Sex-Specific Control and Incomplete Matings: Sperm Removal Behaviour in a Bush Cricket Species

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,738 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 2 sections · click to expand

Abstract

In sexually promiscuous species, sperm removal behaviour (SRB) is a male strategy to increase reproductive success by displacing rival sperm prior to insemination. This behaviour may, however, impose costs on both sexes, generating sexual conflict. We investigated the sex-specific control over SRB in Metaplastes ornatus, a bush cricket species exhibiting this behaviour. We used a double mating design experiment and recorded morphometric measurements from a wild population in Greece. We found that lighter females likely had more successful matings, while body mass did not affect SRB duration in either sex. Repeatability analyses suggested a potential, albeit weak, female influence on SRB duration. We also identified high rates of unsuccessful matings after the initiation of SRB, where behaviour was initiated but terminated before spermatophore transfer. These events were associated with shorter SRB durations and fewer behavioural breaks. A pilot analysis revealed that males with narrower subgenital plates may have greater mating success. Our results suggest that female traits and behaviour could play a critical role in shaping the outcome of SRB, indicating potential female counter-adaptations in this sexually antagonistic system. DOI https://doi.org/10.32942/X2234S Subjects Life Sciences

Keywords

Metaplastes ornatus, sperm removal behaviour, promiscuity, precopulatory sexual selection, sexual conflict Dates Published: 2025-04-30 07:40 Last Updated: 2025-04-30 07:40 License CC BY Attribution 4.0 International Additional Metadata Data and Code Availability Statement: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15296575 Language: English

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00