Sleep neural code perpetuates the evolving negativity bias under stress

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,826 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Negativity bias is the distorted cognitive processing of how self-experiences are negatively perceived through rumination and overgeneralization. Despite proposed theories of higher-order emotional representation and the involvement of default mode networks, the biological mechanisms underlying how negative emotional bias is persistently generated remain unknown. Here, we show that under negative emotional state, sleep orchestrates neural dynamics to shape persistent negativity bias. A negative emotional state, induced by repeated social defeat stress (SoD), generates negativity bias in both memory–recall and novel experiences such as fear conditioning. Longitudinal Ca2+ imaging of the hippocampus across days revealed that in emotional states, negative schema-like representations that encode the semantic aspect of negativity across experiences are generated. These negative schema-like representations are continuously processed along with dynamic co-reactivations of distinct emotional experiences during sleep. Closed-loop optogenetic silencing of stress experience-tagged cellular ensembles during sleep, but not during awake, prevents negativity bias in future memory–recall and novel experiences. Finally, sleep-active, but not sleep-nonactive, SoD cells predict and decode emotional behaviours during learned and novel situations. Together, these results reveal the biological emergence of semantic-like representations of emotional experiences and sleep causally coordinate neuronal dynamics to persistently shape negativity in future conscious states. These findings offer a new perspective on how higher-order emotional processing during sleep may determine our emotional interpretation of past and future experiences. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00