Loop extrusion dynamics and cooperative activation independently regulate enhancer-driven transcription

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,774 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract How enhancers transmit their activation signals to target promoters is a fundamental unanswered question. Gene activation by distal enhancers is affected by the three-dimensional organisation of chromatin driven by cohesin-mediated loop extrusion, but how the dynamic loop extrusion cycle shapes transcriptional outcomes is not fully understood. In addition, genes are typically regulated by multiple enhancers and cases of cooperativity between enhancers have been observed that depend on the relative position of enhancers and gene. The reason for such context-dependent cooperativity is unknown, and whether it is linked to loop extrusion has not been explored. Here, we use synthetic gene activation to show that NIPBL depletion, which decreases loop extrusion rate, reduces long-range activation in a dose-dependent manner. In contrast, WAPL depletion, which reduces cohesin turnover, can both increase and decrease distal gene activation depending on the presence of adjacent CTCF binding sites. These effects on gene activation correlate with the impact on chromatin contacts. Depletion of the co-activator BRD4 also affects long-range activation, but not by changing chromatin contacts. Synthetic activation from two locations results in super-additive responses, which can be predicted by an independently determined response model. These predictions hold for dual activation from proximal and/or distal sites, and with perturbed NIPBL, WAPL, or BRD4. Distal activation therefore appears to be equivalent in nature to proximal activation, and context-dependent cooperativity can arise simply from different level of activation inputs operating on a non-linear response function. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00