Reorientation of activities and self-environment integration (ROASEI)-activities further explained, and theory of activities compared with theories of needs
preprint
OA: closed
Abstract
Needs and activities are intimately related, as activities are means to fulfill the needs. Thus, activities are proximal and needs are distal. In my knowledge, this is the first attempt that compares need with activities. In this attempt, important similarities and differences between needs and activities emerge. The classifications of needs and activities have superficial resemblance. Both have been grouped in three identical looking categories. However, growth, relatedness, and existence needs are not the same as growth related, adjustment related, and restoration related activities. We need to have greater focus on activities, and at the same time we need to reduce focus on needs.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00