Full text
1,944 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
Abstract
Morphologic heterogeneity of colorectal adenocarcinoma (CRC) is poorly understood. Previously, we identified morphological patterns associated with CRC molecular subtypes, and showed that these patterns have distinct molecular motifs (Budinská et al., 2023). Here, we evaluated the heterogeneity of these patterns across CRC. Three pathologists evaluated dominant, secondary, and tertiary morphology on four different tissue blocks per tumor in a pilot set of 22 CRCs (n=88). An artificial intelligence (AI) image analysis tool was trained using the pathologist-rated tumors to assess the morphologic heterogeneity on an expanded set of 161 CRCs (644 images). Heterogeneity was expressed as a combination of morphology patterns (morphotypes) across slides and normalized Shannon’s index (NSI). All pathologists agreed that the majority of tumors had 2-3 different dominant morphotypes, and that the complex tubular (CT) morphotype was the most common. AI analysis confirmed these observations in the full set. CT morphotype combined with all other dominant morphotypes within a tumor. Desmoplastic (DE) morphotype was rarely dominant and rarely combined with other dominant morphotypes. Mucinous (MU) was most often combined with solid/trabecular (TB) and papillary (PP). Most tumors showed medium or high NSI, but without clinical consequence. The proportion of DE morphotype was associated with higher T-stage, N-stage, metastasis, AJCC-stage, and shorter relapse-free survival, and MU morphotype was associated with higher grade, right side, microsatellite instability, and shorter overall survival. In conclusion, we observed high intratumoral morphological heterogeneity of CRC, and that not heterogeneity per se, but the proportion of certain morphotypes showed associations with clinical outcome. This has implications for molecular profiling of CRC.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.