Results
Xiphophorus lacks vascularized compact myocardium in
the ventricle
To establish baseline anatomic al differences that might
influence regenerative capacity, we compared heart
morphology between adult zebrafish and platyfish. In
teleosts, the heart consists of a single atrium and ventricle,
which pumps blood to an elastic outflow chamber, the
bulbus arteriosus. Longitudinal sections were stained with
AFOG, labeling the bulbus arteriosus and valves with the
collagen-binding blue dye, while the ventricle and atrium
appear in beige ( Figure 1B ). The platyfish ventricle was
longer than that in zebrafish, with a more pyramidal
morphology and pointed ap ex. Swordtails displayed
identical architecture (data not shown), indicating
consistent ventricular differences between zebrafish and
Xiphophorus species.
To assess molecular components, sections were labeled with
three markers: phalloidin to visualize the F-actin-rich
contractile tissue, anti-Fibronectin for connective tissue, and
the N2.261 (embCMHC) antibody against a specific isoform
of myosin ( Figure 1C-H ). In zebrafish, N2.261 has
previously been identified as a marker of immature
cardiomyocytes (CMs) in larvae and in regenerating
myocardium
52,53. In the adult intact heart, only individual
CMs were labeled near the outflow tract (Figure 1C, E;
suppl. Figure S1A-C ). In contrast, platyfish displayed
N2.261 immunoreactivity throughout the entire atrium
(Figure 1F, H; suppl. Figure S1D-F ). Platyfish embryos
3
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted September 25, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.23.678041doi: bioRxiv preprint
The livebearers platyfish and swordtails partially regenerate their hearts with persistent scarring
Hisler, V., Rees, L. et al. 2025 (preprint)
4
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted September 25, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.23.678041doi: bioRxiv preprint
The livebearers platyfish and swordtails partially regenerate their hearts with persistent scarring
Hisler, V., Rees, L. et al. 2025 (preprint)
reproduced this pattern, confirming its developmental
origin (suppl. Figure S1H, I). Thus, the N2.261 recognizes
different myosin types in zebrafish versus platyfish,
revealing substantial evolutionary divergence in sarcomere
proteins between these phylogenetic lineages.
Most critically, a fundamental structural difference was
observed in the outer ventricular layer: zebrafish possessed
vascularized compact myocardium, as previously shown
54,
whereas platyfish completely lacked this regeneration-
associated tissue layer (Figure 1D, G; suppl. Figure S1G).
To examine vascularization, whole hearts were stained for
alkaline phosphatase activity
37. The zebrafish ventricle was
extensively covered with a vascular network, whereas
platyfish lacked any comparable vascular pattern (Figure
1I-L). Podocalyxin-2 (Podxl2) immunostaining, which
detects endothelial cell apical surfaces
55, confirmed the
absence of ventricular vascularization in platyfish compared
to zebrafish ( suppl. Figure S1J-M ). Together, these
findings demonstrate that platyfish and zebrafish hearts
differ fundamentally at both morphological and molecular
levels, with Xiphophorus lacking key anatomical features
associated with regenerative capacity.
Cryoinjured ventricles of Xiphophorus regenerate with de-
formation and partial scarring
Having established these fundamental anatomical
differences, we next investigated how they influence cardiac
repair responses. Cryoinjury creates reproducible damage
through controlled freezing and thawing using a precooled
probe
56 (Figure 2A). Examination of whole platyfish hearts
at 7 days post-cryoinjury (7 dpci) revealed profound
Phalloidin-negative tissue protruding from the ventricular
wall, indicating extensive myocardial damage ( Figure 2B).
To evaluate regenerative dynamics, transversal sections of
cryoinjured hearts were analyzed using AFOG staining
across multiple time points. In zebrafish, transient
collagenous tissue appeared between 7 and 14 dpci, detected
by Aniline blue staining, as previously demonstrated
25,26,57
(Figure 2C). In Xiphophorus species, however, the damaged
area contained Fuchsin red-stained protein deposits at these
time points, with minimal collagen present. This pattern
suggests significantly delayed wound clearance in
Xiphophorus compared to zebrafish.
Strikingly, Xiphophorus wounds displayed marked
bulging beyond the presumptive ventricular margin at 7 and
14 dpci ( Figure 2B, C). This distinctive bulging phenotype
closely resembled pseudoaneurysm formation, a
pathological ventricular deformation that occurs after
myocardial infarction in humans when the ventricular wall
cannot maintain structural integrity
58,59. Given that this
abnormality was absent in zebrafish and other non-
regenerative species (medaka and cavefish)
35-37, we
concluded that collagen-deficient cryoinjured hearts are
uniquely prone to deformation in Xiphophorus, revealing
novel variations in teleost healing strategies.
In contrast to zebrafish, Xiphophorus species
showed collagen deposition only beginning at 30 dpci,
representing a significant delay in accessory fibrotic tissue
formation. This collagenous pattern persisted at 60 and 90
dpci, demonstrating failure in matrix resorption ( Figure
2C). The deposited collagen formed a distinctive belt-like
structure, markedly differe nt from the fine network
observed in zebrafish hearts ( Figure 2C; suppl. Figure
S2B). Critically, the wound margin was sealed with a dense
collagenous layer rather than the "myocardial bridge"
structure that spans wounded myocardium in zebrafish
60,61
(Figure 2C). We concluded that Xiphophorus species heal
cardiac wounds through persistent scarring rather than
regenerative repair.
To quantify deformation frequency, we categorized
phenotypes into three groups: little to no wound, typical
non-protruding wound, and protruding swollen wound
(Figure 3A, see Methods). At 7 dpci, approximately 45% and
75% of platyfish and swordtail hearts, respectively, displayed
pseudoaneurysm-like phenotypes. At 14 dpci, this
proportion decreased by nearly half. At 30, 60, and 90 dpci,
wound swelling was rarely observed; however, most hearts
displayed persistent fibrosis, confirming impaired
regeneration.
To quantify healing outcomes, platyfish hearts were
stained with Phalloidin and anti-Fibronectin, and tissue
volumes were calculated by measuring stained areas across
all heart sections (Figure 3B) . Total ventricle volume
remained approximately 1 mm³ at all time points, indicating
consistent heart sizes across experimental groups ( Figure
Figure 2. Cryoinjured ventricles in Xiphophorus fish display transient wound bulging and permanent scarring.
(A) Schematics of heart cryoinjury in platyfish. (B) Hearts from uninjured fish and at 7 days post-cryoinjury (dpci) stained with Phalloidin (green). The
damaged area of the heart is revealed by a weak fluorescence signal in the absence of contractile cells. Arrowheads indicate th e border between
the intact myocardium and the wound. ba: bulbus arteriosus, at: atrium, v: ventricle. (C) AFOG staining of transversal ventricle sections of zebrafish,
platyfish and swordtail, collected at different time points after cryoinjury. Intact myocardium (orange); fibrin and other protein deposits (red); collagen
(blue). The arrowheads indicate the edge of the wound; double-ended arrows depict the myocardial (myo) bridge; the dashed line encircles the
wound tissue that has expanded beyond the normal circumference of the heart (i.e. a pseudoaneurysm).
5
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted September 25, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.23.678041doi: bioRxiv preprint
The livebearers platyfish and swordtails partially regenerate their hearts with persistent scarring
Hisler, V., Rees, L. et al. 2025 (preprint)
Figure 3. Partial restoration of the heart in platyfish and swordtail after cryoinjury.
(A) Classification of injury phenotypes based on AFOG staining, representatively shown in Figure 2. The bar plots display the perc entage of each
category at different time points after injury in platyfish and swordtail. Numbers at the bottom of each bar correspond to biol ogical replicates (fish).
Pearson's chi-squared test with Holm's post hoc correction: ns, not significant; *, p < 0.05. (B) Fluorescence staining of transversal sections of
platyfish hearts. Fibronectin-positiv e wound (red) contrasts with intact myocardium labeled by F-actin (green). Sham ventricles at 30 days post-
thoracotomy serve as control. (C-D) Quantification of regeneration based on wound size and fibronectin deposition, as represented in (B). Kruskal-
Wallis test followed by Dunn's test with Holm’s post-hoc corr ection. Adjusted p-value: * < 0.05, ** < 0.01, *** < 0.001, **** < 0.0001. For C and D, n:
Sham: 24; 7 dpci: 24; 14 dpci: 22; 30 dpci: 32; 60 dpci: 13; 90 dpci: 12. For E, n: Sham: 24; 7 dpci: 15; 14 dpci: 20; 30 dpci: 17.
6
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted September 25, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.23.678041doi: bioRxiv preprint
The livebearers platyfish and swordtails partially regenerate their hearts with persistent scarring
Hisler, V., Rees, L. et al. 2025 (preprint)
3C). The slight increase at 7 and 14 dpci likely reflected
injured area bulging. Wound volume, measured as the
Phalloidin-negative ventricular portion, comprised 15% (SD
±10%) of total ventricle at 7 dpci, decreasing to 10% (±10%)
at 14 dpci, 5% (±6%) at 30 dpci, and 2% (±2%) at 60-90 dpci
(Figure 3D). Swordtails showed similar dynamics (suppl.
Figure S3). Fibronectin quantification revealed progressive
connective tissue decrease, paralleling wound volume
reduction ( Figure 3E ). Importantly, Phalloidin staining
confirmed absence of myocardial bridge formation,
supporting AFOG findings. These quantitative data
demonstrate that while Xiphophorus species achieve
significant wound size reduction over time, this occurs
through fibrotic sealing rather than true myocardial
regeneration, as evidenced by persistent collagenous
scarring and absence of regenerative myocardial bridge
formation.
Cryoinjured ventricles show transcriptomic differences be-
tween zebrafish and platyfish
To identify molecular differences underlying distinct
regenerative responses, we pe rformed bulk transcriptomic
analysis of ventricles at 7 dpci and uninjured controls. In
each species, we identified genes with differential transcript
abundance ( Figure 4A, B; suppl. Table S1, S4 ).
Interspecies comparison revealed that upon cryoinjury, 199
and 268 orthologous gene tran scripts were more abundant
in zebrafish than in platyfish, respectively (Figure 4C) .
Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) revealed that tissue
remodeling factors were enriched whereas metabolic
regulators were reduced in both species (Figure 4D; suppl.
Table 5) . This suggests a similar response to disrupted
homeostasis following heart injury
23,62. Interestingly, some
differences between species were observed in the immune
system, where signaling pathways of C-type lectin receptor,
cytokine and Toll-like recept or were enriched only in
zebrafish, but not in platyfish. Similarly, genes of GnRH,
MAPK and TGFß signaling pathways were increased only in
zebrafish, whereas mTOR signaling and ErbB signaling
factors were even decreased in platyfish.
To better understand these species-specific responses, we
examined individual gene families in detail. The
nomenclature of paralogous genes, which arose through the
Teleost Genome Duplication, involves arbitrarily assigned
"a" or "b" letters. In zebrafish and platyfish, we found
numerous cases where different paralogous genes were
predominantly expressed in the heart, as exemplified by
fibronectin (fn1a/b), periostin (postna/b), or midkine-a
(mdka/b) genes ( Figure 4E ). Here, the annotation of
paralogs was considered when interpreting interspecies
transcriptome comparisons. Analysis of specific signaling
pathways revealed notable differences between species. In
the chemokine cascade, transcripts of cxcl12a ligand were
enriched in the zebrafish heart at 7 dpci, while their
orthologues remained unchanged in platyfish ( Figure 4E).
Similarly, suppressors of cytokine signaling socs3a/b, and
the dual specificity protein phosphatase family dusp2
showed higher abundance in zebrafish cryoinjured hearts,
compared to their platyfish counterparts. Among
transcription factors involved in cell cycle regulation, cebpa
was significantly and substantially enriched exclusively in
zebrafish upon cryoinjury. These molecular factors may
represent candidates associated with different regenerative
responses in both species.
Based on our observation of de layed collagen deposition in
the wounded heart at 7 dpci in platyfish ( Figure 2C ), we
analyzed extracellular matrix-associated genes ( suppl.
Figure S4 ). No striking differences in collagens and
metalloproteinases expression were detected between
platyfish and zebrafish hearts. Thus, the delayed deposition
of fibrotic tissue was not due to reduced collagen expression,
but rather to post-transcriptional regulators. However, we
found little expression of tenascin C ( tnc) in platyfish,
compared to zebrafish. The reduced tenascin C expression in
platyfish hearts indicates fundamental species differences in
extracellular matrix composition that may contribute to
altered wound healing responses.
Delayed and persistent infiltration of leukocytes in the post-
injured myocardium of platyfish
GSEA revealed distinct enrichment of immune-related gene
sets, including Toll-like receptor, Neuregulin/ErbB, and
cytokine signaling pathways, which were differentially
expressed between zebrafish and platyfish (Figure 4D). As
these pathways have been previously associated with cardiac
regeneration
63-66, we analyzed the abundance of gene
transcripts specific to immune cell populations.
Macrophage-related transcripts differed most prominently,
with marked enrichment in zebrafish but not in platyfish
(Figure 5A; suppl. Figure S5A-D).
To visualize immune cell infiltration patterns, we
performed immunofluorescence analysis of platyfish
sections using antibodies against Myeloperoxidase (Mpx or
Mpo) for neutrophils and L-plastin for
7
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted September 25, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.23.678041doi: bioRxiv preprint
The livebearers platyfish and swordtails partially regenerate their hearts with persistent scarring
Hisler, V., Rees, L. et al. 2025 (preprint)
Figure 4. Comparison of bulk-RNA sequencing between zebrafish and platyfish reveals different tissue responses to cryoinjury.
(A-B) Volcano plots of transcriptomes in zebrafish (A) and platyfish (B) cryoinjured ventricles at 7 dpci, compared to uninjured control. The log2 fold
change (log2FC) values show the ratio of gene transcript abundance in cryoinjured versus uninjured conditions. An adjusted p-value (padj) threshold
of less than 0.05 was used to identify genes showing significant changes in transcript levels (decreased in blue and increased in orange). (C) Scatter
plot comparing the log 2FC of the two RNA-seq analyses. Green represents gene transcripts that are more abundant in platyfish than in zebrafish
upon cryoinjury, while purple represents the opposite situation. Highlighted genes are at least twice as abundant after cryoinjury in one species than
the other. (D) A comparison of the Gene Set Enrichment Analysis obtained from th e two species. Color intensity reflects the statistical signi ficance
of reduction (blue) or enrichment (orange) at 7 dpci, compared to uninjured control. Dot size corresponds to the magnitude of d ifference for each
gene set. Selected gene sets have been organized into broader functional categories. (E) Transcript abundance comparison of orthologous genes
between conditions (uninjured, dark color vs. cryoinjured, light color) and species (zebrafish, ZF, purple vs. platyfish, PF, g reen). Each point in the
bar plot corresponds to the DESeq2-based TP M-like values (so-called Normalized read c ounts, see Methods) of the gene in one rep licate. The
log2FC and -log10(padj) are those shown in (A) and (B). The orthologue genes are grouped into general categories.
8
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted September 25, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.23.678041doi: bioRxiv preprint
The livebearers platyfish and swordtails partially regenerate their hearts with persistent scarring
Hisler, V., Rees, L. et al. 2025 (preprint)
phagocytes/macrophages, respectively 67-69 ( suppl. Figure
S5E-G). In sham controls, both markers remained
consistently low at all time points (Figure 5B-E). At 7 dpci,
the number of Mpx-positive neutrophils was significantly
higher in cryoinjured ventricles compared to sham-operated
controls (Figure 5D) . In the intact myocardium, their
numbers increased slightly between 7 and 14 dpci, then
returned to near sham-operated levels. In contrast, within
the wound, neutrophil numbers doubled between 7 and 14
dpci and remained elevated at 30 dpci. A gradual increase
throughout the entire ventricle was also observed for L-
plastin-positive phagocytes (Figure 5E). Between 7 and 30
dpci, their numbers doubled in the intact myocardium and
tripled within the wound.
Comparison of the kinetics of these two cell
populations revealed distinct temporal patterns. In the intact
myocardium, neutrophil numbers rose rapidly but
transiently, whereas phagocytes increased more slowly and
continuously, remaining elevated even at 30 dpci (Figure
5F). Within the wound, neutrophil infiltration occurred
rapidly following cryoinjury, re aching a plateau at 14 dpci,
while L-plastin-positive cells increased markedly only at
later stages, at 14 and 30 dpci (Figure 5G). Critically, these
leukocytes persisted in the injured tissue at 30 days after
cryoinjury. This prolonged inflammatory response differs
dramatically from zebrafish, where leukocytes are nearly
absent after 14 dpci
62,70-72, indicating that platyfish exhibit
delayed resolution of the inflammatory response
Cardiomyocyte proliferation increases mainly in the first
phase of regeneration
Zebrafish cardiac regeneration relies on the
dedifferentiation and proliferation of CMs within the border
zone myocardium (also called peri-injury zone) at a distance
of 100 μm from the injury margin (Figure 6A)
52,53. To
examine CM-specific responses, we filtered our bulk
transcriptomic analysis for genes linked to cardiac cell
proliferation and dedifferentiation, based on scRNA-seq
analysis data from three different studies
73-75. Proliferation
markers such as chaf1a, rrm2, and stmn1a were enriched in
both species at 7 days post-cryoinjury (dpci) (Figure 6B).
However, analysis of CM dedifferentiation-related
transcripts, including kcnh6a, idb3a, and nppb, provided no
evidence for the ability of platyfish CMs to dedifferentiate
(Figure 6B) , suggesting fundamental differences in the
cellular plasticity.
To assess CM proliferation dynamics in platyfish,
we performed PCNA immunofluorescence analysis
combined with Tropomyosin (TPM) and DAPI staining,
followed by quantification within the remote myocardium,
border zone and wounded area (Figure 6A). Sham control
with thoracotomy did not significantly increase PCNA
staining, compared to the uninjured condition (Figure 6C,
D; suppl. Figure S6A, B). At 7 dpci, PCNA-positive nuclei
were significantly enriched in both the remote myocardium
and the wounded area (suppl. Figure S6B). At 14 dpci, the
number of proliferating cells declined, reaching baseline
levels at 30 dpci. Analysis of PCNA/TPM-double positive
nuclei showed the same temporal trend, with high
enrichment at 7 dpci followed by a gradual decrease (Figure
6C, D). Notably, PCNA/TPM-positive nuclei in the border
zone myocardium reached levels comparable to those in the
remote myocardium. Thus, cryoinjury induced transient
CM cell cycle re-entry throughout the entire ventricle, not
restricted to the border zone, as observed in zebrafish
53,76.
To track DNA-replicating over extended periods,
we adapted the BrdU approach previously used in zebrafish,
where treatment from day 7 to day 30 after cryoinjury
resulted in approximately 60% of labeled CMs in the
regenerated tissue
52 (Figure 6E). We applied this approach
to platyfish that were subjected to BrdU treatment starting
at day 3, followed by heart collection at 7, 14 and 30 days
after surgery (suppl. Figure S6C). A peak of DNA synthesis
in CMs was detected on day 7 (suppl. Figure S6E). This
increase was equally pronounced in the remote myocardium
and border zone, confirming that the CM cell cycle re-entry
was not spatially restricted to the border zone, unlike in
zebrafish. At 14 and 30 dpci, the number of BrdU-positive
CMs dropped dramatically in both regions (Figure 6F,
suppl. Figure S6D, E), indicating that the CM proliferative
response occurred exclusively during the initial phase,
consistent with PCNA analysis.
Importantly, unlike zebrafish, neither the wounded
area nor the border zone of cryoinjured platyfish heart
showed evidence of substantial BrdU labeling at later time
points (Figure 6F) . Together, BrdU assay and PCNA
expression analyses demonstrate that while CMs do re-enter
the cell cycle in platyfish, this process is transient and not
sustained by continuous cell proliferation during advanced
regeneration phases. This pattern contrasts sharply with the
prolonged proliferative response observed in successfully
regenerating zebrafish hearts, suggesting that insufficient
9
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted September 25, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.23.678041doi: bioRxiv preprint
The livebearers platyfish and swordtails partially regenerate their hearts with persistent scarring
Hisler, V., Rees, L. et al. 2025 (preprint)
10
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted September 25, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.23.678041doi: bioRxiv preprint
The livebearers platyfish and swordtails partially regenerate their hearts with persistent scarring
Hisler, V., Rees, L. et al. 2025 (preprint)
CM proliferation contributes to the incomplete regenerative
response in platyfish.
Materials and methods
Resources
Phylogenetic information was based on the updated classification of bony
fishes, inferred using molecular and genomic data 11. The number of species
in taxa was taken from FishBase ( https://www.catalogueoflife.org). The ref-
erences for chemical reagents, antibodies, and computer software are listed
in the Supplementary Materials.
Animal strains
Xiphophorus hellerii (swordtail) and Xiphophorus maculatus (platyfish) at
approximately 3.5 cm standard length were purchased from a commercial
aquarium fish vendor (Aqualand, Renens/Lausanne, Switzerland). Wild-
type zebrafish were from the AB strain, bred in our fish facility. Fish were
of random sex and aged between 4 months and 1 year. Fish housing animal
procedures were approved by the cantonal veterinary office of Fribourg. All
assays were performed using different animals randomly assigned to exper-
imental groups. The exact sample size (n) is described for each experiment
on the graphs or in the figure legends.
Ventricular cryoinjury procedure
Fish were first immersed in an analgesic solution of 5 mg/L lidocaine for 45
min, then in an anesthetic solution of 0.6 mM tricaine for a few minutes.
The anesthetic state was verified befo re each procedure. Ventricular cryo-
injuries were performed according to our established video protocol 56.
Briefly, anesthetized fish were placed dorsal side down on a damp sponge
under a stereomicroscope, with the ventral side exposed. Following incision
of the thoracic skin, a stainless steel cryoprobe pre-cooled in liquid nitrogen
was applied to the ventricle for 20-23 s. To terminate the freezing process,
water was poured over the ventricle. The probe was then removed, and the
fish was immediately returned to water. Sham operations consisted of thor-
acotomy alone, i.e., incision of the thoracic skin without cryoprobe applica-
tion. Fish were monitored until spontaneous movement resumed and sub-
sequently observed for several hours.
Heart collection and fixation
Fish were euthanized in 300 mg/L buffered tricaine for a few minutes. The
euthanized state was verified before each procedure. As described in our
protocol 94, the ventral side was reopened, and the heart was extracted.
H e a r t s w e r e r i n s e d w i t h P B S , f i x e d i n 2 % f o r m a l i n o v e r n i g h t a t 4 ° C , r e -
washed in PBS, and equilibrated in 30% sucrose at 4°C for at least 24 hours.
Hearts were then embedded in tissue freezing medium and cryosectioned
at 12 μm. Sections were collected on Superfrost Plus slides, dried for ~1 h at
room temperature, and stored at -20°C in tight boxes.
BrdU treatment
For the indicated time periods, 4 to 5 fish in 1 L of system water were treated
with 50 mg/L of BrdU. The treatment was changed every 2 days with fresh
stock solution. On the day of water change, 5 mg/mL of BrdU was prepared
by dissolving the appropriate weight of BrdU in demineralized water under
gentle agitation at 37°C. The solution was then diluted 100-fold in system
water and well mixed before introducing the fish.
Immunofluorescence analysis
Sections were first permeabilized wi th 0.3% Triton X-100/PBS for 10 min,
then blocked with blocking buffer (5 % goat serum/0.3% Triton X-100/PBS)
for 1-2 hours at room temperature. Sections were then incubated overnight
at 4 °C with primary antibodies dilu ted in blocking buffer. After washing
with 0.3% Triton X-100/PBS, sections were incubated with fluorophore-
conjugated secondary, diluted in blocking buffer for 1-2 hours at room tem-
perature, followed by several wash st eps with 0.3% Triton X-100/PBS. Nu-
clei were counterstained with DAPI, and in some experiments, muscle was
also counterstained with Phalloidin-CruzFluor-488. Primary and secondary
antibodies are listed in (Supplementary Materials) . Finally, the slides
were mounted using a custom glycerol-based mounting medium. Depend-
ing on the experiment, sections we re counterstained with Phalloidin-
CruzFluor-488 during a third incubation step, which lasted 1 hour at room
temperature.
For BrdU and PCNA immunofluorescence analyses, additional antigen re-
trieval steps were performed between the permeabilization and blocking
steps. To reveal BrdU labeling, slides were treated with 2 N HCl/0.3% Triton
X-100/PBS for 45 min at room temp erature. For PCNA immunofluores-
cence analysis, slides were treated with pre-warmed sodium citrate buffer
(10 mM sodium citrate, 0.05% Tween 20, pH 6.0) in a pressure cooker at
maximum pressure for 3 min.
AFOG staining
Aniline blue, acid fuchsin, and orange-G (AFOG) staining was performed
as described 79,95. Briefly, sections were fixed with 10% formalin for 15
minutes at room temperature, washed in 0.3% Triton X-100/PBS for 10
minutes, and incubated in pre-warmed Bouin's fixative for 2.5 hours at
56°C, followed by one hour at room temperature. After washing with tap
water, sections were stained with AFOG solution (3 g acid fuchsin, 2 g Or-
ange G, 1 g aniline blue, 200 mL acidified distilled water, pH 1.1) and re-
washed with distilled water. Finally, the sections were dehydrated through
several baths of increasing ethanol concentrations, treated with xylene, and
mounted with Entellan. The chemical dy es label fibrin/protein deposits in
red, collagen in blue, and muscle in orange. Sections were imaged using the
DM6B Leica microscope.
Alkaline phosphatase staining
For whole mount alkaline phosphatase staining, hearts were fixed for 1h at
room temperature under gentle agitat ion with 2% formalin/PBS, washed
three times 10 min with PBS, equilibrated in 2 mL alkaline buffer (100 mM
Tris, pH 9.5, 100 mM NaCl, 0.1% Tween20) for 45 min at room temperature.
The alkaline phosphatase reaction is triggered by adding 1.7 µL NBT and
1.75 µL BCIP per milliliter of alkaline buffer. After 7 minutes, the staining
reaction was stopped by three PBS washes for 10 minutes each, and the sam-
ples were imaged as soon as proper vessel staining was revealed. Hearts
were photographed with a Leica M205 FA stereo microscope.
Image acquisition with a confocal microscope
Confocal images were acquired usin g a Leica SP5 microscope equipped
with diode, argon, diode-pumped soli d-state, and helium-neon lasers. Dif-
ferent objectives were used: Plan Apo 20×/0.75 multi-immersion, Plan Apo
40×/1.3 oil, and Plan Apo 63×/1.3 glycerol immersion. An electronic zoom
factor of 1.5 was typically applied. Excitation was performed with 405, 488,
561, and 633 nm lasers. Fluorescence de tection was achieved using hybrid
detectors in photon counting mode or PMT detectors, with the following
detection ranges: 415–480 nm, 498–550 nm, 571–630 nm, and 643–780 nm.
Laser intensity, gain, offset, and detection ranges were adjusted to avoid
bleed-through between channels, which was verified for each acquisition.
Complete images were assembled by stitching together multiple adjacent
fields to create composite panoramic views. Note that BrdU and PCNA col-
ocalization analysis were achieved from confocal images.
14
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted September 25, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.23.678041doi: bioRxiv preprint
The livebearers platyfish and swordtails partially regenerate their hearts with persistent scarring
Hisler, V., Rees, L. et al. 2025 (preprint)
Image acquisition with a widefield microscope
Histological and fluorescent staining were imaged using a fully automated
upright Leica DM6B widefield microscope equipped with a Lumencore
SOLA Light Engine as the fluorescence illumination source and a Leica
CTR6 LED for transmitted light illumination. The following objectives were
used: Plan Fluotar 10×/0.32 dry, Plan Apochromat 20×/0.8 dry, and Plan
Apochromat 40×/0.95 dry. For fluorescence, excitation and emission were
achieved using CFT filter cubes, allo wing for the detection of DAPI, FITC,
Cy3, and Cy5 fluorophores. Image ac quisition was performed using three
different cameras. A Hamamatsu Orca Fusion C14440-20UP sCMOS and a
Leica DFC9000GT cCMOS for fluorescence imaging, and a Leica DMC5400
color CMOS camera for brightfield images. The system was controlled using
LAS X Navigator software.
Stereomicroscope imaging of whole hearts
Whole hearts were photographed using a Leica M205 FA stereomicroscope
equipped with a K3 camera. Samples were imaged at 16× magnification in
a Petri dish containing 1% solidified ag arose, either after fixation in PBS or
after dehydration in 30% sucrose/PBS solution. Illumination was provided
from below using transmitted light, and the incidence of the light was man-
ually adjusted to achieve high-contrast images.
Image Analysis
To obtain representative data, multiple sections from each heart at each
time point were imaged and analyzed. Quantification was performed using
Adobe Photoshop CS6, Fiji/ImageJ, and R software for image processing,
data analysis, and graph generation. Custom ImageJ macros were devel-
oped for colocalization and area analysis across multiple regions of interest
(ROIs). The main steps of the macro are outlined below; the full script is
available upon request.
Definition of Regions of Interest and ROI area/volume calculation
For each channel, background subtraction was performed using the rolling
ball algorithm with an appropriate radius, followed by brightness adjust-
ment. To facilitate the specific selection of stained areas with the "Analyze
Particles" function (see below), images were slightly blurred, and the water-
shed algorithm was applied to separate individual nuclear signals and to
segment the ventricular myocardium, thereby excluding internal lumens or
holes from area measurements.
Using DAPI and muscle staining, both the entire heart section and the
wound area were manually delineated. The macro then automatically de-
fined the border zone as a 100 µm-wide band extending from the wound
edge into the intact remote myocardium, provided that the wound area had
been previously outlined. The areas of the different ROIs were saved for
downstream analysis.
For ventricle and wound volume calculation, all sections from a single heart
were analyzed as described above to obtain the area of the remote myocar-
dium and the wound in each section. These areas were then summed and
multiplied by the section thickness (12 µm) and the number of slides pre-
pared from a single heart (8 slides) to estimate the total volume. To calculate
the wound volume as a percentage of the whole ventricle (Figure 3), the
calculated wound volume was divided by the total ventricular volume.
Segmentation and Mask Extraction
A manual thresholding strategy was applied to each channel to generate
binary masks representing the signal of interest. The different ROIs were
then extracted from these masks. Using the separated mask images, particle
analysis was performed on the channels of interest using appropriate size
and circularity parameters.
Area Quantification – L-Plastin, Mpx, Fibronectin.
The total area of all selected particles in each channel of interest was meas-
ured. For L-Plastin and Mpx analysis, the total particle area was normalized
by dividing by the area of the corresponding ROI. For fibronectin, all sec-
tions from a single heart were analyzed, and the approximate volume of fi-
bronectin was calculated (see previous section). This value was then divided
by the calculated ventricular volume to obtain the approximate fibronectin
volume as a percentage of the whole ventricle. Each data point corresponds
to the average value from several no n-consecutive sections of the same
heart, multiplied by a scaling factor of 1000 to obtain values greater than 1.
Colocalization Analysis – BrdU and PCNA
Particles defined in the DAPI channel that overlapped by at least 50% of
their area with the mask of the channel of interest were considered colocal-
ized. If a DAPI-defined particle met this criterion for two channels, it was
counted as positive for both markers. “Normalized count in CMs” corre-
sponds to the total number of nuclei positive for all three channels (BrdU+,
TPM+, DAPI+ or PCNA+, TPM+, DAPI+) divided by the total number of
nuclei positive for DAPI and TPM. “Normalized count” corresponds to the
total number of nuclei positive for two channels (BrdU+, DAPI+ or
PCNA+, DAPI+) divided by the total number of DAPI-positive nuclei. Each
data point represents the average va lue from several non-consecutive sec-
tions of the same heart, multiplied by a scaling factor of 1000.
Quantification of Pseudoaneurysm
Based on AFOG and Phalloidin/DAPI staining of heart sections, each ven-
tricle was classified into three categories: (1) no or minimal injury, (2)
clearly visible injury, and (3) injury bulging beyond the normal circumfer-
ence of the heart. Two independent analyses were performed by two differ-
ent investigators, from cryoinjury to image analysis. For one of them, image
classification was performed blindly by another lab member. The data pre-
sented in this paper combine the results from both analyses.
RNA extraction, library preparation and sequencing
For each zebrafish and platyfish species, at 7 days post-cryoinjury, 24 hearts
from uninjured fish and 24 from cryoinjured fish were collected. Ventricles
were dissected from the atrium and bulbus arteriosus, following a brief
treatment with 5mg/mL heparin to minimize blood cell contamination.
Eight ventricles were pooled per sample, resulting in three biological repli-
cates per condition. Samples were rapidly frozen on dry ice in Eppendorf
tubes containing a single steel bead, then stored at -80 °C until further pro-
cessing.
Tissues were lysed using a TissueLyser LT in 75% TRIzol/RNase-free water,
until homogenization was complete. RNA was isolated and purified using
the Qiagen RNeasy Plus Micro Kit. An on-column DNase digestion (Qiagen,
RNase-free DNase set) was performed to eliminate genomic DNA contami-
nation. RNA quantity was assessed wi th a NanoDrop spectrophotometer,
and quality was evaluated using an Agilent TapeStation. cDNA was synthe-
sized and amplified using the SMART-Seq Low Input RNA Kit for Sequenc-
ing. RNA-seq libraries were prepared from total RNA using the TruSeq
Stranded mRNA kit (Illumina) and sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq3000
system. RNA sequencing data have been deposited at GEO: GSE305467.
15
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted September 25, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.23.678041doi: bioRxiv preprint
The livebearers platyfish and swordtails partially regenerate their hearts with persistent scarring
Hisler, V., Rees, L. et al. 2025 (preprint)
Raw data processing and differential gene expression analysis
The first analyses were run in R. The quality of the RNA-seq data was as-
sessed using fastqc and RSeQC. The reads were mapped to the reference
genome (Danio_rerio.GRCz11.94 for zebrafish and Xiphophorus_macula-
tus.X_maculatus-5.0-male.95 for platyfish) using HiSat2. FeatureCounts
was used to count the number of reads overlapping with each gene as spec-
ified in the genome annotation. The Bioconductor package DESeq2 was
used to test for differential gene expression between the experimental
groups. DESeq2-normalized gene expression was visualized on a volcano
plot and a scatter plot. ClusterProfiler was used to identify gene ontology
terms containing an unusually high number of differentially expressed
genes. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was run in ClusterProfiler us-
ing genesets from KEGG
96 and MSigDb 97. An interactive Shiny application
was set up to facilitate the exploration and visualization of the RNA-seq re-
sults and is available on demand. References and versions of the packages
used are available in the Supplementary Data.
Cross-species RNA-seq analysis
Ortholog
ous gene correspondence between platyfish and zebrafish was es-
tablished by merging data from the Ensembl and Orthogene databases, re-
sulting in a dataset containing 15,609 orthologs ( supplementary Table
S1).
To identify transcripts specific to cell types or cellular behaviors, three sin-
gle-cell RNA-seq datasets were utilized:
1. scRNA-seq data from 1- and 3-days post-fertilization (dpf) zebrafish, and
from various adult tissues (blood, brain, caudal fin, eye, gill, heart, intestine,
kidney, liver, muscle, ovary, pancreas, skin, spleen, swim bladder, and tes-
tis). Only genes from the following clusters were considered: embryonic
macrophage, T cell, embryonic muscle cell, cardiomyocyte (CM), immune
cell, muscle cell, granulocyte, neuron, and macrophage
98.
2. scRNA-seq data from hearts of ad ult zebrafish, including both control
(uninjured, no sham) and cryoinjured (3-, 7-, and 30-days post-cryoinjury)
samples. In this analysis, all genes from atrial and ventricular CMs were
merged into a single CM cluster 74.
3. scRNA-seq data from MPEG1.1+ cells isolated from the epidermis, gill,
intestine, liver, heart, and brain of 6-month-old Tg( mpeg1.1:DsRedx)
zebrafish 75.
Genes present in more than one cluster across these datasets were filtered
out, resulting in a new dataset containing 2,104 genes distributed across 34
cell clusters (supplementary table S2). This dataset was then merged with
the orthologous gene dataset, yielding a final set of 1,294 genes ( supple-
mentary Table S3).
Comparison of Transcriptome Upon Cryoinjury Between Species
For scatter plot analysis, log2 fold chan
ge values calculated by DESeq2 were
compared between one-to-one orthologous genes. A difference of 1 in the
log2 fold change was arbitrarily defi ned as a threshold to highlight genes
differentially enriched upon cryoinjury.
To compare transcriptomes between co nditions and species, DESeq2-nor-
malized values for each gene were divided by the sum of all DESeq2-nor-
malized values from a single replicat e and multiplied by 10⁶ as a scaling
factor. This normalization, similar to TPM (Transcripts Per Million), en-
sures that all sequenced libraries are scaled to the same size, allowing for
direct comparison of transcript abundance levels of orthologous genes be-
tween conditions and species. This dataset was merged with the previous
dataset containing clustered orthologous genes ( supplementary Table
S4). Genes shown in the figures were selected based on their normalized
expression levels, variability between replicates, differences between
species and conditions, and existing knowledge about zebrafish ventricular
regeneration.
Plot and statistical analysis
Analy
ses were performed using custom scripts for R and ImageJ available
on request. Versions of the different software and packages to make the fig-
ure are available below.
References
1. Saleh, M., and Ambrose, J.A. (2018). Understanding myocardial
infarction. F1000Res 7. 10.12688/f1000research.15096.1.
2. Prabhu, S.D., and Frangogiannis, N.G. (2016). The Biological Basis for
Cardiac Repair After Myocardial Infarction. Circ Res 119, 91-112.
10.1161/circresaha.116.303577.
3. Pronobis, M.I., and Poss, K.D. (2020). Signals for cardiomyocyte
proliferation during zebrafish heart regeneration. Curr Opin Physiol
14, 78-85. 10.1016/j.cophys.2020.02.002.
4. Sanz-Morejón, A., and Mercader, N. (2020). Recent insights into
zebrafish cardiac regeneration. Current Opinion in Genetics &
Development 64, 37-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gde.2020.05.020.
5. Arenas Gómez, C.M., and Eche verri, K. (2021). Salamanders: The
molecular basis of tissue regeneration and its relevance to human
disease. Curr Top Dev Biol 145, 235-275. 10.1016/bs.ctdb.2020.11.009.
6. Bolaños-Castro, L.A., Walters, H.E., García Vázquez, R.O., and Yun,
M.H. (2021). Immunity in salamander regeneration: Where are we
standing and where are we headed? Dev Dyn 250, 753-767.
10.1002/dvdy.251.
7. Huang, H., Huang, G.N., and Pa yumo, A.Y. (2024). Two decades of
heart regeneration research: Cardiomyocyte proliferation and beyond.
WIREs Mech Dis 16, e1629. 10.1002/wsbm.1629.
8. Weinberger, M., and Riley, P.R. (2024). Animal models to study
cardiac regeneration. Nature Reviews Cardiology 21, 89-105.
10.1038/s41569-023-00914-x.
9. Mehdipour, M., Park, S., and Huang, G.N. (2023). Unlocking
cardiomyocyte renewal potential for myocardial regeneration therapy.
J Mol Cell Cardiol 177, 9-20. 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2023.02.002.
10. Jensen, B., Wang, T., Christoffe ls, V.M., and Moorman, A.F. (2013).
Evolution and development of the building plan of the vertebrate
heart. Biochim Biophys Acta 1833, 783-794.
10.1016/j.bbamcr.2012.10.004.
11. Betancur-R, R., Wiley, E.O., Arratia, G., Acero, A., Bailly, N., Miya, M.,
Lecointre, G., and Ortí, G. (2017). Ph ylogenetic classification of bony
fishes. BMC evolutionary biology 17, 162-162. 10.1186/s12862-017-
0958-3.
12. Hughes, L.C., Ortí, G., Huang, Y., Sun, Y., Baldwin, C.C., Thompson,
A.W., Arcila, D., Betancur, R.R., Li, C., Becker, L., et al. (2018).
Comprehensive phylogeny of ray-finned fishes (Actinopterygii) based
on transcriptomic and genomic data. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 115,
6249-6254. 10.1073/pnas.1719358115.
13. Clarke, J.T., Lloyd, G.T., and Fr iedman, M. (2016). Little evidence for
enhanced phenotypic evolution in early teleosts relative to their living
fossil sister group. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113, 11531-11536.
10.1073/pnas.1607237113.
14. Santini, F., Harmon, L.J., Carnevale, G., and Alfaro, M.E. (2009). Did
genome duplication drive the origin of teleosts? A comparative study
of diversification in ray-finned fishes. BMC evolutionary biology 9,
194.
16
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted September 25, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.23.678041doi: bioRxiv preprint
The livebearers platyfish and swordtails partially regenerate their hearts with persistent scarring
Hisler, V., Rees, L. et al. 2025 (preprint)
15. McWilliam, J.A. (1885). On the Structure and Rhythm of the Heart in
Fishes, with especial reference to the Heart of the Eel. The Journal of
Physiology 6, 192-292.https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1885.sp000196.
16. Santer, R.M. (1985). Morphology and innervation of the fish heart.
(Springer-Verlag).
17. Chen, X., Zhong, X., and Huang, G.N. (2024). Heart regeneration from
the whole-organism perspective to single-cell resolution. npj
Regenerative Medicine 9, 34. 10.1038/s41536-024-00378-8.
18. Dittrich, A., Hansen, K., Simonsen, M.I.T., Busk, M., Alstrup, A.K.O.,
and Lauridsen, H. (2020). Intrinsi c Heart Regeneration in Adult
Vertebrates May be Strictly Limited to Low-Metabolic Ectotherms.
BioEssays 42, 2000054. https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.202000054.
19. Jaźwińska, A., and Blanchoud, S. (2020). Towards deciphering
variations of heart regeneration in fish. Current Opinion in Physiology
14, 21-26. 10.1016/j.cophys.2019.11.007.
20. Meijler, F.L., and Meijler, T.D. (2011). Archetype, adaptation and the
mammalian heart. Neth Heart J 19, 142-148. 10.1007/s12471-011-
0086-4.
21. González-Rosa, J.M., Burns, C.E ., and Burns, C.G. (2017). Zebrafish
heart regeneration: 15 years of discoveries. Regeneration 4, 105-123.
10.1002/reg2.83.
22. Ross Stewart, K.M., Walker, S.L., Baker, A.H., Riley, P.R., and Brittan,
M. (2022). Hooked on heart regene ration: the zebrafish guide to
recovery. Cardiovasc Res 118, 1667-1679. 10.1093/cvr/cvab214.
23. Zuppo, D.A., and Tsang, M. ( 2020). Zebrafish heart regeneration:
Factors that stimulate cardiomyocyt e proliferation. Semin Cell Dev
Biol 100, 3-10. 10.1016/j.semcdb.2019.09.005.
24. Poss, K.D., Wilson, L.G., and Keat ing, M.T. (2002). Heart regeneration
in zebrafish. Science 298, 2188-2190.
25. Chablais, F., Veit, J., Rainer, G., and Jaźwińska, A. (2011). The
zebrafish heart regenerates after cryoinjury-induced myocardial
infarction. BMC Developmental Biology 11, 21. 10.1186/1471-213X-
11-21.
26. Schnabel, K., Wu, C.C., Kurth, T., and Weidinger, G. (2011).
Regeneration of cryoinjury induced necrotic heart lesions in zebrafish
is associated with epicardial activation and cardiomyocyte
proliferation. PLoS One 6, e18503. 10.1371/journal.pone.0018503.
27. Sánchez-Iranzo, H., Galardi-Castilla, M., Sanz-Morejón, A., González-
Rosa, J.M., Costa, R., Ernst, A., Sainz de Aja, J., Langa, X., and
Mercader, N. (2018). Transient fibr osis resolves via fibroblast
inactivation in the regenerating zebrafish heart. Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences 115, 4188-4193.
10.1073/pnas.1716713115.
28. Bise, T., Sallin, P., Pfefferli, C., and Jaźwińska, A. (2020). Multiple
cryoinjuries modulate the efficiency of zebrafish heart regeneration.
Scientific Reports 10, 11551. 10.1038/s41598-020-68200-1.
29. Fernandez, C.E., Bakovic, M., and Karra, R. (2018). Endothelial
Contributions to Zebrafish Heart Regeneration. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis
5. 10.3390/jcdd5040056.
30. Cao, J., and Poss, K.D. (2018). The epicardium as a hub for heart
regeneration. Nature Reviews Cardiology 15, 631-647.
10.1038/s41569-018-0046-4.
31. Feng, X., Travisano, S., Pearson, C.A., Lien, C.L., and Harrison,
M.R.M. (2021). The Lymphatic System in Zebrafish Heart
Development, Regeneration and Disease Modeling. J Cardiovasc Dev
Dis 8. 10.3390/jcdd8020021.
32. Ryan, R., Moyse, B.R., and Richardson, R.J. (2020). Zebrafish cardiac
regeneration—looking beyond cardiomyocytes to a complex
microenvironment. Histochemistry and Cell Biology 154, 533-548.
10.1007/s00418-020-01913-6.
33. Simões, F.C., and Riley, P.R. ( 2022). Immune cells in cardiac repair
and regeneration. Development 149. 10.1242/dev.199906.
34. Mahmoud, Ahmed I., O’Meara, Caitlin C., Gemberling, M., Zhao, L.,
Bryant, Donald M., Zheng, R., Gannon, Joseph B., Cai, L., Choi, W.-Y.,
Egnaczyk, Gregory F., et al. (2015) . Nerves Regulate Cardiomyocyte
Proliferation and Heart Regeneration. Developmental Cell 34, 387-
399. 10.1016/j.devcel.2015.06.017.
35. I
to, K., Morioka, M., Kimura, S., Tasaki, M., Inohaya, K., and Kudo, A.
(2014). Differential reparative phenotypes between zebrafish and
medaka after cardiac injury. Developmental Dynamics 243, 1106-
1115. 10.1002/dvdy.24154.
36. Potts, H.G., Stockdale, W.T., and Mommersteeg, M.T.M. (2021).
Unlocking the Secrets of the Rege nerating Fish Heart: Comparing
Regenerative Models to Shed Light on Successful Regeneration.
Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease 8, 4.
37. Lai, S.-L., Marín-Juez, R., Moura, P.L., Kuenne, C., Lai, J.K.H.,
Tsedeke, A.T., Guenther, S., Looso, M., and Stainier, D.Y.R. (2017).
Reciprocal analyses in zebrafish an d medaka reveal that harnessing
the immune response promotes cardiac regeneration. eLife 6.
10.7554/eLife.25605.
38. Tiozzo, S., and Copley, R.R. ( 2015). Reconsidering regeneration in
metazoans: an evo-devo approach. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
Volume 3 - 2015. 10.3389/fevo.2015.00067.
39. Fumagalli, M.R., Zapperi, S., and La Porta, C.A. (2018). Regeneration
in distantly related species: common strategies and pathways. NPJ
Systems Biology and Applications 4, 1-8.
40. Elchaninov, A., Sukhikh, G., and Fatkhudinov, T. (2021). Evolution of
Regeneration in Animals: A Tangled Story. Frontiers in Ecology and
Evolution 9. 10.3389/fevo.2021.621686.
41. Dornburg, A., and Near, T.J. (2021). The Emerging Phylogenetic
Perspective on the Evolution of Actinopterygian Fishes. Annual
Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 52, 427-452.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-122120-122554.
42. Parey, E., Louis, A., Montfort, J., Bouchez, O., Roques, C., Iampietro,
C., Lluch, J., Castinel, A., Donnadieu , C., Desvignes, T., et al. (2023).
Genome structures resolve the early diversification of teleost fishes.
Science 379, 572-575. doi:10.1126/science.abq4257.
43. Schartl, M., and Lu, Y. (2024). Vali dity of Xiphophorus fish as models
for human disease. Dis Model Mech 17. 10.1242/dmm.050382.
44. Schartl, M., Kneitz, S., Ormanns, J., Schmidt, C., Anderson, J.L.,
Amores, A., Catchen, J., Wilson, C ., Geiger, D., Du, K., et al. (2021).
The Developmental and Genetic Architecture of the Sexually Selected
Male Ornament of Swordtails. Current Biology 31, 911-922.e914.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2020.11.028.
45. Tobler, M., Kelley, J.L., Plath, M., and Riesch, R. (2018). Extreme
environments and the origins of biodiversity: Adaptation and
speciation in sulphide spring fishes. Molecular Ecology 27, 843-859.
