Colorectal emergencies: perforated diverticulitis (operative and nonoperative management)

Other OA: closed
⚙ AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash+body, 2026-08-24 ⓘ

This paper reviews the epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and CT-based diagnosis of diverticulitis, outlining Hinchey classification stages to guide operative and nonoperative management while noting endometriosis as a differential diagnosis.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

⚙ AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-08-24 · read from full text ⓘ

This review article outlines the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of perforated diverticulitis, noting that rising fiber-poor diets have increased incidence rates in Western populations. It details the Hinchey classification system to stratify disease severity, guiding treatment from conservative antibiotic therapy for uncomplicated cases to emergency surgical resection for generalized peritonitis. The text explicitly lists endometriosis as a key differential diagnosis for patients presenting with left lower quadrant abdominal pain and pelvic symptoms. Relevance to endometriosis: listed as one indication for GnRH antagonists, though the paper's main focus is uterine fibroids.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 13,137 characters · extracted from pmc-nxml · 5 sections · click to expand

Risks

The vast majority of patients who present with uncomplicated diverticulitis respond to conservative measures. The decision to recommend prophylactic resection hinges on several factors. Historically, surgeons recommended elective surgery due to concerns that a subsequent episode of diverticulitis may require emergency surgery, or may lead to the need for a colostomy. A growing body of evidence suggests that the vast majority of patients who present with complicated diverticulitis (Hinchey 2) or a free perforation (Hinchey 3 and 4) do so at the time of their initial episode and therefore this cannot be surgically prevented.[ 14 , 15 ] A study by Hall et al found a 5-year recurrence rate of 36% in patients following an initial episode of diverticulitis. They also identified several risk factors (family history of diverticulitis, length of involved colon &; 5cm, presence of a retroperitoneal abscess) that increased the likelihood of recurrent episodes.[ 4 ] There is some recent evidence to suggest that younger patients, particularly males, present with more severe disease. However, currently there is no consensus on whether young age or male sex alone is associated with an increased risk of recurrence or complications. Patients with multiple episodes of diverticulitis are not at any higher risk for developing complicated disease, and a history of multiple episodes is not currently considered an absolute indication for surgery. Immuno-compromised patients are a high-risk group with a significantly higher rate of free perforation and emergency surgery, and a higher post-operative mortality. This is particularly true in lung transplant patients, whose risk of diverticulitis is highest in the first 1-2 years following transplantation. For these patients, surgery should be strongly considered early, or on the same admission. Taken together, for patients with uncomplicated diverticulitis, a recommendation for surgery should be based on the above risk factors, as well as the frequency and severity of clinical symptoms and CT scan findings, taking into account patient co-morbidities and age. Patients with diverticulitis who were managed conservatively should undergo an outpatient colonoscopy to rule out other diseases such as inflammatory bowel disease and cancer. This is typically performed 6 weeks after the episode. The incidence of detecting cancer in this setting is actually quite low, ∼2%.[ 16 , 17 ] If surgery is being considered, there should be radiographic evidence of disease to confirm the diagnosis, and elective surgery is delayed for 4-6 weeks. Laparoscopic peritoneal lavage is a minimally invasive approach that has garnered considerable attention as a less morbid option for select patients. In fact, this approach shares similarities with the first stage of the historical 3-stage operation. Studies have suggested that this approach could be considered for Hinchey stage 2-3 patients.[ 18 , 19 ] Several prospective, multi-institutional trials are currently underway to evaluate this approach in a more rigorous fashion.

Symptoms

Patients typically present with left lower quadrant abdominal pain that may radiate to the suprapubic area, left groin, or back. This may be in association with alterations in bowel habits (constipation and less commonly diarrhea), fevers, chills, and urinary symptoms, either due to inflammation in close proximity to the bladder, or from a colovesical fistula. Rectal bleeding, the other common manifestation of diverticular disease, is uncommon in the setting of diverticulitis. On physical exam, patients may have isolated tenderness in the left lower quadrant of the abdomen or diffuse peritoneal signs, depending on the severity of the perforation. A tender mass in the left lower quadrant is suggestive of a phlegmon or abscess, or the patient may be distended as a result of a small bowel ileus, or from a large bowel obstruction due to a colonic stricture. Laboratory tests are notable for a leukocytosis.

