steffens DC, Snowden M, Fan MY, et al. Cognitive impairment and depression outcomes in the IMPACT study. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 2006;14(5):401-09. Pfeffer RI, Kurosaki TT, Harrah CH, et al. Measurement of functional activities in older adults in the community. J Gerontol 1982;37(3):323-29. Campbell NL, Khan BA, Farber M, et al. Improving delirium care in the intensive care unit: the design of a pragmatic study. Trials 2011;12:139. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-139 [published Online First: 2011/06/08] Campbell NL, Perkins AJ, Khan BA, et al. Deprescribing in the Pharmacologic Management of Delirium: A Randomized Trial in the Intensive Care Unit. J Am Geriatr Soc 2019;67(4):695-702. Khan BA, Perkins AJ, Campbell NL, et al. Pharmacological Management of Delirium in the Intensive Care Unit: A Randomized Pragmatic Clinical Trial. J Am Geriatr Soc 2019;67(5):1057-65. American Geriatrics Society 2015 Beers Criteria Update Expert Panel. American Geriatrics Society 2015 Updated Beers Criteria for Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Older Adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 2015;63(11):2227-46. doi: 10.1111/jgs.13702 [published Online First: 2015/10/09] Linsky AG, WF. Linder, JA. Friedberg, MW Advancing the Science of Deprescribing: A Novel Comprehensive Conceptual Framework. . J Am Geriatr Soc 2019;67(10):2018-22. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16136 [published Online First: 2019 Aug 20] Tannenbaum C, Paquette A, Hilmer S, et al. A systematic review of amnestic and non-amnestic mild cognitive impairment induced by anticholinergic, antihistamine, GABAergic and opioid drugs. Drugs Aging 2012;29(8):639-58. doi: 10.2165/11633250-000000000-00000 [published Online First: 2012/07/21] Buschke H, Fuld PA. Evaluating storage, retention, and retrieval in disordered memory and learning. Neurology 1974;24(11):1019-19. Deary, Liewald, Nissan. A free, easy-to-use, computer-based simple and four-choice reaction time programme: The Deary-Liewald reaction time task. Behaviour Research Methods 2011;43:258-68. Reitan RM, D W. The Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery: theory and clinical interpretation. Neuropsychology Press 1993 Unverzagt F, Monahan PO, Moser LR, Zhao Q, Carpenter JS, Sledge GW Jr, Champion VL. The Indiana University telephone-based assessment of neuropsychological status: a new method for large scale neuropsychological assessment. . J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2007;13(5):799-806. doi: 10.1017/S1355617707071020 Cella D, Riley W, Stone A, et al. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005–2008. Journal of clinical epidemiology 2010;63(11):1179-94. Horsman J, Furlong W, Feeny D, et al. The Health Utilities Index (HUI®): concepts, measurement properties and applications. Health and quality of life outcomes 2003;1(1):54. Boustani MA, Campbell NL, Khan BA, et al. Enhancing care for hospitalized older adults with cognitive impairment: a randomized controlled trial. J Gen Intern Med 2012;27(5):561-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-1994-8 [published Online First: 2012/02/04] Harris PAT, R.; Thielke, R.; Payne, J.; Gonzalez, N., Conde, J. G;. Research electronic data capture (REDCap) - a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. . J Biomed Inform 2009;42(2):377-81. Harris PAT, R.; Minor, B. L.; Elliott, V.; Fernandez, M.; O'Neal, L.; McLeod, L.; Delacqua, G.; Delacqua, F.; Kirby, J.; Duda, S. N.; REDCap Consortium. The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software partners. J Biomed Inform 2019 doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208 Sumukadas D, McMurdo ME, Mangoni AA, et al. Temporal trends in anticholinergic medication prescription in older people: repeated cross-sectional analysis of population prescribing data. Age Ageing 2014;43(4):515-21. Supplementary Files R2D2InterventionProceduresFinal6.2024.docx Appendix 1: Pharmacist-Based Deprescribing with Behavior Change Influence for R2D2 Study Protocol Reference document: SOP 1008 R2D2 Intervention Procedures Revised 8.19.2020 R2D2ProtocolGeneralDeprescribingRecsFINAL.docx Appendix 2: Anticholinergic Deprescribing Recommendations for R2D2 Study Protocol Reference document: SOP R2D2 Protocol General Deprescribing Recommendations v3 R2D2SPIRITchecklist7.29.24.docx Cite Share Download PDF Status: Published Journal Publication published 22 Nov, 2024 Read the published version in Trials → Version 1 posted Reviewers agreed at journal 24 Oct, 2024 Reviewers invited by journal 24 Oct, 2024 Editorial decision: Minor revision 24 Oct, 2024 Editor assigned by journal 01 Aug, 2024 First submitted to journal 29 Jul, 2024 You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-4682599","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":369929805,"identity":"3d9ac9b0-2208-4bbf-80aa-4b7689f4e2e0","order_by":0,"name":"Noll L. Campbell","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8933-9339","institution":"Purdue University College of Pharmacy Nursing and Health Sciences: Purdue University","correspondingAuthor":true,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Noll","middleName":"L.","lastName":"Campbell","suffix":""},{"id":369929806,"identity":"ab9786fd-928b-4f0f-8ada-1c4c0da1fd88","order_by":1,"name":"Richard J. Holden","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Indiana University Bloomington","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Richard","middleName":"J.","lastName":"Holden","suffix":""},{"id":369929807,"identity":"4c05fddb-073d-4748-b47b-583859bcaa0c","order_by":2,"name":"Sujuan Gao","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Indiana University School of Medicine","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Sujuan","middleName":"","lastName":"Gao","suffix":""},{"id":369929808,"identity":"60582c8a-8c32-4dff-a7d0-bfb6a196831e","order_by":3,"name":"Frederick W. Unverzagt","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Indiana University School of Medicine","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Frederick","middleName":"W.","lastName":"Unverzagt","suffix":""},{"id":369929809,"identity":"e98332e2-ba79-4c39-838c-71fb9557211b","order_by":4,"name":"Kathleen A. Lane","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Indiana University School of Medicine","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Kathleen","middleName":"A.","lastName":"Lane","suffix":""},{"id":369929810,"identity":"7ab446ab-9525-440c-90f8-ab10ef6009ab","order_by":5,"name":"Allie Carter","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Indiana University School of Medicine","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Allie","middleName":"","lastName":"Carter","suffix":""},{"id":369929811,"identity":"7a7dd06d-b542-4340-a452-c63ee5ef1d56","order_by":6,"name":"Addison B. Harrington","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Regenstrief Institute Inc","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Addison","middleName":"B.","lastName":"Harrington","suffix":""},{"id":369929812,"identity":"77dcc7d2-5caa-4a86-9f5e-2568e76927e0","order_by":7,"name":"Sneha Manoharan","email":"","orcid":"","institution":": Regenstrief Institute Inc","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Sneha","middleName":"","lastName":"Manoharan","suffix":""},{"id":369929813,"identity":"18398833-28a8-43aa-9287-39c0829a3c6a","order_by":8,"name":"Neha Manoharan","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Regenstrief Institute Inc","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Neha","middleName":"","lastName":"Manoharan","suffix":""},{"id":369929814,"identity":"b6a8ab2d-ffca-4e9e-a7d5-4e3dc410cd18","order_by":9,"name":"Danielle L. Rosenthal","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Regenstrief Institute Inc","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Danielle","middleName":"L.","lastName":"Rosenthal","suffix":""},{"id":369929815,"identity":"a03aebca-9bb0-41cc-85f7-8f38d22c005c","order_by":10,"name":"Christopher Pitts","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Indiana University Health Methodist Hospital","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Christopher","middleName":"","lastName":"Pitts","suffix":""},{"id":369929816,"identity":"fe2ebf08-ab72-4d5f-a1ae-8005dfc43210","order_by":11,"name":"Kathryn Pelkey","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Community Health Network Inc","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Kathryn","middleName":"","lastName":"Pelkey","suffix":""},{"id":369929817,"identity":"c1427370-982f-4bf9-b51d-6d2d86403e13","order_by":12,"name":"Emily Papineau","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Community Health Network Inc","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Emily","middleName":"","lastName":"Papineau","suffix":""},{"id":369929818,"identity":"bf2366c4-4d2b-4e65-b816-bc6013e3c50f","order_by":13,"name":"David A. Lauck","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Community Health Network Inc","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"David","middleName":"A.","lastName":"Lauck","suffix":""},{"id":369929819,"identity":"b71a6481-4861-4d0d-ab04-6d0e7526e7d0","order_by":14,"name":"Noha Keshk","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Purdue University College of Pharmacy","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Noha","middleName":"","lastName":"Keshk","suffix":""},{"id":369929820,"identity":"4e3c0009-28b0-4abd-9772-936a6b9e65c9","order_by":15,"name":"Khalid Alamer","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Khalid","middleName":"","lastName":"Alamer","suffix":""},{"id":369929821,"identity":"6e6ac819-0515-4aad-8b96-7b8a199e8256","order_by":16,"name":"Hussein Khalil","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Purdue University College of Pharmacy","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Hussein","middleName":"","lastName":"Khalil","suffix":""},{"id":369929822,"identity":"b6467cff-6213-4fde-9f95-5bedb36f6031","order_by":17,"name":"Malaz A. Boustani","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Indiana University School of Medicine","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Malaz","middleName":"A.","lastName":"Boustani","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2024-07-03 20:39:55","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4682599/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4682599/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[{"content":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-08618-4","type":"published","date":"2024-11-22T15:57:33+00:00"}],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":67636733,"identity":"1ec7dc9c-da70-40d7-a814-7c91c0f15535","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-10-28 09:34:07","extension":"png","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":253198,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eConceptual Model of the R2D2 Trial\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4682599/v1/171e50628f6d897d6d1aabcb.png"},{"id":67636730,"identity":"c55634e4-3a65-456e-9272-6d9b6fd3b363","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-10-28 09:34:06","extension":"png","order_by":2,"title":"Figure 2","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":110950,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOverview of the cluster randomized design and outcome assessments\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"2.