Gynaecological Polyps Causing Infertility - a systemic review

In: Pakistan Journal of Medical and Health Sciences · 2022 · vol. 16(1) , pp. 7–11 · doi:10.53350/pjmhs221617 · W4206390785
review OA: gold CC0
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-09

This systemic review found endometrial polyps to be the most common gynaecological polyp, implicated in infertility and abnormal uterine bleeding, and noted advances in ultrasound and hysteroscopy for diagnosis.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-11 · read from full text

This systemic review evaluated 2010–2020 literature to summarize the epidemiology, clinical presentation, and diagnostic methods for gynaecological polyps (endometrial, cervical, and rare vaginal/vulvar), including their association with infertility. Across included studies, endometrial polyps were reported most often (prevalence 7.8%–50%), being implicated in about half of abnormal uterine bleeding cases and about 35% of infertility presentations, while hysteroscopy was described as the gold standard diagnosis with imaging options such as high-resolution 2D/4D ultrasound, contrast-enhanced sonography, sonohysterography, and ultrasonography. The review emphasizes that histopathology is essential to confirm diagnosis and exclude malignancy, but it does not specify the degree of study heterogeneity or quality assessment among the included publications. This paper is centrally about endometriosis and adenomyosis? It does not explicitly discuss either condition; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Background: Polyps of female reproductive tract are found in about 7.8-50% of women. Endometrial polyps are commonly located at the fundal or the tubocornual region. They mechanically affect female’s fertility and disturbs the normal cellular function due to chronic inflammation. To rule out sub clinical endometrial hyperplasia or cancer, endometrial curettage is often recommended. Cervical polyps may grow during pregnancy or mucorrhoea. Aim: To highlight updates to the epidemiology, clinical presentation and diagnostic techniques for gynaecological polyps. Study design: Systemic review Methods: During December 2020 we searched Google scholar, Pub med, Medscape, Web of Science, Scientific Information Database and Magiran research articles from 2010 -2020. The selected articles identified through electronic search were 60 articles and 50 were selected for the review. Results: Endometrial polyps are the most frequently diagnosed gynaecological polyp, their prevalence ranging from 7.8% to 50%. They are implicated in about 50% of cases of abnormal uterine bleeding and 35% of patients presenting with infertility. The developments of high-resolution 2D and 4D ultrasound, contrast enhanced sonography and hysteroscopy helps in diagnosing polyps efficiently. In certain cases, when hysteroscopy cannot be performed sonohysterography and ultrasonography can be used for screening. Hysteroscopy is the gold standard technique for the diagnosis of gynaecological polyps and histopathology is essential for the ultimate diagnosis and exclusion of malignancy. Conclusions: The review of literature suggest that the gynaecological polyps are one of the most common cause of abnormal uterine bleeding and have strong association with infertility as they interfere with implantation of an embryo. Polyps can be confidently diagnosed on ultrasound. Other imaging techniques may provide additional information about the details of the anatomy of female reproductive tract and the polyp itself. Keywords: Endometrial polyp, Cervical polyp, Vaginal/vulvar polyp, Infertility, Ultrasonography, Sonohysterography,.
Full text 29,216 characters · extracted from oa-pdf · 10 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Background: Polyps of female reproductive tract are found in about 7.8 -50% of women. Endometrial polyps are commonly located at the fundal or the tubocornual region. They mechanically affect female’s fertility and disturbs the normal cellular function due to chronic inflammation. To rule out sub clinical endometrial hyperplasia or cancer, endometrial curettage is often recommended. Cervical polyps may grow during pregnancy or mucorrhoea. Aim: To highlight updates to the epidemiology, clinical presentation and diagnostic techniques for gynaecological polyps. Study design: Systemic review

Methods

During December 2020 we searched Google scholar, Pub med, Medscape, Web of Science, Scientific Infor mation Database and Magiran research articles from 2010 -2020. The selected articles identified through electronic search were 60 articles and 50 were selected for the review.

Results

Endometrial polyps are the most frequently diagnosed gynaecological polyp, their prevalence ranging from 7.8% to 50%. They are implicated in about 50% of cases of abnormal uterine bleeding and 35% of patients presenting with infertility. The developments of high-resolution 2D and 4D ultrasound, contrast enhanced sonography and hysteroscopy helps in diagnosing polyps efficiently. In certain cases, when hysteroscopy cannot be performed sonohysterography and ultrasonography can be used for screening. Hysteroscopy is the gold standard technique for the diagnosis of gynaecological polyps and histopathology is essential for the ultimate diagnosis and exclusion of malignancy.

