Minimally verbal children with autism may see the global, but point local: A behavioral and eye-tracking study in visual perceptual processing

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-24 · read from full text

The study investigated whether minimally verbal children with autism (mvASD) access global visual structure, using Kanizsa illusory contours and circular colinear contours presented on a touchscreen while eye gaze and pointing were recorded, alongside a goal-directed drag-and-drop matching task requiring selection of the global solid shape. Compared with typically developing children, mvASD participants showed more attraction to local elements and less centralized spontaneous responding, though their pointing to circular colinear contours was often anchored to one half of the contour regardless of location, consistent with object-centered global selection. In the drag-and-drop task, about 90% of mvASD participants performed above chance in at least one condition and half reached ceiling, indicating accurate global matching despite differences in spontaneous behavior under ambiguity. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 2,654 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Recent work suggests that pointing based assessments may underestimate or mischaracterize perceptual and cognitive abilities in minimally verbal autism (mvASD). Extending this line of work, we address the classic global local question by testing whether mvASD children access global visual structure and whether it is consistently expressed in behavior using Kanizsa illusory contours (KIC) and circular colinear contours (CC). Typically developing (TD) and mvASD children viewed KIC and CC stimuli on a touchscreen while spontaneous eye gaze and pointing were recorded. Participants also completed a goal directed drag and drop matching task that required selecting the solid shape corresponding to the global KIC configuration. In spontaneous responses, mvASD children were more drawn to local elements (e.g., individual inducers, the CC frame, single Gabors) and showed less centralized responding than TD peers. Notably, CC pointing was often anchored to one half of the contour regardless of contour screen location, suggesting object centered global selection. Also, in the drag and drop task, approx. 90% of mvASD participants performed above chance in at least one condition and half performed at ceiling, demonstrating accurate global matching. These findings suggest that global structure is available in mvASD but may be underweighted in spontaneous response selection under ambiguity, consistent with the Affordance Competition Hypothesis and ambiguity resolution accounts. Lay Summary Autism research often asks whether autistic people can see the wood for the trees—integrate parts into a coherent whole. This is difficult to test in minimally verbal autism because many standard tasks rely on a single pointing response that may not reflect what a child actually perceives. In our study, children viewed visual illusions in which a clear shape seems to appear even though it is not actually drawn, for example, a triangle you see because several Pac Man shapes are arranged in just the right way, while we measured both where they looked and where they touched the screen. Minimally verbal autistic children were often more drawn to the smaller parts than typically developing peers, yet when a simple drag and drop game required an explicit choice of the overall shape, most selected the correct global shape. Together, the findings suggest that global structure can be available in mvASD, but its expression in spontaneous behavior may be more context dependent under uncertainty, highlighting the value of using more than one way to measure ability. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00