Angiographic Tool to Detect Pulmonary Arteriovenous Malformations in Single Ventricle Physiology

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 3,663 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 4 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Background Individuals with single ventricle physiology who are palliated with superior cavopulmonary anastomosis (Glenn surgery) may develop pulmonary arteriovenous malformations (PAVMs). The traditional tools for PAVM diagnosis are often of limited diagnostic utility in this patient population. We sought to measure the pulmonary capillary transit time (PCTT) to determine its value as a tool to identify PAVMs in patients with single ventricle physiology.

Methods

We defined the angiographic PCTT as the number of cardiac cycles required for transit of contrast from the distal pulmonary arteries to the pulmonary veins. Patients were retrospectively recruited from a single quaternary North American pediatric center, and angiographic and clinical data was reviewed. PCTT was calculated in 20 control patients and compared to 20 single ventricle patients at the pre-Glenn, Glenn, and Fontan surgical stages (which were compared with a linear-mixed model). Correlation (Pearson) between PCTT and hemodynamic and injection parameters was assessed using 84 Glenn angiograms. Five independent observers calculated PCTT to measure reproducibility (intra-class correlation coefficient).

Results

Mean PCTT was 3.3 cardiac cycles in the control population, and 3.5, 2.4, and 3.5 in the pre-Glenn, Glenn, and Fontan stages, respectively. PCTT in the Glenn population did not correlate with injection conditions. Intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.87.

Conclusions

Pulmonary angiography can be used to calculate the pulmonary capillary transit time, which is reproducible between observers. PCTT accelerates in the Glenn stage, correlating with absence of direct hepatopulmonary venous flow. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Funding Statement This work was supported financially by the Pediatric Scientist Development Program (NICHD K12–HD000850) and the Leducq Foundation Transatlantic Network of Excellence grant: ReVAMP — Recalibrating Mechanotransduction in Vascular Malformations (2022–2027). Author Declarations I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained. Yes The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below: IRB of the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center gave ethical approval for this work. (UTSW IRB 2020-0047). I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals. Yes I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance). Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable. Yes Data Availability All data produced in the present study are available upon request to the authors, pending successful approval of data use sharing agreement with the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00