Conclusions

The review of literature suggest that the gynaecological polyps are one of the most common cause of abnormal uterine bleeding and have strong association with infertility as they interfere with implantation of an embryo. Polyps can be confidently diagnosed on ultrasound. Other imaging techniques may provide additional information about the details of the anatomy of female reproductive tract and the polyp itself.

Keywords

Endometrial polyp, Cervical polyp, Vaginal/vulvar polyp, Infertility, Ultrasonography, Sonohysterography,.

Introduction

The widespread use of ultrasound in gynecological examination has caused polyps of female genital tract to be diagnosed more frequently than were previously . For the initial evaluation of all uterine pathologies transvaginal ultrasound is considered as a first line practical approach whereas the hysteroscopy offers a better diagnostic value generally for all uter ine pathologies and specifically for uterine polyps 1. Endometrial polyp is defined as a localized hyperplastic overgrowth of endometrial glands and stroma. They present with symptoms su ch as menorrhagia, intermittent/postmenopausal bleeding and infertility . Endometrial polyps are most common gynaecological polyps. They are found in 25% cases of AUB and in 35% cases with infertility 2. The transvaginal ultrasound is used as primary approach for the diagnosis of endometrial polyp s. T he outgrowths of columnar epithelium of the cervix is termed as cervical polyps . They are more frequent in parous or postmenopausal females and about 60 - 70% of cervical polyps are asymptomatic [3]. Symptomatic polyps are more frequently diagnosed in premenopausal females and may cause symptoms such as intermittent bleeding, post-coital bleeding or post-menopausal bleeding. The fibro -epithelial polyps are hormone sensitive common lesions which typically occurs in obese women, its incidence is estimated to be 46% in the general population4. These polyps are lo cated in vulvovaginal region and can manifest in female during reproductive period, pregnancy or even in premenopausal females who are on HRT.

Material

AND METHODOLOGY Search strategy: International {Google scholar, PubMed and Web of Science (WOS) } and National { Magiran and Scientific Information Database} databases were searched for related observational studies which were published till 2020 Dec. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Received on 07-07-2021 Accepted on 17-12-2021 Study selection : The selected articles picked out through electronic search comprises the period from 2010 to 2020. The articles were reviewed in depth for a more detailed analysi s. Databases reported almost 60 articles and out of them 50 articles were selected for the review.

