Associations on land and at sea? A pilot study on the utility of proximity loggers to assess inter-individual relationships in colonial seabirds

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 2,886 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 2 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Accurate and extensive data collection is essential for understanding animal sociality, but collecting associations between individuals remains challenging. Animals often associate and interact outside of the range of an observer, especially in environments such as underwater or underground. However, the development of proximity loggers using Bluetooth and radio frequency to detect associations allows scientists to access behavioural information that would otherwise be impossible to collect. Here we examined the use of a logger with a proximity feature to capture associations between Atlantic puffin individuals and assessed how it could complement observations social network studies. To understand the capabilities of the logger, we tested the effect of distance on signal strength and proportion of associations detected, as well as the proportion of contacts recorded by each logger in a dyad, in lab-based and field environments. Thereafter, we tested the loggers on live Atlantic puffins and compared their performance against visual observations. As expected, signal strength decreased with distance, and lab-based values were more consistent than in the field. The proportion of contacts successfully processed decreased with distance, but our experiment in the field was more reliable, probably because we used a lower logger density, limiting opportunities for interference among units. More importantly, the loggers identified more putative associations than detected by observations, including many when and where individuals were not under observation. We also demonstrate that Atlantic puffins that associate frequently on land also associate frequently at sea. Our results bring new insight into the understanding of Atlantic puffin social behaviours, particularly at times and in locations challenging to monitor. DOI https://doi.org/10.32942/X2W648 Subjects Marine Biology, Ornithology

Keywords

Associations, Atlantic puffin, Dyad, Focal sampling, social behaviour, social network, Visual observation Dates Published: 2025-08-15 15:46 Last Updated: 2026-02-27 13:47 Older Versions License CC-By Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Additional Metadata Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare that they received a rebate from TechnoSmart for the proximity loggers to conduct this pilot study. TechnoSmart did not see a draft of the manuscript prior to submission, nor did they participate in the study or in the writing of the manuscript. The authors did not receive any compensation for using the proximity loggers. Data and Code Availability Statement: Data, including analysis, are available in an open-access public repository, accessible via https://osf.io/xy4az/?view_only=538a1e14c263405f8742b747e44cddc3. Language: English

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00