Evaluation of Some Chemical and Biological Fungicides for Controlling Stem Canker on Apricot Trees Caused by Neoscytalidium dimidiatum

Evaluation of Some Chemical and Biological Fungicides for Controlling Stem Canker on Apricot Trees Caused by Neoscytalidium dimidiatum | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Evaluation of Some Chemical and Biological Fungicides for Controlling Stem Canker on Apricot Trees Caused by Neoscytalidium dimidiatum yusuf karakuş, talip yiğit, Erçin Oksal, murat yıldız This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4317360/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Published Journal Publication published 27 Dec, 2024 Read the published version in European Journal of Plant Pathology → Version 1 posted 6 You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Neoscytalidium dimidiatum (Penz.) Crous & Slippers has been causing significant damage to apricot trees in Turkey in recent years. This disease can lead to various problems in apricot trees, including dieback, the formation of cankers, necrosis in vascular tissues, gumming, and ultimately the death of the host. This study was conducted in 2021–2022 in the region with the highest apricot production in the world, Malatya, Türkiye. This research aims to develop a control strategy against N. dimidiatum , which poses a destructive threat to apricot trees. In the study, the effectiveness of 10 chemical and 2 biological fungicides was tested in vitro and under field conditions to manage N. dimidiatum . While the effectiveness of chemical fungicides was assessed both in vitro and under field conditions, the effectiveness of biological fungicides was tested only under field conditions. Given the absence of a study conducted under field conditions for the controlling of N. dimidiatum , this aspect of the research is groundbreaking. In vitro experiments were performed in three replicates for each of the chemical fungicides. In the conducted in vitro experiments, most of the tested chemical fungicides, except for metalaxyl-m + acibenzolar-s-methyl (10.46%), effectively inhibited the mycelial growth of N. dimidiatum . In terms of inhibiting the mycelial growth of N. dimidiatum , the most effective fungicides were ranked as follows: tebuconazole (100%), cyprodinil + fludioxonil (99.43%), azoxystrobin + difenoconazole (99.40%), and floupyram + tebuconazole (99.26%). Chemical fungicides that exhibited high efficacy under in vitro conditions also proved to be effective in field trials. Among these fungicides, azoxystrobin + difenoconazole, floupyram + tebuconazole, and tebuconazole were identified as the most effective fungicides both before and after artificial inoculation. Cyprodinil + fludioxonil showed high efficacy when applied before inoculation but was not effective when applied after inoculation. In contrast to the chemical fungicides, the commercial Bacillus subtilis and Trichoderma harzianum Rifai KRL-AG2, which were exclusively examined in field studies, did not display significant effectiveness against N. dimidiatum . Apricot biological control disease control fungicide Neoscytalidium dimidiatum stem canker Figures Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5 Figure 6 Figure 7 INTRODUCTION Worldwide, approximately 4 million tons of apricots were produced on around 5.6 million decares of land. Turkey holds the top position in the world ranking, accounting for 23.6% of this production (FAO, 2021 ). Despite being a major player in global apricot production, Turkey's apricot production faces significant losses, particularly due to some fungal diseases (Kural & Erdiler 1995; Çığşar, 1998 ; Özgönen & Erkılıç, 2001 ; Oksal et al., 2020b ). Neoscytalidium dimidiatum , among these fungi, is a significant fungal pathogen responsible for causing cankers in a wide geographical and host range, including apricot, almond ( Prunus dulcis ), mango ( Mangifera indica ), pitahaya ( Hylocereus undatus ), Citrus, Musa, Populus, Ficus species, and royal poinciana ( Delonix regia ) in countries such as Australia, China, Egypt, Niger, Tunisia, the United States, and the United Arab Emirates (Reckhaus, 1987 ; Nouri et al., 2018 ; Al Raish et al., 2020 ). In recent studies conducted in Turkey, N. dimidiatum has been reported as a harmful pathogen affecting various product groups, including apricot trees (Dervis et al., 2019 ; Dervis et al., 2020 ; Kurt et al., 2019 ; Oksal & Özer 2021 ; Oksal et al., 2020a ; 2020b ; Ören et al., 2020 ). N. dimidiatum species, which are becoming increasingly prevalent in Turkey, can act as plant pathogens, endophytes, saprophytes, and latent pathogens. Additionally, they are considered as causative agents of mycosis in humans and animals (Phillips et al., 2013 ; Mohd et al., 2013 ; Alizadeh et al., 2022 ; Türkölmez et al., 2019 ). This pathogen can lead to a range of detrimental effects on the plants it affects, including dieback, scorching, canker formation, necrosis in the woody tissues, leaf shedding, chlorosis, gumming, tip dieback, rot, and sometimes the complete death of the host. On apricot trees, in particular, it often causes destructive diseases such as shoot blight, dieback, and cankers (Oksal, 2020b). Despite ecological concerns and health-related issues, the use of chemical fungicides continues to be the primary strategy for mitigating the threat of plant diseases (Saeed et al., 2016 ; Alwahshi et al., 2019 ; Kamil et al., 2018 ). Previous studies on the chemical control of N. dimidiatum in different product groups have reported the successful inhibition of the pathogen's mycelial growth or spore germination by chemical fungicides such as cyprodinil + fludioxonil, azoxystrobin + difenoconazole, tebuconazole, metiram, trifloxystrobin, iminoctadine, pyraclostrobin, azoxystrobin, hexaconazole, and difenoconazole + cyflufenamid (Lin et al., 2017 ; XiaoYong et al., 2018; Al Raish et al., 2020 ; Oksal et al., 2021). Recently, the use of biological control agents (BCAs) in disease management has become more widespread in addition to chemical fungicides. Biological control of N. dimidiatum is achieved, particularly using fungi and bacteria. For example, biocontrol agents such as Trichoderma harzianum and T. atroviride have been successful in reducing the growth of the pathogen. Furthermore, biokontrol bacteria like Bacillus amyloliquefaciens , Penicillium rolfsii , and B. subtilis have exhibited strong antifungal effects against N. dimidiatum under in vitro conditions (Ratanaprom et al., 2021 ; Wang et al., 2021 ). However, whether these biological control agents are effective against N. dimidiatum under field conditions remains unclear and requires further investigation. This study was conducted to assess the potential effectiveness of chemical and biological fungicides against N. dimidiatum . The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of chemical fungicides against N. dimidiatum under in vitro conditions and highlight their performance in field studies, particularly focusing on the most efficient chemical fungicides in both scenarios. Additionally, this study aims to reveal, for the first time, the effectiveness of biopreparations with biocontrol potential under field conditions, as documented in the literature. MATERIALS AND METHOD Plant material and fungal ısolates The fungal material for the study was isolated from Hacıhaliloğlu and Kabaaşı apricot varieties. These plant materials were obtained from apricot trees showing symptoms of drying in Battalgazi, Yesilyurt, Darende, Kale, Akcadag, Hekimhan, Yazıhan, and Puturge districts in the 2018–2019 period, within the scope of Inonu University Project No: FBG-2018-977 (Fig. 1 ). The N. dimidiatum isolate (ITS MH861121, EF1-α KF531795; BT2 KF531796; LSU DQ377922), identified as the most virulent in the project's pathogenicity tests and molecular diagnosis, was selected for use in this study. Fungicides In vitro experiments involved testing the commercial formulations of 10 chemical fungicides for their ability to inhibit the mycelial growth of N. dimidiatum (Table 1 ). The two biological preparations found to be the most effective in in vitro experiments were included, and their potential for preventing infections caused by N. dimidiatum under natural conditions was assessed (Table 2 ). Table 1 Fungicides and doses used in vitro trials. Active ingredient (a.i) Commercial Name / Firm Formulation* Dose / 100 L water Dose of application (µg /ml) 700 g/L Copper oxychloride ZZ-Cuprocol/ Syngenta SC 0- 100 ml-200 ml-300 ml 0, 700, 1400, 2100 Trifloxystrobin %50 Flint/Bayer WG 0–10 g-12,5 g-15 g 0, 50, 62.5, 75 Tebuconazole %25 Folicur/ Bayer WG 0–40 gr-60 gr-80 gr 0, 100, 150, 200 Floupyram 200 g/L + Tebuconazole 200 g/L Luna Experience/ Bayer SC 0–15 ml-25 ml-35 ml 0, 30, 50, 75 Cyprodinil %37,5 + Fludioxonil %25 Switch/ Syngenta WG 0–30 gr-40 gr-50 gr 0, 112.5, 150, 187.5 %70 Thiophanate-Methyl Quartette/Hektaş WP 0–40 g-60 g-80 g 0, 280, 420, 560 %40 Metalaxyl-m + %4 Acıbenzolar-s-methyl Bion/ Syngenta WG 0–10 g-20 g-30 g 0, 40, 80, 120 Azoxystrobin 200 g/L + Difenoconazole 125 g/L Quadris maxx/ Syngenta SC 0–80 ml-100 ml-120 ml 0, 160, 200, 240 400 g/l Phosphorous Acid Driftçe/Koruma SL 0-300 ml-400 ml-500 ml 0, 1200, 1600, 2000 Azoxystrobin 250 g/L Quadris/ Syngenta SC 0–50 ml-75 ml-100 ml 0, 125, 187.5, 250 *WG: Water-dispersible granule, WP: Wettable powder, SC: Water-soluble concentrate, SL: Soluble concentrate. Table 2 Fungicides and doses used in the field trials. Active ingredient (a.i) Dose of application Tebuconazole %25 40 gr Cyprodinil %37,5 + Fludioxonil %25 40 gr Floupyram 200 g/L + Tebuconazole 200 g/L 25 ml Azoxystrobin 200 g/L + Difenoconazole 125 g/L 100 ml %1.15 Trichoderma harzianum Rifai ırk KRL-AG2 (T 22) 400 milyon conidi/g 60 gr Bacillus subtilis 13,4 g/L 1500 ml Determination of the effect of fungicides on mycelial growth Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA, Neogen) was used in Table 1 to determine the levels of inhibitory action of the fungicides listed on the mycelial growth of the N. dimidiatum isolate. In vitro experiments considered the usage conditions in registered products when determining the doses of fungicides, and experiments were conducted with both lower and upper doses (µg/ml) of the recommended usage rates. The effectiveness of each active substance was tested with three doses and one control (see Table 1 ). To obtain the targeted fungicide doses, new stock solutions at concentrations of 1,000 µg/ml and 100 µg/ml were prepared through dilution from initially prepared stock solutions at 10,000 µg/ml. The fungicides were dissolved in sterile distilled water when preparing the stock solutions. To achieve the desired fungicide doses, the required amounts were pipetted, autoclaved for sterilization, and then added to a sterile PDA medium that had been cooled to 45–50°C (Delen et al., 1984 ). Controls were prepared in a similar manner, but sterile distilled water was added instead of the fungicide solution. Care was taken to ensure homogeneity in the mixtures, and equal amounts of sterile water were added to all doses for this purpose. Subsequently, agar media containing the desired fungicide doses or no fungicide (control) were poured into sterile plastic petri dishes (Isolab, 90 x 100 mm) in equal amounts and left to solidify for 24 hours under UV light for sterilization. Fungal discs with a diameter of four millimeters were taken from the edges of 10-day-old fungal colonies of the N. dimidiatum isolate using a cork-borer and placed into the growth cultures with and without fungicide (application and control). The experiment was conducted with three replications in a randomized complete block design. Inoculated petri dishes were incubated in a lightless incubator set at 25 ± 1°C for four days. Four days after incubation, the colony growth and diameter measurements of the N. dimidiatum isolate were evaluated. The data obtained from the experiment were subjected to analysis of variance using the SPSS statistical software package, and the differences between the means were determined using the Duncan test (P ≤ 0.05). The percentage efficacy of fungicides was calculated using the Abbott formula, based on the colony diameter in the control: [(control - treatment) / control) × 100)] (Abbott, 1925 ). Field trials To determine the effectiveness of four chemical fungicides found to be the most effective in in vitro experiments and, in addition, two biopreparations not included in the in vitro study, in controlling infections caused by N. dimidiatum during the growth process of two-year-old grafted Hacıhaliloğlu apricot saplings, the recommended dosage ratio in registered products was used for biopreparations, as shown in Table 2 . Fungicides were applied in the following sequence: 48 hours after inoculation (post-inoculation treatment) and 48 hours before inoculation (pre-inoculation treatment). For post-inoculation treatment, mycelial discs (4 mm in diameter) obtained from PDA cultures of N. dimidiatum were inoculated into wounds made in the stem section, with the growing part facing inward, and then sealed with parafilm to prevent rapid dehydration (Úrbez-Torres, 2014). In control plants, only discs containing sterile PDA were used (Fig. 2 A). Inoculated saplings were planted in pots containing a mixture of 1/3 seedling soil, 1/3 composted animal manure, and 1/3 sand. After these procedures, each pot was left for 48 hours of incubation under natural conditions. At the end of the incubation period, application of the fungicides listed in Table 2 and foliar application was performed by spraying. Only pure water was applied to control plants. For pre-inoculation treatment, wounds made in the stem part were initially treated with the fungicides listed in Table 2 , followed by foliar application. Control plants received an application of sterile distilled water. After 48 hours of application, pathogen inoculation was carried out on the wounds made on the plant stems using the fungal disk method as described by Úrbez-Torres et al., ( 2014 ) (Fig. 2 B). The experiment was regularly monitored for a period of 21 days, as determined in preliminary studies. At the end of the 21-day period, tissue samples were taken from the re-isolation points of the inoculation and placed on petri dishes containing streptomycin sulfate (150 mg/L). The relationship between the color change and the pathogen responsible for the condition was established (Eskalen et al., 2007 ; Mutawilla, 2011; Kotze et al., 2011 ). In the evaluations, the inoculation site and bark tissue of each test plant were scraped with a scalpel, and the length of the darkened area was measured with a ruler after the scraping process. Following the measurements, the percentage efficacy of fungicides was calculated using the Abbott formula, based on disease development in control plants: [(control - treatment) / control) × 100)] (Abbott, 1925 ). Experimental design and statistical analysis The experiment was conducted in a randomized complete block design with three replications, each containing four saplings. Controls were established in two different ways: one with only the pathogen present (positive control) and the other with no application (negative control) (Fig. 3 ). Data obtained from the experiment were subjected to analysis of variance using SPSS 17.0 (Ver.17.