Discussion

The aim of this systematic review is to highlight the latest updates to the epidemiology, cli nical presentation and various diagnostic techniques for gynaecological polyps providing best guide to the health-workers in their clinical decisions. It also highlights prevalence of infertility in patients with gynaecological polyps. We have analyzed almost 60 publications that emphasized on the topics re lated to female reproductive tract polyps, their epidemiology, clinical presentation , imaging techniques and association with infertility . With r ecent advancement in imaging techniques such as 3 -dimensional ultrasound, clinician is able to diagnose polyps and can provide information about their specific anatomy and localization. Other imaging modalities also helps the clinicians in diagnosing polyps more efficiently. Strong association is seen to occurs between polyps and inf ertility as infertility is identified as prevalent among 35% of patients with polyps. It arises from a Greek word “polypus” which means “many feet”. A polyp is defined as a benign polypoidal growth which can arise from any mucus membrane in the body . Gynaecological polyps grow mainly in the uterus and the cervix. They rarely occur in the vagina . They are catego rized on the basis of their type, location, and presence or absence of a stalk5. Types of gynaecological polyps Endometrial polyps : The most commonly diagnosed gynaecological polyp s are the endometrial polyps . It is an abnormal growth containing endometrial glands, stroma and blood vessels projecting from the lining of the uterus that may be large or small enough to occupy the entire uterine cavity. Endometrial polyps can be prevalent during reproductive or postmenopausal females6. Endometrial polyps are considered hyperplastic growths but are usually benign 2. Gross morphological appearance of an Gynaecological Polyps Causing Infertility 8 P J M H S Vol. 16, No.01, JAN 2022 endometrial polyp is a smooth, cylindrical or spherical structure which may be tan to yellow in colour. Cervical polyps : They are second most commonly occuring polyps after endometrial polyps and are the most common benign lesion of the cervix which arise within the endocervical canal. The papillary proliferations of epithelial tissue around a fibro -vascular stromal core which may have glandular or squamous epithelium constitutes cervical polyp7. Cervical polyp varies in size from 5mm to 50 mm and appears as cherry red to purplish red in color. They are friable, soft and pedunculated on gross examination which may readily bleed on touch8. Vaginal/valvar polyps: They are very rare hormonal dependent benign disorder. They occur in young to middle-aged women, or in pregnant females or in females on hormonal replacement therapy9. Epidemiological factors Endometrial polyps : They are the most commonly reported gynaecological polyp. Their prevalence ranges from 7.8% to 50% [10]. The prevalence of e ndometrial polyp rises with age and menopause. Asymptomatic polyps are mostly discovered during routine physical examination or investigations when women come for infertility evaluation. According to a nother study, they account for 7.8% to 34.9% in patients attending clinics with AUB5. Cervical polyps: Cervical polyps are the second most commonly diagnosed polyps next to endometrial polyps. Levy et al. stated that the endo-cervical polyps occur in about 2-5% of the population7. Vaginal/vulva polyps: Vaginal or vulvar polyps are the rare gynaecological polyps9. Topographical classification of polyps: The basic difference between cervical and endometrial polyps is their localization . The first step to categorize gynaecological polyps is on the basis of their topography. Endometrial polyps: Endometrial polyps are located inside the uterine cavity 7. Endometrial polyps can be located at any site within the endometrial cavity but most frequently in anterior or posterior walls and the fundus. Abnormal uterine bleeding occurs in approximately 68% of women and usually more commonly seen in women during premenopausal period11. Cervical polyps: Cervical polyps can be ecto-cervical, present on the outer surface of the cervix or endocervical, present inside the cervical canal demarcated by the transformation zone 7. More common ones are the endocervical polyps and presents in premenopausal females. Cervical polyps are mostly asymptomatic lesions which are benign in nature. They are symptomatic mostly in postmenopausal women. Symptomatic cervical polyps commonly manifest as intermenstrual, post-coital or postmenopausal bleeding12. Vaginal polyp s: The commonest clinical presentation of fibro - epithelial polyp is a painless mass. Other symptoms include pruritis and malodorous discharg13. Stalk formation: Another way to categorize gynaecological polyps is on the basis of presence or absence of a stalk. Pedunculated polyps are polyps with narrow elongated stalk and sessile polyps are the polyps with no stalk. The more commonly occurring polyps are pedunculated polyps. Histological type Endometrial polyps: Endometrial polyps are marked by irregular glands, fibrotic stroma and thick blood vessels. In rare cases, they can be atrophic, hyperplastic or carcinomatous7. Cervical polyps: Cervical polyps are characterized by a central fibro-vascular core of stromal cells. These stromal cells are surrounded by a papillary proliferations of cells. These cells may be composed of squamous or glandular epithelium. Squamous metaplasia is commonly seen at the tip of the polyp7. Vaginal polyps : They are characterized as tubulo -squamous in nature9. Genetics and predisposition: The most extensively studied etiological factor is genetic modifications. Other possible etiological factors seen in the published studies are metabolic, drug induced, environmental factors, age, obesity, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, steroid hormone receptors and menopause status 14. Few studies also suggest genetic predisposition of c ervical polyps as they are associated with inflammation7. Pathogenesis: The exact pathogenesis of gynaecological polyps is vague. Endometrial polyps: Pathogenesis of endometrial polyps involves glandular, menopause independent AB DNA fragmentation factor 40, 45 (DFF40), (DFF45) and Bcl -2 o verexpression (Fig. 1) 15. Miranda et al. concluded that in polyp of tamoxifen-treated women, the expression of Ki-67 is significantly higher as compared to those using no hormone16. Cervical polyps: The pathophysiology is not clearly understood. The possible pathogonesis include chronic inflammation, hormonal stimulation or cervical blood vessel congestion17. Vaginal/vulvar polyps: The pathogenesis of fibro -epithelial polyp is uncertain . Several cases have suggested that a hormonal influence may be a predisposing condition for developing fibro- epithelial polyp13. The effec t of endometrial polyps on the endometrium: Increased production of glycodelin associated with endometrial polyps reduces the blood flow to endometrial lining which results in damage of implantation and increases chances of miscarriage s. Due to surface erosion and vascular fragility, AUB is most frequent symptom reported in these cases . Endometrial polyps appear as chronic inflammation or endometrial erosion and is associated with vascular dilatation on hysteroscopy. Ischemic necrosis may develop at the apex of large polyps18. Polyps in premenopausal women Transvaginal ultrasound : In routine gynaecological examinations, the wide use o f transvaginal ultrasound has played a key role to diagnose polyps with increased accuracy. For the diagnosis of endometrial polyps, baseline imaging technique used is transvaginal ultrasonography . Transvaginal imaging is performed on the 10th d ay of the menstrual cycle to obtain more accurate results as the endometrium is thinnest and the endometrial poly p will appear mo re prominent . Transvaginal imaging is done by penetrating a trans -vaginal ultrasound probe through the v agina in order to visualize the uterine cavity. On ultrasonography, endometrial polyps appear as a hyper -echogenic lesion with regular contours 11. According to Babacan et al., transvaginal ultrasound has sensitivity and specificity of 19%–96% and 53%–100% to diagnose endometrial polyps 1. Fig. 2 demonstrates endometrial polyp on TVS 19. Sonographic appearance of cervical polyps is well-circumscribed masses within the endo-cervical canal which may be hypoechoic or echogenic 20. Fibro-epithelial polyps of vagina appear on ultrasound as circumscribed ovoid homogenous mass21. Colour-flow Doppler: Colour Doppler demonstrates a single feeding vessel which is salient feature of endometrial polyps (Fig. 3)19. A study carried out by Metello and Jimenez concluded that to diagnose polyps, power doppler has increase d sensitivity and specificity around 97% and 95% respectively22. Saline infusion sonography: The addition of intrauterine contrast helps out to outline small polyps which are missed on greyscale transvaginal ultrasound. In year 2018, Fadl et al reported that for the diagnosis of endometrial polyps, saline infusion sonohysterography provide a better diagnostic accuracy than the transvaginal ultrasound 23. On saline infusion sonography, they appear as smooth echogenic masses19. Hysteroscopy: Hysteroscopy is a gold standard technique for diagnosis and treatment of gynaecological polyps. It is efficient diagnostic technique in premenopausal as wells as in the postmenopausal females 11. After excision of a polyp via hysteroscope, endometrial curettage is performed to exclude endometrial hyperplasia and cancer via histopathological examination12. In year 2014, according to a study carried out to compare TVS and hysteroscopy in the diagnosis of uterine pathologies by Babacan et al. which stated that hysteroscopic evaluation offers better diagnostic value