Prognostic significance of diagnostic laparoscopy for spontaneous fertility.
article
OA: closed
CC0
⤵ 5 in-corpus citations
AI-generated summary
Laparoscopy revealed that tubal occlusion and hydrosalpinx significantly reduced spontaneous pregnancy rates, but the presence of peritubal adhesions did not affect prognosis.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the prognostic significance of laparoscopy results for fertility outcome. STUDY DESIGN: Consecutive patients undergoing hysterosalpingography and laparoscopy for subfertility in our department between May 1985 and November 1987 were identified from medical records. The impact of tubal occlusion, hydrosalpinx and adhesions as detected at laparoscopy was studied. Kaplan-Meier curves for the occurrence of spontaneous intrauterine pregnancy were constructed for patients without tubal pathology, with mild tubal pathology (unilateral pathology or adhesions) and with severe tubal pathology (bilateral pathology). Fecundity rate ratios (FRR) were calculated to express the association between findings at laparoscopy and the occurrence of spontaneous intrauterine pregnancy. RESULTS: Of the 200 cases that could be analyzed, 129 (65%) showed no tubal occlusion on laparoscopy, 40 (20%) had unilateral tubal occlusion, and 31 (15%) had bilateral tubal occlusion. Unilateral hydrosalpinx was present in 13 (7%) patients, whereas 19 (10%) patients had bilateral hydrosalpinx. Adjusted FRRs were 0.65 and 0.20 for unilateral and bilateral tubal occlusion, and 0.46 and 0.32 for unilateral and bilateral hydrosalpinx. Peritubal adhesions were detected in 43% of patients and seemed to have no prognostic significance. CONCLUSION: Severe tubal pathology detected at laparoscopy affects fertility prospects strongly. However, since spontaneous intrauterine pregnancies occurred even in patients with bilateral tubal occlusion at laparoscopy, this technique should not be considered the gold standard in the diagnosis of tubal infertility.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood
Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.
Cited by (5)
- The role of diagnostic laparoscopy for acute abdominal conditions: an evidence-based review 2008
- Role of treatment with ovarian stimulation and intrauterine insemination in women with unilateral tubal occlusion diagnosed by hysterosalpingography 2007
- $R0APAIOANNOUISACONSULTANT/BSTETRICIANAND'YNAECOLOGISTATTHE(EARTOF%NGLAND .(3&OUNDATION4RUSTIN"IRMINGHAM5+4HETOPICFORHIS-$WASTHEUSEOFSELECTIVE SALPINGOGRAPHYANDTUBALCATHETERISATIONCOMPLETEDATTHE5NIVERSITYOF"IRMINGHAMDURING HISCLINICALFELLOWSHIPINREPRODUCTIVEMEDICINE(EHASAKEENINTERESTINTHESTUDYOFTHE &ALLOPIANTUBEANDTHETREATMENTOFTUBALDISEASE 2007
- Tubal assessment tests: still have not found what we are looking for 2007
- Laparoscopy in the “Normal” Infertile Patient: A Question Revisited 2000
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK