Knowledge and attitude about intrauterine contraceptive devices among patients attending the National Guard Hospital in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study

other OA: closed public-domain-us
View on PubMed View at publisher
AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-07-29

This study surveyed 269 women in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, finding poor knowledge and several misconceptions regarding intrauterine devices, particularly concerning ectopic pregnancy and infection risks.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate women's knowledge and attitudes regarding the use of the intrauterine device (IUD) for contraceptive purposes and to explore eventual misconceptions about its benefits, and disadvantages. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in the Obstetrics and Gynaecology (OB/GYN) outpatient department at King Khalid National Guard Hospital in King Abdul-Aziz Medical City, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. It involved women aged 15-55 years, who attended the outpatient OB/GYN clinic from July 2018 till May 2019. A validated self-structured questionnaire was used to collect demographic data and clinical data; including, medical and surgical history, obstetrical and gynaecological history. RESULTS: Of 269 participants, 32.3% reported a positive history of unintended pregnancy, and 28.6% declared using or having used IUD, with copper being the most frequent type (17.8%). A majority (81.4%) of the respondents viewed IUD as a contraceptive method only. In comparison, more than 70% declared not knowing the type of IUD used for bleeding control, cycle regulation, endometriosis treatment, cervix cancer prevention, and endometrial hyperplasia. Further, 21.9% and 55.4% believed that IUD increases the risk of ectopic pregnancy and infections, respectively. CONCLUSION: Women attending outpatient clinics in our centre had poor knowledge levels about IUDs, with several misconceptions and apprehensions, especially regarding the risk of genital infections and ectopic pregnancy, which may constitute a significant psychological barrier use.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Intrauterine Devices Intrauterine Devices, Copper Intrauterine Devices, Medicated Attitude Cross-Sectional Studies Female Hospitals Humans Levonorgestrel Pregnancy Saudi Arabia

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-08-21T06:14:13.963979+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:24:26.422845+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-14T19:30:52.867331+00:00
License: public-domain-us · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine