sitetool: an application for field site selection and evaluation

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Field studies are fundamental to ecological research, yet many studies rely on unspecified or convenience-based methods for site selection, potentially introducing bias that can compromise research results. Remote-sensing data provides a quantitative way to evaluate potential sites without expensive pilot visits, however, interacting with spatial data can be computationally complex. We present an R Shiny application that integrates geospatial data into the site selection process, helping researchers generate a list of potential field sites in a region of interest and ensuring sites fall along a gradient of variation relevant to their research questions. Through integration of remote-sensing data into an easy-to-use interface, this tool improves the ability of researchers to make quantitative site selection decisions, ultimately leading to more robust studies and research results.
Full text 1,507 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint. You must log in to post a comment. There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint. Add a Comment You must log in to post a comment. Comments There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. Field studies are fundamental to ecological research, yet many studies rely on unspecified or convenience-based methods for site selection, potentially introducing bias that can compromise research results. Remote-sensing data provides a quantitative way to evaluate potential sites without expensive pilot visits, however, interacting with spatial data can be computationally complex. We present an R Shiny application that integrates geospatial data into the site selection process, helping researchers generate a list of potential field sites in a region of interest and ensuring sites fall along a gradient of variation relevant to their research questions. Through integration of remote-sensing data into an easy-to-use interface, this tool improves the ability of researchers to make quantitative site selection decisions, ultimately leading to more robust studies and research results. https://doi.org/10.32942/X2G65X Life Sciences, Research Methods in Life Sciences Published: 2025-10-27 12:59 Last Updated: 2025-10-27 12:59 CC BY Attribution 4.0 International Language: English

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00