Endometriose: Hysterektomie mit vs. ohne Ovarerhalt
This retrospective study investigated how ovarian preservation versus removal during hysterectomy for endometriosis affects subsequent surgeries and pain management.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
A Canadian research team conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the impact of ovarian preservation versus oophorectomy during hysterectomy for endometriosis. The investigators analyzed how this surgical decision influenced the frequency of subsequent operative interventions and the later utilization of pain management treatments among affected women. The paper compares clinical outcomes based on whether ovaries were retained or removed at the time of the primary hysterectomy procedure. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — specifically comparing surgical strategies involving hysterectomy with and without ovarian conservation for disease management.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
928 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cites (1)
References (1)
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00