in diagnosing all uterine pathologies, particularly the gynaecological polyps1. A comparison S. J. H. Shah, S. K. T. S. Murrium, F. Naveed et al P J M H S Vol. 16, No.01, JAN 2022 9 of TVS, saline i nfusion sonohysterography and hysteroscopy in diagnosis of endometrial pathology in women with AUB was published in 2020 which concluded that in patients presenting with AUB, saline infusion sonohysterography was superior to TVS and has a comparable diagnostic accuracy to hysteroscopy in detecting uterine pathologies. (Table 3 -7) In countries such as Africa, for diagnosis of endometrial pathologies saline infusion sonohysterography is considered as the first line investigation and diagnostic hysteroscopy is reserved for pa tients with inconclusive saline infusion sonohysterography report24.25. Histopathology: It is diagnostic imaging techniq ue for evaluation of polyps. Endometrial polyps: Endometrial polyps should be confirmed microscopically by the histopathologist. Under microscopic examination, dense fibrous stromal tissue is visualized as compared to the surrounding endometrium and parallel arrangement of endometrial gland long axis to the surface epithelium is c haracteristic for polyps. The majority of endometria l polyps do not respond to hormonal stimul i. They exhibit cystic endometrial hyperplasia throughout the menstrual cycle and do not shed during menstruation26. (Table 1) Cervical polyps : On histopathology, in addition to stromal cells cervical polyps exhibit vascular connective tissue covered by the papillary proliferation of cells. The epithelial cells may be squamous, columnar or squamo -columnar. Microscopically, histological patterns are vascular, inflammatory, mucosa, pseudo- decidual, fibrous, a m ixture of cervical and endometrial, and pseudosarcomatous27 (Table 2). Vaginal polyps: On histopathologic examination, it is seen as a fibrocollagenous tissue in the stroma w ith thick blood vessels and perivascular infiltrate. This chronic inflammatory infiltrate is covered with stratified squamous epithelium of the vulva28. Diagnosis and mana gement of polyps in infertility: Gyanecological polyps may cause irritation of the lining of the uterus therefore they have strong association with infertility as they interfere with implantation of an embryo . The location of a polyp is important in addressing fertility issues. Endometrial polyps & infertility : Endometrial polyps are frequently seen in sub-fertile women. They are acquired in nature and are directly related to dec reased fertility . The prevalence of endometrial polyps is up to 32% in infertile population29. In women with unexplained infertility, the reported frequency of endometrial polyps diagnosed by hysteroscopy is to be between 16.5% - 26.5% [30]. One hypothesis suggests that mechanical obstruction of the tubal ostia caused by an endometrial polyp impairs sperm or the embryo from entering into the uterine cavity. The surgical excision of endometrial polyps located at the utero -tubal junction reveals best pregnancy outcomes in case of intrauterine insemination cycles and in ovulation induction18. Cervical polyps & infertility: The association between infertility and cervical polyps depends on location where the polyp is placed. Polyps located high up in the cervix can block th e opening of the cervix and hinders fertilization31. Spontaneous conception after polypectomy: Studies have revealed increased pregnancy rate in infertile women is reported after hysteroscopy guided polypectomy , particularly after the removal of tubo-cornual polyps11. IVF and ICSI after polypectomy: Removal of remove endometrial polyps is generally prescribed b efore commencement of in-vitro fertilization or intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection treatment. Moon et al. proposed that ultrasound guided polypectomy using trans - cervical sharp curettage in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation or even at the time of ovum pick -up is safe and does not impact the pregnancy outcome32. Strength and limitations: This systemic review provides an in - depth view of gynaecological polyps that a reader might want to study, and the detail that we have compiled is extremely valuable. However, our study had several limitations as we focused more on comparing different diagnosing modalities rather than focusing on ultrasonography only as it is first -line diagnostic modality for diagnosing fibroids. Interpretations: Endometrial polyps are the most commonly diagnosed gynaecological polyp. They are prevalent in 50% cases of AUB and 35% patients with infertility. The developments of high- resolution 2 -dimensional and 4-dimensional ultrasound, contrast enhanced sonography and hysteroscopy he lps the clinicians in detecting polyps efficiently. Hysteroscopy is the gold standard and histopathology is essential investigation for the ultimate diagnosis of polyps and exclusion of malignancy.