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) software, and differences between means were determined using the Duncan test (P ≤ 0.05). RESULTS Determination of the effect of fungicides on mycelial growth The effectiveness of the fungicides listed in Table 1 in inhibiting the mycelial growth of N. dimidiatum isolate was determined based on the lowest concentration that inhibited mycelial growth in the in vitro tests. After four days of incubation, colony growth and diameter measurements of N. dimidiatum isolate were performed. When examining the fungicides based on their percentage of effectiveness in inhibiting the mycelial growth of N. dimidiatum isolate, tebuconazole, cyprodinil + fludioxonil, azoxystrobin + difenoconazole, and floupyram + tebuconazole were the most effective fungicides, with effectiveness ranging from 99–100%. These fungicides were followed by trifloxystrobin, thiophanate-methyl, and copper oxychloride with effectiveness between 83% and 85%, and phosphorous acid and azoxystrobin with effectiveness ranging from 74.8–60%. The fungicide containing metalaxyl-m + acibenzolar-s-methyl had a lower effectiveness of 10.4% in inhibiting the mycelial growth of N. dimidiatum isolate compared to other fungicides. The lowest effective doses of the most effective fungicides in the same statistical group were selected for field studies, including tebuconazole's first dose (40 g), cyprodinil + fludioxonil (40 g), azoxystrobin + difenoconazole (100 ml), and floupyram + tebuconazole (25 ml) (Table 3 , Fig. 4 ). Table 3 In vitro efficacies of fungicides (%) against N. dimidiatum isolate Active ingredient (a.i) Doses (ml/100L) Average Colony Diameters (cm 2 ) Efficacy (%) 700 g/L Copper oxychloride Control (0) 56,00 83,27 100 ml 14,11 200 ml 12,44 300 ml 1,56 Trifloxystrobin %50 Control (0) 52,22 85,89 10,0 g 7,56 12,5 g 7,00 15,0 g 7,56 Tebuconazole %25 Control (0) 45,28 100,00 40 g 0,00 60 g 0,00 80 g 0,00 Floupyram 200 g/L + Tebuconazole 200 g/L Control (0) 45,28 99,26 15 ml 1,00 25 ml 0,00 35 ml 0,00 Cyprodinil %37,5 + Fludioxonil %25 Control (0) 58,67 99,43 30 g 0,67 40 g 0,33 50 g 0,00 %70 Thiophanate-Methyl Control (0) 58,67 83,71 40 g 11,22 60 g 9,22 80 g 8,22 %40 Metalaxyl-m + %4 Acıbenzolar-s-methyl Control (0) 58,78 10,46 10 g 50,11 20 g 58,67 30 g 49,11 Azoxystrobin 200 g/L + Difenoconazole 125 g/L Control (0) 42,94 99,40 80 ml 0,78 100 ml 0,00 120 ml 0,00 400 g/l Phosphorous Acid Control (0) 42,89 60,02 300 ml 32,44 400 ml 11,56 500 ml 7,44 Azoxystrobin 250 g/L Control (0) 43,11 74,83 50 ml 12,11 75 ml 10,56 100 ml 9,89 Bakır oksiklorür, Trif: Trifloxystrobin %50, Teb: Tebuconazole %25, Flou + Teb: Floupyram 200 g/L + Tebuconazole 200 g/L, Cyp + Flud: Cyprodinil %37,5 + Fludioxonil %25, Thio: %70 Thiophanate-Methyl, M + Ac: %40 Metalaxyl-m + %4 Acıbenzolar-s-methyl, Azoxy + Dif: Azoxystrobin 200 g/L + Difenoconazole 125 g/L, Azoxy: Azoxystrobin 250 g/L Field results Two separate field trials were conducted to determine the effects of the fungicides listed in Table 2 on apricot saplings inoculated with N. dimidiatum . These trials were designed as post-inoculation and pre-inoculation fungicide applications. All data obtained from these trials were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA), and the effectiveness of the fungicides was determined. In the evaluations conducted 21 days after inoculation, it was found that fungicide applications (except for pre-inoculation Trichoderma application) were statistically significant compared to positive controls (P < 0.05). Brown-colored to black lesions of varying lengths were observed at the sites where the pathogen was inoculated, and these lesions were more pronounced in positive controls. In negative controls, color changes due to oxidation were observed, which was confirmed by the re-isolation studies (Fig. 5 ). Effectiveness of the fungicides as post-inoculation treatments In post-inoculation fungicide applications, the average lesion lengths in the vascular tissues were measured within a range of min. 29.0 ± 1.6 mm to max. 45.5 ± 2.0 mm. In the control group without fungicide application, the average lesion length was 50.0 ± 1.9 mm. When examining the effect of fungicides on lesion lengths in vascular tissues, azoxystrobin + difenoconazole (29.0 ± 1.6 mm) and floupyram + tebuconazole (30.2 ± 1.7 mm) were statistically significant (P < 0.05), followed by tebuconazole (38.6 ± 1.5 mm). Other fungicides were statistically in the same group as the control and did not have a significant effect on lesion lengths (Table 4 ). Azoxystrobin + difenoconazole and floupyram + tebuconazole were the most effective fungicides in terms of their curative aspect against N. dimidiatum , showing 41.8% and 39.5% efficacy, respectively, compared to the control. Floupyram + tebuconazole (26.6%) was the closest in terms of percentage efficacy, while other fungicides were not significantly effective compared to the control (Fig. 6 ). Table 4 Determination of the post-inoculation effect of fungicides (%) used against N. dimidiatum Active ingredient (a.i) Mean Lesion Length (mm) Efficacy (%) Azoxystrobin 200 g/L + Difenoconazole 125 g/L 29,0 ± 1,6 a * 41,8 Floupyram 200 g/L + Tebuconazole 200 g/L 30,2 ± 1,7 a 39,5 Tebuconazole %25 38,6 ± 1,5 ab 22,6 Bacillus subtilis 13,4 g/L 42,8 ± 2,0 b 14,3 Cyprodinil %37,5 + Fludioxonil %25 44,3 ± 2,0 b 11,3 Trichoderma harzianum Rifai KRL-AG2 45,5 ± 2,0 b 9,0 Positive control 50,0 ± 1,9 b - The average lesion lengths on inoculated apricot saplings. The effectiveness of applied fungicides against N. dimidiatum (%). * Significant differences exist between the mean values within each column as indicated by the Duncan's multiple range test (P = 0.05). Effectiveness of the fungicides as pre-inoculation treatments In pre-inoculation fungicide applications, the average lesion lengths in the vascular tissues were measured within a range of min. 20.9 ± 1.5 mm to max. 49.2 ± 1.4 mm. The control without fungicide application had an average lesion length of 50.0 ± 1.9 mm. When examining the effect of fungicides on lesion lengths in vascular tissues, tebuconazole (20.9 ± 1.5 mm) and cyprodinil + fludioxonil (22.0 ± 1.4) were statistically the most effective fungicides (P < 0.05). The fungicide azoxystrobin + difenoconazole (31.2 ± 1.6 mm) was the closest to them in terms of effectiveness. Bacillus subtilis (46.6 ± 1.6 mm) and Trichoderma harzianum Rifai KRL-AG2 (49.2 ± 1.4 mm) biopreparations were in the same group as the control and did not have a significant effect on lesion lengths (Table 5 ). Tebuconazole (58.1%) and cyprodinil + fludioxonil (55.8%) were the most effective fungicides against N. dimidiatum in terms of protective efficacy, showing effectiveness of 58.1% and 55.8%, respectively, compared to the control. Following these fungicides in terms of effectiveness were azoxystrobin + difenoconazole (37.5%) and floupyram + tebuconazole (21.1%) in terms of percentage of effectiveness (Table 5 ). The other fungicides were not significantly effective in terms of percentage of effectiveness (Fig. 7 ). Table 5 Determination of the pre-inoculation effect of fungicides (%) used against N. dimidiatum Active ingredient (a.i) Mean Lesion Length (mm) Efficacy (%) Tebuconazole %25 20,9 ± 1,5 a * 58,1 Cyprodinil %37,5 + Fludioxonil %25 22,0 ± 1,4 a 55,8 Azoxystrobin 200 g + Difenoconazole 125 g 31,2 ± 1,6 ab 37,5 Floupyram 200 g/L + Tebuconazole 200 g/L 39,4 ± 1,5 b 21,1 Bacillus subtilis 13,4 g/L 46,6 ± 1,6 bc 6,6 Trichoderma harzianum Rifai KRL-AG2 49,2 ± 1,4 bc 1,5 Positive control 50,0 ± 1,9 bc - The average lesion lengths on inoculated apricot saplings. The effectiveness of applied fungicides against N. dimidiatum (%). * Significant differences exist between the mean values within each column as indicated by the Duncan's multiple range test (P = 0.05). DISCUSSION This study has demonstrated the efficacy of some fungicides in both in vitro and field conditions for controlling N. dimidiatum on apricot trees. Chemical fungicides, despite their potential adverse effects on health (Al-Tememe et al., 2019 ; Budzinski et al., 2018), are widely used due to their cost-effectiveness, quick action, long-lasting effects, stability, and ease of application (Kuai et al., 2017 ). In the in vitro part of the study for controlling N. dimidiatum , the tested fungicides aimed at inhibiting mycelial growth, with tebuconazole, cyprodinil + fludioxonil, azoxystrobin + difenoconazole, and floupyram + tebuconazole achieving the highest efficacy rates, ranging from 99–100%. Metalaxyl-m + acibenzolar-s-methyl, with a 10.4% efficacy rate, was the least effective fungicide in inhibiting the mycelial growth of N. dimidiatum (Table 3 , Fig. 4 ). Lin et al., ( 2017 ) conducted a study on the main causal agent of pitaya cancer, N. dimidiatum , testing the efficacy of some fungicides against the pathogen in vitro. The results of their study revealed that cyprodinil + fludioxonil, azoxystrobin + difenoconazole, and tebuconazole fungicides were the most effective in inhibiting the mycelial growth of the pathogen. These fungicides were also identified as the most effective in our study. Similarly, XiaoYong et al., (2018) tested the effectiveness of pyraclostrobin, azoxystrobin, tebuconazole, and hexaconazole fungicides in an in vitro environment against pitaya cancer and reported that all fungicides were effective against the pathogen. The effectiveness of azoxystrobin and tebuconazole fungicides found in their study is consistent with our findings. In the United Arab Emirates (UAE), some fungicides were evaluated for their effectiveness in vitro and under greenhouse conditions against N. dimidiatum , which causes root cancer in royal poinciana ( Delonix regia ) trees. As a result of the evaluation, it was reported that azoxystrobin + difenoconazole (Amistrar® Top) and difenoconazole-based Cidely® Top (difenoconazole + cyflufenamid) fungicides, which are also included in our study, were among the most effective fungicides in inhibiting mycelial growth (Al Raish et al., 2020 ). In a recent study conducted by Oksal et al., (2021), the effect of 7 different fungicides at various dose series on the mycelial growth of N. dimidiatum was tested. In their study, all fungicides except phosphorous acid showed significant efficacy in inhibiting the pathogen's mycelial growth, with floupyram + tebuconazole, cyprodinil + fludioxonil, and tebuconazole standing out with 100% effectiveness. The results we obtained from our study are consistent with the findings of Oksal et al., (2021), except for the effectiveness of phosphorous acid. In the field experiments, the lesions caused by N. dimidiatum in the vascular tissues of healthy apricot seedlings (Fig. 5 ) were similar to the symptoms observed under natural conditions, and this was confirmed by re-isolation. Our data are consistent with data from other studies where N. dimidiatum was artificially inoculated into other plant species (Al-Bedak et al., 2018 ; Nouri et al., 2018 ). In the growth process of apricot saplings of the Hacıhaliloğlu variety under field conditions, the most effective fungicides in preventing infections caused by N. dimidiatum were azoxystrobin + difenoconazole, floupyram + tebuconazole, and tebuconazole, both post-inoculation (Table 4 ) and pre-inoculation (Table 5 ). These fungicides, identified as the most effective in inhibiting mycelial growth in in vitro studies, also maintained their effectiveness under field conditions. Previous studies have also reported that these fungicides, either alone or in combination, are effective in preventing infections caused by N. dimidiatum (XiaoYong et al., 2018; Al Raish et al., 2020 ). Cyprodinil + fludioxonil showed high effectiveness when applied pre-inoculation (55.8%) but was not effective when applied post-inoculation (11.3%). The combination of cyprodinil + fludioxonil has been reported to be highly effective in controlling trunk diseases in grapes, which cause similar damage to N. dimidiatum . In these studies, immersing grapevine saplings in the cyprodinil + fludioxonil mixture before pathogen inoculation significantly reduced disease severity and positively affected growth parameters (Nascimento et al., 2007 ; Rego et al., 2009 ). In this respect, it can be concluded that the combination of cyprodinil + fludioxonil highlights the protective property of the fungicide. This observation aligns with the results of our study, demonstrating the effectiveness of these fungicides in controlling N. dimidiatum affecting apricot trees. Unlike chemical fungicides, the commercial biopreparations we included in our field study, B. subtilis and Trichoderma harzianum Rifai KRL-AG2, did not show significant effectiveness in preventing infections caused by N. dimidiatum , both pre-inoculation and post-inoculation (see Table 4 and Table 5 ). There have been some studies testing the effectiveness of BCAs against N. dimidiatum or different pathogens (AbuQamar et al., 2017; Rusmarini et al., 2017 ); however, these studies are generally of in vitro origin and do not evaluate their effectiveness in field conditions. Therefore, more research on the biological control of N. dimidiatum under field conditions is needed for accurate conclusions. In conclusion, the increasing prevalence of N. dimidiatum requires the use of chemical control as a strategy to reduce its frequency and severity. Our study suggests that utilizing chemicals that have shown efficacy in both in vitro and field trials, taking advantage of their protective and curative properties, can be beneficial in the management of the disease and its subsequent control. Declarations ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This work is supported with the project number TAGEM/BSAD/B/20/A2/P4/1677 by General Directorate of Agricultural Research and Policy of Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry Research involving human participants and/or animals This study does not include experiments with either human participants or animals. Conflict of interest The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results. References Abbott, W. S. (1925). A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. Journal of Economic Entomology, 18 (2), 265-267. Abu Qamar, S., Moustafa, K., & Tran, L.-S. (2017). Mechanisms and strategies of plant defense against Botrytis cinerea . Critical Reviews in Biotechnology, 37 , 262–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/07388551.2016.1271767 Al Raish, S. M., Saeed, E. E., Sham, A., Alblooshi, K., El-Tarabily, K. A., & AbuQamar, S. F. (2020). Molecular characterization and disease control of stem canker on Royal Poinciana ( Delonix regia ) caused by Neoscytalidium dimidiatum in the United Arab Emirates. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 21 (3), 1033. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21031033 Al-Bedak, O. A., Mohamed, R. A., & Seddek, N. H. (2018). First detection of Neoscytalidium dimidiatum associated with canker disease in Egyptian Ficus trees. Forest Pathology, 48 , e12411. https://doi.org/10.1111/efp.12411 Alizadeh, M., Safaie, N., Shams-Bakhsh, M., & Mehrabadi, M. (2022). Neoscytalidium novaehollandiae causes dieback on Pinus eldarica and its potential for infection of urban forest trees. Scientific Reports, 12 , 9337. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-13414-8 Al-Tememe, Z. A. M., Lahuf, A., Abdalmoohsin, R. G., & Al-Amirry, A. T. (2019). Occurrence, identification, pathogenicity and control of Neoscytalidium dimidiatum fungus, the causal agent of sooty canker on Eucalyptus camaldulensis in Kerbala Province of Iraq. Plant Archives, 19 , 31–38. Alwahshi, K. J., Saeed, E. E., Sham, A., Alblooshi, A. A., Alblooshi, M. M., El-Tarabily, K. A., & AbuQamar, S. F. (2019). Molecular identification and disease management of date palm sudden decline syndrome in the United Arab Emirates. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 20 , 923. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20040923 Budzinsk, H., & Couderchet, M. (2018). Environmental and human health issues related to pesticides: From usage and environmental fate to impact. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25 , 14277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1738-3 Çığşar, İ. (1998). Malatya ve Elazığ’da Kayısılarda Görülen Fitopatolojik Sorunlar ve Çözüm Önerileri. Doğu Anadolu Tarım Kongresi Bildirileri , Erzurum, 114-120. Delen, N., Yıldız, M., & Maraite, H. (1984). Benzimidazole and dithiocarbamate resistance of B. cinerea on greenhouse crops in Turkey. Med. Fac. Landbauw. Rijk. Gent. , 153-161 pp. Dervis, S., Özer, G., & Türkölmez, Ş. (2020). First report of Neoscytalidium novaehollandiae causing stem blight on tomato in Turkey. Journal of Plant Pathology, 102 (4), 1339–1340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42161-020-00627-x Dervis, S., Turkolmez, S., Ciftci, O., Ulubas, S. C., & Dikilitas, M. (2019). First report of Neoscytalidium dimidiatum causing canker, shoot blight, and root rot of pistachio in Turkey. Plant Disease, 103 (6), 1411. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-01-19-0053-PDN Eskalen, A., Rooney-Latham, S., & Gubler, W. D. (2007). Protection of grapevine pruning wounds against Esca and Young Esca pathogens. Phytopathology, 97 , 33. FAO. (2021). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC (Date accessed: 06.10.2021). Hajlaoui, M. R., Nouri, M. T., Hamrouni, N., Trouillas, F. P., Ben Yahmed, N., Eddouzi, J., & Mnari-Hattab, M. (2018). First record of dieback and decline of plum caused by Neoscytalidium dimidiatum in Tunisia. New Disease Reports, 38 , 20. http://dx.doi.org/10.5197/j.2044-0588.2018.038.020 Kamil, F. H., Saeed, E. E., El-Tarabily, K. A., & AbuQamar, S. F. (2018). Biological control of mango dieback disease caused by Lasiodiplodia theobromae using streptomycete and non-streptomycete actinobacteria in the United Arab Emirates. Frontiers in Microbiology, 9 , 829. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.00829 Kotze, C., Van Niekerk, J., Mostert, L., Halleen, F., & Fourie, P. (2011). Evaluation of biocontrol agents for grapevine pruning wound protection against trunk pathogen infection. Phytopathologia Mediterranea, 50 , 247-263. Kuai, X., Barraco, C., & Després, C. (2017). Combining fungicides and prospective NPR1-based “just-in-time” immunomodulating chemistries for crop protection. Frontiers in Plant Science, 8 , 1715. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01715 Kural, İ., & Erdiller, G. (1995). Kayısıda Cytospora Kanseri (Leucostoma cincta (Fr) Hohn) ’nin Malatya ve Elazığ koşullarında Gelişimi ve Bazı Kayısı Çeşitlerinin Duyarlılık Düzeylerinin Belirlenmesi Üzerinde Çalışmalar. VII. Türkiye Fitopatoloji Kongresi, Adana, Bildirileri , 530-533. Kurt, Ş., Uysal, A., Soylu, E., Kara, M., & Soylu, S. (2019). First record of Neoscytalidium novaehollandiae associated with pistachio dieback in the Southeastern Anatolia region of Turkey. Mycologia Iranica, 6 (1), 55-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.22043/mi.2020.121015 Lin, C., Ni, H., Huang, C., & Yang, H. (2017). Pathogen characterization and chemical control of pitaya stem canker disease. Australasian Plant Disease Notes, 10 , 1–4. Mohd, M. H., Salleh, B., & Zakaria, L. (2013). Identification and molecular characterizations of Neoscytalidium dimidiatum causing stem canker of red-fleshed dragon fruit ( Hylocereus polyrhizus ) in Malaysia. Journal of Phytopathology, 161 , 841–849. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jph.12146 Mutawila, C., Fourie, P. H., Halleen, F., & Mostert, L. (2011). Histo-pathology study of the growth of Trichoderma harzianum, Phaeomoniella chlamydospora and Eutypa lata on grapevine pruning wounds. Phytopathologia Mediterranea, 50 , 46-60. Nascimento, T., Rego, C., & Oliveira, H. (2007). Potential use of chitosan in the control of grapevine trunk diseases. Phytopathologia Mediterranea, 46 , 218–224. https://doi.org/10.14601/Phytopathol_Mediterr-2156 Nouri, M. T., Lawrence, D. P., Yaghmour, M. A., Michailides, T. J., & Trouillas, F. P. (2018). Neoscytalidium dimidiatum causing canker, shoot blight and fruit rot of almond in California. Plant Disease, 102 , 1638–1647. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-12-17-1967-RE Oksal, E., Çelik, Y., & Özer, G. (2020a). Neoscytalidium dimidiatum causes canker and dieback on grapevine in Turkey. Australasian Plant Disease Notes, 14 (1), 33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13314-019-0363-4 Oksal, E., Özer, G. (2021). First report of shoot blight and branch canker of Pyrus communis by Neoscytalidium novaehollandiae in Turkey. Journal of Plant Pathology, 103 (2), 673-674. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42161-021-00762-z Oksal, E., Yiğit, T., & Özer, G. (2020b). First report of Neoscytalidium dimidiatum causing shoot blight, dieback and canker of apricot in Turkey. Journal of Plant Pathology, 102 , 579–580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42161-019-00467-4 Ören, E., Koca, G., Gencer, R., & Bayraktar, H. (2020). First report of Neoscytalidium novaehollandiae associated with stem canker and branch dieback of almond trees. Australasian Plant Disease Notes, 15 , 17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13314-020-00386-9 Özgönen, H., & Erkılıç, A. (2001). Malatya-Elazığ yöresinde kayısılarda görülen fungal hastalıkların ve yaygınlık oranlarının belirlenmesi. Türkiye IX. Fitopatoloji Kongresi Bildiriler , s. 669-675. Phillips, A. J. L., Alves, A., Abdollahzadeh, J., Slippers, B., Wingfield, M. J., Groenewald, J. Z., & Crous, P. W. (2013). The Botryosphaeriaceae: Genera and species known from culture. Studies in Mycology, Volume 76 , 51-167. https://doi.org/10.3114/sim0021. Ratanaprom, S., Nakkanong, K., Nualsri, C., Jiwanit, P., Rongsawat, T., & Woraathakorn, N. (2021). Overcoming encouragement of dragon fruit plant ( Hylocereus undatus ) against stem brown spot disease caused by Neoscytalidium dimidiatum using Bacillus subtilis combined with codium bicarbonate . Journal of Plant Pathology, 37 , 205–214. doi: 10.5423/PPJ.OA.01.2021.0007 Reckhaus, P. (1987). Hendersonula dieback of mango in Niger. Plant Disease, 71 , 1045. Rego, C., Nascimento, T., Cabral, A., Silva, M. J., & Oliveira, H. (2009). Control of grapevine wood fungi in commercial nurseries. Phytopathologia Mediterranea, 48 , 128-135. https://doi.org/10.14601/Phytopathol_Mediterr-2881 Rusmarini, W., Shah, U. K. D., Abdullah, M. P., Mamat, S., & Hun, T. G. (2017). Identification of Trichoderma harzianum T3.13 and its interaction with Neoscytalidium dimidiatum U1, a pathogenic fungus isolated from dragon fruit ( Hylocereus polyrhizus ) in Malaysia. International Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Research, 3 , 3205–3228. Saeed, E. E., Sham, A., El-Tarabily, K. A., Abu Elsamen, F., Iratni, R., & AbuQamar, S. F. (2016). Chemical control of dieback disease on date palm caused by the fungal pathogen, Thielaviopsis punctulata , in United Arab Emirates. Plant Disease, 100 , 2370–2376. https://doi.org/10.1094/pdis-05-16-0645-re Türkölmez, Ş., Derviş, S., Çifçi, O., Serçe, Ç. U., & Dikilitas, M. (2019). New disease caused by Neoscytalidium dimidiatum devastates tomatoes ( Solanum lycopersicum ) in Turkey. Crop Protection, 118 , 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2018.12.004 Úrbez-Torres, J. R., Haag, P., Bowen, P., & O’Gorman, D. T. (2014). Grapevine trunk diseases in British Columbia: Incidence and characterization of the fungal pathogens associated with black foot disease of grapevine. Plant Disease, 98 , 456-468. https://doi.org/10.1094/pdis-05-13-0524-re Wang, F., Zhang, R., Yuan, Z., & Chen, P. (2021). Biological prevention and control of pitaya fruit canker disease using endophytic fungi isolated from papaya. Archive Microbiology, 203 , 4033–4040. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-021-02378-4 Xian, X., Lin, S., Zhu, G., Wei, X., Qin, W., & Zhong, Y. (2018). Indoor virulence and field effects of fungicides on pitaya canker. Journal of Southern Agriculture, 49 , 1338–1345. Yi, R. H., Lin, Q. L., Mo, J. J., Wu, F. F., & Chen, J. (2015). Fruit internal brown rot caused by Neoscytalidium dimidiatum on pitahaya in Guangdong province, China. Australasian Plant Disease Notes, 10 , 1–4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13314-015-0166-1 Cite Share Download PDF Status: Published Journal Publication published 27 Dec, 2024 Read the published version in European Journal of Plant Pathology → Version 1 posted Editorial decision: Major revisions 27 Jun, 2024 Reviewers agreed at journal 06 May, 2024 Reviewers invited by journal 06 May, 2024 Editor invited by journal 01 May, 2024 Editor assigned by journal 29 Apr, 2024 First submitted to journal 26 Apr, 2024 You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-4317360","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":299081014,"identity":"44a5cba3-cc5a-49d2-bc87-b46cfe90d5d7","order_by":0,"name":"yusuf karakuş","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"TC Tarım ve Orman Bakanlığı: Turkiye Cumhuriyeti Tarim ve Orman Bakanligi","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"yusuf","middleName":"","lastName":"karakuş","suffix":""},{"id":299081015,"identity":"58d02dfd-da71-47dc-b1cb-cd125f9123be","order_by":1,"name":"talip yiğit","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Malatya Turgut Özal Üniversitesi: Malatya Turgut Ozal Universitesi","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"talip","middleName":"","lastName":"yiğit","suffix":""},{"id":299081016,"identity":"610355bd-c9b0-4704-90c0-c03478083770","order_by":2,"name":"Erçin Oksal","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7049-4419","institution":"Malatya Turgut Özal Üniversitesi: Malatya Turgut Ozal Universitesi","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Erçin","middleName":"","lastName":"Oksal","suffix":""},{"id":299081017,"identity":"f29745e1-ac95-40d5-987e-4b97e0073e3a","order_by":3,"name":"murat yıldız","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"TC Tarım ve Orman Bakanlığı: Turkiye Cumhuriyeti Tarim ve Orman Bakanligi","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"murat","middleName":"","lastName":"yıldız","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2024-04-24 10:09:35","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4317360/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4317360/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[{"content":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-024-02986-y","type":"published","date":"2024-12-27T15:57:05+00:00"}],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":56243309,"identity":"6fbffe38-53b0-4f1e-8f58-854b9ceea838","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-05-10 10:27:19","extension":"png","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":294685,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eThe districts where samples were collected in the province of Malatya (Türkiye) are marked in red.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"floatimage1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4317360/v1/de179e23dda827adc36fb00a.png"},{"id":56243651,"identity":"5cba0a92-e5d6-41b9-ad08-873733893a40","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-05-10 10:35:19","extension":"png","order_by":2,"title":"Figure 2","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":249603,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eFungicide application to apricot saplings after (A) and before inoculation (B).\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"floatimage2.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4317360/v1/ad3cd3790c6b62c1f97e761f.png"},{"id":56242801,"identity":"7377d192-a3b2-452f-9ed8-3d2427ed00d9","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-05-10 10:19:19","extension":"png","order_by":3,"title":"Figure 3","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":378089,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eApricot saplings in the field trial.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"floatimage3.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4317360/v1/8661178a1b53504e31fe6b6e.png"},{"id":56242797,"identity":"b3b207d0-f3d8-40f7-9b87-265d68c8e8a4","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-05-10 10:19:19","extension":"png","order_by":4,"title":"Figure 4","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":48655,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eIn vitro \u003c/em\u003eefficacies of selected fungicides against\u003cem\u003e N. dimidiatum \u003c/em\u003eisolate. Cu: 700 g/L\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"floatimage4.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4317360/v1/80d2f6dc110cd2b9957de187.png"},{"id":56242804,"identity":"82a44f18-f632-494c-be0c-3b1181af0bb9","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-05-10 10:19:19","extension":"png","order_by":5,"title":"Figure 5","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":333071,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eMeasurement of lesion lengths (mm) after \u003cem\u003eN. dimidiatum\u003c/em\u003e inoculation in apricot saplings, A-Negative control (no \u003cem\u003eN. dimidiatum\u003c/em\u003e), B-Positive control (\u003cem\u003eN. dimidiatum \u003c/em\u003eonly), C-Fungicide-treated apricot saplings\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"floatimage5.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4317360/v1/fed896abd63b4edb7faa466a.png"},{"id":56242798,"identity":"d0933e73-d4d9-4288-9103-8c55292789a8","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-05-10 10:19:19","extension":"png","order_by":6,"title":"Figure 6","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":84980,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eField efficacies of selected fungicides against\u003cem\u003e N. dimidiatum \u003c/em\u003eisolate. Azoxy + Dif: Azoxystrobin 200 g/L + Difenoconazole 125 g/L, Flou + Teb: Floupyram 200 g/L + Tebuconazole 200 g/L, Teb: Tebuconazole %25, Bacillus: \u003cem\u003eBacillus subtilis\u003c/em\u003e 13,4 g/L, Cyp + Flud: Cyprodinil %37,5 + Fludioxonil %25, Trh: \u003cem\u003eTrichoderma harzianum\u003c/em\u003e Rifai KRL-AG2.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"floatimage6.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4317360/v1/5e13f3980613ff49cf287cc7.png"},{"id":56242800,"identity":"1b14d450-ccbf-417f-8f7a-1727997caa03","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-05-10 10:19:19","extension":"png","order_by":7,"title":"Figure 7","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":87694,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eField efficacies of selected fungicides against\u003cem\u003e N. dimidiatum \u003c/em\u003eisolate.\u003cem\u003e \u003c/em\u003eAzoxy + Dif: Azoxystrobin 200 g/L + Difenoconazole 125 g/L, Flou + Teb: Floupyram 200 g/L + Tebuconazole 200 g/L, Teb: Tebuconazole %25, Bacillus: \u003cem\u003eBacillus subtilis, \u003c/em\u003eCyp + Flud: Cyprodinil %37,5 + Fludioxonil %25, Trh: \u003cem\u003eTrichoderma harzianum\u003c/em\u003e Rifai KRL-AG2.