Diagnosis

The differential diagnosis includes irritable bowel syndrome, appendicitis, inflammatory bowel disease, cystitis, endometriosis, ectopic pregnancy, ovarian torsion, pelvic inflammatory disease, colitis from any cause, and colon cancer. The CT scan is the diagnostic test of choice and is valuable because it establishes the diagnosis, determines the location of disease, and assesses the severity of the inflammation. Common CT scan findings include pericolic fat infiltration, wall thickening, and muscular hypertrophy. The severity of inflammation seen on CT scan correlates with clinical response and can therefore guide clinical decision-making.[ 3 , 4 ] The CT scan may also identify other complications of diverticulitis, including a fistula, abscess, or obstruction. The most well-known classification system for diverticulitis is the Hinchey classification, described in 1978 based on operative findings at the time of surgery. [ 5 ] Hinchey stage 1 is considered “uncomplicated” diverticulitis, and is defined by diverticulitis with a pericolic phlegmon or a small pericolic (<2 cm) abscess. Hinchey stage 2 falls under the category of “complicated” disease and is defined as diverticulitis with a pelvic, abdominal, or retroperitoneal abscess. Hinchey stage 1 and 2 are contained perforations, usually caused by a microperforation. Hinchey stage 3 is defined as diverticulitis with generalized purulent peritonitis, while Hinchey stage 4 is diverticulitis with generalized feculent peritonitis. Hinchey stage 3 and 4 are free perforations. These occur in less than 10% of patients who present with diverticulitis. Hinchey stages correlate with mortality (<5% for stage 1-2, 13% for stage 3, 43% for stage 4). [ 6 ]

Treatment

Hinchey stage 3 (purulent peritonitis) and 4 (feculent peritonitis) patients present with generalized peritonitis due to a free perforation, have systemic symptoms, and require emergency surgery. Historically, this was performed in a “3-stage” fashion. Stage 1 consisted of a proximal diverting colostomy, irrigation, and drainage of the diseased segment. Stage 2 involved a resection of the diseased segment and primary anastomosis, and stage 3 involved a colostomy takedown. Today, patients undergoing emergency surgery are managed by a two-stage approach, which is associated with improved morbidity and mortality, and a greater likelihood of stoma reversal compared to the 3-stage approach. The classic two-stage operation, also referred to as the Hartmann procedure, involves resection of the diseased segment of colon, closure of the rectal stump, and creation of a proximal end colostomy. The second stage involved takedown of the colostomy and primary anastomosis. An alternative two-stage approach has been gaining favor recently and involves resection of the diseased segment of colon, a primary anastomosis, and a diverting ileostomy, followed by ileostomy reversal at the second operation. Comparing these two “2-stage” approaches, morbidity and mortality rates were similar for the first operation, but for the second operation, hospital costs, length of stay, operative time, and the likelihood of stoma reversal all favored the ileostomy group.[ 7 ] Operative management of diverticulitis involves basic surgical principles that apply regardless of whether surgery is elective or emergent, laparoscopic or open, or performed in one, two, or three stages. The first and most obvious is that the diseased segment of colon is removed. Surgery does not involve removal of all the diverticula, which may be present anywhere in the colon. Therefore, recurrent diverticulitis is possible following surgery, estimated to occur in 3-7% of patients.[ 8 - 10 ] Second, the remaining sigmoid colon distal to the area of disease should be resected, even if it appears normal. The level of bowel transection is a major determinant of recurrence (3-7% for a colorectal anastomosis vs. 12.5% for a colo-sigmoid anastomosis).[ 9 , 10 ] The rectosigmoid junction is characterized by a loss of epiploic appendages (present on the sigmoid colon but not the rectum) and splaying of the taenia, three bands of longitudinal muscle present on the colon wall that become a uniformly distributed layer of longitudinal muscle at the level of the upper rectum. Third, one should try to preserve the inferior mesentery artery (IMA) whenever possible. If may be unavoidable in situations when cancer has not yet been excluded. Otherwise, some studies suggest that preservation of the IMA may improve anastomotic leak rates and functional outcomes following surgery.[ 11 , 12 ] This may be related to the preservation of arterial blood flow to the upper rectum, or to preservation of the underlying hypogastric nerves. Also, in emergent situations in which a pre-operative colonoscopy was not performed, it is prudent to open the resected specimen in the operating room to evaluate for the presence of cancer. Hinchey stage 2 patients present with diverticulitis and a contained perforation (abscess). These patients are typically managed by percutaneous drainage and conservative measures. Elective resection is indicated in these patients because their risk of developing another episode of complicated diverticulitis is higher.[ 13 ] When a perforation leading to diverticulitis is contained by adjacent organs or structures, this can lead to the development of a fistula (large or small bowel, bladder, vagina, uterus, ureter, skin). For these patients, initial treatment involves controlling the infection with antibiotics and bowel rest, followed by excision of the diseased colon to remove the fistula source, often on an elective basis. Chronic inflammation from recurrent episodes can lead to the development of a colonic stricture. Malignancy must be excluded in this situation and surgery is required to remove the area of narrowing. Patients that present with uncomplicated (Hinchey stage 1) diverticulitis are managed conservatively. Outpatient management is reserved for patients who can tolerate oral intake, have no systemic symptoms and no co-morbidities, and can reliably follow up if their symptoms worsen. These patients are treated with oral antibiotics for 7-10 days and a low residue diet. Inpatient management is reserved for patients who are older, have co-morbidities, present with localized peritonitis and/or systemic symptoms, cannot tolerate oral intake or require additional pain medication. These patients are treated with IV antibiotics and are initially kept NPO. Most experience symptom resolution within 2-3 days. A CT scan should be considered for persistent or worsening symptoms to assess for the presence of worsening inflammation or an abscess. Surgery should be considered for patients with worsening symptoms, or with no symptomatic improvement in 3-4 days.

