A problem at the heart of precision medicine – are current clinical prediction models fully actionable for individuals?

preprint OA: closed
View at publisher

Abstract

Current clinical prediction models are static models of association, rather than correctly specified counterfactual prediction models based on modifiable causes. They do not tell us that, if we change a predictor variable, this will alter the outcome for an individual. Instead, the intervention recommended based on current prediction models is unrelated to the model and only shown to work on average across the population. Consequently, current clinical prediction models are not fully actionable for individuals. To improve actionability, clinical prediction models should be based on causation rather than association, model the individualised treatment effect and predict counterfactuals incorporating the proposed intervention into the model, and provide dynamic predictions which react to changes in treatment. Then prediction models will be closer to meeting the precision medicine ideal.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00