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"floatimage7.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4317360/v1/0ded5c1e30b0f1fd02f438b3.png"},{"id":72640397,"identity":"ec83a356-6bf9-4f41-bb5d-a0c7c00ddb23","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-12-30 16:05:47","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":2518162,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4317360/v1/652160c9-94a2-4c9a-a34d-825d9cd54ec7.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"","formattedTitle":"Evaluation of Some Chemical and Biological Fungicides for Controlling Stem Canker on Apricot Trees Caused by Neoscytalidium dimidiatum","fulltext":[{"header":"INTRODUCTION","content":"\u003cp\u003eWorldwide, approximately 4\u0026nbsp;million tons of apricots were produced on around 5.6\u0026nbsp;million decares of land. Turkey holds the top position in the world ranking, accounting for 23.6% of this production (FAO, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e). Despite being a major player in global apricot production, Turkey's apricot production faces significant losses, particularly due to some fungal diseases (Kural \u0026amp; Erdiler 1995; \u0026Ccedil;ığşar, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1998\u003c/span\u003e; \u0026Ouml;zg\u0026ouml;nen \u0026amp; Erkılı\u0026ccedil;, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR30\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2001\u003c/span\u003e; Oksal et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR28\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020b\u003c/span\u003e). \u003cem\u003eNeoscytalidium dimidiatum\u003c/em\u003e, among these fungi, is a significant fungal pathogen responsible for causing cankers in a wide geographical and host range, including apricot, almond (\u003cem\u003ePrunus dulcis\u003c/em\u003e), mango (\u003cem\u003eMangifera indica\u003c/em\u003e), pitahaya (\u003cem\u003eHylocereus undatus\u003c/em\u003e), Citrus, Musa, Populus, Ficus species, and royal poinciana (\u003cem\u003eDelonix regia\u003c/em\u003e) in countries such as Australia, China, Egypt, Niger, Tunisia, the United States, and the United Arab Emirates (Reckhaus, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR33\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1987\u003c/span\u003e; Nouri et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR25\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2018\u003c/span\u003e; Al Raish et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e). In recent studies conducted in Turkey, \u003cem\u003eN. dimidiatum\u003c/em\u003e has been reported as a harmful pathogen affecting various product groups, including apricot trees (Dervis et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e; Dervis et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e; Kurt et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR20\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e; Oksal \u0026amp; \u0026Ouml;zer \u003cspan citationid=\"CR27\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e; Oksal et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR26\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020a\u003c/span\u003e; \u003cspan citationid=\"CR28\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020b\u003c/span\u003e; \u0026Ouml;ren et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR29\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e). \u003cem\u003eN. dimidiatum\u003c/em\u003e species, which are becoming increasingly prevalent in Turkey, can act as plant pathogens, endophytes, saprophytes, and latent pathogens. Additionally, they are considered as causative agents of mycosis in humans and animals (Phillips et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR31\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2013\u003c/span\u003e; Mohd et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR22\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2013\u003c/span\u003e; Alizadeh et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e; T\u0026uuml;rk\u0026ouml;lmez et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR37\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e). This pathogen can lead to a range of detrimental effects on the plants it affects, including dieback, scorching, canker formation, necrosis in the woody tissues, leaf shedding, chlorosis, gumming, tip dieback, rot, and sometimes the complete death of the host. On apricot trees, in particular, it often causes destructive diseases such as shoot blight, dieback, and cankers (Oksal, 2020b).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eDespite ecological concerns and health-related issues, the use of chemical fungicides continues to be the primary strategy for mitigating the threat of plant diseases (Saeed et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR36\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2016\u003c/span\u003e; Alwahshi et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e; Kamil et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2018\u003c/span\u003e). Previous studies on the chemical control of \u003cem\u003eN. dimidiatum\u003c/em\u003e in different product groups have reported the successful inhibition of the pathogen's mycelial growth or spore germination by chemical fungicides such as cyprodinil\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;fludioxonil, azoxystrobin\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;difenoconazole, tebuconazole, metiram, trifloxystrobin, iminoctadine, pyraclostrobin, azoxystrobin, hexaconazole, and difenoconazole\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;cyflufenamid (Lin et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR21\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e; XiaoYong et al., 2018; Al Raish et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e; Oksal et al., 2021). Recently, the use of biological control agents (BCAs) in disease management has become more widespread in addition to chemical fungicides. Biological control of \u003cem\u003eN. dimidiatum\u003c/em\u003e is achieved, particularly using fungi and bacteria. For example, biocontrol agents such as \u003cem\u003eTrichoderma harzianum\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eT. atroviride\u003c/em\u003e have been successful in reducing the growth of the pathogen. Furthermore, biokontrol bacteria like \u003cem\u003eBacillus amyloliquefaciens\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003ePenicillium rolfsii\u003c/em\u003e, and \u003cem\u003eB. subtilis\u003c/em\u003e have exhibited strong antifungal effects against \u003cem\u003eN. dimidiatum\u003c/em\u003e under in vitro conditions (Ratanaprom et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR32\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e; Wang et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR39\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e). However, whether these biological control agents are effective against \u003cem\u003eN. dimidiatum\u003c/em\u003e under field conditions remains unclear and requires further investigation.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis study was conducted to assess the potential effectiveness of chemical and biological fungicides against \u003cem\u003eN. dimidiatum\u003c/em\u003e. The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of chemical fungicides against \u003cem\u003eN. dimidiatum\u003c/em\u003e under in vitro conditions and highlight their performance in field studies, particularly focusing on the most efficient chemical fungicides in both scenarios. Additionally, this study aims to reveal, for the first time, the effectiveness of biopreparations with biocontrol potential under field conditions, as documented in the literature.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"MATERIALS AND METHOD","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec3\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003ePlant material and fungal ısolates\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe fungal material for the study was isolated from Hacıhaliloğlu and Kabaaşı apricot varieties. These plant materials were obtained from apricot trees showing symptoms of drying in Battalgazi, Yesilyurt, Darende, Kale, Akcadag, Hekimhan, Yazıhan, and Puturge districts in the 2018\u0026ndash;2019 period, within the scope of Inonu University Project No: FBG-2018-977 (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e). The \u003cem\u003eN. dimidiatum\u003c/em\u003e isolate (ITS MH861121, EF1-α KF531795; BT2 KF531796; LSU DQ377922), identified as the most virulent in the project's pathogenicity tests and molecular diagnosis, was selected for use in this study.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec4\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eFungicides\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn vitro experiments involved testing the commercial formulations of 10 chemical fungicides for their ability to inhibit the mycelial growth of \u003cem\u003eN. dimidiatum\u003c/em\u003e (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e). The two biological preparations found to be the most effective in in vitro experiments were included, and their potential for preventing infections caused by \u003cem\u003eN. dimidiatum\u003c/em\u003e under natural conditions was assessed (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab1\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 1\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFungicides and doses used \u003cem\u003ein vitro\u003c/em\u003e trials.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"5\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c5\" colnum=\"5\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eActive ingredient (a.i)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCommercial Name / Firm\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFormulation*\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDose / 100 L water\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDose of application (\u0026micro;g /ml)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e700 g/L Copper oxychloride\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eZZ-Cuprocol/ Syngenta\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSC\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0- 100 ml-200 ml-300 ml\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0, 700, 1400, 2100\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTrifloxystrobin %50\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFlint/Bayer\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eWG\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0\u0026ndash;10 g-12,5 g-15 g\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0, 50, 62.5, 75\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTebuconazole %25\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFolicur/ Bayer\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eWG\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0\u0026ndash;40 gr-60 gr-80 gr\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0, 100, 150, 200\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFloupyram 200 g/L\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;Tebuconazole 200 g/L\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLuna Experience/ Bayer\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSC\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0\u0026ndash;15 ml-25 ml-35 ml\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0, 30, 50, 75\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCyprodinil %37,5\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;Fludioxonil %25\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSwitch/ Syngenta\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eWG\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0\u0026ndash;30 gr-40 gr-50 gr\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0, 112.5, 150, 187.5\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e%70 Thiophanate-Methyl\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eQuartette/Hektaş\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eWP\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0\u0026ndash;40 g-60 g-80 g\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0, 280, 420, 560\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e%40 Metalaxyl-m +\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e%4 Acıbenzolar-s-methyl\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBion/ Syngenta\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eWG\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0\u0026ndash;10 g-20 g-30 g\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0, 40, 80, 120\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAzoxystrobin 200 g/L +\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eDifenoconazole 125 g/L\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eQuadris maxx/ Syngenta\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSC\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0\u0026ndash;80 ml-100 ml-120 ml\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0, 160, 200, 240\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e400 g/l Phosphorous Acid\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDrift\u0026ccedil;e/Koruma\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSL\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0-300 ml-400 ml-500 ml\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0, 1200, 1600, 2000\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAzoxystrobin 250 g/L\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eQuadris/ Syngenta\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSC\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0\u0026ndash;50 ml-75 ml-100 ml\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0, 125, 187.5, 250\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e*WG: Water-dispersible granule, WP: Wettable powder, SC: Water-soluble concentrate, SL: Soluble concentrate.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab2\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 2\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFungicides and doses used in the field trials.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"2\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eActive ingredient (a.i)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDose of application\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTebuconazole %25\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e40 gr\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCyprodinil %37,5\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;Fludioxonil %25\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e40 gr\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFloupyram 200 g/L\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;Tebuconazole 200 g/L\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e25 ml\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAzoxystrobin 200 g/L\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;Difenoconazole 125 g/L\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e100 ml\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e%1.15 \u003cem\u003eTrichoderma harzianum\u003c/em\u003e Rifai ırk KRL-AG2 (T 22) 400 milyon conidi/g\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e60 gr\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eBacillus subtilis\u003c/em\u003e 13,4 g/L\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1500 ml\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec5\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eDetermination of the effect of fungicides on mycelial growth\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003ePotato Dextrose Agar (PDA, Neogen) was used in Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e to determine the levels of inhibitory action of the fungicides listed on the mycelial growth of the \u003cem\u003eN. dimidiatum\u003c/em\u003e isolate. In vitro experiments considered the usage conditions in registered products when determining the doses of fungicides, and experiments were conducted with both lower and upper doses (\u0026micro;g/ml) of the recommended usage rates. The effectiveness of each active substance was tested with three doses and one control (see Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTo obtain the targeted fungicide doses, new stock solutions at concentrations of 1,000 \u0026micro;g/ml and 100 \u0026micro;g/ml were prepared through dilution from initially prepared stock solutions at 10,000 \u0026micro;g/ml. The fungicides were dissolved in sterile distilled water when preparing the stock solutions. To achieve the desired fungicide doses, the required amounts were pipetted, autoclaved for sterilization, and then added to a sterile PDA medium that had been cooled to 45\u0026ndash;50\u0026deg;C (Delen et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1984\u003c/span\u003e). Controls were prepared in a similar manner, but sterile distilled water was added instead of the fungicide solution. Care was taken to ensure homogeneity in the mixtures, and equal amounts of sterile water were added to all doses for this purpose. Subsequently, agar media containing the desired fungicide doses or no fungicide (control) were poured into sterile plastic petri dishes (Isolab, 90 x 100 mm) in equal amounts and left to solidify for 24 hours under UV light for sterilization. Fungal discs with a diameter of four millimeters were taken from the edges of 10-day-old fungal colonies of the \u003cem\u003eN. dimidiatum\u003c/em\u003e isolate using a cork-borer and placed into the growth cultures with and without fungicide (application and control). The experiment was conducted with three replications in a randomized complete block design. Inoculated petri dishes were incubated in a lightless incubator set at 25\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1\u0026deg;C for four days. Four days after incubation, the colony growth and diameter measurements of the \u003cem\u003eN. dimidiatum\u003c/em\u003e isolate were evaluated.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe data obtained from the experiment were subjected to analysis of variance using the SPSS statistical software package, and the differences between the means were determined using the Duncan test (P\u0026thinsp;\u0026le;\u0026thinsp;0.05). The percentage efficacy of fungicides was calculated using the Abbott formula, based on the colony diameter in the control: [(control - treatment) / control) \u0026times; 100)] (Abbott, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1925\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec6\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eField trials\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eTo determine the effectiveness of four chemical fungicides found to be the most effective in in vitro experiments and, in addition, two biopreparations not included in the in vitro study, in controlling infections caused by \u003cem\u003eN. dimidiatum\u003c/em\u003e during the growth process of two-year-old grafted Hacıhaliloğlu apricot saplings, the recommended dosage ratio in registered products was used for biopreparations, as shown in Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e. Fungicides were applied in the following sequence: 48 hours after inoculation (post-inoculation treatment) and 48 hours before inoculation (pre-inoculation treatment).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFor post-inoculation treatment, mycelial discs (4 mm in diameter) obtained from PDA cultures of \u003cem\u003eN. dimidiatum\u003c/em\u003e were inoculated into wounds made in the stem section, with the growing part facing inward, and then sealed with parafilm to prevent rapid dehydration (\u0026Uacute;rbez-Torres, 2014). In control plants, only discs containing sterile PDA were used (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003eA). Inoculated saplings were planted in pots containing a mixture of 1/3 seedling soil, 1/3 composted animal manure, and 1/3 sand. After these procedures, each pot was left for 48 hours of incubation under natural conditions. At the end of the incubation period, application of the fungicides listed in Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e and foliar application was performed by spraying. Only pure water was applied to control plants.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFor pre-inoculation treatment, wounds made in the stem part were initially treated with the fungicides listed in Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e, followed by foliar application. Control plants received an application of sterile distilled water. After 48 hours of application, pathogen inoculation was carried out on the wounds made on the plant stems using the fungal disk method as described by \u0026Uacute;rbez-Torres et al., (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR38\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2014\u003c/span\u003e) (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003eB).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe experiment was regularly monitored for a period of 21 days, as determined in preliminary studies. At the end of the 21-day period, tissue samples were taken from the re-isolation points of the inoculation and placed on petri dishes containing streptomycin sulfate (150 mg/L). The relationship between the color change and the pathogen responsible for the condition was established (Eskalen et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR13\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2007\u003c/span\u003e; Mutawilla, 2011; Kotze et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2011\u003c/span\u003e). In the evaluations, the inoculation site and bark tissue of each test plant were scraped with a scalpel, and the length of the darkened area was measured with a ruler after the scraping process. Following the measurements, the percentage efficacy of fungicides was calculated using the Abbott formula, based on disease development in control plants: [(control - treatment) / control) \u0026times; 100)] (Abbott, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1925\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec7\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eExperimental design and statistical analysis\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe experiment was conducted in a randomized complete block design with three replications, each containing four saplings. Controls were established in two different ways: one with only the pathogen present (positive control) and the other with no application (negative control) (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e). Data obtained from the experiment were subjected to analysis of variance using SPSS 17.0 (Ver.17.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) software, and differences between means were determined using the Duncan test (P\u0026thinsp;\u0026le;\u0026thinsp;0.05).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"RESULTS","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec9\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eDetermination of the effect of fungicides on mycelial growth\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe effectiveness of the fungicides listed in Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e in inhibiting the mycelial growth of \u003cem\u003eN. dimidiatum\u003c/em\u003e isolate was determined based on the lowest concentration that inhibited mycelial growth in the in vitro tests. After four days of incubation, colony growth and diameter measurements of \u003cem\u003eN. dimidiatum\u003c/em\u003e isolate were performed.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWhen examining the fungicides based on their percentage of effectiveness in inhibiting the mycelial growth of \u003cem\u003eN. dimidiatum\u003c/em\u003e isolate, tebuconazole, cyprodinil\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;fludioxonil, azoxystrobin\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;difenoconazole, and floupyram\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;tebuconazole were the most effective fungicides, with effectiveness ranging from 99\u0026ndash;100%. These fungicides were followed by trifloxystrobin, thiophanate-methyl, and copper oxychloride with effectiveness between 83% and 85%, and phosphorous acid and azoxystrobin with effectiveness ranging from 74.8\u0026ndash;60%. The fungicide containing metalaxyl-m\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;acibenzolar-s-methyl had a lower effectiveness of 10.4% in inhibiting the mycelial growth of \u003cem\u003eN. dimidiatum\u003c/em\u003e isolate compared to other fungicides. The lowest effective doses of the most effective fungicides in the same statistical group were selected for field studies, including tebuconazole's first dose (40 g), cyprodinil\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;fludioxonil (40 g), azoxystrobin\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;difenoconazole (100 ml), and floupyram\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;tebuconazole (25 ml) (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e, Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab3\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 3\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn vitro efficacies of fungicides (%) against \u003cem\u003eN. dimidiatum\u003c/em\u003e isolate\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"4\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eActive ingredient (a.i)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDoses (ml/100L)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAverage Colony Diameters (cm\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eEfficacy (%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\" morerows=\"3\" rowspan=\"4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e700 g/L Copper oxychloride\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eControl (0)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e56,00\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\" morerows=\"3\" rowspan=\"4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e83,27\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e100 ml\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e14,11\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e200 ml\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e12,44\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e300 ml\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1,56\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\" morerows=\"3\" rowspan=\"4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTrifloxystrobin %50\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eControl (0)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e52,22\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\" morerows=\"3\" rowspan=\"4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e85,89\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e10,0 g\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e7,56\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e12,5 g\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e7,00\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e15,0 g\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e7,56\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\" morerows=\"3\" rowspan=\"4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTebuconazole %25\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eControl (0)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e45,28\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\" morerows=\"3\" rowspan=\"4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e100,00\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e40 g\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0,00\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e60 g\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0,00\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e80 g\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0,00\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\" morerows=\"3\" rowspan=\"4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFloupyram 200 g/L\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;Tebuconazole 200 g/L\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eControl (0)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e45,28\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\" morerows=\"3\" rowspan=\"4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e99,26\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e15 ml\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1,00\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e25 ml\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0,00\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e35 ml\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0,00\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\" morerows=\"3\" rowspan=\"4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCyprodinil %37,5\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;Fludioxonil %25\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eControl (0)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e58,67\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\" morerows=\"3\" rowspan=\"4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e99,43\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e30 g\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0,67\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e40 g\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0,33\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e50 g\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0,00\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\" morerows=\"3\" rowspan=\"4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e%70 Thiophanate-Methyl\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eControl (0)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e58,67\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\" morerows=\"3\" rowspan=\"4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e83,71\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e40 g\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e11,22\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e60 g\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e9,22\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e80 g\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e8,22\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\" morerows=\"3\" rowspan=\"4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e%40 Metalaxyl-m +\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e%4 Acıbenzolar-s-methyl\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eControl (0)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e58,78\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\" morerows=\"3\" rowspan=\"4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e10,46\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e10 g\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e50,11\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e20 g\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e58,67\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e30 g\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e49,11\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\" morerows=\"3\" rowspan=\"4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAzoxystrobin 200 g/L +\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eDifenoconazole 125 g/L\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eControl (0)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e42,94\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\" morerows=\"3\" rowspan=\"4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e99,40\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e80 ml\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0,78\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e100 ml\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0,00\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e120 ml\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0,00\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\" morerows=\"3\" rowspan=\"4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e400 g/l Phosphorous Acid\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eControl (0)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e42,89\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\" morerows=\"3\" rowspan=\"4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e60,02\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e300 ml\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e32,44\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e400 ml\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e11,56\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e500 ml\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e7,44\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\" morerows=\"3\" rowspan=\"4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAzoxystrobin 250 g/L\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eControl (0)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e43,11\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\" morerows=\"3\" rowspan=\"4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e74,83\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e50 ml\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e12,11\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e75 ml\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e10,56\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e100 ml\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e9,89\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eBakır oksiklor\u0026uuml;r, Trif: Trifloxystrobin %50, Teb: Tebuconazole %25, Flou\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;Teb: Floupyram 200 g/L\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;Tebuconazole 200 g/L, Cyp\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;Flud: Cyprodinil %37,5\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;Fludioxonil %25, Thio: %70 Thiophanate-Methyl, M\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;Ac: %40 Metalaxyl-m + %4 Acıbenzolar-s-methyl, Azoxy\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;Dif: Azoxystrobin 200 g/L\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;Difenoconazole 125 g/L, Azoxy: Azoxystrobin 250 g/L\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec10\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eField results\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eTwo separate field trials were conducted to determine the effects of the fungicides listed in Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e on apricot saplings inoculated with \u003cem\u003eN. dimidiatum\u003c/em\u003e. These trials were designed as post-inoculation and pre-inoculation fungicide applications. All data obtained from these trials were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA), and the effectiveness of the fungicides was determined. In the evaluations conducted 21 days after inoculation, it was found that fungicide applications (except for pre-inoculation \u003cem\u003eTrichoderma\u003c/em\u003e application) were statistically significant compared to positive controls (P\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05). Brown-colored to black lesions of varying lengths were observed at the sites where the pathogen was inoculated, and these lesions were more pronounced in positive controls. In negative controls, color changes due to oxidation were observed, which was confirmed by the re-isolation studies (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec11\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eEffectiveness of the fungicides as post-inoculation treatments\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn post-inoculation fungicide applications, the average lesion lengths in the vascular tissues were measured within a range of min. 29.0\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.6 mm to max. 45.5\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;2.0 mm. In the control group without fungicide application, the average lesion length was 50.0\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.9 mm. When examining the effect of fungicides on lesion lengths in vascular tissues, azoxystrobin\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;difenoconazole (29.0\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.6 mm) and floupyram\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;tebuconazole (30.2\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.7 mm) were statistically significant (P\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05), followed by tebuconazole (38.6\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.5 mm). Other fungicides were statistically in the same group as the control and did not have a significant effect on lesion lengths (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e). Azoxystrobin\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;difenoconazole and floupyram\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;tebuconazole were the most effective fungicides in terms of their curative aspect against \u003cem\u003eN. dimidiatum\u003c/em\u003e, showing 41.8% and 39.5% efficacy, respectively, compared to the control. Floupyram\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;tebuconazole (26.6%) was the closest in terms of percentage efficacy, while other fungicides were not significantly effective compared to the control (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig6\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab4\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 4\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDetermination of the post-inoculation effect of fungicides (%) used against \u003cem\u003eN. dimidiatum\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"3\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eActive ingredient (a.i)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMean Lesion Length (mm)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eEfficacy (%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAzoxystrobin 200 g/L\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;Difenoconazole 125 g/L\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e29,0\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1,6 a\u003csup\u003e*\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e41,8\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFloupyram 200 g/L\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;Tebuconazole 200 g/L\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e30,2\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1,7 a\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e39,5\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTebuconazole %25\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e38,6\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1,5 ab\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e22,6\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eBacillus subtilis\u003c/em\u003e 13,4 g/L\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e42,8\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;2,0 b\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e14,3\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCyprodinil %37,5\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;Fludioxonil %25\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e44,3\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;2,0 b\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e11,3\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eTrichoderma harzianum\u003c/em\u003e Rifai KRL-AG2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e45,5\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;2,0 b\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e9,0\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePositive control\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e50,0\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1,9 b\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe average lesion lengths on inoculated apricot saplings. The effectiveness of applied fungicides against \u003cem\u003eN. dimidiatum\u003c/em\u003e (%). * Significant differences exist between the mean values within each column as indicated by the Duncan's multiple range test (P\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.05).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec12\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eEffectiveness of the fungicides as pre-inoculation treatments\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn pre-inoculation fungicide applications, the average lesion lengths in the vascular tissues were measured within a range of min. 20.9\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.5 mm to max. 49.2\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.4 mm. The control without fungicide application had an average lesion length of 50.0\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.9 mm. When examining the effect of fungicides on lesion lengths in vascular tissues, tebuconazole (20.9\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.5 mm) and cyprodinil\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;fludioxonil (22.0\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.4) were statistically the most effective fungicides (P\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05). The fungicide azoxystrobin\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;difenoconazole (31.2\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.6 mm) was the closest to them in terms of effectiveness. \u003cem\u003eBacillus subtilis\u003c/em\u003e (46.6\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.6 mm) and \u003cem\u003eTrichoderma harzianum\u003c/em\u003e Rifai KRL-AG2 (49.2\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.4 mm) biopreparations were in the same group as the control and did not have a significant effect on lesion lengths (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTebuconazole (58.1%) and cyprodinil\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;fludioxonil (55.8%) were the most effective fungicides against \u003cem\u003eN. dimidiatum\u003c/em\u003e in terms of protective efficacy, showing effectiveness of 58.1% and 55.8%, respectively, compared to the control. Following these fungicides in terms of effectiveness were azoxystrobin\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;difenoconazole (37.5%) and floupyram\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;tebuconazole (21.1%) in terms of percentage of effectiveness (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e). The other fungicides were not significantly effective in terms of percentage of effectiveness (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig7\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab5\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 5\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDetermination of the pre-inoculation effect of fungicides (%) used against \u003cem\u003eN. dimidiatum\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"3\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eActive ingredient (a.i)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMean Lesion Length (mm)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eEfficacy (%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTebuconazole %25\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e20,9\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1,5 a\u003csup\u003e*\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e58,1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCyprodinil %37,5\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;Fludioxonil %25\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e22,0\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1,4 a\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e55,8\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAzoxystrobin 200 g\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;Difenoconazole 125 g\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e31,2\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1,6 ab\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e37,5\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFloupyram 200 g/L\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;Tebuconazole 200 g/L\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e39,4\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1,5 b\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e21,1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eBacillus subtilis\u003c/em\u003e 13,4 g/L\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e46,6\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1,6 bc\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6,6\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eTrichoderma harzianum\u003c/em\u003e Rifai KRL-AG2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e49,2\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1,4 bc\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1,5\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePositive control\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e50,0\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1,9 bc\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe average lesion lengths on inoculated apricot saplings. The effectiveness of applied fungicides against \u003cem\u003eN. dimidiatum\u003c/em\u003e (%). * Significant differences exist between the mean values within each column as indicated by the Duncan's multiple range test (P\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.05).