Auto-conservation ovocytaire : pourquoi le Comité consultatif national d’éthique (CCNE) se trompe

J. Belaisch-Allart
In: Gynécologie Obstétrique Fertilité & Sénologie · 2017 · vol. 45(11) , pp. 582–583 · doi:10.1016/j.gofs.2017.09.007 · PMID:29100821 · W2765230075
editorial OA: closed CC0
Limited metadata. Only one source feed has indexed this record so far — no abstract, full text, or open-access copy is available through Endo Lab. The publisher's page (linked below) is the canonical location for the actual content. If you have institutional access, use "Find at my library".
View at publisher → View on OpenAlex View on PubMed
⚙ AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-10 ⓘ

This paper analyzes the French National Consultative Ethics Committee's (CCNE) position on oocyte cryopreservation and argues against their reasoning.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

References (5)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK