Land use change models that integrate quantitative and qualitative approaches better explain deforestation patterns in Amazonian protected areas

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 2,546 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 2 sections · click to expand

Abstract

The Amazon Basin’s agricultural frontiers – many of which overlap with protected areas (PAs) – experience deforestation for agriculture and pasture. Responses to PA deforestation require understanding the region-wide and PA-specific socio-environmental factors that increase forest conversion. Standard, quantitative approaches to land-use change (LUC) modeling may omit some factors, constraining understandings of and responses to deforestation. Dominant discourses about deforestation – promoted by government and conservation organizations – also shape deforestation responses. We integrated quantitative and qualitative analysis of deforestation dynamics into LUC models of three Amazonian PA complexes (Brazil’s Jamanxim National Forest, Bolivia’s Amboró and Carrasco National Parks, and Peru’s Tambopata National Reserve and Bahuaja-Sonene National Park) to understand 1) the ability of conservation discourses to inform deforestation models and 2) region-wide and site-level factors related to deforestation. Our integrative methodology yielded better model performance than standard LUC modeling. From 2008-2018, forests on steeper slopes with higher population densities were less likely to convert, while forests surrounded by non-forest and closer to agriculture and fires had increased deforestation. Legal threats to Jamanxim’s status increased deforestation likelihood, while in Amboró and Carrasco, payments for ecosystem services projects were associated with decreased deforestation. While dominant discourses sometimes aligned with LUC models’ results (e.g., fires and increased deforestation), some factors commonly cited in deforestation discourses were not supported (e.g., REDD+ projects). Our results can inform forest management in our study sites and Amazon-wide, and emphasize the need for integrative approaches to operationalizing discourses in conservation science and practice, as the framing of deforestation shapes management responses. DOI https://doi.org/10.32942/X2GG8T Subjects Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Environmental Studies

Keywords

land use change, deforestation, tropical forest, Amazon Basin, Protected areas, conservation Dates Published: 2024-10-14 20:27 Last Updated: 2025-11-02 07:57 Older Versions Additional Metadata Conflict of interest statement: None Data and Code Availability Statement: All data used are publicly available. Language: English

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00