Indirect effects dominate ecosystem service losses in response to agricultural intensification

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 2,175 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint. You must log in to post a comment. There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint. Add a Comment You must log in to post a comment. Comments There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. Feeding a growing human population while preventing biodiversity loss is a major challenge. Land conversion impacts multiple ecosystem services (ESs), including food production and biodiversity-dependent services; yet, the role of indirect effects on ESs within this context, such as parasitoids boosting crop yield by controlling herbivores, remains poorly understood. Using species-network data from an organic agroecosystem with multiple habitats, we simulated the effects of converting extensive to intensive crop production on multiple ESs. Projected land conversion increased crop yield by up to 191% but severely reduced other ESs (e.g., pollination by 95%). However, indirect effects on ES-providing species declined by 97%, revealing undescribed effects of habitat conversion. Comparison to a null model showed that the identity of species lost either mitigates or amplifies these effects, depending on the ES type. Uncovering how land-use changes shape direct and indirect interplay among multiple services is crucial for sustainable agroecosystem management. https://doi.org/10.32942/X2F33T Agriculture, Biodiversity, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Life Sciences biodiversity, Food production, habitat conversion, land-use change, network analysis, Indirect ecosystem services provision, Species Interactions Published: 2025-03-06 04:00 CC-BY Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International Conflict of interest statement: None Data and Code Availability Statement: The raw data were taken from Pocock et al., 2012 (https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1214915). The full raw and processed data, as well as code, are available on the following GitHub repository: https://github.com/Ecological-Complexity-Lab/Norwood_farm Language: English

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00