Circulating microglia-derived extracellular vesicles predict recovery after rehabilitation in stroke survivors
Circulating microglia-derived extracellular vesicles, along with neuron-derived vesicles and specific inflammatory markers, were found to predict functional recovery in stroke survivors undergoing rehabilitation.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This paper studied whether circulating blood biomarkers could predict functional recovery in 30 sub-acute stroke survivors undergoing intensive rehabilitation, using serum measurements at admission (T0) and discharge (T1). Researchers used multiplex Surface Plasmon Resonance imaging to profile extracellular vesicles (EVs) carrying markers from brain (neurons, astrocytes, microglia) and non-brain sources, combined with cytokine and neurofilament assessments, and applied machine learning with cross-validation to predict T1 modified Barthel Index outcomes from T0 data. They found that higher IL-6 and neurofilament light chain at T0 related to worse residual disability at T1, while higher EV levels from neurons (CD171+) and microglia (CD11b+) and increased VEGF receptor expression on microglial EVs were associated with better recovery; conversely, higher TGF-β receptor expression on IB4+ EVs during the subacute phase was associated with greater stroke severity. The paper is centrally about biomarker predictors of post-stroke rehabilitation recovery, and it does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
4,317 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· 4 sections
· click to expand
Abstract
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00