A Cohort Study of the Efficacy of the Dienogest and the Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonist in Women with Adenomyosis
This study found that both dienogest and GnRH-a significantly reduced dysmenorrhea in adenomyosis patients, but GnRH-a was more effective at improving anemia and decreasing uterine volume.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This prospective cohort study enrolled 127 premenopausal women with ultrasound-confirmed uterine adenomyosis and dysmenorrhea, allocating them by alternation to dienogest 2 mg daily or the GnRH agonist goserelin acetate 3.6 mg every 4 weeks, with follow-up at 12 weeks. Both treatments significantly reduced dysmenorrhea severity by Visual Analog Scale and decreased CA125 levels after 12 weeks, but hemoglobin changes differed: anemia improved significantly with goserelin while hemoglobin in anemia patients did not improve significantly with dienogest, and uterine volume increased slightly (not significant) with dienogest but decreased significantly with goserelin. The study’s limitation included nonrandom alternation allocation and attrition due to treatment discontinuation for adverse effects, without use of add-back therapy. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it specifically investigates hormonal efficacy for adenomyosis-related dysmenorrhea in women with uterine adenomyosis, comparing dienogest versus GnRH agonist effects.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00