Culmulative Cultural Evolution - A Flawed Concept

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 2,180 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 2 sections · click to expand

Abstract

The concept of cumulative cultural evolution (CCE) is fundamentally flawed. The second process of evolution is enacted via imagination at the individual level. This process utilizes an artificial genome within our mind when conceiving a new idea. Homo sapiens has expanded the artificial genome available to each of us, but this does not amount to a cumulative process practically. It is the artificial variation of organisms expanding their genome within the context of natural reproduction. The concept of evolution already includes progressive accumulation making the word cumulative redundant. The concept of culture is also improperly defined. The concept of culture is really the ancient Latin definition of cultivation which meant – evolution. So, the word culture is also redundant. The concept of culture produced by modern academics is also improperly defined on its own terms. The concept they attempt to describe is an artificial species – the artificial segregation of homo sapiens based on distinct artificial structural and behavioral adaptations. This makes the concept of CCE to be practically defined as “evolution evolution evolution” which is nonsensical. The conceptual pattern of a culture is also improperly defined thus making a clear case for Alex Mesoudi’s proposed Darwinian synthesis of the social sciences. https://doi.org/10.32942/X2TD1K Social and Behavioral Sciences

Keywords

Cultural evolution, cumulative cultural evolution, artificial evolution, artificial species, artificial genome, natural genome, artificial reproduction, natural reproduction, natural mutation, artificial mutation Published: 2025-05-12 08:03 Last Updated: 2025-05-12 08:03 CC-BY Attribution-No Derivatives 4.0 International Language: English

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00