Tracking mobilization uncovers an evolutionarily conserved mechanism in suppressing transpositions during somatic development

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-09-21 · read from full text ⓘ

Researchers investigated the mechanisms suppressing transposon mobilization during somatic development by monitoring transpositions with single-cell resolution in Drosophila hindgut regeneration and mouse embryonic erythropoiesis. They identified Cramp1 as a conserved factor that safeguards genomic integrity by binding to histone gene clusters to initiate linker histone H1 transcription, which subsequently promotes heterochromatin formation for transposon silencing. The study highlights an evolutionarily conserved arms race between hosts and transposons, demonstrating how core suppression mechanisms are maintained across species. This paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Transposon mobilizations could cause gene mutations and even genomic instability, whose aberrant activation is tightly linked with cancer, neurodegenerative disorder and other pathologies. However, the precise suppression mechanisms of transposon mobilizations during somatic development throughout evolution remain largely obscure. Here, by spatiotemporally monitoring transpositions with single-cell resolution, we determined a highly conserved mechanism in suppressing transposon mobilizations. We identified that Cramp1 safeguards the genomic integrity in both Drosophila hindgut regeneration and mouse embryonic erythropoiesis through silencing transposon mobility. Cramp1 is characterized as a major hallmark that specifically binds to the DNA sequences of histone gene cluster to initiate transcription of linker histone H1, which subsequently promotes H3K36me2-established heterochromatin for transposon silencing. Our finding highlights that with the endless arms race between hosts and transposons during evolution, the core mechanisms will also evolve to suppress transposon mobilizations during somatic development. One-sentence abstract Cramp1 plays an evolutionarily conserved role in specifically initiating linker histone H1 transcription and triggering H1-H3K36me2-established heterochromatin to suppress transposon mobilizations and maintain genome integrity during somatic development.
Full text 1,491 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Transposon mobilizations could cause gene mutations and even genomic instability, whose aberrant activation is tightly linked with cancer, neurodegenerative disorder and other pathologies. However, the precise suppression mechanisms of transposon mobilizations during somatic development throughout evolution remain largely obscure. Here, by spatiotemporally monitoring transpositions with single-cell resolution, we determined a highly conserved mechanism in suppressing transposon mobilizations. We identified that Cramp1 safeguards the genomic integrity in both Drosophila hindgut regeneration and mouse embryonic erythropoiesis through silencing transposon mobility. Cramp1 is characterized as a major hallmark that specifically binds to the DNA sequences of histone gene cluster to initiate transcription of linker histone H1, which subsequently promotes H3K36me2-established heterochromatin for transposon silencing. Our finding highlights that with the endless arms race between hosts and transposons during evolution, the core mechanisms will also evolve to suppress transposon mobilizations during somatic development. One-sentence abstract Cramp1 plays an evolutionarily conserved role in specifically initiating linker histone H1 transcription and triggering H1-H3K36me2-established heterochromatin to suppress transposon mobilizations and maintain genome integrity during somatic development. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00