Comparison of efficacy between levonorgestrel intrauterine system and dienogest in adenomyosis: a randomized clinical trial
other
OA: gold
CC-BY-NC-4.0
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Medical management of adenomyosis is an emerging perspective in modern gynecology. Though levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) and dienogest (DNG) effectively relieve symptoms in adenomyosis, neither has been approved for the same indication. Our study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of these progestins in treating adenomyosis.
OBJECTIVE: To study the efficacy and safety of LNG-IUS versus DNG in patients with symptomatic adenomyosis.
DESIGN: Open-labeled, parallel, single-centered, randomized clinical trial.
METHODS: Patients with adenomyosis-associated pain with or without abnormal uterine bleeding were randomly allocated to either LNG-IUS group or DNG group. The primary outcome was a reduction in painful symptoms after 12 weeks of treatment measured by visual analog scale (VAS) score. Changes in menstrual blood loss (MBL), improvement in quality of life (QoL), and adverse drug reactions were also analyzed.
RESULTS: The VAS score significantly decreased from baseline in both groups. The baseline and post-treatment VAS scores in the LNG-IUS group were 6.41 ± 1.07 and 3.41 ± 1.04 (p = <0.001) and in the DNG group, were 6.41 ± 0.95 and 3.12 ± 1.40 (p = <0.001), respectively. A significantly greater proportion of patients in the LNG-IUS group experienced lighter MBL as compared to the DNG group [27/30 (90%) in the LNG-IUS group versus 17/22 (77.2%) in the DNG group (p = 0.006)]. Both the groups had improvement in QOL scores calculated by the World Heath Organisation QOL scale (WHOQOL BREF) questionnaire; however, it was more pronounced in the DNG group [(28.76 ± 30.47 in the LNG-IUS group versus 48.26 ± 44.91 in the DNG group (p = 0.04)]. Both the agents were safe as there were no reported major adverse drug reactions.
CONCLUSION: DNG can be an effective and safe alternative to LNG-IUS for the medical management of adenomyosis.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was prospectively registered at the clinical trial registry - India (CTRI) vide CTRI number CTRI/2020/05/025186.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Outcome instruments
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
SciLite annotations
chemicals 28
levonorgestrel
dienogest
levonorgestrel
dienogest
progestin
dienogest
levonorgestrel
progestin
estrogen
levonorgestrel
danazol
dienogest
ulipristal
mifepristone
dopamine
bromocriptine
prostaglandin
19-norandrostenedione
progestin
n-[(2r,3r,4r,5s,6r)-2-[[(2r,3r,4r,5r,6s)-5-acetamido-6-[(2r,3r,4s,5s,6r)-2-[(2r,3r,4r,5r,6s)-4,5-dihydroxy-2-(hydroxymethyl)-6-[(2r,3s,4r,5r,6r)-4,5,6-trihydroxy-2-(hydroxymethyl)oxan-3-yl]oxyoxan-3-yl]oxy-3,5-dihydroxy-6-(hydroxymethyl)oxan-4-yl]oxy-3-hydroxy-4-[(2r,3r,4s,5r,6r)-3,4,5-trihydroxy-6-(hydroxymethyl)oxan-2-yl]oxyoxan-2-yl]methoxy]-4,5-dihydroxy-6-(hydroxymethyl)oxan-3-yl]acetamide
triptorelin
acetate
progestin
progestin
progestin
nafarelin acetate
nafarelin acetate
estradiol
organisms 4
noordeloos 2009062
noordeloos 2009062
noordeloos 2009062
homo heidelbergensis
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-06-12T06:13:51.797165+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-06-12T06:12:10.869140+00:00
- scilite
- last seen: 2026-05-18T04:57:49.680383+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-14T19:30:52.867331+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-4.0
· commercial use OK
· attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine