Enactment, Entanglement, #Endometriosis: Feminist Technoscience and the Instagrammatic Illness Narrative

In: Sustainable Development Goals Series · 2023 · pp. 65–81 · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-49807-7_5 · W4392054133
book-chapter OA: closed CC0
Full text JSON View on OpenAlex View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06+body, 2026-06-06

This paper examines #endometriosis Instagram narratives using enactment and entanglement theories to demonstrate how feminist technoscience can shape health humanities research on digital cultures.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-06 · read from full text

This chapter analyzes how “wounded storytelling” about endometriosis unfolds on Instagram by examining accounts and posts clustered around #endometriosis, drawing on feminist technoscience and two related concepts: enactment and entanglement. Using a preliminary corpus identified via a hashtag explorer dataset, Greene selects rich, representative accounts and requests permission from account owners to analyze and reproduce their posts, arguing that illness narratives on social media should be read on their own networked terms rather than reduced to earlier “remediation” frameworks from other mediascapes. A major caveat is that the chapter frames enactment/entanglement as theoretical tools rather than offering empirical clinical measures, and it relies on a preliminarily scoped hashtag-based corpus. Relevance to endometriosis: the paper is centrally focused on #endometriosis Instagram narratives and explicitly develops feminist technoscience approaches to interpreting those stories, rather than addressing adenomyosis.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 8,330 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 2 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Amanda Greene argues that a critical feminist framework is well-situated to grapple with how “wounded storytelling” about endometriosis unfolds on visual social media without artificially unraveling the complex hybridities that define these narratives. Leveraging two major theories, enactment and entanglement, to examine accounts and posts clustered around #endometriosis on Instagram, Greene suggests that feminist technoscience can generatively shape health humanities research on dynamic digital cultures. Feminist technoscience and research on illness narratives have had surprisingly little overlap. Yet, as digital contexts increasingly demand alternative theoretical frames that live at the interface of human bodies and new technologies, this scholarly nexus can be an invaluable resource for the twenty-first-century health humanities. This chapter offers tools to grapple with specific stories and practices of storying on their own networked, knotted terms as opposed to constraining readings to those that emerged out of earlier work and different mediascapes. Feminist technoscience can push researchers to move past the idea of remediation as a key to social media narrative scholarship and offers important insights into the experiences of those posting about endometriosis on social media. Access this chapter Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout Purchases are for personal use only Similar content being viewed by others Notes - 1. The six articles testify to the richness of combining feminist technoscience, digital culture, and illness narratives. I hope to build on this corpus of work in a way that foregrounds potentially transferable methods and that emphasizes the visual multimodalities of Instagram. - 2. For a recent popular example see Norman, Ask Me About My Uterus (2018). - 3. See Wilson Psychosomatic (2004) for more on hysteria and conversion disorder. - 4. Remediation, forwarded by Bolter and Grusin (2000), refers to the ways in which new media adapt and reproduce the form and content of older media. - 5. I identified these accounts by examining a large dataset of posts tagged with #endometriosis, collected with the University of Amsterdam’s Digital Methods Initiative’s open-source hashtag explorer. From this preliminary corpus, several particularly rich, representative, and active accounts were identified to serve as exemplary cases. The owners of these accounts were contacted via email or Instagram Direct Message in order to request permission to analyze and reproduce their posts in this scholarship. - 6. - 7. - 8. - 9. For more on this campaign and the experience of crip time through Instagram enactments, see my chapter “Chronic Constellations” in the Routledge Handbook of Media and Health (2023). - 10. “Spoon theory” was developed by Christine Miserandino in a 2013 blog post as a way of explaining the challenges of everyday life with chronic illness and has been widely adopted online.

Bibliography

Arduser, Lora. “Remediating Diagnosis: A Familiar Narrative Form or Emerging Digital Genre?.” Emerging Genres in New Media Environments, edited by Carolyn Miller and Ashley Kelley, Palgrave Macmillan, 2017, pp. 63–78. Ballweg, Mary Lou. “Impact of Endometriosis on Women’s Health: Comparative Historical Data Show that the Earlier the Onset, the More Severe the Disease.” Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, vol. 18, no. 2, 2004, pp. 201–218. Barad, Karen. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Duke UP, 2007. Bolter, Jay David and Richard Grusin. Remediation: Understanding New Media. MIT Press, 2000. Chun, Wendy Hui Kyong. Updating to Remain the Same: Habitual New Media. MIT Press, 2016. Culley, Lorraine, et al. “The Social and Psychological Impact of Endometriosis on Women’s Lives: A Critical Narrative Review.” Human Reproduction Update, vol. 19, no. 6, 2013, pp. 625–639. Denny, Elaine. “Women’s Experience of Endometriosis.” Journal of Advanced Nursing, vol. 46, no. 6, 2004, pp. 641–648. Fausto-Sterling, Anne. “The Bare Bones of Sex: Part 1—Sex and Gender.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, vol. 30, no. 2, 2005, pp. 1491–1527. Frank, Arthur W. The Wounded Storyteller: Body, Illness, and Ethics. 2nd ed., U of Chicago P, 2013. Gonzalez-Polledo, Elena. “Chronic Media Worlds: Social Media and the Problem of Pain Communication on Tumblr.” Social Media+ Society, vol. 2, no. 1, 2016, 2056305116628887. Gonzalez-Polledo, Elena, and Jen Tarr. “The Thing about Pain: The Remaking of Illness Narratives in Chronic Pain Expressions on Social Media.” New Media & Society, vol. 18, no. 8, 2016, pp. 1455–1472. Greene, Amanda K. “Chronic Constellations: Instagrammatic Aesthetics and Crip Time.” Routledge Handbook of Health and Media, edited by Lester D. Friedman & Therese Jones. Routledge, 2023. Han, Jofen, and Jo Wiley. “Digital Illness Narratives: A New Form of Health Communication.” Transactions of the International Conference on Health Information Technology Advancement, vol. 2, no. 1, 2013, pp. 47–52. http://scholarworks.wmich.edu/ichita_transactions/18. Haraway, Donna. The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People, and Significant Otherness. Vol. 1. Prickly Paradigm Press, 2003. Hummelshoj, Lone. “Adhesions,” 2018, Endometriosis.org, http://endometriosis.org/endometriosis/adhesions/ Jones, Cara E. “The Pain of Endo Existence: Toward a Feminist Disability Studies Reading of Endometriosis.” Hypatia, vol. 31, no. 3, 2016, pp. 554–571. Jurgenson, Nathan. “The IRL Fetish.” The New Inquiry. https://thenewinquiry.com/the-irlfetish/. June 28, 2012. Kleinman, Arthur. The Illness Narratives: Suffering, Healing, and the Human Condition. Basic Books, 1988. Markovic, Milica et al. “Endurance and Contest: Women’s Narratives of Endometriosis.” Health, vol. 12, no. 3, 2008, pp. 349–367. Maslen, Sarah, and Deborah Lupton. “Enacting Chronic Illness with and through Digital Media: A Feminist New Materialist Approach.” Information, Communication & Society, vol. 23, no. 11, 2020, pp. 1640–1654. Melander, Ida. “Multimodal Illness Narratives on Instagram: Sharing the Experience of Endometriosis.” DIEGESIS: Interdisciplinary E-Journal for Narrative Research, vol. 8, no. 2, 2019, pp. 68–90. https://www.diegesis.uni-wuppertal.de/index.php/diegesis/article/download/358/566 Miserandino, Christine. “The Spoon Theory.” www.butyoudontlooksick.com, 2013. Mol, Annemarie. The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice. Duke UP, 2002. Norman, Abby. Ask me about my uterus: A quest to make doctors believe in women’s pain. Bold Type Books, 2018. Porpora, Maria Grazia, et al. “Correlation between Endometriosis and Pelvic Pain.” The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists, vol. 6, no. 4, 1999, pp. 429–434. Ressler, Pamela Katz, et al. “Communicating the Experience of Chronic Pain and Illness through Blogging.” Journal of Medical Internet Research, vol. 14, no. 5, 2012, e2002. Rideout, Victoria, and Susannah Fox. Digital Health Practices, Social Media Use, and Mental Well-Being Among Teens and Young Adults in the U.S. Hopelab and Well Being Trust. assets.hopelab.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/a-national-survey-by-hopelab-and-well-being-trust-2018.pdf. 2018. Whelan, Emma. “Putting Pain to Paper: Endometriosis and the Documentation of Suffering.” Health, vol. 7, no. 4, 2003, pp. 463–482. Wilson, Elizabeth A. Psychosomatic: Feminism and the Neurological Body. Duke UP, 2004. Author information Authors and Affiliations Corresponding author Editor information Editors and Affiliations Rights and permissions Copyright information © 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG About this chapter Cite this chapter Greene, A.K. (2023). Enactment, Entanglement, #Endometriosis: Feminist Technoscience and the Instagrammatic Illness Narrative. In: Cressman, J., DeTora, L., Ludlow, J., Martin Peterson, N. (eds) Envisioning Embodiment in the Health Humanities. Sustainable Development Goals Series. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-49807-7_5 Download citation DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-49807-7_5 Published: Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham Print ISBN: 978-3-031-49806-0 Online ISBN: 978-3-031-49807-7 eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosis

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (27)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK