Clinical Evaluation of MRI,Ultrasonography and Estimation of Serum CA125 Levels in the Diagnosis of Uterine Adenomyosis
article
OA: closed
CC0
AI-generated summary
This study found MRI demonstrated higher sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy than ultrasonography or serum CA125 levels in diagnosing uterine adenomyosis.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Objectives To investigate the magnetic resonance imaging(MRI),ultrasonography(US)and estimation of serum CA125 levels in the diagnosis of adenomyosis(ADM).MethodsMRI, US and estimation of serum CA125 levels were carried out in thirty eight patients confirmed pathologically as ADM and thirty two patients with uterine myoma after operation. ResultsThe sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of MRI were 94.74%,100% and 97.14%, respectively; whereas those of US were 76.31%,85.29% and 81.43% as well as those of serum CA125 level estimation were 76.32%,87.88% and 81.43 % ,respectively.ConclusionPreoperative MRI,US and estimation of serum CA125 levels are helpful to the diagnosis of ADM. But the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of MRI are higher than those of US and estimation of serum CA125 levels. Therefore, US and estimation of serum CA125 levels are preferred according to clinical manifestations; if differential diagnosis between ADM and uterine myoma cannot be made, MRI is the most accurate choice of imaging technique for decisive detection .
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK