Full text
9,656 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
Zusammenfassung
Auch wenn der Laparoskopie (LSK) im Rahmen der Diagnostik der ungewollten Kinderlosigkeit der Status eines Goldstandards zuerkannt wird, haben assistierte Reproduktionstechniken einen Paradigmenwechsel eingeleitet, viele Schritte im Fertilisationsprozess werden technisch assistiert. Es stellt sich die Frage, welche Evidenzen für den Einsatz der LSK bei verschiedenen Sterilitätsursachen existieren. Es ist die LSK, die den Anteil sog. ungeklärter Sterilitäten niedrig hält und die unmittelbar zur operativen Intervention erweitert werden kann. Bei den Tubenpathologien führen laparoskopische Salpingoovariolysen bei erhaltener Tubenpassage zu Ergebnissen, die den assistierten Reproduktionstechniken (ART) überlegen sind. Unter den Myomtypen FIGO (Fédération Internationale de Gynécologie et dʼObstrétique) 0, 1, 2, 2–5, 3, 4, 5, 6 entfalten die dem Cavum uteri anliegenden Myome den höchsten fertilitätsblockierenden Effekt, welcher auch für die Myomtypen 3, 4, 5, 6 angenommen werden muss, obwohl das Cavum nicht distorsiert wird. Die Myomtypen 0, 1, 2 sind eine Domäne hysteroskopischer Operationstechniken, alle anderen Myome können erfolgreich laparoskopisch operiert werden, solange ein ausreichend hohes Planum zwischen Optiktrokar und Objekt für die Insertion der Arbeitstrokare existiert. Bei den verschiedenen Endometriosemanifestationen besteht eine Priorität zur laparoskopischen Intervention bei therapieresistenten Schmerzen. Insbesondere stenosierende Prozesse im Bereich des harnableitenden Systems und des Darms indizieren die LSK. Bei Hydrosalpingen ist ein Nutzen durch die laparoskopische Salpingektomie vor In-vitro-Fertilisation (IVF) gesichert. Für die Endometriose existieren Subgruppen, die von dem Prinzip „surgery first“ vor ART profitieren.
Abstract
Even if laparoscopy is awarded the status of a gold standard in the diagnosis of involuntary childlessness, assisted reproductive techniques (ART) have initiated a paradigm shift and many steps in the fertilization process are technically assisted. The question arises as to what evidence exists for the use of laparoscopy for the various causes of sterility. It is laparoscopy that keeps the proportion of so-called unexplained sterility low and that can be immediately expanded to include a surgical intervention. In the case of tubal pathology, laparoscopic salpingo-ovariolysis with preserved tubal patency leads to results that are superior to ART. Among the Fédération internationale de gynécologie et dʼobstétrique (FIGO) myoma types 0, 1, 2, 2–5, 3, 4, 5, 6, the myomas adjacent to the cavity of the uterus develop the highest fertility-blocking effects, which must also be assumed for the myoma types 3, 4, 5, 6, although the cavity is not distorted. Myoma types 0, 1, 2 are a domain of hysteroscopic surgical techniques, all others myomas can successfully be operated on laparoscopically as long as there is a sufficiently high plane between the optical trocar and the object for the insertion of the working trocars. For the various phenotypes of endometriosis, priority is given to laparoscopic intervention in cases of treatment-resistant pain. In particular, stenosing processes in the urinary tract and the intestines are indications for laparoscopy. In cases of hydrosalpinx, a benefit is ensured by laparoscopic salpingectomy before in vitro fertilization (IVF). There are subgroups of endometriosis that benefit from the principle of surgery first before ART.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literatur
Cosma S, Benedetto C (2020) Classification algorithm of patients with endometriosis: proposal for tailored management. Adv Clin Exp Med 29:615–622
Dolmans MM, Isaacson K, Zhang W et al (2021) Intramural myomas more than 3–4 centimeters should be surgically removed before in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 116:945–958
Donnez J (2021) Intramural myomas–related infertility: should the myomas be removed??? Not easy to reach a consensus. Fertil Steril 116:943–944
Duffy JMN, Arambage K, Correa FJS (2014) Laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011031
Dunselman GAJ, Vermeulen N, Becker C et al (2014) ESHRE guideline: management of women with endometriosis. Hum Reprod 29:400–412
Fara F, Gremeau A‑S, Pouly JL et al (2019) Laparoscopic myomectomy in 10 steps. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1553465019300378 (Video article). Zugegriffen: 9. Aug. 2021
Gomel V (2019) From laparotomy to laparoscopy to in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 112:183–196
Gordts S (2021) Endoscopic management of the unexplained infertility, what does it add? Hum Reprod. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deab126.004
Grimbizis GF, Di Spiezio Sardo A, Saravelos SH et al (2016) The Thessaloniki ESHRE/ESGE consensus on diagnosis of female genital anomalies. Hum Reprod 31:2–7
Johnson N, van Voorst S, Sowter MC et al (2011) Tubal surgery before IVF. Hum Reprod Update 17:5