10.1111/mec.14497.
46. Schartl, M., and Walter, R.B. (2016). Xiphophorus and Medaka Cancer
Models. In Cancer and Zebrafis h: Mechanisms, Techniques, and
Models, D.M. Langenau, ed. (Springer International Publishing), pp.
531-552. 10.1007/978-3-319-30654-4_23.
47. Safian, D., Wiegertjes, G.F., and Po llux, B.J.A. (2021). The Fish Family
Poeciliidae as a Model to Study th e Evolution and Diversification of
Regenerative Capacity in Vertebrates. Frontiers in Ecology and
Evolution Volume 9 - 2021. 10.3389/fevo.2021.613157.
17
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted September 25, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.23.678041doi: bioRxiv preprint
The livebearers platyfish and swordtails partially regenerate their hearts with persistent scarring
Hisler, V., Rees, L. et al. 2025 (preprint)
48. Pollux, B.J.A., Pires, M.N., Banet, A.I., and Reznick, D.N. (2009).
Evolution of Placentas in the Fish Family Poeciliidae: An Empirical
Study of Macroevolution. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and
Systematics 40, 271-289. 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.110308.120209.
49. Schartl, M., Walter, R.B., Shen, Y., Garcia, T., Catchen, J., Amores, A.,
Braasch, I., Chalopin, D., Volff, J. N., Lesch, K.P., et al. (2013). The
genome of the platyfish, Xiphophorus maculatus, provides insights
into evolutionary adaptation and several complex traits. Nat Genet 45,
567-572. 10.1038/ng.2604.
50. Rees, L., König, D., and Jaźwińska, A. (2022). Platyfish bypass the
constraint of the caudal fin ventral identity in teleosts. Developmental
Dynamics 251, 1862-1879. https://doi.org/10.1002/dvdy.518.
51. Rees, L., König, D., and Jaźwińska, A. (2023). Regeneration of the
dermal skeleton and wound epidermis formation depend on BMP
signaling in the caudal fin of platyfish. Froniers in Cell and
Developmental Biology 11. 10.3389/fcell.2023.1134451.
52. Sallin, P., de Preux Charles, A.S., Duruz, V., Pfefferli, C., and
Jaźwińska, A. (2015). A dual epim orphic and compensatory mode of
heart regeneration in zebrafish. Dev Biol 399, 27-40.
10.1016/j.ydbio.2014.12.002.
53. Pfefferli, C., and Jaźwińska, A. (2017). The careg element reveals a
common regulation of regeneration in the zebrafish myocardium and
fin. Nature Communications 8, 15151. 10.1038/ncomms15151.
54. Hu, N., Yost, H.J., and Clark, E.B. (2001). Cardiac morphology and
blood pressure in the adult zebrafish. Anat Rec 264, 1-12.
55. Herwig, L., Blum, Y., Krudewig, A., Ellertsdottir, E., Lenard, A.,
Belting, H.G., and Affolter, M. (2011). Distinct cellular mechanisms of
blood vessel fusion in the zebrafish embryo. Curr Biol 21, 1942-1948.
10.1016/j.cub.2011.10.016.
56. Chablais, F., and Jaźwińska, A. (2012). Induction of myocardial
infarction in adult zebrafish using cryoinjury. Journal of Visualized
Experiments (JoVE), e3666. 10.3791/3666.
57. Gonzalez-Rosa, J.M., Martin, V., Peralta, M., Torres, M., and
Mercader, N. (2011). Extensive scar formation and regression during
heart regeneration after cryoinjury in zebrafish. Development 138,
1663-1674. 10.1242/dev.060897.
58. Frances, C., Romero, A., and Grady, D. (1998). Left ventricular
pseudoaneurysm. Journal of the Am erican College of Cardiology 32,
557-561. 10.1016/s0735-1097(98)00290-3.
59. Soni, M.K., and Raja, S.G. (2020). Post-infarction Ventricular
Aneurysms. In Cardiac Surgery, pp. 243-252. 10.1007/978-3-030-
24174-2_26.
60. Pfefferli, C., Bonvin, M., Robatel, S., Perler, J., König, D., and
Jaźwińska, A. (2020). Oncogene-ind uced cardiac neoplasia shares
similar mechanisms with heart regeneration in zebrafish. bioRxiv,
2020.2012.2015.422853. 10.1101/2020.12.15.422853.
61. González-Rosa, J.M., Sharpe, M., Field, D., Soonpaa, M.H., Field, L.J.,
Burns, C.E., and Burns, C.G. (20 18). Myocardial Polyploidization
Creates a Barrier to Heart Regenera tion in Zebrafish. Developmental
Cell 44, 433-446.e437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2018.01.021.
62. Ryan, R., Moyse, B.R., and Richardson, R.J. (2020). Zebrafish cardiac
regeneration-looking beyond cardiomyocytes to a complex
microenvironment. Histochem Cell Biol 154, 533-548.
10.1007/s00418-020-01913-6.
63. Kanwal, Z., Wiegertjes, G.F., Veneman, W.J., Meijer, A.H., and
Spaink, H.P. (2014). Comparative studies of Toll-like receptor
signalling using zebrafish. Dev Comp Immunol 46, 35-52.
10.1016/j.dci.2014.02.003.
64. Bongiovanni, C., Bueno-Levy, H., Posadas Pena, D., Del Bono, I.,
Miano, C., Boriati, S., Da Pra, S., Sacchi, F., Redaelli, S., Bergen, M., et
al. (2024). BMP7 promotes cardiomy ocyte regeneration in zebrafish
and adult mice. Cell Rep 43, 114162. 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114162.
65. Rasouli, S.J., and Stainier, D.Y.R. (2017). Regulation of cardiomyocyte
behavior in zebrafish trabeculatio n by Neuregulin 2a signaling. Nat
Commun 8, 15281. 10.1038/ncomms15281.
66. de Bakker, D.E.M., Bouwman, M., Dronkers, E., Simões, F.C., Riley,
P.R., Goumans, M.J., Smits, A.M., and Bakkers, J. (2021). Prrx1b
restricts fibrosis and promotes Nrg1-dependent cardiomyocyte
proliferation during zebrafish heart regeneration. Development 148.
10.1242/dev.198937.
67. Redd, M.J., Kelly, G., Dunn, G., Way, M., and Martin, P. (2006).
Imaging macrophage chemotaxis in vivo: Studies of microtubule
function in zebrafish wound inflammation. Cell Motility and the
Cytoskeleton 63, 415-422. 10.1002/cm.20133.
68. Morley, S.C. (2012). The actin-bund ling protein L-plastin: a critical
regulator of immune cell function. Int J Cell Biol 2012, 935173.
10.1155/2012/935173.
69. Keightley, M.-C., Wang, C.-H., Pazh akh, V., and Lieschke, G.J. (2014).
Delineating the roles of neutrophils and macrophages in zebrafish
regeneration models. The International Journal of Biochemistry &
Cell Biology 56, 92-106. 10.1016/j.biocel.2014.07.010.
70. Simões, F.C., Cahill, T.J., Kenyon, A., Gavriouchkina, D., Vieira, J.M.,
Sun, X., Pezzolla, D., Ravaud, C., Masmanian, E., Weinberger, M., et
al. (2020). Macrophages directly contribute collagen to scar formation
during zebrafish heart regeneration and mouse heart repair. Nature
Communications 11, 600. 10.1038/s41467-019-14263-2.
71. Bevan, L., Lim, Z.W., Venkatesh, B., Riley, P.R., Martin, P., and
Richardson, R.J. (2019). Specific macrophage populations promote
both cardiac scar deposition and subsequent resolution in adult
zebrafish. Cardiovascular Research 116, 1357-1371.
10.1093/cvr/cvz221.
72. Wei, K.H., Lin, I.T., Chowdhury, K., Lim, K.L., Liu, K.T., Ko, T.M.,
Chang, Y.M., Yang, K.C., and Lai, S.B. (2023). Comparative single-cell
profiling reveals distinct cardiac resident macrophages essential for
zebrafish heart regeneration. Elife 12. 10.7554/eLife.84679.
73. Jiang, M., Xiao, Y., E, W., Ma, L., Wang, J., Chen, H., Gao, C., Liao, Y.,
Guo, Q., Peng, J., et al. (2021). Characterization of the Zebrafish Cell
Landscape at Single-Cell Resolution. Frontiers in Cell and
Developmental Biology 9. 10.3389/fcell.2021.743421.