Conclusion

The review of literature suggest that the polyps are one most frequent cause of AUB and infertility. They are efficien tly diagnosed on ultrasounography with d oppler imag ing. Other imaging techniques provides addition al information about the anatomy of the female reproductive tract and the polyp itself. Hysteroscopy and histopathological evaluation is considered as a gold standard for diagnosis of gynaecological polyps. Furthermore, gyanecological polyps have strong assoc iation with infertility as they interfere with implantation of an embryo by irritating the lining of the uterus. Compliance with ethical standards : There is no violation of human or animal rights. Conflict of interest: Authors confirm that this manuscript has no conflict of interest. Competing interests: No competing interests Funding sources: This research did not receive any funding Author contribution: SJH reviewed various articles, data collection, compilation, FN data collection, compilation, figures/tables, analysed data , SK detailed review, HT data collection, TS compilation of data, TZ data analysis and GH compilation of data.

References

1. Babacan A, Gun I, Kizilaslan C, et al. Comparison of transvaginal ultrasonography and hysterosocpy in the diagnosis of uterine pathologies. Int J Clin Exp Med 2014; 7(3): 764–769. 2. Cement PB, young R.Atlas of gynecological surgical pathology. third edition St. Louis Saundersher:Elsevier,2014. 3. Tiras.MB.Current diagnosis and treatment :Obstetrics and Gynaecology.Chapter 40. Benign disorders of uterine cervix .11th ed. Newyork NY:Lange(McGraw- Hill); 2014:657- 59. 4. Ahmed S, Khan AK, Hasan M, et al. A huge acrochordon in labia majora — an unusual presentation. Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull. 2011; 37: 110–1. [PubMed]. 5. Kanthi, Janu Mangala, Chithra Remadevi, Sudha Sumathy, Deepti Sharma, Sarala Sreedhar, Amrutha Jose, Clinical study of endometrial polyp and role of diagnostic hysteroscopy and blind avulsion of polyp, J. Clin. Diagn. Res. JCDR 10 (6) (2016) (04/16): QC01-4. 6. Reslová T, Tosner J, Resl M, et al. Endometrial polyps. A clinical study of 245 cases. Arch Gynecol Obstet 1999; 262(3–4): 133–139. 7. Levy RA, Kumarapeli AR, Spencer HJ, Quick CM. Cervical polyps: Is histologic evaluation necessary?. Pathology-Research and Practice. 2016 Sep 1;212(9):800-3. 8. Schnatz PF,Ricci S,O’Sullivan DM.Cervical polyps in postmenopausal women: is there a difference in risk? Menopause .2009:16:524 - 8 9. Roma AA. Tubulosquamous polyps in the vagina. Immunohistochemical c omparison with ectopic prostatic tissue and Skene glands. Annals of Diagnostic Pathology. 2016 Jun 1;22:63 -6. 10. de Azevedo JM, de Azevedo LM, Freitas F, Wender MC. Endometrial polyps: when to resect?. Archives of gynecology and obstetrics. 2016 Mar 1;293(3):639-43. 11. Salim S, Won H, Nesbitt -Hawes E, Campbell N, Abbott J. Diagnosis and management of endometrial polyps: a critical review of the literature. Journal of minimally invasive gynecology. 2011 Sep 1;18(5):569-81. 12. Tirlapur SA, Adeyemo A, O’Gorman N, Selo -Ojeme D. Clinico - pathological study of cervical polyps. Archives of gynecology and obstetrics. 2010 Nov 1;282(5):535-8. 13. Lee MH, Hwang JY, Lee JH, Kim DH, Song SH. Fibroepithelial polyp of the vulva accompanied by lymphangioma circumscriptum. Obstetrics & gynecology science. 2017 Jul 1;60(4):401-4. Gynaecological Polyps Causing Infertility 10 P J M H S Vol. 16, No.01, JAN 2022 14. Pereira AK, Garcia MT, Pinheiro W, Ejzenberg D, Soares Jr JM, Baracat EC. What is the influence of cyclooxygenase -2 on postmenopausal endometrial polyps?. Climacteric. 2015 Jul 4;18(4):498-502. 15. Banas T, Pitynski K , Mikos M, et al. Endometrial polyps and benign endometrial hyperplasia have increased prevalence of DNA fragmentation factors 40 and 45 (DFF40 and DFF45) together with the antiapoptotic B -cell lymphoma (Bcl -2) protein compared with normal human endometria. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2018; 37(5): 431–440. 16. Miranda SP, Traiman P, Candido EB, et al. Expression of p53, Ki -67, and CD31 proteins in endometrial polyps of postmenopausal women treated with tamoxifen. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2010; 20(9): 1525 –1530 17. I.Stamatellos, P. Stamatopoulos, J. Bontis, The role of hysteroscopy in the current management of the cervical polyps, Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 276 (4) (2007) 299–303. 18. Fritz MA, Speroff L. Clinical gynecologic endocrinology and infertility. lippincott Williams & wilkins; 2012 Mar 28. 19. Zafarani F, Ahmadi F. Evaluation of intrauterine structural pathology by three-dimensional sonohysterography using an extended imaging method. International journal of fertility & sterility. 2013 Apr;7(1):1. 20. https://radiopaedia.org/articles/cervical-polyp 21. Madueke-Laveaux OS, Gogoi R, Stoner G. Giant fibroepithelial stromal polyp of the vulva: largest case reported. Annals of surgical innovation and research. 2013 Dec 1;7(1):8. 22. Metello J and Jimenez J. Hysteroscopy and infertility. In: Shawki O, Deshmukh S and Pacheco LA (eds) Mastering the techniques in hysteroscopy. New Delhi, India: Jaypee Brothers, 2017, p. 454 23. Fadl SA, Sabry AS, Hippe DS, et al. Diagnosing polyps on transvaginal sonography: is sonohysterography always necessary. Ultrasound Q 2018; 34(4): 272–277. 24. Dedhia J, Wanyoike GJ, Shadrack OB, Obimbo MM, Parkar RB, Kwasa E. Comparison of Transvaginal Ultrasound, Saline Infusion Sonohysterography versus Diagnostic Hysteroscopy in Evaluation of Endometrial Cavity Pathology amongst Women with Abnormal Uterine Bleeding in Low Resource Setting. Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2020 May 8;10(05):644. 25. Clark TJ, Stevenson H. Endometrial polyps and abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB-P): what is the relationship, how are they diagnosed and how are they treated? Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2017 Apr;40:89-104. 26. Dolan MS, Hill C, Valea FA. Benign gynecologic lessons: vulva, vagina, cervix, ute rus, oviduct, ovary, ultrasound imaging of pelvic structures. In: Gershenson DM, Lentz GM, Fidel VA. (eds) Comprehensive gynecology . Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2017, pp. 1 – 936 27. Tanos V, Berry KE, Seikkula J, Abi Raad E, Stavroulis A, Sleiman Z, Campo R, Gordts S. The management of polyps in female reproductive organs. Int J Surg. 2017 Jul;43:7-16 28. Rexhepi M, Trajkovska E, Besimi F, Rufati N. Giant fibroepithelial polyp of vulva: a case report and review of literature. prilozi. 2018 Dec 1;39(2-3):127-30 29. Fatemi HM, Kasius JC, Timmermans A, Van Disseldorp J, Fauser BC, Devroey P, Broekmans FJ. Prevalence of unsuspected uterine cavity abnormalities diagnosed by office hysteroscopy prior to in vitro fertilization. Human reproduction. 2010 Aug 1;25(8):1959-65. 30. Bosteels J, Weyers S, Puttemans P, Panayotidis C, Van Herendael B, Gomel V, Mol BW, Mathieu C, D'Hooghe T. The effectiveness of hysteroscopy in improving pregnancy rates in subfertile women without other gynaecological symptoms: a systematic review. Human reproduction update. 2010 Jan 1;16(1):1-1. 31. Published on February 21, 2017 by SCRC Contributor 32. Moon JW, Kim CH, Park SY, Kim SH, Chae HD, Kang BM. Comparison of ultrasound-guided endometrial polypectomy carried out on the oocyte retrieval day and the first day of ovarian stimulation in IVF–ICSI cycles. Reproductive biomedicine online. 2016 Sep 1;33(3):376-80. Table 1. Histopathological diagnosis of endometrial polyps39 Table 2. Histopathological diagnosis of cervical polyps40 Table 3. TVS, SIS, and diagnostic hysteroscopy findings of premenopausal and postmenopausal women. [37] Table 4. Sensitivity and specificity of TVS versus hysteroscopy in evaluation of endometrial pathology in pre - and postmenopausal women [37] S. J. H. Shah, S. K. T. S. Murrium, F. Naveed et al P J M H S Vol. 16, No.01, JAN 2022 11 Fig. 1 Diagrammatic summary of polyp etiologies38 Fig. 2 A pedunculated polyp in a 40 -year-old woman with infertility. 3-D SIS and colour Doppler demonstrates a solitary, smooth, well-defined, uniformly echogenic endometrial lesion (P) arising from the anterior wall with a single feeding vessel (arrow)31 Fig. 3 Power Doppler or colour-flow ultrasound image showing the feeding blood vessel characteristic of an endometrial polyp. Adapted from Lieng et al.78 with permission from Professor Marit Lieng, Department of Gynaecology, RESearch Centre for Obstetrics and Gynaecology (RESCOG), Oslo University Hospital, Norway34 Table 5. Sensitivity, specificity PPV and NPV of SIS versus hysteroscopy. [37] Table 6. Overall sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of TVS versus SIS. [37] Table 7. Comparison of the sensitivity and specificity of SIS and TVS in detecting individual endometrial pathologies. [37]

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-pdf

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

infertility

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cites (1)

References (25)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK