Evaluating transformer-based models for structural characterization of orphan proteins
The study evaluated several transformer-based models for predicting protein structural features using an expert-curated set of orphan proteins from the Meloidogyne genus, for which no experimentally determined structures exist. Using consistency analyses that compared model predictions to features seen in known homologous protein sets and across different models, the authors found that multiple sequence alignment–based approaches (including AlphaFold2) and single-sequence/embedding-based language model predictors (including ESMFold, OmegaFold, and ProtT5) performed poorly for orphan proteins. The poor performance could not be fully explained by intrinsic disorder, as independent disorder predictors confirmed only partial disorder contributions. Secondary structure elements were captured more reliably, with model agreement of about 70% on average, even when global fold similarity was low, and consistent identification by dedicated secondary-structure tools, while accurate tertiary structure prediction remained out of reach. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
1,881 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· 2 sections
· click to expand
Abstract
Results
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00