74. Hu, B., Lelek, S., Spanjaard, B., El-Sammak, H., Simões, M.G.,
Mintcheva, J., Aliee, H., Schäfer, R., Meyer, A.M., Theis, F., et al.
(2022). Origin and function of activated fibroblast states during
zebrafish heart regeneration. Nature Genetics 54, 1227-1237.
10.1038/s41588-022-01129-5.
75. Zhou, Q., Zhao, C., Yang, Z., Qu, R., Li, Y., Fan, Y., Tang, J., Xie, T.,
and Wen, Z. (2023). Cross-organ si ngle-cell transcriptome profiling
reveals macrophage and dendritic cell heterogeneity in zebrafish. Cell
Reports 42. 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112793.
76. Pfefferli, C., Bonvin, M., Grepper, D., Robatel, S., König, D., Lischer,
H.E.L., Bruggmann, R., and Jaźwińska, A. (2023). Parallels between
oncogene-driven cardiac hyperplasia and heart regeneration in
zebrafish. Development 150. 10.1242/dev.201412.
77. Braasc
h, I., Peterson, S.M., Desvignes, T., McCluskey, B.M., Batzel, P.,
and Postlethwait, J.H. (2015). A new model army: Emerging fish
models to study the genomics of vertebrate Evo-Devo. Journal of
Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental
Evolution 324, 316-341. 10.1002/jez.b.22589.
18
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted September 25, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.23.678041doi: bioRxiv preprint
The livebearers platyfish and swordtails partially regenerate their hearts with persistent scarring
Hisler, V., Rees, L. et al. 2025 (preprint)
78. Chowdhury, K., Lin, S., and Lai, S.-L. (2022). Comparative Study in
Zebrafish and Medaka Unravels the Mechanisms of Tissue
Regeneration. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution Volume 10 - 2022.
10.3389/fevo.2022.783818.
79. Chablais, F., and Jaźwińska, A. (2012). The regenerative capacity of
the zebrafish heart is dependent on TGFbeta signaling. Development
139, 1921-1930. 10.1242/dev.078543.
80. Marro, J., Pfefferli, C., de Preux Charles, A.S., Bise, T., and Jaźwińska,
A. (2016). Collagen XII Contribute s to Epicardial and Connective
Tissues in the Zebrafish Heart during Ontogenesis and Regeneration.
PLoS One 11, e0165497. 10.1371/journal.pone.0165497.
81. Lafontant, P.J., Behzad, A.R., Brown, E., Landry, P., Hu, N., and Burns,
A.R. (2013). Cardiac myocyte diversity and a fibroblast network in the
junctional region of the zebrafish heart revealed by transmission and
serial block-face scanning electron microscopy. PLoS One 8, e72388.
10.1371/journal.pone.0072388.
82. Klaourakis, K., Vieira, J.M., and Riley, P.R. (2021). The evolving
cardiac lymphatic vasculature in development, repair and
regeneration. Nat Rev Cardiol 18, 368-379. 10.1038/s41569-020-00489-
x.
83. Pfefferli, C., and Jaźwińska, A. (2019). Lymphatic vessels help mend
broken hearts. eLife 8, e52200. 10.7554/eLife.52200.
84. Kapuria, S., Yoshida, T., and Li en, C.L. (2018). Coronary Vasculature
in Cardiac Development and Regeneration. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis 5.
10.3390/jcdd5040059.
85. Lowe, V., Wisniewski, L., and Pellet-Many, C. (2021). The Zebrafish
Cardiac Endothelial Cell-Roles in Development and Regeneration. J
Cardiovasc Dev Dis 8. 10.3390/jcdd8050049.
86. Stockdale, W.T., Lemieux, M.E., Killen, A.C., Zhao, J., Hu, Z.,
Riepsaame, J., Hamilton, N., Kudoh, T., Riley, P.R., van Aerle, R., et
al. (2018). Heart Regeneration in the Mexican Cavefish. Cell Reports
25, 1997-2007.e1997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2018.10.072.
87. Offen, N., Blum, N., Meyer, A., and Begemann, G. (2008). Fgfr1
signalling in the development of a sexually selected trait in vertebrates,
the sword of swordtail fish. BMC Developmental Biology 8.
10.1186/1471-213x-8-98.
88. Patel, S., Ranadive, I., Desai, I., and Balakrishnan, S. (2019).
Regeneration of caudal fin in Poecilia latipinna: Insights into the
progressive tissue morphogenesis. Organogenesis 15, 35-42.
89. Darnet, S., Dragalzew, A.C., Amaral, D.B., Sousa, J.F., Thompson,
A.W., Cass, A.N., Lorena, J., Pires, E.S., Costa, C.M., Sousa, M.P., et al.
(2019). Deep evolutionary origin of limb and fin regeneration.
Proceedings of the Nation al Academy of Sciences 116, 15106.
10.1073/pnas.1900475116.
90. Cobham, A.E., Kenzior, A., Morales-Sosa, P., Javier, J.E., Swanson, S.,
Wood, C., and Rohner, N. (2025). Cave adaptation favors aging
resilience in the Mexican tetra. npj Metabolic Health and Disease 3,
33. 10.1038/s44324-025-00069-y.
91. Farrell, A.P., Farrell, N.D., Jourdan, H., and Cox, G.K. (2012). A
Perspective on the evolution of the coronary circulation in fishes and
the transition to terrestrial life. In Ontogeny and Phylogeny of the
Vertebrate Heart, S. D., and T. Wang, eds. (Springer), pp. 75-102.
92. Farrell, A.P. (2023). Getting to the heart of anatomical diversity and
phenotypic plasticity: fish hearts are an optimal organ model in need
of greater mechanistic study. J Exp Biol 226. 10.1242/jeb.245582.
93. Farrell, A.P., and Jones, D.R. (1992). The heart. In Fish Physiology:
The Cardiovascular System., W.S. Hoar, D.J. Randall, and A.P. Farrell,
eds. (Academic Press), pp. 1-88.
94. Bise, T., and Jaźwińska, A. (2019). Intrathoracic Injection for the Study
of Adult Zebrafish Heart. Journal of Visualized Experiments (JoVE),
e59724. doi:10.3791/59724.
95. Oudhoff, H., Hisler, V., Baumgartner, F., Rees, L., Grepper, D., and
Jaźwińska, A. (2024). Skeletal muscle regeneration after extensive
cryoinjury of caudal myomeres in adult zebrafish. NPJ Regen Med 9 ,
8. 10.1038/s41536-024-00351-5.
96. Kanehisa, M., Sato, Y., and Kawashima, M. (2022). KEGG mapping
tools for uncovering hidden features in biological data. Protein Science
31, 47-53. https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.4172.
97. Liberzon, A., Birger, C., Thorvaldsdóttir, H., Ghandi, M., Mesirov, J.P.,
and Tamayo, P. (2015). The Molecular Signatures Database (MSigDB)
hallmark gene set collection. Cell Syst 1, 417-425.
10.1016/j.cels.2015.12.004.
98. Jiang, M., Xiao, Y., E, W., Ma, L., Wang, J., Chen, H., Gao, C., Liao, Y.,
Guo, Q., Peng, J., et al. (2021). Characterization of the Zebrafish Cell
Landscape at Single-Cell Resolution. Front Cell Dev Biol 9, 743421.
10.3389/fcell.2021.743421.
99. Aleström, P., D’Angelo, L., Midtlyng, P.J., Schorderet, D.F., Schulte-
Merker, S., Sohm, F., and Warner, S. (2019). Zebrafish: Housing and
husbandry recommendations. Laboratory Animals 54, 213-224.
10.1177/0023677219869037.
100. Nelson, G. (1989). Phylogeny of ma jor fish groups. The hierarchy of
life, 325-336.
101. Sanciangco, M.D., Carpenter, K.E., and Betancur, R.R. (2016).
Phylogenetic placement of enigmatic percomorph families (Teleostei:
Percomorphaceae). Mol Phylogenet Evol 94, 565-576.
10.1016/j.ympev.2015.10.006.
19
.CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseperpetuity. It is made available under a
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted September 25, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.23.678041doi: bioRxiv preprint