Significance of surgery for infertile patients with endometrioma

In: ACTA MEDICA KINDAI UNIVERSITY · 2020 · vol. 45(1) , pp. 1–11 · W7145646117
article OA: green CC0
📄 Open PDF View on OpenAlex
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-08

This retrospective study analyzed 852 infertile patients and found surgery improved fertility in those <35 years old with endometrioma but may decrease it in patients 35-39 years old by reducing ovarian reserve.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-08

This retrospective study analyzed 852 infertility patients treated at Kindai University Hospital from 1997 to 2013 to assess how surgery (including cystectomy) for ovarian endometrioma relates to pregnancy outcomes, with ovarian reserve evaluated using baseline FSH and AMH and patients stratified by age. The key findings were that reduced ovarian reserve at treatment start did not differ between women with unilateral or bilateral endometrioma vs no endometrioma in those <35 years, but did differ in women aged 35–39; cumulative pregnancy rates differed among endometrioma status groups in <35 years but not in 35–39 years, while among those who underwent surgery, pregnancy rates were similar by endometrioma laterality in <35 years but significantly differed in 35–39 years. A major caveat noted in the paper is selection bias typical of retrospective designs, and that AMH-based ovarian reserve assessment was limited to cases after 2011. This paper is centrally about endometriosis—specifically the significance of surgical cystectomy for infertile patients with endometrioma and how ovarian reserve and age modify reproductive outcomes.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

[Abstract] Background: The significance of cystectomy for infertile patients with endometrioma remains controversial.Methods: Between 1997 and 2013, 852 female patients visited Kindai University Hospital and were treated for infertility, and the significance of surgery for infertile patients with endometrioma was retrospectively analyzed in this study.Results: Among patients without endometrioma(N=740), patients with unilateral endometrioma(N=81), and patients with bilateral endometrioma(N=31), the proportion of patients with reduced ovarian reserve at the start of treatment was not different in patients <35 years old (5.0% vs 8.0% vs 10.5%, p=0.41) but was significantly different in patients 35 to 39 years old (15.6% vs 29.6% vs 45.5%, p=0.014). Among these three groups, the cumulative pregnancy rates in patients before surgery or in those who did not undergo surgery were significantly different in patients <35 years old (59.9% vs 27.3% vs 18.0%, p=0.008) and were not different in patients 35 to 39 years old (45.3% vs 38.0% vs 10.0%, p=0.93). Among the three groups, the cumulative pregnancy rates of patients who underwent surgery were not different in patients <35 years old (51.2% vs 45.2% vs 50.0%, p=0.71) but were significantly different in patients 35 to 39 years old (40.7% vs 31.3% vs 0%, p=0.025).Conclusions: Surgery, including cystectomy, for infertile patients with endometrioma improves fertility in patients <35 years old by correcting the pelvic environment to the same extent as that in patients without endometrioma but may decrease fertility in 35- to 39-year-old patients by reducing ovarian reserve.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriomainfertility

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK