[The effect of chlamydial infection on tubal patency].

OA: closed
View on PubMed
AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-08-07

This study found that infertile women with evidence of past chlamydial infection were significantly more likely to have tubal occlusion compared to those without.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

The study was carried out on 162 infertile women (110 with primary and 52 with secondary infertility), patients of the University Clinic of Gynecologic Endocrinology and Infertility, Sofia. The present study was designed to estimate the effect of chlamydial infection as a cause of tubal pathology in infertile women. Evidence of past chlamydial infection was determined by the presence of antichlamydial IgG antibodies by commercial ELISA test. 101 of the patients examined were positive for antichlamydial IgG antibodies (62.3%). 76 women were examined for tubal patience by means of hysterosalpingography and/or laparoscopy. 38 women had patient tubes and 38 women had tubal occlusion (20 had bilateral and 18 unilateral occlusion). 29 of the women with unilateral or bilateral tubal occlusion had a presence of IgG antichlamydial antibodies in their sera (76.3%) compared to 17 of the women with patient tubes (44.7%). The risk for tubal obstruction in women with positive serology for Chlamydia is 3.22 compared to 0.85 risk in the women with negative serology for chlamydia. The results of the present study indicate that women with evidence of past chlamydial infection are 4 times more likely to have obstructed fallopian tubes compared to women who had no such evidence. It is mandatory to examine the patient for chlamydial serology at the beginning of the diagnostic protocol in order to ensure adequate management prior to more invasive procedures such as hysterosalpingography or laparoscopy.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-08-30T09:23:35.175841+00:00