Seeking smarts: Male chickadees with better spatial cognition sire more extra-pair young

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,798 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Across animal taxa, females commonly mate with more than one male, even in monogamous mating systems. These extra-pair (EP) copulations and resulting young may increase the fitness of the female via a variety of mechanisms, including genetic benefits. North American chickadees provide an interesting system to study the role of sexual selection via EP paternity, because they are socially monogamous, nonmigratory birds that rely on spatial cognition to recover food stores and variation in spatial cognition is associated with increased survival, longer lifespan, and is heritable. Given spatial cognitive abilities are heritable and associated with direct survival benefits, these abilities may be under sexual selection if males with better spatial abilities sire more offspring and females prefer to mate with such males. We aimed to address these predictions by quantifying extra-pair paternity and comparing spatial abilities of EP males to those of the social male they cuckold in a wild population of mountain chickadees (Poecile gambeli). We found that 1. males with better spatial cognitive abilities have more EP young and produce heavier offspring in their own nests compared to their poorer performing counterparts, and 2. EP males have significantly better spatial cognition than the social males they cuckolded. These results suggest that sexual selection is involved in the evolution of spatial cognitive abilities in food-caching chickadees and are consistent with the good genes hypothesis, which posits that females gain indirect genetic benefits via EP young. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes The text of the manuscript has been edited to reduce the emphasis on female choice. No results or data have been edited.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00