Incorporating ‘Effort’ into Communication Models: An Exploratory Study

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

This paper proposes that _effort_ must be taken into account in both theorization and assessments of communication and, accordingly, offers an exploratory consideration of effort in communication encounters. As a subjective element of communication, operationalizing effort in communication encounters is very difficult. As a result, there has been very little research taking up effort as a factor in communication. The present research proposes that effort be viewed in communication as one element to be contrasted with others. In this research, effort is cast as one of four communication encounter success factors, along with topic knowledge, communication skill and comfortable communication. As a means of preliminarily testing the proposition, research participants were asked to assess these four factors—effort, knowledge, skill and cordiality—both for themselves and for the other in their communication interaction and as reflective of success in a professional communication encounter (or not) or satisfaction with a personal communication encounter (or not). The research tentatively points toward effort as a meaningful construct in interpersonal communication studies, with indication of several identifiable patterns. However, as preliminary research, the paper concludes by noting that the concepts must be more clearly delineated and the methodology and tools more robustly designed.
Full text 621 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
There is a newer version available for this {{ publicationType }}. View latest version {{ publication.field_name }} {{ publication.subfield_name }} Copyright: © {{ publicationYear }} {{ publication.presentation_authors[0].full_name + (publication.presentation_authors.length > 1 ? ' et al' : '') }}. This is an open access publication distributed under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Check the {{ publicationType | capitalize }} Source for copyright and license information. Listen on

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00