Cross-product quantity discounts without requiring a unified discount schedule

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 14,536 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Cross-product quantity discounts without requiring a unified discount schedule | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Cross-product quantity discounts without requiring a unified discount schedule Liu, Zuofeng This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2580042/v4 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 4 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Show more versions Abstract Existing cross-product quantity discounts require unifying quantity discount schedules. However, the range of products eligible for a unified schedule is quite limited, particularly those already configured with different schedules, which severely restricts the scope of cross-product quantity discounts. To address this issue, we propose a general algorithm for reasonably computing discounts across any product combination while allowing each product to retain its individual schedule. Our approach is grounded in the observation that, in any quantification process, defining equivalent units is a fundamental prerequisite. By further analyzing the existing quantity discount methods and relevant research, we reveal the three-step methodology that any cross-product quantity discount must follow: (1) defining equivalent units in the context of quantity discounts; (2) establishing rules that allow products to possess such equivalent units; and (3) computing discounts based on these equivalences. Consequently, we uncover a fundamental theoretical gap: the definition of equivalent units in the context of quantity discounts remains unclear, and the corresponding rules remain underdeveloped. By delving into the underlying logic of quantity discounts, we deduce the definition of equivalent units; following the principles of rationality, necessity, and feasibility, we establish the rules and construct the algorithm. While this algorithm has not yet been applied in practice, we validate it through a series of typical simulation test cases, and the results fully comply with theoretical expectations. It paves the way for innovative business models, such as new group-buying, advanced loyalty management, and novel fission marketing, as discussed in this paper. Operations Research Econometrics Computational Mathematics Pricing Cross-product quantity discounts Product combination General algorithm Equivalent units Full Text Additional Declarations The authors declare no competing interests. Supplementary Files OnlineAppendixA.pdf Appendix A: Proof of uniqueness of CS4 method 1 under algorithm constraints OnlineAppendixB.pdf Appendix B: Simulation test design and test results in curves CPQDTestCaseGenerator.xlsx Test case generator Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 4 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Show more versions Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-2580042","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":373043494,"identity":"2f4938d8-145c-4847-9dfd-a8f83dec19b1","order_by":0,"name":"Liu, Zuofeng","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Zuofeng","middleName":"","lastName":"Liu","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2023-02-13 02:54:44","currentVersionCode":4,"declarations":{"humanSubjects":false,"vertebrateSubjects":false,"conflictsOfInterestStatement":false,"humanSubjectEthicalGuidelines":false,"humanSubjectConsent":false,"humanSubjectClinicalTrial":false,"humanSubjectCaseReport":false,"vertebrateSubjectEthicalGuidelines":false},"doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-2580042/v4","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2580042/v4","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":86806940,"identity":"b3d2244d-201b-4fbe-9946-e7489dbb630d","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-07-15 18:32:03","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":510628,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Crossproductquantitydiscounts.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-2580042/v4_covered_61858869-78a6-4862-abd4-f0a99c35f81d.pdf"},{"id":86806205,"identity":"b2b389e3-5ace-4a09-adce-a0a7e14db57f","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-07-15 18:16:02","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":267138,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eAppendix A: Proof of uniqueness of CS4 method 1 under algorithm constraints\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"OnlineAppendixA.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-2580042/v4/6af27c8ca9c2b4fcb9e744a0.pdf"},{"id":86806207,"identity":"bfde6928-9ac2-4ca9-a4fd-285e8ddf0301","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-07-15 18:16:02","extension":"pdf","order_by":2,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":318924,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eAppendix B: Simulation test design and test results in curves\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"OnlineAppendixB.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-2580042/v4/63a42f26e0bf7d16152d6e55.pdf"},{"id":86806206,"identity":"98388f8d-6270-47fd-8aaa-4219020ba216","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-07-15 18:16:02","extension":"xlsx","order_by":3,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":1218850,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eTest case generator\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"CPQDTestCaseGenerator.xlsx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-2580042/v4/5560250b479265b25802617f.xlsx"}],"financialInterests":"The authors declare no competing interests.","formattedTitle":"\u003cp\u003eCross-product quantity discounts without requiring a unified discount schedule\u003c/p\u003e","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":true,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Pricing, Cross-product quantity discounts, Product combination, General algorithm, Equivalent units","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-2580042/v4","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2580042/v4","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eExisting cross-product quantity discounts require unifying quantity discount schedules. However, the range of products eligible for a unified schedule is quite limited, particularly those already configured with different schedules, which severely restricts the scope of cross-product quantity discounts. To address this issue, we propose a general algorithm for reasonably computing discounts across any product combination while allowing each product to retain its individual schedule. Our approach is grounded in the observation that, in any quantification process, defining equivalent units is a fundamental prerequisite. By further analyzing the existing quantity discount methods and relevant research, we reveal the three-step methodology that any cross-product quantity discount must follow: (1) defining equivalent units in the context of quantity discounts; (2) establishing rules that allow products to possess such equivalent units; and (3) computing discounts based on these equivalences. Consequently, we uncover a fundamental theoretical gap: the definition of equivalent units in the context of quantity discounts remains unclear, and the corresponding rules remain underdeveloped. By delving into the underlying logic of quantity discounts, we deduce the definition of equivalent units; following the principles of rationality, necessity, and feasibility, we establish the rules and construct the algorithm. While this algorithm has not yet been applied in practice, we validate it through a series of typical simulation test cases, and the results fully comply with theoretical expectations. It paves the way for innovative business models, such as new group-buying, advanced loyalty management, and novel fission marketing, as discussed in this paper.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Cross-product quantity discounts without requiring a unified discount schedule","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":4,"date":"2025-07-15 18:15:57","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-2580042/v4","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}},{"code":3,"date":"2024-11-01 15:00:57","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-2580042/v3","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":1}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}},{"code":2,"date":"2023-10-23 15:41:37","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-2580042/v2","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":1}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}},{"code":1,"date":"2023-02-14 17:42:24","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-2580042/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"3367812b-479a-4242-b94e-29c90f1c81fe","owner":[],"postedDate":"July 15th, 2025","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[{"id":51219753,"name":"Operations Research"},{"id":51219754,"name":"Econometrics"},{"id":51219755,"name":"Computational Mathematics"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2023-02-15T16:15:30+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2025-07-15 18:15:57","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v4","identity":"rs-2580042","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-2580042","identity":"rs-2580042","version":["v4"]},"buildId":"8U1c8b4HqxoKbykW_rLl7","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00