Johnson NP, Hummelshoj L, Adamson GD et al (2017) World endometriosis society consensus on the classification of endometriosis. Hum Reprod 32:315–324
Jones G, Jenkinson C, Kennedy S (2004) Evaluating the responsiveness of the endometriosis health profile questionnaire: the EHP-30. Qual Life Res 13:705–713
Lessey BA, Gordts S, Donnez O et al (2018) Ovarian endometriosis and infertility: in vitro fertilization (IVF) or surgery as the first approach? Fertil Steril 110:1218–1226
Maignien C, Santulli P, Gayet V et al (2017) Prognostic factors for assisted reproductive technology in women with endometriosis-related infertility. Am J Obstet Gynecol 216:280.e1–280.e9
Melo P, Georgiou EX, Johnson N et al (2020) Surgical treatment for tubal disease in women due to undergo in vitro fertilization. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002125.pub4
Munro MG, Critchley HOD, Broder MS et al (2011) FIGO classification system (PALM-COEIN) for causes of abnormal uterine bleeding in nongravid women of reproductive age. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 113:3–13
Nezhat C, Nezhat F, Nezhat C (2012) Endometriosis: ancient disease, ancient treatments. Fertil Steril 98:S1–62
NICE. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2013) Fertility problems: assessment and treatment. Clinical guideline. www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg156. Zugegriffen: 3. Sept. 2021
NICE. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2017) Endometriosis: diagnosis and management. NICE guideline. www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng73. Zugegriffen: 3. Sept. 2021
Paracchini S, Rhazi Y, Chauvet P et al (2020) Video article Laparoscopic ovarian dermoid cystectomy in 10 steps. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 27:19–20
Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (2015) Diagnostic evaluation of the infertile female: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 103:e44–50
Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (2017) Removal of myomas in asymptomatic patients to improve fertility and/or reduce miscarriage rate: a guideline. Fertil Steril 108:416–425
Pritts EA, Parker WH, Olive DL (2009) Fibroids and infertility: a systematic review of the evidence. Fertil Steril 91:1215–1223
Somigliana E, Vigano P, Benaglia L et al (2017) Management of endometriosis in the infertile patient. Semin Reprod Med 35:31–37
Taylor HS (2018) Fibroids: when should they be removed to improve in vitro fertilization success? Fertil Steril 109:784–785
The Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (2015) Role of tubal surgery in the era of assisted reproductive technology: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 103:e37–45
Toth B, Baston-Büst DM, Behre HM et al (2019) Diagnosis and therapy before assisted reproductive treatments. Guideline of the DGGG, OEGGG and SGGG (S2k level, AWMF register number 015-085, february 2019)—part 1, basic assessment of the woman. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 79:1278–1292
Saridogan E, Becker CM, Feki A et al (2017) Recommendations for the surgical treatment of endometriosis. Part 1: ovarian endometrioma. Hum Reprod Open. https://doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hox016
Keckstein J, Becker CM, Canis M et al (2020) Recommendations for the surgical treatment of endometriosis. Part 2: deep endometriosis. Hum Reprod Open. https://doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoaa002
Yan L, Ding L, Li C et al (2014) Effect of fibroids not distorting the endometrial cavity on the outcome of in vitro fertilization treatment: a retrospective cohort study. Fertil Steril 101:716–721
Yan L, Yu Q, Zhang Y et al (2018) Effect of type 3 intramural fibroids on in vitro fertilization-intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes: a retrospective cohort study. Fertil Steril 109:817–822
Yan L, Zhu C, Liang G et al (2021) Salpingectomy versus neosalpingostomy in women with hydrosalpinx: a prospective cohort study with long-term follow-up. Hum Reprod. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deab126.068
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Interessenkonflikt
J. Kleinstein gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.
Für diesen Beitrag wurden von dem Autor keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren durchgeführt. Für die aufgeführten Studien gelten die jeweils dort angegebenen ethischen Richtlinien.
Additional information
Redaktion
Heribert Kentenich, Berlin
QR-Code scannen & Beitrag online lesen
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kleinstein, J. Laparoskopie bei Infertilität, Tubenpathologie, Endometriose und vor ART. Gynäkologische Endokrinologie 20, 15–20 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10304-021-00424-4
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10304-021-00424-4
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.