Linzagolix (endometriosis); Benefit assessment according to §35a SGB V

report OA: green CC0
Full text 1,874 characters · extracted from oa-html · click to expand
18.03.2025 Linzagolix for endometriosis: comparative data are lacking For endometriosis, there are no comparative studies with established drugs. Placebo comparisons are unsuitable for assessing the added benefit. Press release Last updated 17.03.2025 Project no.: A24-123 Commission: Commission awarded on 16.12.2024 by the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA). Report type: Dossier assessment Status: Commission completed Department/Division: Drug Assessment Topic: Reproductive health and birth Indication: Symptomatic treatment of endometriosis in adult women of reproductive age with a history of previous medical or surgical treatment for their endometriosis; with concomitant hormonal add-back therapy Result of dossier assessment: Added benefit not proven Note: After completion of the assessment by IQWiG the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA) conducts a commenting procedure. This may provide supplementary information and as a result lead to a modified benefit assessment. Further information and the decision on the early benefit assessment can be found on the relevant page of the G-BA website. DOI: https://doi.org/10.60584/A24-123_en 18.03.2025 For endometriosis, there are no comparative studies with established drugs. Placebo comparisons are unsuitable for assessing the added benefit. Press release - Extract of dossier assessment: Linzagolix (endometriosis) – Benefit assessment according to §35a Social Code Book V DOI: https://doi.org/10.60584/A24-123_en EN, PDF, 244 kB, PDFpublished on Mar 17, 2025 - Dossier assessment: Linzagolix (endometriosis) – Benefit assessment according to §35a Social Code Book V DOI: https://doi.org/10.60584/A24-123 DE, PDF, 423 kB, PDFpublished on Mar 17, 2025 | Project no. | Title | Status | |---|---|---| | A24-92 | Linzagolix (uterine fibroids) – Benefit assessment according to §35a Social Code Book V | Commission completed |

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosis

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-05-10T10:26:17.946222+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK