Warming-induced sex bias fuels deceptive conservation success in sea turtles

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-09-11 · read from full text

This study investigates how global warming drives extreme sex-ratio biases in loggerhead sea turtles by combining 15 years of field monitoring with drone-based surveys and eco-physiological modeling. The researchers found that rising incubation temperatures have created a deceptive population increase characterized by a 9:1 female-to-male breeding ratio, which masks the underlying threat of male scarcity to future reproduction. While current nest counts appear robust, the data indicate that this growth is unsustainable without sufficient males for fertilization. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Global warming threatens species with temperature-dependent sex determination (TSD) by risking extreme offspring sex-ratio bias. In sea turtles, warmer incubation conditions produce more females. Such biases can transiently inflate apparent population growth before male scarcity undermines reproduction, possibly leading to population extinction. Here, we combine 15 years of field monitoring, drone-based sex-ratio surveys, Argos telemetry, and eco-physiological modelling to test whether rising temperatures underpin the rapid increase in loggerhead ( Caretta caretta ) nesting in Cabo Verde, one of the world’s largest populations. Historical air temperature, lagged by one generation, predicts current nest counts, consistent with a climate-driven, female-biased population. Drone surveys reveal an approximately 9:1 female-to-male breeding sex ratio across two consecutive breeding seasons, and simulations reproduce observed nesting trajectories under historical warming but not under null (no-warming) scenarios. Extending the analysis to 28 global loggerhead populations reveals consistent links between temperatures, latitude, and nesting trends. Our results identify warming-induced sex ratio bias as a key, yet deceptive, driver of apparent recovery, highlighting the need to reassess conservation success through the lens of demography of TSD species.
Full text 1,449 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Global warming threatens species with temperature-dependent sex determination (TSD) by risking extreme offspring sex-ratio bias. In sea turtles, warmer incubation conditions produce more females. Such biases can transiently inflate apparent population growth before male scarcity undermines reproduction, possibly leading to population extinction. Here, we combine 15 years of field monitoring, drone-based sex-ratio surveys, Argos telemetry, and eco-physiological modelling to test whether rising temperatures underpin the rapid increase in loggerhead (Caretta caretta) nesting in Cabo Verde, one of the world’s largest populations. Historical air temperature, lagged by one generation, predicts current nest counts, consistent with a climate-driven, female-biased population. Drone surveys reveal an approximately 9:1 female-to-male breeding sex ratio across two consecutive breeding seasons, and simulations reproduce observed nesting trajectories under historical warming but not under null (no-warming) scenarios. Extending the analysis to 28 global loggerhead populations reveals consistent links between temperatures, latitude, and nesting trends. Our results identify warming-induced sex ratio bias as a key, yet deceptive, driver of apparent recovery, highlighting the need to reassess conservation success through the lens of demography of TSD species. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00