Introduction

Diverticulitis is the most common manifestation of diverticulosis. It accounts for roughly 150,000 hospital admissions in the US per year, resulting in ∼ 50,000 bowel resections. It is defined simply as inflammation due to perforation of a diverticulum. Diverticulosis, defined as the presence of diverticula in the colon, was rare prior to the 1900's. Since that time there has been a significant increase in the incidence of diverticulosis and diverticulitis, across all age groups.[ 1 , 2 ] This rising incidence coincided with the advent of industrial roller milling in the late 1800's, a process that turned whole grains into refined white flour and led to a significant reduction in fiber consumption in western societies. We currently estimate that roughly 5-10% of the US population has diverticula present in their colon by the age of 40. This incidence increases to 60-70% by the age of 80. Of all patients that have diverticulosis, 10-25% will become symptomatic. Low dietary fiber results in diminished stool bulk, resulting in slower gastrointestinal (GI) transit and changes in colonic motility, leading to elevated regional colonic (intraluminal) pressures as the colon must contract more vigorously to propel stool. Diverticula develop due to these increased intraluminal pressures, forming herniations at areas of weakness where the vasa recta, terminal branches of the marginal artery, penetrate the bowel wall to provide arterial blood to the mucosal layer. Colonic diverticula are pulsion, or false diverticula, composed of mucosa, muscularis mucosa, and peritoneum. The sigmoid colon is the most commonly affected segment of bowel. Other risk factors for the development of diverticulosis include age, obesity, and lack of physical activity. Diverticulitis develops following perforation of a diverticulum. Older theories surmised that diverticulitis was caused by an initial obstruction at the neck of the diverticulum, leading to distention and eventual perforation. This led to the recommendation to avoid certain foods such as popcorn, seeds, and nuts, to minimize the risk that they might get stuck and lead to perforation. This theory has largely fallen out of favor and the current thinking is that diverticulitis simply develops when the colonic pressure exceeds the wall tension of a diverticulum.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: pmc-nxml ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

MeSH descriptors

Abdominal Abscess Diverticulitis, Colonic Intestinal Fistula Intestinal Perforation Abdominal Abscess Abdominal Abscess Diverticulitis, Colonic Diverticulitis, Colonic Diverticulitis, Colonic Diverticulitis, Colonic Emergencies Humans Intestinal Fistula Intestinal Fistula Intestinal Perforation Intestinal Perforation Intestinal Perforation Peritonitis Peritonitis Peritonitis

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-10-11T09:27:45.537177+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-08T21:12:41.142639+00:00