The impact of ankle immobility on sprint cycling performance: Implications for para-cycling classification

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,586 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 4 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Purpose The para-cycling classification system aims to minimize the impact of impairments on competition outcomes with the help of scientific evidence. This study investigated the impact of unilateral and bilateral ankle immobility on cycling performance, quantified by the maximal average mechanical power output (AMPO) over one revolution relative to that without ankle immobility.

Methods

Ten well-trained non-disabled cyclists performed all-out 6-second sprints on a cycle ergometer at 120 rpm under three conditions: without ankle foot orthoses (AFOs), with 1 AFO and with 2 AFOs immobilizing the ankle joint(s). Mechanical power output, pedal forces, cycling kinematics and surface-electromyography were measured. Maximal AMPO; ankle, knee and hip joint AMPO; and the amount of muscle excitation were calculated.

Results

With 1 AFO and 2 AFOs, respectively, maximal AMPO was 96% (p<0.05) and 91% (p<0.001) of that without AFOs (1188 W). The decrease in maximal AMPO with ankle immobilization was less than the decrease in ankle joint AMPO (126 W decrease with 2 AFOs; p<0.001), due to an increase in hip joint AMPO (69 W increase with 2 AFOs; p<0.05). The amount of muscle excitation was not significantly different across conditions.

Conclusions

These findings provide a first quantitative and mechanistic indication of the impact of ankle immobility on cycling performance, which may offer valuable evidence to support the development of an evidence-based para-cycling classification system. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00