Exposure route drives SARS-CoV-2 infection patterns in non-human primates

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-24 · read from full text

This paper compiled and statistically analyzed the largest published database of non-human primate SARS-CoV-2 challenge experiments (107 studies, 721 animals, 22,183 observations) to quantify how exposure conditions and demographics shape within-host infection kinetics in respiratory and gastrointestinal tissues. It found that exposure route had stronger effects on infection kinetics than dose, age, sex, or species, with directly exposed tissues showing distinct spatiotemporal kinetics compared with non-exposed tissues. The authors estimated tissue-specific 50% infectious doses that varied widely depending on exposure route, and reported that dose effects were route- and tissue-specific, mainly affecting nasally inoculated animals. The paper’s key caveat is that it relies on published studies and their inherent variability, motivating the meta-analytic approach for disentangling confounding despite small sample sizes in individual experiments. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 1,741 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Public health policy and clinical interventions against infectious diseases rely on understanding the factors that govern the initiation and progression of infections inside hosts. Animal infection experiments are essential tools to study these complex, multi-scale processes under controlled conditions, and they have shown that the dose and route of exposure can influence within-host disease dynamics. However, observed differences are difficult to quantify and to disentangle from confounding factors because small sample sizes limit the statistical power and scientific scope of individual studies. Here, by compiling and analyzing the largest published database of non-human primate challenge experiments (107 studies; 721 animals; 22,183 observations), we quantify how exposure conditions and demographic factors shape within-host SARS-CoV-2 infection kinetics in the respiratory and gastrointestinal tracts. We show that exposure route has stronger effects on kinetics than dose, age, sex, or species, with directly exposed tissues exhibiting distinct spatiotemporal kinetics from non-exposed tissues. We estimate 50% infectious doses for different tissues and show that they vary greatly (from 107.4 pfu) depending on the exposure route. We find that dose effects on kinetics are also route-and tissue-specific, primarily influencing nasally-inoculated animals. Our results suggest that exposure route drives infection kinetics more strongly than dose in a critical model system for translational medicine, and they demonstrate the untapped potential for meta-analysis to extract additional insights from costly animal experiments. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00