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"DISCUSSION","content":"\u003cp\u003eThis study has demonstrated the efficacy of some fungicides in both in vitro and field conditions for controlling \u003cem\u003eN. dimidiatum\u003c/em\u003e on apricot trees. Chemical fungicides, despite their potential adverse effects on health (Al-Tememe et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR6\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e; Budzinski et al., 2018), are widely used due to their cost-effectiveness, quick action, long-lasting effects, stability, and ease of application (Kuai et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e). In the in vitro part of the study for controlling \u003cem\u003eN. dimidiatum\u003c/em\u003e, the tested fungicides aimed at inhibiting mycelial growth, with tebuconazole, cyprodinil\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;fludioxonil, azoxystrobin\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;difenoconazole, and floupyram\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;tebuconazole achieving the highest efficacy rates, ranging from 99\u0026ndash;100%. Metalaxyl-m\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;acibenzolar-s-methyl, with a 10.4% efficacy rate, was the least effective fungicide in inhibiting the mycelial growth of \u003cem\u003eN. dimidiatum\u003c/em\u003e (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e, Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e). Lin et al., (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR21\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e) conducted a study on the main causal agent of pitaya cancer, \u003cem\u003eN. dimidiatum\u003c/em\u003e, testing the efficacy of some fungicides against the pathogen in vitro. The results of their study revealed that cyprodinil\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;fludioxonil, azoxystrobin\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;difenoconazole, and tebuconazole fungicides were the most effective in inhibiting the mycelial growth of the pathogen. These fungicides were also identified as the most effective in our study. Similarly, XiaoYong et al., (2018) tested the effectiveness of pyraclostrobin, azoxystrobin, tebuconazole, and hexaconazole fungicides in an in vitro environment against pitaya cancer and reported that all fungicides were effective against the pathogen. The effectiveness of azoxystrobin and tebuconazole fungicides found in their study is consistent with our findings. In the United Arab Emirates (UAE), some fungicides were evaluated for their effectiveness in vitro and under greenhouse conditions against \u003cem\u003eN. dimidiatum\u003c/em\u003e, which causes root cancer in royal poinciana (\u003cem\u003eDelonix regia\u003c/em\u003e) trees. As a result of the evaluation, it was reported that azoxystrobin\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;difenoconazole (Amistrar\u0026reg; Top) and difenoconazole-based Cidely\u0026reg; Top (difenoconazole\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;cyflufenamid) fungicides, which are also included in our study, were among the most effective fungicides in inhibiting mycelial growth (Al Raish et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e). In a recent study conducted by Oksal et al., (2021), the effect of 7 different fungicides at various dose series on the mycelial growth of \u003cem\u003eN. dimidiatum\u003c/em\u003e was tested. In their study, all fungicides except phosphorous acid showed significant efficacy in inhibiting the pathogen's mycelial growth, with floupyram\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;tebuconazole, cyprodinil\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;fludioxonil, and tebuconazole standing out with 100% effectiveness. The results we obtained from our study are consistent with the findings of Oksal et al., (2021), except for the effectiveness of phosphorous acid.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn the field experiments, the lesions caused by \u003cem\u003eN. dimidiatum\u003c/em\u003e in the vascular tissues of healthy apricot seedlings (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e) were similar to the symptoms observed under natural conditions, and this was confirmed by re-isolation. Our data are consistent with data from other studies where \u003cem\u003eN. dimidiatum\u003c/em\u003e was artificially inoculated into other plant species (Al-Bedak et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2018\u003c/span\u003e; Nouri et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR25\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2018\u003c/span\u003e). In the growth process of apricot saplings of the Hacıhaliloğlu variety under field conditions, the most effective fungicides in preventing infections caused by \u003cem\u003eN. dimidiatum\u003c/em\u003e were azoxystrobin\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;difenoconazole, floupyram\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;tebuconazole, and tebuconazole, both post-inoculation (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e) and pre-inoculation (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e). These fungicides, identified as the most effective in inhibiting mycelial growth in in vitro studies, also maintained their effectiveness under field conditions. Previous studies have also reported that these fungicides, either alone or in combination, are effective in preventing infections caused by \u003cem\u003eN. dimidiatum\u003c/em\u003e (XiaoYong et al., 2018; Al Raish et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e). Cyprodinil\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;fludioxonil showed high effectiveness when applied pre-inoculation (55.8%) but was not effective when applied post-inoculation (11.3%). The combination of cyprodinil\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;fludioxonil has been reported to be highly effective in controlling trunk diseases in grapes, which cause similar damage to \u003cem\u003eN. dimidiatum\u003c/em\u003e. In these studies, immersing grapevine saplings in the cyprodinil\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;fludioxonil mixture before pathogen inoculation significantly reduced disease severity and positively affected growth parameters (Nascimento et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR24\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2007\u003c/span\u003e; Rego et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR34\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2009\u003c/span\u003e). In this respect, it can be concluded that the combination of cyprodinil\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;fludioxonil highlights the protective property of the fungicide. This observation aligns with the results of our study, demonstrating the effectiveness of these fungicides in controlling \u003cem\u003eN. dimidiatum\u003c/em\u003e affecting apricot trees. Unlike chemical fungicides, the commercial biopreparations we included in our field study, \u003cem\u003eB. subtilis\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eTrichoderma harzianum\u003c/em\u003e Rifai KRL-AG2, did not show significant effectiveness in preventing infections caused by \u003cem\u003eN. dimidiatum\u003c/em\u003e, both pre-inoculation and post-inoculation (see Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e and Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e). There have been some studies testing the effectiveness of BCAs against \u003cem\u003eN. dimidiatum\u003c/em\u003e or different pathogens (AbuQamar et al., 2017; Rusmarini et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR35\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e); however, these studies are generally of in vitro origin and do not evaluate their effectiveness in field conditions. Therefore, more research on the biological control of \u003cem\u003eN. dimidiatum\u003c/em\u003e under field conditions is needed for accurate conclusions.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn conclusion, the increasing prevalence of \u003cem\u003eN. dimidiatum\u003c/em\u003e requires the use of chemical control as a strategy to reduce its frequency and severity. Our study suggests that utilizing chemicals that have shown efficacy in both in vitro and field trials, taking advantage of their protective and curative properties, can be beneficial in the management of the disease and its subsequent control.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eACKNOWLEDGEMENTS\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis work is supported with the project number TAGEM/BSAD/B/20/A2/P4/1677 by General Directorate of Agricultural Research and Policy of Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eResearch involving human participants and/or animals\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis study does not include experiments with either human participants or animals.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eConflict of interest\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAbbott, W. S. (1925). A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. \u003cem\u003eJournal of Economic Entomology, 18\u003c/em\u003e(2), 265-267.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAbu Qamar, S., Moustafa, K., \u0026amp; Tran, L.-S. (2017). Mechanisms and strategies of plant defense against \u003cem\u003eBotrytis cinerea\u003c/em\u003e. \u003cem\u003eCritical Reviews in Biotechnology, 37\u003c/em\u003e, 262\u0026ndash;274. https://doi.org/10.1080/07388551.2016.1271767\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAl Raish, S. M., Saeed, E. E., Sham, A., Alblooshi, K., El-Tarabily, K. A., \u0026amp; AbuQamar, S. F. (2020). Molecular characterization and disease control of stem canker on Royal Poinciana (\u003cem\u003eDelonix regia\u003c/em\u003e) caused by \u003cem\u003eNeoscytalidium dimidiatum\u003c/em\u003e in the United Arab Emirates. \u003cem\u003eInternational Journal of Molecular Sciences, 21\u003c/em\u003e(3), 1033. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21031033\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAl-Bedak, O. A., Mohamed, R. A., \u0026amp; Seddek, N. H. (2018). First detection of \u003cem\u003eNeoscytalidium dimidiatum\u003c/em\u003e associated with canker disease in Egyptian Ficus trees. \u003cem\u003eForest Pathology, 48\u003c/em\u003e, e12411. https://doi.org/10.1111/efp.12411\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAlizadeh, M., Safaie, N., Shams-Bakhsh, M., \u0026amp; Mehrabadi, M. (2022). \u003cem\u003eNeoscytalidium novaehollandiae\u003c/em\u003e causes dieback on \u003cem\u003ePinus eldarica\u003c/em\u003e and its potential for infection of urban forest trees. \u003cem\u003eScientific Reports, 12\u003c/em\u003e, 9337. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-13414-8\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAl-Tememe, Z. A. M., Lahuf, A., Abdalmoohsin, R. G., \u0026amp; Al-Amirry, A. T. (2019). Occurrence, identification, pathogenicity and control of \u003cem\u003eNeoscytalidium dimidiatum\u003c/em\u003e fungus, the causal agent of sooty canker on \u003cem\u003eEucalyptus camaldulensis\u003c/em\u003e in Kerbala Province of Iraq. \u003cem\u003ePlant Archives, 19\u003c/em\u003e, 31\u0026ndash;38.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAlwahshi, K. J., Saeed, E. E., Sham, A., Alblooshi, A. A., Alblooshi, M. M., El-Tarabily, K. A., \u0026amp; AbuQamar, S. F. (2019). Molecular identification and disease management of date palm sudden decline syndrome in the United Arab Emirates. \u003cem\u003eInternational Journal of Molecular Sciences, 20\u003c/em\u003e, 923. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20040923\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBudzinsk, H., \u0026amp; Couderchet, M. (2018). Environmental and human health issues related to pesticides: From usage and environmental fate to impact. \u003cem\u003eEnvironmental Science and Pollution Research, 25\u003c/em\u003e, 14277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1738-3\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u0026Ccedil;ığşar, İ. (1998). Malatya ve Elazığ\u0026rsquo;da Kayısılarda G\u0026ouml;r\u0026uuml;len Fitopatolojik Sorunlar ve \u0026Ccedil;\u0026ouml;z\u0026uuml;m \u0026Ouml;nerileri. \u003cem\u003eDoğu Anadolu Tarım Kongresi Bildirileri\u003c/em\u003e, Erzurum, 114-120.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDelen, N., Yıldız, M., \u0026amp; Maraite, H. (1984). Benzimidazole and dithiocarbamate resistance of \u003cem\u003eB. cinerea\u003c/em\u003e on greenhouse crops in Turkey. \u003cem\u003eMed. Fac. Landbauw. Rijk. Gent.\u003c/em\u003e, 153-161 pp.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDervis, S., \u0026Ouml;zer, G., \u0026amp; T\u0026uuml;rk\u0026ouml;lmez, Ş. (2020). First report of \u003cem\u003eNeoscytalidium novaehollandiae\u003c/em\u003e causing stem blight on tomato in Turkey. \u003cem\u003eJournal of Plant Pathology, 102\u003c/em\u003e(4), 1339\u0026ndash;1340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42161-020-00627-x\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDervis, S., Turkolmez, S., Ciftci, O., Ulubas, S. C., \u0026amp; Dikilitas, M. (2019). First report of \u003cem\u003eNeoscytalidium dimidiatum\u003c/em\u003e causing canker, shoot blight, and root rot of pistachio in Turkey. \u003cem\u003ePlant Disease, 103\u003c/em\u003e(6), 1411. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-01-19-0053-PDN\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEskalen, A., Rooney-Latham, S., \u0026amp; Gubler, W. D. (2007). Protection of grapevine pruning wounds against \u003cem\u003eEsca\u003c/em\u003e and Young \u003cem\u003eEsca\u003c/em\u003e pathogens. \u003cem\u003ePhytopathology, 97\u003c/em\u003e, 33.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eFAO. (2021). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC (Date accessed: 06.10.2021).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHajlaoui, M. R., Nouri, M. T., Hamrouni, N., Trouillas, F. P., Ben Yahmed, N., Eddouzi, J., \u0026amp; Mnari-Hattab, M. (2018). First record of dieback and decline of plum caused by \u003cem\u003eNeoscytalidium dimidiatum\u003c/em\u003e in Tunisia. \u003cem\u003eNew Disease Reports, 38\u003c/em\u003e, 20. http://dx.doi.org/10.5197/j.2044-0588.2018.038.020\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKamil, F. H., Saeed, E. E., El-Tarabily, K. A., \u0026amp; AbuQamar, S. F. (2018). Biological control of mango dieback disease caused by \u003cem\u003eLasiodiplodia theobromae\u003c/em\u003e using streptomycete and non-streptomycete actinobacteria in the United Arab Emirates. \u003cem\u003eFrontiers in Microbiology, 9\u003c/em\u003e, 829. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.00829\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKotze, C., Van Niekerk, J., Mostert, L., Halleen, F., \u0026amp; Fourie, P. (2011). Evaluation of biocontrol agents for grapevine pruning wound protection against trunk pathogen infection. \u003cem\u003ePhytopathologia Mediterranea, 50\u003c/em\u003e, 247-263.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKuai, X., Barraco, C., \u0026amp; Despr\u0026eacute;s, C. (2017). Combining fungicides and prospective NPR1-based \u0026ldquo;just-in-time\u0026rdquo; immunomodulating chemistries for crop protection. \u003cem\u003eFrontiers in Plant Science, 8\u003c/em\u003e, 1715. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01715\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKural, İ., \u0026amp; Erdiller, G. (1995). Kayısıda \u003cem\u003eCytospora Kanseri (Leucostoma cincta (Fr) Hohn)\u003c/em\u003e\u0026rsquo;nin Malatya ve Elazığ koşullarında Gelişimi ve Bazı Kayısı \u0026Ccedil;eşitlerinin Duyarlılık D\u0026uuml;zeylerinin Belirlenmesi \u0026Uuml;zerinde \u0026Ccedil;alışmalar. \u003cem\u003eVII. T\u0026uuml;rkiye Fitopatoloji Kongresi, Adana, Bildirileri\u003c/em\u003e, 530-533.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKurt, Ş., Uysal, A., Soylu, E., Kara, M., \u0026amp; Soylu, S. (2019). First record of \u003cem\u003eNeoscytalidium novaehollandiae\u003c/em\u003e associated with pistachio dieback in the Southeastern Anatolia region of Turkey. \u003cem\u003eMycologia Iranica, 6\u003c/em\u003e(1), 55-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.22043/mi.2020.121015\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLin, C., Ni, H., Huang, C., \u0026amp; Yang, H. (2017). Pathogen characterization and chemical control of pitaya stem canker disease. \u003cem\u003eAustralasian Plant Disease Notes, 10\u003c/em\u003e, 1\u0026ndash;4.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMohd, M. H., Salleh, B., \u0026amp; Zakaria, L. (2013). Identification and molecular characterizations of \u003cem\u003eNeoscytalidium dimidiatum\u003c/em\u003e causing stem canker of red-fleshed dragon fruit (\u003cem\u003eHylocereus polyrhizus\u003c/em\u003e) in Malaysia. \u003cem\u003eJournal of Phytopathology, 161\u003c/em\u003e, 841\u0026ndash;849. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jph.12146\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMutawila, C., Fourie, P. H., Halleen, F., \u0026amp; Mostert, L. (2011). Histo-pathology study of the growth of \u003cem\u003eTrichoderma harzianum, Phaeomoniella chlamydospora\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eEutypa lata\u003c/em\u003e on grapevine pruning wounds. \u003cem\u003ePhytopathologia Mediterranea, 50\u003c/em\u003e, 46-60.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eNascimento, T., Rego, C., \u0026amp; Oliveira, H. (2007). Potential use of chitosan in the control of grapevine trunk diseases. \u003cem\u003ePhytopathologia Mediterranea, 46\u003c/em\u003e, 218\u0026ndash;224. https://doi.org/10.14601/Phytopathol_Mediterr-2156\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eNouri, M. T., Lawrence, D. P., Yaghmour, M. A., Michailides, T. J., \u0026amp; Trouillas, F. P. (2018). \u003cem\u003eNeoscytalidium dimidiatum\u003c/em\u003e causing canker, shoot blight and fruit rot of almond in California. \u003cem\u003ePlant Disease, 102\u003c/em\u003e, 1638\u0026ndash;1647. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-12-17-1967-RE\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eOksal, E., \u0026Ccedil;elik, Y., \u0026amp; \u0026Ouml;zer, G. (2020a). \u003cem\u003eNeoscytalidium dimidiatum\u003c/em\u003e causes canker and dieback on grapevine in Turkey. \u003cem\u003eAustralasian Plant Disease Notes, 14\u003c/em\u003e(1), 33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13314-019-0363-4\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eOksal, E., \u0026Ouml;zer, G. (2021). First report of shoot blight and branch canker of \u003cem\u003ePyrus communis\u003c/em\u003e by \u003cem\u003eNeoscytalidium novaehollandiae\u003c/em\u003e in Turkey. \u003cem\u003eJournal of Plant Pathology, 103\u003c/em\u003e(2), 673-674. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42161-021-00762-z\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eOksal, E., Yiğit, T., \u0026amp; \u0026Ouml;zer, G. (2020b). First report of \u003cem\u003eNeoscytalidium dimidiatum\u003c/em\u003e causing shoot blight, dieback and canker of apricot in Turkey. \u003cem\u003eJournal of Plant Pathology, 102\u003c/em\u003e, 579\u0026ndash;580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42161-019-00467-4\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u0026Ouml;ren, E., Koca, G., Gencer, R., \u0026amp; Bayraktar, H. (2020). First report of \u003cem\u003eNeoscytalidium novaehollandiae\u003c/em\u003e associated with stem canker and branch dieback of almond trees. \u003cem\u003eAustralasian Plant Disease Notes, 15\u003c/em\u003e, 17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13314-020-00386-9\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u0026Ouml;zg\u0026ouml;nen, H., \u0026amp; Erkılı\u0026ccedil;, A. (2001). Malatya-Elazığ y\u0026ouml;resinde kayısılarda g\u0026ouml;r\u0026uuml;len fungal hastalıkların ve yaygınlık oranlarının belirlenmesi. \u003cem\u003eT\u0026uuml;rkiye IX. Fitopatoloji Kongresi Bildiriler\u003c/em\u003e, s. 669-675.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePhillips, A. J. L., Alves, A., Abdollahzadeh, J., Slippers, B., Wingfield, M. J., Groenewald, J. Z., \u0026amp; Crous, P. W. (2013). The Botryosphaeriaceae: Genera and species known from culture. \u003cem\u003eStudies in Mycology, Volume 76\u003c/em\u003e, 51-167. https://doi.org/10.3114/sim0021.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRatanaprom, S., Nakkanong, K., Nualsri, C., Jiwanit, P., Rongsawat, T., \u0026amp; Woraathakorn, N. (2021). Overcoming encouragement of dragon fruit plant (\u003cem\u003eHylocereus undatus\u003c/em\u003e) against stem brown spot disease caused by \u003cem\u003eNeoscytalidium dimidiatum\u003c/em\u003e using \u003cem\u003eBacillus subtilis\u003c/em\u003e combined with \u003cem\u003ecodium bicarbonate\u003c/em\u003e. \u003cem\u003eJournal of Plant Pathology, 37\u003c/em\u003e, 205\u0026ndash;214. doi: 10.5423/PPJ.OA.01.2021.0007\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eReckhaus, P. (1987). \u003cem\u003eHendersonula\u003c/em\u003e dieback of mango in Niger. \u003cem\u003ePlant Disease, 71\u003c/em\u003e, 1045.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRego, C., Nascimento, T., Cabral, A., Silva, M. J., \u0026amp; Oliveira, H. (2009). Control of grapevine wood fungi in commercial nurseries. \u003cem\u003ePhytopathologia Mediterranea, 48\u003c/em\u003e, 128-135. https://doi.org/10.14601/Phytopathol_Mediterr-2881\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRusmarini, W., Shah, U. K. D., Abdullah, M. P., Mamat, S., \u0026amp; Hun, T. G. (2017). Identification of \u003cem\u003eTrichoderma harzianum\u003c/em\u003e T3.13 and its interaction with \u003cem\u003eNeoscytalidium dimidiatum\u003c/em\u003e U1, a pathogenic fungus isolated from dragon fruit (\u003cem\u003eHylocereus polyrhizus\u003c/em\u003e) in Malaysia. \u003cem\u003eInternational Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Research, 3\u003c/em\u003e, 3205\u0026ndash;3228.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSaeed, E. E., Sham, A., El-Tarabily, K. A., Abu Elsamen, F., Iratni, R., \u0026amp; AbuQamar, S. F. (2016). Chemical control of dieback disease on date palm caused by the fungal pathogen, \u003cem\u003eThielaviopsis punctulata\u003c/em\u003e, in United Arab Emirates. \u003cem\u003ePlant Disease, 100\u003c/em\u003e, 2370\u0026ndash;2376. https://doi.org/10.1094/pdis-05-16-0645-re\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eT\u0026uuml;rk\u0026ouml;lmez, Ş., Derviş, S., \u0026Ccedil;if\u0026ccedil;i, O., Ser\u0026ccedil;e, \u0026Ccedil;. U., \u0026amp; Dikilitas, M. (2019). New disease caused by \u003cem\u003eNeoscytalidium dimidiatum\u003c/em\u003e devastates tomatoes (\u003cem\u003eSolanum lycopersicum\u003c/em\u003e) in Turkey. \u003cem\u003eCrop Protection, 118\u003c/em\u003e, 21\u0026ndash;30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2018.12.004\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u0026Uacute;rbez-Torres, J. R., Haag, P., Bowen, P., \u0026amp; O\u0026rsquo;Gorman, D. T. (2014). Grapevine trunk diseases in British Columbia: Incidence and characterization of the fungal pathogens associated with black foot disease of grapevine. \u003cem\u003ePlant Disease, 98\u003c/em\u003e, 456-468. https://doi.org/10.1094/pdis-05-13-0524-re\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWang, F., Zhang, R., Yuan, Z., \u0026amp; Chen, P. (2021). Biological prevention and control of pitaya fruit canker disease using endophytic fungi isolated from papaya. \u003cem\u003eArchive Microbiology, 203\u003c/em\u003e, 4033\u0026ndash;4040. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-021-02378-4\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eXian, X., Lin, S., Zhu, G., Wei, X., Qin, W., \u0026amp; Zhong, Y. (2018). Indoor virulence and field effects of fungicides on pitaya canker. \u003cem\u003eJournal of Southern Agriculture, 49\u003c/em\u003e, 1338\u0026ndash;1345.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eYi, R. H., Lin, Q. L., Mo, J. J., Wu, F. F., \u0026amp; Chen, J. (2015). Fruit internal brown rot caused by \u003cem\u003eNeoscytalidium dimidiatum\u003c/em\u003e on pitahaya in Guangdong province, China. \u003cem\u003eAustralasian Plant Disease Notes, 10\u003c/em\u003e, 1\u0026ndash;4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13314-015-0166-1\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":false,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":true,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":true,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"european-journal-of-plant-pathology","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"ejpp","sideBox":"Learn more about [European Journal of Plant Pathology](http://link.springer.com/journal/10658)","snPcode":"10658","submissionUrl":"https://www.editorialmanager.com/ejpp/default2.aspx","title":"European Journal of Plant Pathology","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"em","reportingPortfolio":"Springer Hybrid","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":false},"keywords":"Apricot, biological control, disease control, fungicide, Neoscytalidium dimidiatum, stem canker","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4317360/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4317360/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003eNeoscytalidium dimidiatum\u003c/em\u003e (Penz.) Crous \u0026amp; Slippers has been causing significant damage to apricot trees in Turkey in recent years. This disease can lead to various problems in apricot trees, including dieback, the formation of cankers, necrosis in vascular tissues, gumming, and ultimately the death of the host. This study was conducted in 2021\u0026ndash;2022 in the region with the highest apricot production in the world, Malatya, T\u0026uuml;rkiye. This research aims to develop a control strategy against \u003cem\u003eN. dimidiatum\u003c/em\u003e, which poses a destructive threat to apricot trees. In the study, the effectiveness of 10 chemical and 2 biological fungicides was tested in vitro and under field conditions to manage \u003cem\u003eN. dimidiatum\u003c/em\u003e. While the effectiveness of chemical fungicides was assessed both in vitro and under field conditions, the effectiveness of biological fungicides was tested only under field conditions. Given the absence of a study conducted under field conditions for the controlling of \u003cem\u003eN. dimidiatum\u003c/em\u003e, this aspect of the research is groundbreaking.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn vitro experiments were performed in three replicates for each of the chemical fungicides. In the conducted in vitro experiments, most of the tested chemical fungicides, except for metalaxyl-m\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;acibenzolar-s-methyl (10.46%), effectively inhibited the mycelial growth of \u003cem\u003eN. dimidiatum\u003c/em\u003e. In terms of inhibiting the mycelial growth of \u003cem\u003eN. dimidiatum\u003c/em\u003e, the most effective fungicides were ranked as follows: tebuconazole (100%), cyprodinil\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;fludioxonil (99.43%), azoxystrobin\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;difenoconazole (99.40%), and floupyram\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;tebuconazole (99.26%). Chemical fungicides that exhibited high efficacy under in vitro conditions also proved to be effective in field trials. Among these fungicides, azoxystrobin\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;difenoconazole, floupyram\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;tebuconazole, and tebuconazole were identified as the most effective fungicides both before and after artificial inoculation. Cyprodinil\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;fludioxonil showed high efficacy when applied before inoculation but was not effective when applied after inoculation. In contrast to the chemical fungicides, the commercial \u003cem\u003eBacillus subtilis\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eTrichoderma harzianum\u003c/em\u003e Rifai KRL-AG2, which were exclusively examined in field studies, did not display significant effectiveness against \u003cem\u003eN. dimidiatum\u003c/em\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Evaluation of Some Chemical and Biological Fungicides for Controlling Stem Canker on Apricot Trees Caused by Neoscytalidium dimidiatum","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2024-05-10 10:19:15","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4317360/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0},{"type":"decision","content":"Major revisions","date":"2024-06-27T05:18:40+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"","date":"2024-05-06T13:45:21+00:00","index":0,"fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewersInvited","content":"","date":"2024-05-06T06:29:01+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvited","content":"European Journal of Plant Pathology","date":"2024-05-01T08:20:24+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorAssigned","content":"","date":"2024-04-29T14:09:03+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"submitted","content":"European Journal of Plant Pathology","date":"2024-04-26T09:07:51+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"european-journal-of-plant-pathology","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"ejpp","sideBox":"Learn more about [European Journal of Plant Pathology](http://link.springer.com/journal/10658)","snPcode":"10658","submissionUrl":"https://www.editorialmanager.com/ejpp/default2.aspx","title":"European Journal of Plant Pathology","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"em","reportingPortfolio":"Springer Hybrid","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":false}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"1f8b9c84-294d-4c06-a791-75e096ba1fa9","owner":[],"postedDate":"May 10th, 2024","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"published-in-journal","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2024-12-30T15:59:12+00:00","versionOfRecord":{"articleIdentity":"rs-4317360","link":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-024-02986-y","journal":{"identity":"european-journal-of-plant-pathology","isVorOnly":false,"title":"European Journal of Plant Pathology"},"publishedOn":"2024-12-27 15:57:05","publishedOnDateReadable":"December 27th, 2024"},"versionCreatedAt":"2024-05-10 10:19:15","video":"","vorDoi":"10.1007/s10658-024-02986-y","vorDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-024-02986-y","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-4317360","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-4317360","identity":"rs-4317360","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"qtupq5eGEP_6zYnWcrvyt","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}