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4682599/v1/58d975d0b08f28cd78d7417b.png"},{"id":67636731,"identity":"f5269ac4-4ee5-4a61-8dd0-2d7eb09b0210","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-10-28 09:34:07","extension":"png","order_by":3,"title":"Figure 3","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":71647,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eSchedule of enrollment, interventions, and assessments.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"3.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4682599/v1/9befec37bc9a2a84eb53fd3d.png"},{"id":67638011,"identity":"48cf5473-ec95-4862-94cf-56d8ca4d47a9","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-10-28 09:42:07","extension":"png","order_by":4,"title":"Figure 4","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":144893,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFactors to be influenced by the Pharmacist Deprescribing Care Coordinator\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"4.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4682599/v1/2e8fa0b46d008f82aba7118e.png"},{"id":69834885,"identity":"c0a33f4c-5561-471d-8c26-d6d4476ed4ef","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-11-25 16:10:01","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":1189643,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4682599/v1/070b8631-a7b0-4615-934c-41ecaab86132.pdf"},{"id":67636735,"identity":"4f61c5f0-1aea-49c5-b9d4-371d39b2d1f6","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-10-28 09:34:07","extension":"docx","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":204882,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eAppendix 1: Pharmacist-Based Deprescribing with Behavior Change Influence for R2D2 Study Protocol\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e- Reference document: SOP 1008 R2D2 Intervention Procedures Revised 8.19.2020\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"R2D2InterventionProceduresFinal6.2024.docx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4682599/v1/2382f29b23efaca8f14bfb46.docx"},{"id":67636732,"identity":"6a7025dd-7b15-4073-9b7f-b76fe67166b8","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-10-28 09:34:07","extension":"docx","order_by":2,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":148681,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eAppendix 2: Anticholinergic Deprescribing Recommendations for R2D2 Study Protocol\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e- Reference document: SOP R2D2 Protocol General Deprescribing Recommendations v3\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"R2D2ProtocolGeneralDeprescribingRecsFINAL.docx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4682599/v1/11ac8f4611ca60976f2fa17b.docx"},{"id":67636729,"identity":"7b571a5d-4961-4719-85f6-04ca8798fc7f","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-10-28 09:34:06","extension":"docx","order_by":3,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":33088,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"R2D2SPIRITchecklist7.29.24.docx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4682599/v1/2e0783ead0e0fc152025654d.docx"}],"financialInterests":"","formattedTitle":"Deprescribing Anticholinergics to Preserve Brain Health: Reducing the Risk of Dementia through Deprescribing (R2D2): Study Protocol for a Randomized Clinical Trial","fulltext":[{"header":"Background","content":"\u003cp\u003eMore than 6 million older adults annually experience disability, hospitalization, or death due to a medication-related adverse event.\u003csup\u003e1-4\u003c/sup\u003e Up to 30% of older Americans use at least one strong anticholinergic medication every year.\u003csup\u003e5 6\u003c/sup\u003e These medications are associated with increased risks of delirium, general cognitive impairment and Alzheimer\u0026rsquo;s disease and related disorders (ADRD),\u003csup\u003e6-16\u003c/sup\u003e leading to higher morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs.\u003csup\u003e17\u003c/sup\u003e \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMedications with anticholinergic activity block cholinergic receptors in the brain, and have been associated with increased pathology thought to cause ADRD, with evidence from both mouse models and human studies.\u003csup\u003e18-24\u003c/sup\u003e Structural changes in human brain imaging studies have also been identified among users of anticholinergics compared with non-users.\u003csup\u003e25\u003c/sup\u003e Although a specific mechanism connecting anticholinergics with ADRD remains to be proven, several epidemiologic studies in humans show that anticholinergics increase the risk of ADRD among older adults receiving primary care.\u003csup\u003e7-11 13-16\u003c/sup\u003e However, these association studies lack evidence for a causal relationship between anticholinergics and ADRD. This warrants the pursuit of prospective \u0026ldquo;deprescribing\u0026rdquo; trials to determine whether changing the potential risk factor (anticholinergic medication use) has an influence on cognition or important clinical outcomes related to brain health and patient safety. \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eDespite recommendations that anticholinergics should not be used as first line treatments in older adults, no deprescribing guidelines exist to support the safe and effective reduction of these high-risk medications. Prior studies have evaluated deprescribing interventions in reducing exposure to anticholinergics.\u003csup\u003e26-30\u003c/sup\u003e These studies targeted a variety of populations and medications, including those with pre-existing ADRD, with some designed as feasibility studies with small sample sizes and short duration. However, two studies identified benefit in cognition in subgroups.\u003csup\u003e26 30\u003c/sup\u003e \u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior deprescribing trials suggest that pharmacist-based and educational interventions can safely deprescribe anticholinergics; however, the impact on clinical outcomes, namely performance on cognitive measures or the onset or diagnosis of ADRD, have not been tested in clinical trials.\u003csup\u003e5 26-28 31 32\u003c/sup\u003e Furthermore, prior trials have not focused exclusively on strong anticholinergics, which hold the highest binding affinity to cholinergic receptors and would provide the strongest test of the link between anticholinergic medication and adverse cognitive effects.\u003csup\u003e33 34\u003c/sup\u003e \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eTherefore, we designed and initiated the randomized clinical trial, \u0026ldquo;Reducing the Risk of Dementia through Deprescribing\u0026rdquo; (R2D2) to evaluate the impact of a pharmacist-based deprescribing intervention on important cognitive and safety outcomes. The primary aim for the R2D2 trial is to determine the efficacy of anticholinergic deprescribing on objectively measured cognition compared to usual care in community-dwelling older adults. The secondary aim is to examine the quality of life and safety profile of anticholinergic deprescribing compared to usual care. \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eOur conceptual model (Figure 1) holds that removal of offending anticholinergic agents will lead to increased cholinergic neurotransmission and preserved or improved cognitive function including memory, executive cognitive ability, and speed of processing. The enhancement in neural function and cognitive function produced by the intervention should result in a lower risk of cognitive impairment or delay in the time to ADRD. This trial will focus on proximal outcomes with future studies planned to evaluate the impact on disease outcomes (i.e., diagnosis of ADRD). \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eInsert Figure 1: Conceptual Model of the R2D2 trial\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Methods","content":"\u003cp\u003eThe R2D2 trial primary objective is to determine the efficacy of an anticholinergic deprescribing intervention on cognition compared to usual care in older adults using strong anticholinergics at baseline. The second objective is to examine the quality of life and safety profile of deprescribing compared to usual care. Third, the study intends to determine whether demographic (age, gender, race), genetic (APOE Ɛ4 status), or clinical characteristics (comorbidities, number of medications) moderate the effect of the deprescribing intervention.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eStudy Design\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis trial adopts a cluster randomized design of a deprescribing intervention delivered over 24 months in primary care patients. The clustering component is intended to minimize the potential for contamination and is conducted at the level of primary care provider. Figure 2 provides an overview of the general study design noting the level of randomization and schedule of outcome assessments. A unique feature of the design intended to address a key gap in the existing literature is the long duration of follow-up, allowing us to detect trends in changes in outcomes up to 24 months.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eInsert Figure 2: Overview of the cluster randomized design and outcome assessments.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eStudy Sites and Recruitment Procedures\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRecruitment is conducted within primary care practices of health systems in central Indiana, including Indiana University Health and the Community Health Network. Indiana University Health is a large, quaternary care state-wide health system. Primary care locations in the greater Indianapolis area were prioritized based on the original plan for in-person recruitment. Community Health Network is a large tertiary care regional network located in central Indiana. Select primary care locations in the greater Indianapolis area were invited to participate based on potentially eligible population density and availability of support from clinical pharmacists.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrimary care leaders provide approval to conduct proposed studies in primary care environments and within patient panels. Searchable elements from electronic medical records are used to identify providers with potentially eligible patients, and group those lists of patients by providers. While we do not collect data directly from providers, the intervention may influence the care some of their patients receive (particularly those providers randomized to the intervention group), making it ethically appropriate to allow providers the opportunity to opt out. Thus, prior to recruitment of potentially eligible patients, providers receive information about the study objectives, procedures, and expectations and are offered an opportunity to not participate (thus excluding all patients under their care) or exclude some of their patients. See figure 3 for the timeline of recruitment, intervention, and assessment of the R2D2 trial. This opt out approach was recommended by primary care leadership at participating sites.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRecruitment of potentially eligible patients utilizes lists generated from searchable criteria from electronic medical records, including age, medication and visit history, diagnostic data, and participating provider. With telephone-based recruitment, the Informed Consent Form and HIPAA forms are provided to the participant by postal or electronic mail, or left at an agreed-upon location based on the participants comfort. The person obtaining consent arranges a time to discuss the study with the participant by telephone. During this telephone meeting, the person obtaining consent reviews the Informed Consent and HIPAA and answers any questions. After all questions have been addressed, the participant is asked to sign and date these study documents, then to return them by mail or email. The personnel obtaining consent signs and dates each returned document and proceeds with study procedures. This person is blinded to randomization status.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eEligibility criteria:\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eEligible individuals are community-dwelling older adults without a diagnosis of ADRD who receive primary care from two regional healthcare systems in Indiana. We intentionally exclude those with ADRD because prior work suggests this population is not likely to benefit from the intervention.\u003csup\u003e16 26 35\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eInclusion Criteria:\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003col\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eAge 65 years and older\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eAt least one office visit to their primary care physician within the previous 12 months\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eUse of at least one strong anticholinergic medication in the previous 2 weeks OR a ratio of total standardized days exposed within the prior 365 days of at least 0.4 or higher.\u003csup\u003e7 11 14\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eOriginal criteria required the presence of subjective cognitive dysfunction by meeting either (a) or (b) of the following criteria:\u003col style=\"list-style-type: lower-alpha;\"\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eA response of \u0026ldquo;somewhat worse\u0026rdquo; or \u0026ldquo;much worse\u0026rdquo; to the SCD screening question: \u0026ldquo;In general, how would you describe your memory as compared to 10 years ago? Response offerings are: much better / somewhat better / about the same / somewhat worse / much worse. This item is derived from the Sydney Memory and Aging study\u003csup\u003e36\u003c/sup\u003e and is comparable to items used to document self-report of memory in the HRS-AHEAD Study (1993 to present), the IQCODE questionnaire for cognitive decline in the elderly,\u003csup\u003e37\u003c/sup\u003e and items used in the Pittsburgh cohort studies of aging.\u003csup\u003e38\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eA score of 5 or less on the Six-Item Screener (SIS).\u003csup\u003e39\u003c/sup\u003e The SIS is a global measure of cognitive status that assesses three-item recall and orientation to year, month, and day of the week.\u003csup\u003e39\u003c/sup\u003e The SIS screening test was developed in the primary care population at Eskenazi Health and validated in a racially diverse population. Scoring is determined by the number correct with a range of 0-6, where higher scores indicate better cognition; a score of \u0026le; 5 has a sensitivity of 97.7% and specificity of 49.3% for identifying cognitive impairment in primary care older adults.\u003csup\u003e39\u003c/sup\u003e \u003csup\u003e40\u003c/sup\u003e \u003csup\u003e41\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003c/ol\u003e\n \u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eAble to communicate in English\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eAccess to a telephone.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ol\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAfter reviewing the initial 6 months of recruitment, the study team recognized that certain eligibility requirements significantly compromised the ability to meet recruitment targets. With approval from the Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB), we subsequently expanded criterion 2 to include those who achieved a calculated measure of anticholinergic medication exposure based on medical record data from the prior 12 months, and removed the requirement for criterion 4a and 4b (presence of subjective cognitive decline defined through either approach). We continued to collect data on the presence of subjective cognitive complaints in a similar manner as outlined above.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eExclusion Criteria:\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003col style=\"list-style-type: lower-alpha;\"\u003e\n \u003cli\u003ePermanent resident of an extended care facility (nursing home)\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eDiagnosis of schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, or schizoaffective disorder defined by ICD9/10 codes\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eDiagnosis of ADRD as determined by either:\u003col style=\"list-style-type: lower-alpha;\"\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eICD-9/ICD10 codes, or\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eCurrent use of a medication for ADRD (donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine, or memantine), or\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eA pattern of responses to the Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ) that suggest a combination of assistance and dependence in daily activities that is consistent with level of function in ADRD (i.e., exclude if \u0026ge; 3 FAQ items are scored at \u0026ldquo;requires assistance,\u0026rdquo; or if \u0026ge; 1 FAQ item is scored at \u0026ldquo;dependent\u0026rdquo;).\u003csup\u003e42\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003c/ol\u003e\n \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ol\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eInsert Figure 3: Schedule of Enrollment, Interventions, and Assessments\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eRandomization procedures\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn this cluster randomized trial, randomization occurs at the level of primary care provider in a 1:1 proportion between intervention and usual care using a randomization list with a computer-generated random scheme in random blocks of 4 or 6 stratified by healthcare system. Research staff are blinded to provider allocation status at the time of recruitment and throughout the study to avoid bias in data collection.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eDeprescribing Intervention\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe deprescribing intervention is executed through a trained clinical pharmacist employed within each study site, called a Deprescribing Care Coordinator (DCC). This model is developed from prior experiences in anticholinergic deprescribing in our local institutions.\u003csup\u003e33 43-45\u003c/sup\u003e Training is provided in geriatric care (particularly high risk medications and appropriate alternatives), educational methods, titration and monitoring schedules, and behavioral economic principles that encourage communication and successful deprescribing attempts. The latter emphasizes the use of messengers, identifying incentives, and setting defaults that can support deprescribing. The trained clinical pharmacists communicate the deprescribing attempt with the patient, providers, and pharmacy as needed to coordinate the transition from a high-risk anticholinergic medication to a safer alternative.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe following general steps are conducted by the DCC to complete the deprescribing process: 1) Clarifying the indication for the anticholinergic through medical record review and participant interview, 2) Education of potential risks of cognitive impairment in older adults, 3) Making a shared decision to deprescribe among participant, caregiver (as needed), and providers, 4) Identifying an appropriate alternative (not an anticholinergic medication or potentially inappropriate medication for older adults as defined by the American Geriatrics Society\u0026rsquo;s Beers Criteria \u0026reg;\u003csup\u003e46\u003c/sup\u003e) if desired, 5) Communicating the deprescribing plan with the appropriate provider(s), and 6) Monitoring and revising the plan as needed. The deprescribing process is initiated within seven days of enrollment, and most deprescribing is expected to be completed within four to six weeks after enrollment (see appendix\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe participant, pharmacist and physician will decide which deprescribing approach is most appropriate. Timelines for taper schedules will follow recommendations in the appendix regardless of the intent to replace the anticholinergic with a non-anticholinergic alternative or non-pharmacologic approach. Modification to deprescribing tapering intervals will be allowed based on clinical judgment of the research or clinical staff (DCC or provider physician) along with monitoring of symptom burden. If multiple anticholinergics are being used concurrently, a drug-specific decision on the deprescribing approach will be necessary, and only one deprescribing attempt will be performed at a time. According to the deprescribing protocol, tapering/discontinuation attempts will follow either a concurrent crossover, delayed crossover, or tapered discontinuation plan (see Appendices 1 \u0026amp; 2 for additional recommendations); however, this process is subject to interruption and delay based on clinical context for each participant and agreement between the DCC and providers caring for the participant.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe design of the intervention acknowledges a number of factors that influence deprescribing success as recognized in the general model published by Linsky and colleagues (see figure 4 below).\u003csup\u003e47\u003c/sup\u003e These include patient factors, provider considerations/factors, and the process of deprescribing (medication orders, monitoring plans and adjustment based on patient-reported outcomes). Furthermore, our model of deprescribing anticholinergics includes the influence of behavioral economics on each of these factors. Recognizing the role of the messenger, incentives, and default settings in the process of deprescribing is addressed in the deprescribing protocol and contributes to the implementation of the intervention.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eInsert Figure 4: Factors to be influenced by the Pharmacist Deprescribing Care Coordinator.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eUsual Care\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe group randomized to usual care will receive educational material via traditional mail that reviews risks of polypharmacy, but no information specific to anticholinergic medications. The material will direct participants to their prescribers or pharmacists if they have concerns about their medications. The information will be delivered approximately 7 days following enrollment to coincide with the onset of the intervention in those randomized to the intervention group.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eMeasures\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe primary outcome measure is cognitive performance in three critical domains relevant to the diagnosis of dementia that include information processing speed, memory, and executive function. In older adults, these domains have been shown to be impaired by anticholinergic medications.\u003csup\u003e48\u003c/sup\u003e We originally selected four cognitive tests based on a systematic review of 78 RCT\u0026rsquo;s among healthy adults that identified tests that were sensitive to the adverse cognitive effects of medications.\u003csup\u003e48\u003c/sup\u003e These included the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (information processing speed), Buschke selective reminding task (memory and new learning), Choice Reaction Time and Trail Making Test Parts A and B (executive cognitive function).\u003csup\u003e49-51\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBecause approval to initiate recruitment was received only days before in-person research operations were interrupted by the COVID-19 pandemic, we identified an alternative battery of cognitive tests encompassing the same domains but with the ability to be administered remotely with equivalent validity. Therefore, we modified the battery for the primary outcome to include the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (information processing speed), Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (memory \u0026amp; new learning), Oral Trails Making Test (executive function), and Controlled Oral Word Association and Semantic Fluency tests (executive function including phonemic and semantic fluency). These tests have been used by our team with fidelity across telephonic modes of delivery.\u003csup\u003e52\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWe will form an overall cognitive composite score as the average of each cognitive measure\u0026rsquo;s z-score, which is constructed by subtracting the mean baseline scores and dividing by the baseline standard deviation. Cognitive measures will be taken at baseline, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months during scheduled outcome assessment visits conducted by telephone. Parallel alternate forms will be used for all tests (3 versions each) presented in a counterbalanced fashion throughout the trial thus minimizing confounding due to learning effect.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe study intervention proposes to reduce exposure to medications that are prescribed to manage symptoms of depression, anxiety, insomnia, and pain. We will use the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) to capture the four patient safety outcomes. PROMIS was developed by the National Institute of Health. It is unique in its ability to standardize scores across diagnoses and symptoms, it possesses excellent reliability and validity, and it is inclusive of diverse population characteristics and backgrounds.\u003csup\u003e53\u003c/sup\u003e The PROMIS profile-29 (www.nihpromis.org) includes brief scales for several domains; we will use four-item scales for depression, anxiety, and sleep disturbance (insomnia), and a 3-item pain intensity scale.\u003csup\u003e53\u003c/sup\u003e These and other safety measures (see below) will be collected at baseline and months 6, 12, 18, and 24. Comprehensive scoring manuals are available for each measure with guidance for interpreting individual and composite scales. Each PROMIS raw score can be converted to a T-score where 50 represents the general population norm for that symptom and each 10-point deviation represents one standard deviation (SD) from the population norm.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWe will use the 15-item Health Utility Index (HUI) to determine each participant\u0026rsquo;s health-related quality of life (HRQOL) at baseline and months 6, 12, 18, and 24.\u003csup\u003e54\u003c/sup\u003e The HUI is a utility-based HRQOL instrument applied in patients with a wide range of medical conditions. It has eight attributes: vision, hearing, speech, ambulation, dexterity, emotion, cognitive function and pain. The individual health domain scores range from 0.00 (maximum impairment) to 1.00 (no impairment) and the multi-attribute (HUI) scores, a multiplicative function of individual attribute levels, range from 0.36 to 1.00 with anchors 0.00 = dead and 1.00 = perfect health.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTo assess adverse events, two methods are planned: 1) a single-item question will be asked at each follow-up assessment to collect self-reported adverse events, and 2) acute care utilization, defined as emergency room or hospitalization recognized through our statewide health information exchange (Indiana Network for Patient Care). Both methods will be reviewed and summarized at each meeting of the DSMB.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe presence of APOE Ɛ4 alleles may modify the effect of anticholinergics on cognitive impairment, therefore, we originally planned to collect blood from each participant at baseline to include as a covariate in the responder analysis (secondary aim). However, given the COVID-19 interruption of in-person research, we revised our procedures to collect the APOE Ɛ4 variable remotely through saliva samples. Genomic DNA will be extracted from saliva samples using the DNeasy Blood \u0026amp; Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Inc., Valencia, CA) according to the manufacturer\u0026apos;s protocol. Sample kits will be distributed by mail to participant homes with instructions on how to complete and with pre-paid packaging to return to the Indiana Biobank for storage and processing. The sample kit will be distributed at the beginning of the study, but may be completed at any time of participation, and must be completed before 24 months or withdrawal from the study. Extracted DNA will be sent to LGC Limited, the preferred genotyping resource of the Indiana Alzheimer\u0026rsquo;s Disease Center and the Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBecause individual differences have potential to modify treatment outcomes, we will measure the following demographic and clinical factors: age, self-reported race, self-reported gender, self-reported years of education, and relevant clinical diagnoses impacting cognition such as depression, cardiovascular disease, stroke, and diabetes as we have done in prior studies.\u003csup\u003e8 17 55\u003c/sup\u003e These demographic variables will be collected at baseline while diagnoses from the electronic medical record will be collected at baseline and 24 months (see Table 1). We will collect medication use through both self-report at baseline and each outcome assessment, and extract prescribed medications (medication orders) from electronic medical records prior to enrollment as well as during the 24-month study period.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eTable 1: Planned Outcome Measures and Covariates\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ctable border=\"1\" cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"0\" width=\"654\"\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 28.5496%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eVariables/Outcomes\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 10.229%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eBaseline\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 9.61832%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e6 Months\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 9.61832%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e12 Months\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 9.92366%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e18 Months\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 10.9924%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e24 Months\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 21.0687%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMethod\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 28.5496%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eDemographic characteristics\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 10.229%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eX\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 9.61832%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 9.61832%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 9.92366%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 10.9924%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 21.0687%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSelf Report\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 28.5496%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eClinical characteristics/Diagnoses\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 10.229%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eX\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 9.61832%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 9.61832%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 9.92366%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 10.9924%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eX\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 21.0687%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSelf Report \u0026amp; EMR\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 28.5496%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSelf-Reported Medications\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 10.229%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eX\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 9.61832%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eX\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 9.61832%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eX\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 9.92366%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eX\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 10.9924%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eX\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 21.0687%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSelf Report\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 28.5496%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ePrescribed Medications\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 10.229%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eX\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 9.61832%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 9.61832%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 9.92366%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 10.9924%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eX\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 21.0687%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eEMR\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 28.5496%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eCognitive Performance\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 10.229%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eX\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 9.61832%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eX\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 9.61832%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eX\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 9.92366%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eX\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 10.9924%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eX\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 21.0687%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ePerformance\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 28.5496%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ePROMIS 4-item scales:\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cul\u003e\n \u003cli\u003ePain\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eAnxiety\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eInsomnia\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eDepression\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003c/ul\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 10.229%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eX\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 9.61832%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eX\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 9.61832%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eX\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 9.92366%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eX\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 10.9924%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eX\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 21.0687%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSelf Report\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 28.5496%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eHealth Utility Index\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 10.229%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eX\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 9.61832%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eX\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 9.61832%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eX\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 9.92366%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eX\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 10.9924%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eX\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 21.0687%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSelf Report\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 28.5496%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eApoE Ɛ4\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 10.229%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eX\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 9.61832%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 9.61832%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 9.92366%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 10.9924%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 21.0687%;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSaliva\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n\u003c/table\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eApoE Ɛ4: Apolipoprotein Ɛ4\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eEMR: Electronic medical record\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePROMIS: Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eData Management\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eStudy data are collected and managed using the Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) electronic data capture tools supported by the Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute at Indiana University.\u003csup\u003e56 57\u003c/sup\u003e REDCap is a secure, web-based software platform designed to support data capture for research studies, providing 1) an intuitive interface for validated data capture; 2) audit trails for tracking data manipulation and export procedures (auditing is independent of investigators and sponsors); 3) automated export procedures for seamless data downloads to common statistical packages; and 4) procedures for data integration and interoperability with external sources.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eAnalysis Plan\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe cluster randomized trial design will be used by randomizing primary care physicians (PCP) into the intervention or usual care arms. Outcomes will be collected and analyzed at the patient level. We will examine assigned randomization against the computer-generated randomization scheme to ensure randomization validity. Patient characteristics between the two groups will be compared using mixed effects models for continuous variables and generalized estimating equations for categorical variables while adjusting for random PCP effects. We will examine the distributions of continuous variables and use alternative approaches such as transformation or nonparametric methods in cases of violation to the normal distribution assumption. We will also examine the frequency distribution of all categorical variables and adopt exact inference procedures in cases of zero or small cell size. Any baseline variable that is found to be significantly different between the two groups will be included as a covariate in the analyses outlined below.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAn intension to treat approach will be used in the analysis of all outcome measures. Composite cognitive scores collected at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months will be used as the primary outcome variables in mixed effects models. An indicator variable for intervention group (intervention vs usual care), time, interaction between group and time, and baseline cognitive scores will be included as independent variables as well as significant factors from the baseline comparison. PCP will be used as random effects to adjust for within-physician correlations. Significant group and time interaction or significant group main effect will indicate differences in cognitive function between the two groups. If significant interactions between group and time are found, post-hoc analyses will be conducted to determine the times when the two groups have significantly different cognitive scores. A significant main group effect in the absence of a group-by-time interaction would indicate differences between groups in cognitive function at all follow-up time points.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn a second set of models, we will determine whether differences between groups were accounted for by decreases in total exposure to anticholinergics from baseline to 24 months. For each medication, standardized daily exposure will be calculated using standardized daily dose as in the study by Gray\u003csup\u003e7\u003c/sup\u003e and validated in our prior work\u003csup\u003e14 17 33\u003c/sup\u003e in which the daily dose is divided by the minimum effective dose. Days of standardized exposure for each medication will be the sum of the standardized days of exposure in a time period that includes each medication for each patient. This exposure is defined analogously to the pack-years\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003econcept used to characterize exposure to cigarette smoking and is a cumulative measure reflecting both exposure intensity and duration. Total exposure will be compared between the two groups using mixed effects models with group (intervention and control) as the independent variable adjusting for significant baseline variables and random PCP effects. We will then use the mixed effect model with cognitive scores at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months as outcome variables described above with total anticholinergic exposure as an additional independent variable adjusting for baseline cognitive scores and PCP random effects. Attenuation of the intervention effect from the original model would indicate that the effect of intervention is mediated through the reduction in anticholinergic exposure. Comparisons of PROMIS scores and HUI will be conducted similarly to the models we described above for cognitive scores. Exploration of potential moderation effects from \u003cem\u003eAPOE\u003c/em\u003e, or participants\u0026apos; characteristics will be conducted by including each of these variables and its interaction with the randomization group in the mixed effects models for the outcome measures. Significant interactions will indicate significantly different intervention effects in subgroups defined by \u003cem\u003eAPOE\u003c/em\u003e, or participants\u0026apos; characteristics.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eInterim analyses will not be conducted to evaluate conditional power (futility) or efficacy, thus preserving the overall Type-I error probability regarding the efficacy of the intervention. Given the nature of an elderly study population, we expect study attrition in the form of participant death or withdrawal. Our proposed analysis plan using mixed effects models are robust under the missing at random (MAR) assumption that the probability for dropping out depends on participants\u0026rsquo; characteristics and medical conditions. We will compare patients\u0026rsquo; characteristics between the completers and non-completers to detect potential violation to the missing at random assumption. We will conduct sensitivity analyses to assess the potential impact of missing data using multiple imputation which allows the imputation of missing outcomes for those who drop out using data gathered from these patients at baseline and prior to drop-out. We will use SAS software version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina) or relevant updated versions for all analyses.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eSample Size and Rationale\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe sample size calculation was conducted using a mixed effects model and adjusting for the cluster randomization design. Assuming a within-subject correlation of 0.3, 0.2 and 0.1 for outcomes observed 6, 12 and 18 months apart, respectively, from the same individuals over time, 96 patients per group is required for 80% power to detect differences in composite cognitive scores of 0.6 SD at 24 months between the intervention and usual care groups with type I error rate at \u0026alpha;=0.05 assuming linear trends in cognitive change in both groups. We further assume an intra-class coefficient (ICC) of 0.05 for primary care physicians and an average of 6 patients per physician. Accounting for the cluster design requires 120 patients per group to complete the trial. With an expected 30% attrition rate, we plan to enroll 172 patients per group into the study. Prior studies have reported mean differences in 1-year change of cognitive scores of 1.82 (SD 17) or 1.93 (SD 15) between those on definite anticholinergics versus those non-users. The effect sizes we used assume that our intervention will be able to detect a one-sixth reduction in expected cognitive decline if patients in the intervention group discontinue anticholinergics. Our assumption on the ICC is based on prior studies on prescribing patterns in physicians and practices.\u003csup\u003e58\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn Primary Aim 2, using the effective sample size of 96 patients per group accounting for the design effect from cluster randomization, we will have 85.6% power to estimate the confidence bands with half-width of 0.3 SD for the differences in symptom scores from PROMIS and HUI scores between the intervention and usual care groups during follow-up using the two-sample t-tests at the 0.05 level. Power estimates were calculated using the GLMPower and Power procedures in SAS software version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eEthics Review and Approval\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAll procedures have received and maintained ethical approval from the Institutional Review Board of the Indiana University (IRB# 1811254189; Federal-Wide Assurance Number, FWA00003544). As a multisite clinical trial, a reliance agreement was established to retain the Indiana University IRB as the single site ethical review board. The trial has also been registered at clinicaltrials.gov (Identifier: NCT04270474).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe study employs an external DSMB including a senior investigator trained in geriatrics (chair), a biostatistician, a pharmacist/pharmacy services researcher, and funding agency representatives. The DSMB approved the study procedures meets at 6-9 month intervals or as needed to review safety data.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe study received approval to initiate recruitment in March 2020 just days before a national interruption of research activities as a result of the global pandemic. In response, the study team revised operations to shift to fully remote procedures to avoid further delay in initiating and executing the trial. This included revisions to the process for recruitment, data collection, and measures employed. In June 2020, these changes were approved by the IRB, the DSMB, and the National Institute on Aging (NIA), with recruitment starting in July 2020.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Discussion","content":"\u003cp\u003eThe R2D2 study will be the first to evaluate the impact of deprescribing strong anticholinergic medications on measures of cognition captured up to two years following the deprescribing attempt. Key elements of the study design include cluster randomization to minimize risk of contamination and a two year follow up phase to evaluate the impact of deprescribing on long-term cognition. The deprescribing intervention utilizes a pharmacist-based deprescribing care coordinator approach to reduce the use of potentially inappropriate anticholinergic medications in primary care older adults. This study will advance the field by addressing the potential causal relationship between anticholinergic medication use and cognition. \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eIn addition to these key features, we note that our approach to the deprescribing intervention intends to test the hypothesis that anticholinergic medications adversely affect cognitive performance. Therefore, the intervention offers alternative, non-anticholinergic medications as alternatives where preferred by participants in the intervention arm. This is not to be confused with other deprescribing approaches that may attempt to reduce the total number of medications (polypharmacy in general). While the intervention does offer a tapered discontinuation without replacement of an alternative medication if acceptable to the participant, it is possible the net impact on the total number of medications will be nil. \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eWe recognize other prospective anticholinergic deprescribing trials that have been conducted, including studies by Moga and colleagues,\u003csup\u003e30\u003c/sup\u003e Ailabouni and colleagues,\u003csup\u003e29\u003c/sup\u003e Kersten and colleagues,\u003csup\u003e26\u003c/sup\u003e and Gnjidic and colleagues.\u003csup\u003e28\u003c/sup\u003e These studies were important preliminary work that either proved feasibility or guided deprescribing approaches in anticholinergic deprescribing, however only the study by Moga and colleagues identified the potential for improvement in executive function in a subgroup of participants with a higher level of amyloid-beta pathology. Other studies failed to find differences in cognitive outcomes, though three were preliminary studies limited by sample size, one was limited by frailty of the study population or duration of follow-up. Our approach is unique in its exclusive focus on strong anticholinergic medications, target population of primary care older adults without dementia, and duration of follow-up. Additionally, our planned sample size of 344 represents the largest randomized trial of anticholinergic deprescribing conducted to date. \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eSome limitations of the study are worth noting. First, while the cognitive outcomes employed in this study represent domains relevant to the diagnosis of dementia, we recognize that performance on cognitive outcomes alone is only one component of the diagnosis of dementia. If our hypotheses hold, and a differential effect on cognition between groups is identified, future work could extend the intervention and determine the impact on the diagnosis of dementia and time to diagnosis of dementia. Secondly, the study as proposed lacks a measure of the mechanism through which the causal relationship between anticholinergics and cognition are linked. While financial and scientific support for the planned trial is acknowledged, the resources were insufficient to include biomarkers of the mechanism through which anticholinergics may lead to cognitive impairment. We are unable to include biomarkers of anticholinergic use and cognitive impairment to correlate changes is measures of medication use with brain health. Finally, we collect two sources of medication use: self-reported medication use at six month intervals and medication prescriptions (orders) from the electronic medical records. These sources introduce advantages and disadvantages, however represent the data sources available to the study team throughout the conduct of the study. \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eTrial Status\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe study began recruitment on July 20\u003csup\u003eth\u003c/sup\u003e, 2020 and is currently recruiting participants. At the time of drafting of the manuscript, approximately 328 participants have been enrolled and is expected to be completed by July 31\u003csup\u003est\u003c/sup\u003e, 2024. Data collection is expected to be completed by July 31\u003csup\u003est\u003c/sup\u003e, 2026. \u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eEthics Approval and Consent to Participate\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAll procedures have received and maintained ethical approval from the Institutional Review Board of the Indiana University (IRB# 1811254189; Federal-Wide Assurance Number, FWA00003544). The trial has also been registered at clinicaltrials.gov (Identifier: NCT04270474). \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eConsent for Publication\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIdentities of individuals are not discussed in this manuscript. A model consent form is available on request. \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eAvailability of Data and Materials \u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eData will be made available upon written request, including information about the identity of the investigator(s), data requested and plans for data analysis. Trial results will be shared on clinicaltrials.gov, published in peer-reviewed scientific publications and presented at state, regional, national, and possibly international scientific meetings. \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCompeting Interests\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDr. Boustani serves as a chief Scientific Officer and co-Founder of BlueAgilis; the Chief Health Officer of DigiCare Realized, Inc; and the Chief Health Officer of Mozyne health, inc. He has equity interest in Blue Agilis, Inc; DigiCare Realized, Inc; and Mozyne Health, Inc. He sold his equity in Preferred Population Health Management LLC; and MyShift, Inc (previously known as RestUp, LLC). He serves as an advisory board member or consultant for Eli Lilly and Co,; Eisai, Inc; Merck \u0026amp; Co Inc; Biogen Inc; and Genentech Inc. These conflicts have been reviewed by Indiana University and has been appropriately managed to maintain objectivity. All other authors report no conflicts of interest. \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eFunding Acknowledgement\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eResearch reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute on Aging of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R01AG061452 (PI: Campbell). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eAuthors\u0026rsquo; Contributions\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAuthor contributions include the following: Conception, design, acquisition of funding: NLC, RJH, SG, FWU, MAB; operational execution: NLC, RJH, KAL, AC, ABH, SM, EP, DAL, KA, MAB; ethical review and maintenance: NLC, AC, ABH, SM; acquisition of data: ABH, SM, NM, DLR, CP, KP, KA, HK; data management: KAL, AC, ABH, CP, KP, NK, KA, HK. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript. \u003cbr\u003e \u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHanlon JT, Schmader KE, Koronkowski MJ, et al. Adverse drug events in high risk older outpatients. \u003cem\u003eJ Am Geriatr Soc\u003c/em\u003e 1997;45(8):945-8. [published Online First: 1997/08/01]\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eOpondo D, Eslami S, Visscher S, et al. Inappropriateness of medication prescriptions to elderly patients in the primary care setting: a systematic review. \u003cem\u003ePloS one\u003c/em\u003e 2012;7(8):e43617.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAnathhanam S, Powis RA, Cracknell AL, et al. Impact of prescribed medications on patient safety in older people. \u003cem\u003eTherapeutic advances in drug safety\u003c/em\u003e 2012;3(4):165-74.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBoudreau RM, Hanlon JT, Roumani YF, et al. Central nervous system medication use and incident mobility limitation in community elders: the Health, Aging, and Body Composition study. \u003cem\u003ePharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf\u003c/em\u003e 2009;18(10):916-22. doi: 10.1002/pds.1797 [published Online First: 2009/07/09]\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCastelino RL, Hilmer SN, Bajorek BV, et al. Drug Burden Index and potentially inappropriate medications in community-dwelling older people: the impact of Home Medicines Review. \u003cem\u003eDrugs Aging\u003c/em\u003e 2010;27(2):135-48. doi: 10.2165/11531560-000000000-00000 [published Online First: 2010/01/29]\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCampbell N, Boustani M, Limbil T, et al. The cognitive impact of anticholinergics: a clinical review. \u003cem\u003eClin Interv Aging\u003c/em\u003e 2009;4:225-33. [published Online First: 2009/06/26]\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGray SL, Anderson ML, Dublin S, et al. Cumulative use of strong anticholinergics and incident dementia: a prospective cohort study. \u003cem\u003eJAMA internal medicine\u003c/em\u003e 2015;175(3):401-07.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCai X, Campbell N, Khan B, et al. Long-term anticholinergic use and the aging brain. \u003cem\u003eAlzheimer\u0026apos;s \u0026amp; Dementia\u003c/em\u003e 2013;9(4):377-85.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKalisch Ellett LM, Pratt NL, Ramsay EN, et al. Multiple anticholinergic medication use and risk of hospital admission for confusion or dementia. \u003cem\u003eJournal of the American Geriatrics Society\u003c/em\u003e 2014;62(10):1916-22.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eFox C, Smith T, Maidment I, et al. Effect of medications with anti-cholinergic properties on cognitive function, delirium, physical function and mortality: a systematic review. \u003cem\u003eAge and ageing\u003c/em\u003e 2014;43(5):604-15.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRichardson K, Fox C, Maidment I, et al. Anticholinergic drugs and risk of dementia: case-control study. \u003cem\u003eBMJ\u003c/em\u003e 2018;361:k1315.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCoupland CAC, Hill, T., Dening, T., Morriss, R. Moore, M., Hippisley-Cox, J. Anticholinergic drug exposure and the risk of dementia: A nested case-control study. . \u003cem\u003eJAMA Intern Med\u003c/em\u003e 2019;179(8):1084-93. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.0677\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCampbell NL, Boustani MA, Lane KA, et al. Use of anticholinergics and the risk of cognitive impairment in an African American population. \u003cem\u003eNeurology\u003c/em\u003e 2010;75(2):152-9. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181e7f2ab [published Online First: 2010/07/14]\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCampbell NL, Lane KA, Gao S, et al. Anticholinergics influence transition from normal cognition to mild cognitive impairment in older adults in primary care. \u003cem\u003ePharmacotherapy\u003c/em\u003e 2018;38(5):511-19.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCoupland CA, Hill T, Dening T, et al. Anticholinergic drug exposure and the risk of dementia: a nested case-control study. \u003cem\u003eJAMA internal medicine\u003c/em\u003e 2019\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eFox C, Richardson K, Maidment ID, et al. Anticholinergic medication use and cognitive impairment in the older population: the medical research council cognitive function and ageing study. \u003cem\u003eJ Am Geriatr Soc\u003c/em\u003e 2011;59(8):1477-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03491.x [published Online First: 2011/06/29]\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCampbell N, Perkins A, Bradt P, et al. Association of anticholinergic burden with cognitive impairment and healthcare utilization among a diverse ambulatory older adult population. \u003cem\u003ePharmacotherapy\u003c/em\u003e 2016;36(11):1123-31.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eScheiderer CL, McCutchen E, Thacker EE, et al. Sympathetic sprouting drives hippocampal cholinergic reinnervation that prevents loss of a muscarinic receptor-dependent long-term depression at CA3\u0026ndash;CA1 synapses. \u003cem\u003eJournal of Neuroscience\u003c/em\u003e 2006;26(14):3745-56.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCaccamo A, Oddo S, Billings LM, et al. M1 receptors play a central role in modulating AD-like pathology in transgenic mice. \u003cem\u003eNeuron\u003c/em\u003e 2006;49(5):671-82.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBierer LM, Haroutunian V, Gabriel S, et al. Neurochemical correlates of dementia severity in Alzheimer\u0026apos;s disease: relative importance of the cholinergic deficits. \u003cem\u003eJournal of neurochemistry\u003c/em\u003e 1995;64(2):749-60.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGeula C. Abnormalities of neural circuitry in Alzheimer\u0026apos;s disease Hippocampus and cortical cholinergic innervation. \u003cem\u003eNeurology\u003c/em\u003e 1998;51(1 Suppl 1):S18-S29.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSivaprakasam K. Towards a unifying hypothesis of Alzheimer\u0026apos;s disease: cholinergic system linked to plaques, tangles and neuroinflammation. \u003cem\u003eCurrent medicinal chemistry\u003c/em\u003e 2006;13(18):2179-88.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePerry EK, Kilford L, Lees AJ, et al. Increased Alzheimer pathology in Parkinson\u0026apos;s disease related to antimuscarinic drugs. \u003cem\u003eAnnals of neurology\u003c/em\u003e 2003;54(2):235-38.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003edel Pino J, Zeballos G, Anad\u0026oacute;n MJ, et al. Cadmium-induced cell death of basal forebrain cholinergic neurons mediated by muscarinic M1 receptor blockade, increase in GSK-3\u0026beta; enzyme, \u0026beta;-amyloid and tau protein levels. \u003cem\u003eArchives of toxicology\u003c/em\u003e 2016;90(5):1081-92.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRisacher SL, McDonald BC, Tallman EF, et al. Association between anticholinergic medication use and cognition, brain metabolism, and brain atrophy in cognitively normal older adults. \u003cem\u003eJAMA neurology\u003c/em\u003e 2016;73(6):721-32.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKersten H, Molden E, Tolo IK, et al. Cognitive effects of reducing anticholinergic drug burden in a frail elderly population: a randomized controlled trial. \u003cem\u003eJ Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci\u003c/em\u003e 2013;68(3):271-8. doi: 10.1093/gerona/gls176 [published Online First: 2012/09/18]\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eYeh Y-C, Liu C-L, Peng L-N, et al. Potential benefits of reducing medication-related anticholinergic burden for demented older adults: a prospective cohort study. \u003cem\u003eGeriatr Gerontol Int \u003c/em\u003e2013;13:694-700.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGnjidic D, Le Couteur DG, Abernethy DR, et al. A pilot randomized clinical trial utilizing the drug burden index to reduce exposure to anticholinergic and sedative medications in older people. \u003cem\u003eAnn Pharmacother\u003c/em\u003e 2010;44(11):1725-32. doi: 10.1345/aph.1P310 [published Online First: 2010/09/30]\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAilabouni N, Mangin, D., Nishtala, P. S. DEFEAT-polypharmacy: deprescribing anticholinergic and sedative medicines feasibility trial in residential aged care facilities. \u003cem\u003eInt J Clin Pharm\u003c/em\u003e 2019;1 (41):167-78. doi: 10.1007/s11096-019-00784-9\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMoga DC, Abner, E. L., Schmitt, F. A., Eckmann, L., Huffmeyer, M., Martinez, A. I., Beech, B. F., George, R., El Khouli, R. H., Ali, D., Jicha, G. A. intervention for Cognitive Reserve Enhancement in Delaying the Onset of Alzheimer\u0026apos;s Symptomatic Expression (INCREASE) Study: Results from a Randomized Controlled Study of Medication Therapy Management Targeting a Delay in Prodromal Dementia Symptom Progression. . \u003cem\u003eJ Prev Alz Dis\u003c/em\u003e 2022;9(4):646-54. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14283/jpad.2022.55\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSalahudeen MS, Duffull SB, Nishtala PS. Impact of anticholinergic discontinuation on cognitive outcomes in older people: a systematic review. \u003cem\u003eDrugs \u0026amp; aging\u003c/em\u003e 2014;31(3):185-92.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGnjidic D, Le Couteur DG, Kouladjian L, et al. Deprescribing trials: methods to reduce polypharmacy and the impact on prescribing and clinical outcomes. \u003cem\u003eClinics in geriatric medicine\u003c/em\u003e 2012;28(2):237-53.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCampbell NL, Pitts C, Corvari C, et al. Deprescribing anticholinergics in primary care older adults: experience from two models and impact on a continuous measure of exposure. . \u003cem\u003eJ Am Coll Clin Pharm\u003c/em\u003e 2022;Published online ahead of print [published Online First: July 18, 2022]\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCampbell NL, Holden R, Boustani MA. Preventing Alzheimer Disease by Deprescribing Anticholinergic Medications. \u003cem\u003eJAMA Intern Med\u003c/em\u003e 2019 doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.0676\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSink KM, Thomas J, Xu H, et al. Dual use of bladder anticholinergics and cholinesterase inhibitors: long-term functional and cognitive outcomes. \u003cem\u003eJournal of the American Geriatrics Society\u003c/em\u003e 2008;56(5):847-53.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSlavin MJ, Brodaty H, Kochan NA, et al. Prevalence and predictors of \u0026quot;subjective cognitive complaints\u0026quot; in the Sydney Memory and Ageing Study. \u003cem\u003eAm J Geriatr Psychiatry\u003c/em\u003e 2010;18(8):701-10. [published Online First: 2011/04/16]\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJorm AF. The Informant Questionnaire on cognitive decline in the elderly (IQCODE): a review. \u003cem\u003eInternational psychogeriatrics / IPA\u003c/em\u003e 2004;16(3):275-93.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSnitz BE, Yu L, Crane PK, et al. Subjective Cognitive Complaints of Older Adults at the Population Level An Item Response Theory Analysis. \u003cem\u003eAlzheimer Disease \u0026amp; Associated Disorders\u003c/em\u003e 2012;26(4):344-51. doi: 10.1097/WAD.0b013e3182420bdf\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCallahan CM, Unverzagt FW, Hui SL, et al. Six-item screener to identify cognitive impairment among potential subjects for clinical research. \u003cem\u003eMedical care\u003c/em\u003e 2002;40(9):771-81.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWilber ST, Lofgren SD, Mager TG, et al. An evaluation of two screening tools for cognitive impairment in older emergency department patients. \u003cem\u003eAcad Emerg Med\u003c/em\u003e 2005;12(7):612-16. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.01.017\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSteffens DC, Snowden M, Fan MY, et al. Cognitive impairment and depression outcomes in the IMPACT study. \u003cem\u003eAmerican Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry\u003c/em\u003e 2006;14(5):401-09.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePfeffer RI, Kurosaki TT, Harrah CH, et al. Measurement of functional activities in older adults in the community. \u003cem\u003eJ Gerontol \u003c/em\u003e1982;37(3):323-29.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCampbell NL, Khan BA, Farber M, et al. Improving delirium care in the intensive care unit: the design of a pragmatic study. \u003cem\u003eTrials\u003c/em\u003e 2011;12:139. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-139 [published Online First: 2011/06/08]\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCampbell NL, Perkins AJ, Khan BA, et al. Deprescribing in the Pharmacologic Management of Delirium: A Randomized Trial in the Intensive Care Unit. \u003cem\u003eJ Am Geriatr Soc\u003c/em\u003e 2019;67(4):695-702.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKhan BA, Perkins AJ, Campbell NL, et al. Pharmacological Management of Delirium in the Intensive Care Unit: A Randomized Pragmatic Clinical Trial. \u003cem\u003eJ Am Geriatr Soc\u003c/em\u003e 2019;67(5):1057-65.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAmerican Geriatrics Society 2015 Beers Criteria Update Expert Panel. American Geriatrics Society 2015 Updated Beers Criteria for Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Older Adults. \u003cem\u003eJ Am Geriatr Soc\u003c/em\u003e 2015;63(11):2227-46. doi: 10.1111/jgs.13702 [published Online First: 2015/10/09]\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLinsky AG, WF. Linder, JA. Friedberg, MW Advancing the Science of Deprescribing: A Novel Comprehensive Conceptual Framework. . \u003cem\u003eJ Am Geriatr Soc\u003c/em\u003e 2019;67(10):2018-22. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16136 [published Online First: 2019 Aug 20]\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTannenbaum C, Paquette A, Hilmer S, et al. A systematic review of amnestic and non-amnestic mild cognitive impairment induced by anticholinergic, antihistamine, GABAergic and opioid drugs. \u003cem\u003eDrugs Aging\u003c/em\u003e 2012;29(8):639-58. doi: 10.2165/11633250-000000000-00000 [published Online First: 2012/07/21]\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBuschke H, Fuld PA. Evaluating storage, retention, and retrieval in disordered memory and learning. \u003cem\u003eNeurology\u003c/em\u003e 1974;24(11):1019-19.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDeary, Liewald, Nissan. A free, easy-to-use, computer-based simple and four-choice reaction time programme: The Deary-Liewald reaction time task. \u003cem\u003eBehaviour Research Methods\u003c/em\u003e 2011;43:258-68.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eReitan RM, D W. The Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery: theory and clinical interpretation. \u003cem\u003eNeuropsychology Press\u003c/em\u003e 1993\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUnverzagt F, Monahan PO, Moser LR, Zhao Q, Carpenter JS, Sledge GW Jr, Champion VL. The Indiana University telephone-based assessment of neuropsychological status: a new method for large scale neuropsychological assessment. . \u003cem\u003eJ Int Neuropsychol Soc\u003c/em\u003e 2007;13(5):799-806. doi: 10.1017/S1355617707071020\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCella D, Riley W, Stone A, et al. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005\u0026ndash;2008. \u003cem\u003eJournal of clinical epidemiology\u003c/em\u003e 2010;63(11):1179-94.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHorsman J, Furlong W, Feeny D, et al. The Health Utilities Index (HUI\u0026reg;): concepts, measurement properties and applications. \u003cem\u003eHealth and quality of life outcomes\u003c/em\u003e 2003;1(1):54.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBoustani MA, Campbell NL, Khan BA, et al. Enhancing care for hospitalized older adults with cognitive impairment: a randomized controlled trial. \u003cem\u003eJ Gen Intern Med\u003c/em\u003e 2012;27(5):561-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-1994-8 [published Online First: 2012/02/04]\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHarris PAT, R.; Thielke, R.; Payne, J.; Gonzalez, N., Conde, J. G;. Research electronic data capture (REDCap) - a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. . \u003cem\u003eJ Biomed Inform\u003c/em\u003e 2009;42(2):377-81.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHarris PAT, R.; Minor, B. L.; Elliott, V.; Fernandez, M.; O\u0026apos;Neal, L.; McLeod, L.; Delacqua, G.; Delacqua, F.; Kirby, J.; Duda, S. N.; REDCap Consortium. The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software partners. \u003cem\u003eJ Biomed Inform\u003c/em\u003e 2019 doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSumukadas D, McMurdo ME, Mangoni AA, et al. Temporal trends in anticholinergic medication prescription in older people: repeated cross-sectional analysis of population prescribing data. \u003cem\u003eAge Ageing\u003c/em\u003e 2014;43(4):515-21.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":false,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":true,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"trials","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"trls","sideBox":"Learn more about [Trials](http://trialsjournal.biomedcentral.com/)","snPcode":"13063","submissionUrl":"https://www.editorialmanager.com/trls","title":"Trials","twitterHandle":"MedicalEvidence","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"em","reportingPortfolio":"BMC/SO AJ","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Anticholinergics, deprescribing, cognition, dementia","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4682599/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4682599/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eBackground: \u003c/strong\u003eOlder adults commonly experience chronic medical conditions and are at risk of cognitive impairment as a result of age, chronic comorbidity, and medications prescribed to manage multiple chronic conditions. Anticholinergic medications are common treatments for chronic conditions, and have been repeatedly associated with poor cognitive outcomes, including delirium and dementia, in epidemiologic studies. However, no study has definitively evaluated the causal relationship between anticholinergics and cognition in a randomized controlled trial design. Utilizing our prior experience in deprescribing anticholinergic medications in various clinical environments, we designed an outpatient deprescribing intervention to prospectively test the potential causal relationship between anticholinergics and cognition in primary care older adults.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMethods: \u003c/strong\u003eThis cluster randomized clinical trial will be conducted to evaluate the impact of an anticholinergic deprescribing intervention compared to usual care on outcomes of cognition and safety in primary care older adults. Participants will include those aged 65 years and over, receiving primary care in the greater Indianapolis area, using a strong anticholinergic within the last two weeks or with evidence of high-risk exposure in the past year. Those excluded will have a diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease or related dementia, or serious mental illness. The trial plans to enroll 344 participants who will be cluster-randomized at the level of primary care physician to avoid contamination. Participants will complete outcome assessments every six months up to 2 years by blinded outcome assessors. The primary outcome of the study is a composite measure of cognition that includes domains assessing executive cognitive function, language, and memory. Secondary outcomes include patient-reported measures of pain intensity, depression, anxiety, sleep disturbance, and health-related quality of life.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eDiscussion: \u003c/strong\u003eThe R2D2 trial will be the largest and longest prospective randomized trial testing the impact of an anticholinergic-specific deprescribing intervention on cognition in primary care older adults. Results could influence deprescribing methodology and provide new insight on the relationship between anticholinergics and cognition.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eTrial Registration:\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTrial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04270474. Registered17 February 2020.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Deprescribing Anticholinergics to Preserve Brain Health: Reducing the Risk of Dementia through Deprescribing (R2D2): Study Protocol for a Randomized Clinical Trial","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2024-10-28 09:34:02","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4682599/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"","date":"2024-10-24T11:17:38+00:00","index":0,"fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewersInvited","content":"","date":"2024-10-24T10:45:33+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"decision","content":"Minor revision","date":"2024-10-24T08:08:50+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorAssigned","content":"","date":"2024-08-01T09:12:24+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"submitted","content":"Trials","date":"2024-07-29T17:00:22+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"trials","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"trls","sideBox":"Learn more about [Trials](http://trialsjournal.biomedcentral.com/)","snPcode":"13063","submissionUrl":"https://www.editorialmanager.com/trls","title":"Trials","twitterHandle":"MedicalEvidence","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"em","reportingPortfolio":"BMC/SO AJ","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"1d5c6638-9d34-4267-9975-fac8b93c7526","owner":[],"postedDate":"October 28th, 2024","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"published-in-journal","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2024-11-25T16:01:43+00:00","versionOfRecord":{"articleIdentity":"rs-4682599","link":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-08618-4","journal":{"identity":"trials","isVorOnly":false,"title":"Trials"},"publishedOn":"2024-11-22 15:57:33","publishedOnDateReadable":"November 22nd, 2024"},"versionCreatedAt":"2024-10-28 09:34:02","video":"","vorDoi":"10.1186/s13063-024-08618-4","vorDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-08618-4","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-4682599","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-4682599","identity":"rs-4682599","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"7rjqhiLT3MXkJMwkYKINL","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}