Massively parallel functional screen identifies thousands of regulatory differences in human versus chimpanzee postcranial skeletal development

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,750 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Every element of the human skeleton exhibits some differences in comparison to our closest living relatives, chimpanzees. Many of these skeletal modifications underpin key events in human evolution, enabling our species to walk upright, manipulate tools with precision, and support enlarged brains. Identifying the genomic changes that underlie these features remains an outstanding challenge due to the substantial number of differences between the human and chimpanzee genomes. To identify human-chimp sequence differences that modulate gene expression in the developing postcranial skeleton, we used a massively parallel reporter assay (MPRA) to screen the human and chimp versions of 70,000 regulatory elements present in the prenatal skeletal template for differential activity. After testing our library in two cartilage and one bone marrow-derived lymphoblast line, we identify 30,736 regions (45.2%) with activity in our assay. Of the active regions, we find that 11,542 (37.6%; or 17% of the entire pool) regions exhibited differential activity between the human and chimpanzee. We find that human ancestor quickly evolved regions (HAQERs) were predictive of differential activity while Human Accelerated Regions were not and both sets failed to predict the magnitude of effect, unlike the total number of base pair differences between species, which was weakly correlated with effect size. These findings reveal that human skeletal evolution involves widespread regulatory changes distributed across thousands of elements rather than concentrated effects at a few key loci, supporting a polygenic model for the evolution of complex morphological traits. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00