Results of annual screening in phase I of the United Kingdom familial ovarian cancer screening study highlight the need for strict adherence to screening schedule

Non-randomised trial OA: closed
📄 Open PDF View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-08-23 ⓘ

Annual screening for high-risk women detected ovarian cancer with 81.3% sensitivity, while delayed screening intervals significantly increased the likelihood of advanced-stage disease at diagnosis.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

PURPOSE: To establish the performance characteristics of annual transvaginal ultrasound and serum CA125 screening for women at high risk of ovarian/fallopian tube cancer (OC/FTC) and to investigate the impact of delayed screening interval and surgical intervention. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between May 6, 2002, and January 5, 2008, 3,563 women at an estimated ≥ 10% lifetime risk of OC/FTC were recruited and screened by 37 centers in the United Kingdom. Participants were observed prospectively by centers, questionnaire, and national cancer registries. RESULTS: Sensitivity for detection of incident OC/FTC at 1 year after last annual screen was 81.3% (95% CI, 54.3% to 96.0%) if occult cancers were classified as false negatives and 87.5% (95% CI, 61.7% to 98.5%) if they were classified as true positives. Positive and negative predictive values of incident screening were 25.5% (95% CI, 14.3 to 40.0) and 99.9% (95% CI, 99.8 to 100) respectively. Four (30.8%) of 13 incident screen-detected OC/FTCs were stage I or II. Compared with women screened in the year before diagnosis, those not screened in the year before diagnosis were more likely to have ≥ stage IIIc disease (85.7% v 26.1%; P = .009). Screening interval was delayed by a median of 88 days before detection of incident OC/FTC. Median interval from detection screen to surgical intervention was 79 days in prevalent and incident OC/FTC. CONCLUSION: These results in the high-risk population highlight the need for strict adherence to screening schedule. Screening more frequently than annually with prompt surgical intervention seems to offer a better chance of early-stage detection.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

MeSH descriptors

Early Detection of Cancer Fallopian Tube Neoplasms Genetic Predisposition to Disease Mass Screening Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial Ovarian Neoplasms Peritoneal Neoplasms Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial Early Detection of Cancer Fallopian Tube Neoplasms Fallopian Tube Neoplasms Fallopian Tube Neoplasms Female Follow-Up Studies Guideline Adherence Humans Mass Screening

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-10-04T09:26:46.659050+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-08T21:11:10.042802+00:00